The console debate has been playing out for as long as I can remember. Nintendo vs. Sega, SNES vs. Genesis, PlayStation vs. N64, PS2 vs. XBox and now, PS3 vs. XBox 360. When two products have similar capabilities, comparisons will be drawn, naturally. When it comes to consoles, such comparisons often turn into heated, insult-riddled "debates" about which is the better system. Here are some popular talking points from both sides:
-Processing power
-Exclusive titles
-Multiplayer interface
-Blu Ray player
-Controller preference
-Genre superiority
-Your mother
I am lucky enough to own both a PS3 and an XBox 360 but if I was told I had to choose only one, I'd give up the PS3 in a second. Why is it that I prefer one to the other? Is it any of the reasons I mentioned above? No, not really. Sure, I think XBox has a better online system in place but PSN does its job sufficiently AND it's free. So, then, what is it? For me, it came down to one thing- money.
Plenty of unforgettable games have completely messed up their players throughout the years, all the way back from the PS1 days to the dark recesses of the modern internet.
Gary Green said: Namco Bandai heard the call of many fans asking for the PlayStation release of Tales of Graces which was originally released seemingly exclusively for the Wii back in 2009. If you’re acquainted with the Tales series then Graces f won’t be something entirely new to you, yet if you’re a newcomer then you’ll find a plethora of gameplay mechanics and nuances that distinguish this series from other JRPGs. While the game finds itself following the traditional archetype of JRPGs, such as a somewhat clichéd story, Graces has something to offer to both veterans and newcomers alike.
Huzaifah from eXputer: "Sleeping Dogs from the early 2010s is one of the best open-world games out there but in dire need of a resurgence."
You say "yet" as if it's even possible anymore. United Front Games is gone, along with anyone that made this game what it is
That’s what happens when games sell poorly. And I’ve seen people wonder why people cry when a game sells badly… this is your answer.
Majority of the time it's true but if a company/publisher is big (in terms of money), they can take a hit or 2. e.g. I am not worried about Rebirth sales as Square will make Remake 3 anyway but if FF 17 doesn't sell then Square might need to look for alternative. <-- my humble opinion
Oh okay, Activision owned True Crime, but when that didn’t sell as intended it was canceled. Six months later Square Enix bought the rights and changed the title to Sleeping Dogs.*
*As per Wikipedia
Sleeping Dogs was a sleeper hit back then. It was fantastic. It actually still is. Would love a sequel to this, or at least a revive of True Crime series.
word.
Guys guys guys....Dreamcast>Everythin g else.
Haha I did like the little screens. If you think about it, dreamcast and ps3 are similar in that they were both expensive and lacked early adopters. Although, I don't think PS3 had the same programming obstacles.
apparently I'm an idiot and when I click agree or disagree, I do, rather than my iphone showing who agreed or disagred. Disregard my agree and disagree on the two comments above.