550°

Phil Harrison Talks Little Big Planet, Home , 30 FPS Madden & Upcoming PS3 Titles

Remember that E3 thing? During that three days of not-so-glorious madness, 1UP cornered Sony Computer Entertainment's Head of Worldwide Studios, Phil Harrison, for some head-to-head discussion about a number of topics related to the PlayStation universe. What'd they talk about? GameVideos has the footage, with highlights below.

Madden on PS3 Only 30 FPS
"[pause] Well, I can only point to our own sports studio [doing a] 1080p, 60 frames-per-second basketball game, but I'm afraid I have no idea. We're providing some tools and technologies from our worldwide studio's core technology groups to 3rd parties now, as well. You may remember something from GDC, we announced this thing called EDGE and that's now widely deployed within the 3rd party community, and that is clearly improving the developer's ability to maximize what the CELL processor does. Hopefully, that will assist folks like EA. It would concern me if the platform was incapable of doing it, but we've proven the platform is capable of doing it, so it's not a PlayStation 3 issue. I'm trying to be polite."

How Home is Progressing
"We did have a small hiccup on getting the Home development kit out, but it actually went out on Tuesday [Harrison is referring to Tuesday, July 10th], so that's already started out there. Some of the functionality that goes into Home is actually based on top of the PlayStation Network functionality and it has to be deployed there first before we can put the visual layer on top of it, so there's a couple of different schedule issues in that, but, we're on schedule for the Fall, as we said yesterday. Game launching, the ability to launch games directly from inside of Home, is in the next library update for developers, which will be in August."

highps36205d ago

As far as Madden 08, id care if it were a decent football game but its not. The whole entire game needs to be completely re done...

Have they EVER switched the camera view? EVER? Even in the 90's Madden still had that same 3rd person over the quarterback view... Sorry but in real football surely the quarterback doesnt see the field as if he were in a blimp...

I have Madden 07 which frankly looks the same, ill pretend my rosters updated and save 59.99 for a decent game... I like how they pawned off side line catches as a feature this year... As opposed to last years retarded AI just running out of bounds...

Thats EA for you... Creativity NOT IN THE GAME!

Omegasyde6205d ago

Phil gave a verbal "back hand" to EA and Take2

"...Well We(sony) can produce a full 1080p basketball game running at 60 frames....."

Granted it is less players on "field" vs football but usually the basketball games make it up by making the fans in the stands pop out.

Vs.

Madden making the people in the stands look like generic moving cardboard stickouts which all wear the same flannel sweater. :)

ben hates you6204d ago

madden will still no matter what sell like crazy

risk6204d ago

and you can thank hicks for that.

Vojkan6204d ago

Hmm, it was ok interview. Not much of new did we found out. They should have asked him more specific things about Infamous, than are 8 Days and GetAway 3 in works or are they canceled and so on.
HOME and LBP and already explained and overused for so many times since GDC 07.
But yeah tumbs up for PhilH.

junk566205d ago

phil harrison is probably the best exec from all the companies. hes not a liar, scripted and he doesnt dodge the questions like a lot of the other execs. when hes interviewed, he simply answers the question in the proper manner not repeating or biasing much

Omegasyde6205d ago (Edited 6205d ago )

Yea If he could only give public relations lessons to Jack Trenton. This guy should of taken the Mic from Ken Kataguri and Jack Trenton along time ago.

WIIIS16205d ago

Man EA ought to sue this guy for defamation. Everyone knows the cell is useless for games which accounts for the framerate issues in PS3 games, and there he goes casting aspersions at the developers' integrity.

DrPirate6205d ago (Edited 6205d ago )

Too bad we can't sue you for forcing us to read your stupid banter.

MK_Red6205d ago

Have you even seen a good PS3 game like Ninja Gaiden Sigma or Resistance? NGS runs smoothly at 60 FPS at 1080p while Resistance goes does the same at 720p. Cell may indeed be a bit more difficult to work for but if games like MGS4, GT5, Killzone2 and Ratchet & Clank TOD are any indication, bad ports on PS3 like this one from EA are the fault of lazy developers.

Bathyj6205d ago

I cant believe you used the word integrity while talking about EA.

I only wish your parents were as lazy as them an not bothered having sex to create you 10 years ago.

jerrell6205d ago

I can see that you do not have a PS3 and what someone needs to do is sue your parents for conceiving you! I agree with DrPirate with his comment. That is just stupid banter!!!

WIIIS16205d ago

@ Bathyi

You really don't have to tell us all about how much of a chore it was for your parents to have sex with each other.

And I'm guessing you go around justifying your virginity by saying you're just too lazy to have sex?

Vash_The_Stampede6205d ago

lol@BS3

That was a weak comeback.

