Top
120°
7.0

GameCritics: Halo Reach Review

In a game absolutely packed with embarrassing relics of the first Halo-silly Covenant vehicle design, the Spartans' ridiculous looking low-G jump existing alongside a modern physics engine, the return to one gun at a time-Bungie chose to fix only a multiplayer game mode.

Read Full Story >>
gamecritics.com
The story is too old to be commented.
Ahasverus2940d ago (Edited 2940d ago )

Gotta love Gamecritics =P . I seriously don't understand a single of their reviews, they do think games are movies, they rate them like movies.
Not saying this game deserves anything more, I'll buy it next week along with Castlevania, but the review parameters are just.. wrong.

Fred-G-Sanford2940d ago

This is the same site that gave Mass effect 2 a 7.5.

That pretty much speaks for itself. lol

kancerkid2940d ago

Yea, because they have to rate a game based on other reviews...

Lord Gunchrote2940d ago

I hate the world. You cannot disagree with the masses or else something is "wrong". halo reach is underwhelming, the campaign at least. I love the Multiplayer as always. But lets not kid...Halo needs a new developer to change the single player aspect.

Redgehammer2940d ago

I would have thought Roger Ebert wrote that review.. Halo Reach is a 9.5 in my book.

antz11042940d ago

Missed the bus Gamecritics, meet us at the next stop.

Garrus_Vakarian2940d ago

Made me herp so much that I derped.

YoshiMeetsU2940d ago

"How are Spartans literally able to survive re-entry into a planet's atmosphere and the subsequent 30-mile drop onto a mountain range one moment, then be felled by a single sniper's bullet"

If you are going to rip that deep into every element of the story how about you actually read the books? They talk about the armor as well as the ammunition and would answer your question.

Have they ever wrote a review that made sense?

Show all comments (20)
The story is too old to be commented.