Nox Kreiker of Inside AX: "How can you tell if a game is bad? Well, I am about to teach you using my self-conceived method I like to call the ‘Three Way.’ How the Three Way works is while you’re looking at a game, you ask yourself these three questions, and if they all turn up positive, chances are highly likely that you’re looking at a bad game."
The Outerhaven writes: Split/Second was the explosive arcade racing game that outshone Ridge Racer and Burnout. That is, until Disney shut it all down before a sequel could happen.
As a kid i had some heart attacks playing this game. The soundtrack right on point with those close calls. I love this game.
Split/Second was one of the game I enjoyed playing. In fact it's still the most popular video on my YouTube channel. It's a gameplay of Split/Second posted 15 years ago. This past month 25 people viewed it. Split/Second is a favourite amongst racing gamers worldwide.
This game was super awesome and hella fun playing split-screen with the homie. Trashing your friend’s car during split-screen competition using one of those QuickTime events was so funny haha
From the mid-1980s to the early part of the 2000s, light gun rail shooters were a staple in both arcade and home system gaming. Arguably, the genre started to really hit its stride in the mid-1990s. While games like Time Crisis, Virtual Cop, and House of the Dead, among others, dominated both the home system and arcade space, some one relegated to only home game systems. Today, we’ll be talking about a little-known cult game published by Sony called Project: Horned Owl. This game was developed by Alfa Systems, and all in all, this is a fun game.
Just like you don’t ask a woman her age, you don’t ask a Final Fantasy fan how many games there are in total.
I don't quiet get who it's directed at. General player? Sure, I can believe them not knowing some of the less popular final fantasy games. But final fantasy FANS? There is nothing forgotten about these games.
wrong wrong. really really dumb article
Edit I won't argue with his opinions on which of some of his games are bad and I disagree, but arguing his opinions is irrelevant to the article.
God Of War 3
Crysis
Mario (though you can argue they look bad, but they look good for wii)
Final Fantasy VII (for it's time) had a 100 million dollar campaign to sell it. Good graphics, fancy cg etc.
Gran Turismo Series
Metal Gear Solid Series
sheehs
All the grand theft auto's before 4 in my opinion. err 3, vc, and SA. Though they all didn't look that pretty, but in that case GTA4 wouldn't be included. imo
I can name some games that don't look good but sold very good, pretty much this is a lame way to tell if it is a bad game.
To some FF13 was a really bad game, others ok game, to me I like it and its story.
3D Dot Hero doesn't come close to most other games, but it was fun, most Wii games don't look as good as 360 or PS3 and they sell pretty well an are good games.
So yeah this is all BS ways to know if the game is bad.
Playstation 3 exclusives blow this guys flawed logic out of the water. He's arguing that good graphics, an extablished fan base and good marketing make a bad game?!
What a douche!
The key to sniffing out bad games is to play the games yourself.