You may be overwhelmed by the choices, and just go for whichever one is advertised the most near you; if that's the case, you'll likely get either a slim and lite, or a go. Personally, I don't think either of these are the best choices, but that's what we are going to discuss.
TNS: Sony had great ideas back then for its PSPgo-- it that even had the same features as the Nintendo Switch. Too bad that wasn't enough.
I still have the Go with the dock and a paired sixaxis controller. I could have used a DS3 but since the PSP games have no rumble, why waste a rumble enabled controller on it.
I still have my psp, psp go and vita.
Home brewed to be retro gaming machines. I love them, my kid picked the go over a 3ds.
I never wanted to bother with psp go.. first it was too small for my hands and didn’t like the clicking d pad but mostly because it didn’t support my physical games. It was DOA and it just flopped so hard so fast
Replies(1)And long before that Sega came up with the Genesis Nomad and nobody cared.
You've also been able to connect a phone/tablet to TVs for years and nobody cares.
Not... quite the same. Sure you could plug it into a tv but you had to hold it while playing. The PSP 2000/3000 would be compared to the Nomad as they did the same thing. Plug into a tv but you had to hold it to play.
Not very convenient.
Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Nomad taking full fledged Genesis/ Mega Drive cartridges? It was basically handheld tv console.
Yep. The Switch wasn't a success because it can be a handheld or a home console. It was successful because it did that AND it was a well-supported device that was Nintendo's primary focus for a full generation.
Such a painful pill for sony to swallow. They really should have supported the vita and psvr2 much better. games like resident evil on psvr are too few and far between, the 1st party support has always been lacking.
Alex S. from Link Cable Gaming writes: "I bought a 12-year-old, digital-only system. And I gotta say – I love it."
I got one at launch and still have it.
Great system and super portable.
Not so comfortable for big hands playing for long sessions though.
Have good memories of Peace Walker on the Go, pun intended.
I believe there is some prototype of a hand held console with dedicated GPU that can run modern AAA games too.
PSP has such great games, it's such a shame Vita didn't do as well, I still use mine I bought in 2014. I still would love an upgraded handheld if just for ports, though.
I've enjoyed my PSP a lot, too bad they're not making handhelds anymore.
That time when Skype was available on PSP was awesome.
Ed writes: Yesterday, Microsoft revealed the brand new, disc drive less Xbox One S All Digital Edition console to the... confusion of a lot gamers.
it's more prevalent now, so I don't think it's the same thing. I've been all digital since 2014, so if the next gen of consoles has a discless SKU as well as one for physical media, I would likely get the discless one.
Yeah, it's just another option to add to the mix. Does seem like it's releasing way too late in the generation though. I was also expecting $200. I don't see anyone buying this at $250.
I love the PSP Go. It is an awesome little handheld that can also double as a home console. I'm still amazed that so many people DONT know about that feature. sure the 2k and 3k could plug into a tv but you still had to use them as the controller. The Go has a dedicated dock and you can sync a sixaxis controller to it for couch play using an actual controller. Doing what the switch does, before the switch.
Mine has an additional 16gb M2 card inserted for 32gb of storage. the main problem was Sony not having any sort of digital validation program for people with existing UMD's. It was rumored they were working on a UMD reader that could plug into the USB of a PS3 and then it could validate the game and allow you to dl a digital version to play on the Go. They were also toying with the idea of digital trade in program at retailers, along those same lines. You bring your UMD games to trade in for digital versions.
Despite what people think about its failure... it really is an awesome little device.
@ziggurcat
Yes you do pay for the license with either physical or digital. But with physical you get a sense of owner ship with that title unlike digital. And if a studio loses a license then a person who wants to buy that game digitally is screwed. Like when Activision lost the license to all the Transformers games and the digital copies all got ripped from the digital stores. People who bought the digital copies can still access the games but a new person can't.
Have fun paying more for all digital. Try bot to get to violate the ever changing TOS too...
I heard they released it just to test the “diskless” waters so to speak in gathering research for next gen.
@darxyde:
It’s exactly where licensing is concerned. You’re paying for the same license regardless of whether you buy physical or digital.
Well, that's almost a moot point as you'll likely be able to plug in an external HDD of far greater capacity than what the internal drive would be. You could easily just use that external for games storage, and transfer any games from the external to the internal for the duration of time you play that game.
Technically... it did get a hdd upgrade. Majority of the S units are 500gb while some specific bundles include 1tb or more.
But with all digital the prices at launch are £10 more here in the UK, not sure about the US though?
It's certainly the same principal. But yeah, times have changed and there may be a market for it. I think that market may be more prevalent if they priced it lower, but never know. Stranger things have happened. Although, I think its success depends more on MS making X1 more popular overall.