Omegasyde6205d ago

Go rent Def jam or something, or heck go watch Yo Mamma! on MTV. Your shiznit is weak, son.

If anyone is to blame, its Trojan Brand Latex for your presence here today.

WIIIS16205d ago

Sony fans, just because I think Phil shouldn't be pointing fingers at developers doesn't mean that you have to get so riled up and talk trash about topics that you're just too young to fully comprehend, such as sex. Its not like you're all the bastard sons of Phil Harrison are you? Or are you...?

T_Tokyo20106205d ago

I think its only fair to say that both sides play the blame game once in a while, and some of the time its true that the devs are just lazy, or too short on time.

macalatus6205d ago

@Bull$h!t the Third, aka BS3

Look at you, Bull$h!t the Third, all invigorated with those (unfortunately given) "5" bubbles!! If you weren't so much idiotic as to post something like "everyone knows that the cell is useless" then you wouldn't have to deal of being gang-posted by Sony fans. And another thing: Where in the freakin' interview does it shows that Harrison said something truly bad that would be constituted as "slander"? A slander would be saying something that isn't entirely true and stating it as "fact". A good example of slander would be me calling you "stupid". But then again, as evident in your post, you proved that it is a FACT, so it can't be "slander". Oh, what the hell, you didn't call yourself Bull$h!t the Third for nothing!!

PS Speaking about sex, and since you probably know more about it, how's the progress in producing the next member of the Bull$h!t family, Bull$h!t the Fourth?

ISay6205d ago

i read his comment and thought it was dumb then i read all your comments and thought you guys might be going a little too far with this guy then i read his comment again to find your right “what a cunt thing to say”

The Wood6204d ago

you were meant to be OUT at three strikes. If your supprised buy peoples response to your childlike comments then you really are dupid.

on topic
Phill is a good speaker especially when your face to face it seems. Lets hope he can keep it like this as it gives LESS fodder for sony haters.

Real Gambler6204d ago

When asked about the fact that EA did a game in 30fps for the PS3, Phil said that there's already games out in 1080P at 60fps. He also said that Sony has develepped tools to help developpers make games. What's bad about this please???

If somebody could be sued for defamation, it could be you... After all, you're saying "Everyone knows the cell is useless for games" but with absolutely no proof whatsoever. This is defamation. Proof, there's many awesome games out already, and more to come. You are truly sad.

popup6204d ago

Keep saving those pennies BS3, and you too can afford one someday.

Children today....

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 6204d ago
madness6205d ago

Fluffy Rabbit Game = System Seller

Show all comments (84)
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel78d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga77d ago (Edited 77d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow77d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo18277d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie76d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow76d ago (Edited 76d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

76d ago
Hereandthere76d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 76d ago
Notellin76d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

76d ago
Hereandthere76d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow75d ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere76d ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow75d ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX77d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney75d ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody77d ago (Edited 77d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno77d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno77d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

76d ago
fsfsxii76d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno76d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)
320°

Most Offensive Video Games That Would Never Cut It Today

Times are changing, and these games would have never been made in today's climate.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
thorstein130d ago (Edited 130d ago )

Every single time someone uses this phrase whether it's music, movies, books, comics, video games, etc it's always the same claim.

The ubiquitous "they" won't allow it to be made. And every decade these claims are made the claimant completely ignores all the "offensive" material that is published when the claim is made.

In ten years, you can write a new article about how you can't make games like Helldivers 2, Resident Evil VIII, Mortal Kombat I, Dragon's Dogma 2, Alan Wake 2 etc etc etc any more.

MrBaskerville129d ago

Yeah, people wouldn't be constantly outraged if there weren't games that people found enraging. The whole SBI discourse shit wouldn't be a thing if all games were inoffensive. A game like Starfield can make a guy froth at his mouth, so there will always be room for a list like this.

0hMyGandhi129d ago

Normally, I'd be inclined to agree with you, but there are massive caveats.
TV shows like Venture Bros, Ren and Stimpy, and Aqua Team wouldn't/couldn't be made today. Hell, Ren and Stimpy was a *children's* show, same thing with Rocko's Modern Life.

It's not for some arbitrary reason, either. It's branding and IP alignment. Companies are far more risk-averse than they were when I was kid in the 90's. Of course, you have companies coming out of the woodwork to hell spur on similar content, but remember: Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon and some incredibly provocative material.

And for movies? it's pretty obvious. American Pie/Wedding Crashers/Eurotrip among many other "raunch coms" have fallen out of style, and are absolutely outside what the modern day film industry is willing to stand by.
Ace Ventura 1 and 2, Dumb and Dumber, Freddy Got Fingered, Rat Race, Harold and Kumar, and Van Wilder follow suit.

