Top
120°
7.0

GameCritics: Halo Reach Review

In a game absolutely packed with embarrassing relics of the first Halo-silly Covenant vehicle design, the Spartans' ridiculous looking low-G jump existing alongside a modern physics engine, the return to one gun at a time-Bungie chose to fix only a multiplayer game mode.

Read Full Story >>
gamecritics.com
Oculus Quest Giveaway! Click Here to Enter
The story is too old to be commented.
Ahasverus3334d ago (Edited 3334d ago )

Gotta love Gamecritics =P . I seriously don't understand a single of their reviews, they do think games are movies, they rate them like movies.
Not saying this game deserves anything more, I'll buy it next week along with Castlevania, but the review parameters are just.. wrong.

Fred-G-Sanford3333d ago

This is the same site that gave Mass effect 2 a 7.5.

That pretty much speaks for itself. lol

kancerkid3333d ago

Yea, because they have to rate a game based on other reviews...

Lord Gunchrote3333d ago

I hate the world. You cannot disagree with the masses or else something is "wrong". halo reach is underwhelming, the campaign at least. I love the Multiplayer as always. But lets not kid...Halo needs a new developer to change the single player aspect.

Redgehammer3333d ago

I would have thought Roger Ebert wrote that review.. Halo Reach is a 9.5 in my book.

antz11043333d ago

Missed the bus Gamecritics, meet us at the next stop.

Garrus_Vakarian3333d ago

Made me herp so much that I derped.

YoshiMeetsU3333d ago

"How are Spartans literally able to survive re-entry into a planet's atmosphere and the subsequent 30-mile drop onto a mountain range one moment, then be felled by a single sniper's bullet"

If you are going to rip that deep into every element of the story how about you actually read the books? They talk about the armor as well as the ammunition and would answer your question.

Have they ever wrote a review that made sense?

Show all comments (20)
The story is too old to be commented.