PSP Go was a neat little system though. I might have been interested except I could have downloadable games on the regular version which I already had. Best part I liked about it was the sliding control pad. On the flip side....there is really nothing special about the X1SAD.
Sony at least had the decency to put in 16GB storage in the PSP Go which was more space than what other models with disc drives had out of the box to compensate for the lack of physical media.
Microsoft didn’t even bother putting in a 4TB HDD into this thing to make it more enticing over a standard model. This whole things reeks of halfassed decisions just to see how the market reacts to an all digital device.
Like the Ps4 pro less than half of a difference on screen from ps4 base lol talk about half azzed
@ Atticus the soup textures are not the best in gaming Sony needs talented developers because the pro is weak in power.Ps5 will show you how terrible Pro is.And yeah im not a fanboy so I can care less about xbox sad.Im a ps3 fan 360 Dreamcast onex fan never been a fan of Base ps4 or pro or xbox one base and s
4TB? Won’t that increase the price of the console even further? Even the much more expensive Xbox One X and PS4 Pro has nowhere near that much amount of storage.
Let be real now and not complain just for the sake of it.
I think it's a blatant push for Game Pass. Since games cycle through frequently, you don't need to top off on storage unless you're buying.
bluebenjamin,
Pro is not what it *could have* been. They could have included dedicated BC hardware which would've been sweet and a UHD bluray drive if you're into that... but on the other hand, Pro does some pretty incredible things with the specs it has. I only have a base PS4, and I'm still seriously impressed with Sony's studios. God of War, Horizon: Zero Dawn, and Uncharted 4 to name a few look stunning in the base hardware.
I'm pretty happy with not buying a Pro though because the next generation is gonna be that much sweeter.
@ blue
Dafuq are you even talking about?
@ King
Because 4TB is the only reasonable way you’d convince consumers to give up a physical drive. Nixing the disc slot is a pretty big deal and not making a huge incentive for consumers is really insulting.
There’s even been a 2TB Xbox One model yet Microsoft didn’t bother including that size in this thing. Not that 2TB on its own would justify lacking physical media, but it would’ve been a lot better than the 1TB
Not exactly. We're talking about an all digital console not having something as essential as more HDD storage. The original Xbox One launched with a 500GB HDD and a device that ONLY accepts digital content only has 2x that. Doesn't make a lot of sense, especially when every game has to be installed either way. It's also $250 and doesn't offer real advantage over the original One S at all.
PS4 not having a 4K blu ray player doesn't seem to have hurt a GAMING device's popularity and appeal.
Keep up, homie.
Yeah the PSP Go was good, because Sony. Xbox One S All digital is bad because there’s no Sony logo on it, you’re right.
Both are pretty bad.
I think the argument being made here is that 16GB storage in PSP is decent since games were much smaller back then, but 1TB for an all-digital console with games that frequently require patches and updates and has Game Pass is pretty paltry.
Now if someone buys this with the sole intention of playing exclusives, 1TB is probably fine.
Otherwise, no, all digital gaming devices are not great ideas. To the PSP Go's credit though, it's a portable device. A portable DVD player with all digital access is practical where you can have a DVD player and DVD collection at home.
Switch gets it right in my opinion. The cartridges are tiny and easy to move around with, so going all digital makes less sense for that. I don't see any reason for an all digital home console. Options are good, sure, but I just don't see the point unless you're really constrained on space.
Something for everyone, I guess...
I added a 16gb M2 to mine for 32gb of storage. My other PSP models only have 8gb MSPDuo cards.
Its far more relevant now and could EASILY be a popular choice...
but just not at that price
i have the 3000, im playing socom fire team bravo3 online and single player, omg this game rocks it had such good graphics and story. slant6 sure does know how to make a great socom game (despite server issues for with confrontations)
he actually says 1000 and 2000 are "superior" because there easier to homebrew/hack
also:
1. the 2000 doesn't have the best screen, both 1000 and 2000 screens have noticeable ghost (bad pixel response time), and an overall lower quality screen compared to the 3000.
2. the screen scan line issue of the 3000 only affects a small percentage of psp 3000s.
3. the author forgot to mention the built in mic for the 3000
4. that jackass list the smaller screen of the GO as a pro
i have a 2000 i love it but i wish i could hook it up to a sdtv like the 3000 thats the only feature i envy then i could play on friends tvs and carry movies on it so if me and my boys are bored i plug it in and watch movies. the psp go is dope for sexiness and portability though
i have the crisis core psp edition 2000 its great
Nice article. I got my son (8 years old) the PSP Go for Christmas and he loves it. Out of all the cons that I read, the one that I agree with the most is not being able to buy used games (and of course price). I still think it's a cool little piece of equipment though. It fits easily in a kids pocket and I don't have to worry about media lying around the house.