Remember: I am not explicitly talking about films put onto streamers. I am talking wide-releases in actual theaters. Same thing goes for games: Carmageddon, Duke Nukem, Manhunt, Six Days In Fallujah (with their original concept), Hatred, and so on and so forth. Of course, I'd be inclined to mention most tactical shooters like Rainbow Six and Joint Ops as well, due to cultural sensitivity regarding *who* you are shooting and why.

And not all of it is bad (obviously). Tastes change, and perspectives change to fit the demographic.
I should add that I'm a lefty, living in L.A. Working in film.

thorstein129d ago

The Boys, Invincible, Jojo Rabbit, Deadpool, Gen V, Last of Us, Banshee... There are plenty of media being made today that people will claim "can't be made today".

Profchaos129d ago

Yeah but if you consider manhunt which was basically a snuff film could you seriously make that game with high than PS2 era graphics.

thorstein128d ago

The Outlast Trials just came out.

But the storyline of Manhunt was that you were executed. But then lived. And if you didn't do as you were told, you'd die. And the people you killed were not innocents.

It was all filmed by a psychopath.

As we speak GTA VI is being finished up for a release. You get to play a Bonnie and Clyde type of protagonist who run up against the law.

Bodycam looks so real.

People are making those games. Articles like this will always exist no matter how incorrect they are, no matter how many times they blame "them" for whatever it is "they" do to prevent "those" games from being made.

Number1TailzFan129d ago

The UK is the biggest junk country pandering to that nonsense as well, with laws against free speech and expression to match. It got so bad even Rowan Atkinson made a video on free speech about it.

Now the UK raises the age rating on harmless films like Mary Poppins, it's just a load of pansy weak ass nonsense.

MrDead129d ago (Edited 129d ago )

The right wing Tories have been in power in the UK for the 14 years you know the ones that are "anti-woke", blame them for your perceptions.

Killer2020UK129d ago (Edited 129d ago )

Are these snowflakes in the room with us now?

This is more faux outrage designed to get hits. The consequences are unfortunately creating hysteria amongst those willing to buy into it and blame "them" or "the left" or "liberals" meanwhile the left are kicking off about genocide, actual real world abhorrent acts. Nobody is campaigning to censor this shit.

Huey_My_D_Long129d ago

Not too mention the fact that some of these game are controversial for you know, underage porn and encouraging rape.

So either the guy just came in to comment snowflakes without reading anything, or he is calling people snowflakes for having a problem with said titles. Crazy how much brain rot someone can have.

banger88130d ago

Dead Island: "The early PC version of the zombie game swapped the playable character Purna’s Gender Wars skill with a prototype name, which shouldn’t be mentioned directly. The skill name made fun of both Purna as a character and feminists."

"Feminist Whore" lmao

gold_drake129d ago

ill add one more to the list.
drakengard 1.

its ridiculous tho, especially since they'd still be able to find their place in alot of places in the world. except america of course ha. and maybe Australia.

ppl are so sensitive these days. ha. but it is what it is.

Barlos129d ago (Edited 129d ago )

They're not offensive.

And we need another Fat Princess. Fantastic little game!

Some people just have no sense of humour if this sort of thing offends them. They need to lighten up and stop taking themselves so seriously.

Deeeeznuuuts129d ago

Would love a new fat princess game 🤟

CantThinkOfAUsername129d ago

Games literally about sexual assault, mass genocide, bombing civilians, and school shooting. None of which is satirical.

isarai129d ago

Actually it's about fat princesses

Huey_My_D_Long129d ago (Edited 129d ago )

Its crazy that people are fixated on Fat princess when clearly the list is going over controversies, and not all of them are equal. Like way worse examples but pretend the entire list is like that.

Show all comments (37)
70°

Top 20 Best PlayStation 3 Games (20-11)

Alex DS. from Link Cable Gaming writes: "Is the PlayStation 3 retro? This is a surprisingly hard question to answer as the system definitely has the age to be considered retro, having launched in 2006, over 15 years ago now. But with it being home to so many massive games, many of which still hold up today and in fact were released for the PlayStation 4 when that console was released, make the PS3 a retro console that doesn’t feel retro."

Read Full Story >>
linkcablegaming.com
shinoff2183816d ago

No ps3 is not retro. I dont even consider ps2 era retro. All imo.

shinoff2183816d ago

Typically, the term retro is given to items which are at least 20 years old (but not yet 40 years old).

Quick google search

badz149815d ago

No the PS3 is not yet a retro console. But if you're gonna put 1 game from a series in this list, then LBP2 should be there instead of the original, Motorstorm PR is also an overall better game than the 1st game and to put Tools of Destruction over A Crack in Time is a blasphemy when ACiT is the best game in the series.