370°

Goldeneye 007 on Nintendo Wii Already Disappoints Real Fans

J Lynch: "Goldeneye 007 on the Nintendo Wii might have been one of the biggest surprises at E3 2010, but with everyone having a little time to think about it, we’ve all quickly realized that instead of excitement, most of the media is filled with confusion and disappointment. Sure we got a remake to one of our favorite games of all time, but it’s on a machine that isn’t even hooked up in the rooms of most gamers who wanted it."

Read Full Story >>
gofanboy.com
BattersUp5048d ago

Putting the remake exclusively on the Wii is the stupidest thing Activision could have done. Are little kids really going to appreciate it?

BeaRye5048d ago

I'm sure there was a lot of legal stuff behind the scenes we don't even know about. Think about all the info about licensing that fans did hear. That means we probably missed out on a lot! And who cares. How often are remakes anywhere near as good as the originals?

IaMs125047d ago

Well id would have really liked it if MS finished off what they started. They had an HD remake going, with screens and all. It would have came out just like Perfect Dark did, and i say the Perfect Dark remakes was perfect lol. They did everything but just made the graphics clear so we can see haha.

Cevapi885047d ago

why cant Nintendo remaster the N64 version for the Wii, like the PS3 with its PS2 titles...i think that move would be cool along with the new Goldeneye to see where Activision stayed true to the formula that made Goldeneye 64 the defining shooter on consoles

The Meerkat5048d ago

I would imagine most Wii players were not even born when Goldeneye was released.

charlescox45047d ago

That's exactly what I was thinking. Most of the Wii players were what five years old or younger when 007 hit the Nintendo 64? I actually like the 64. I rememeber playing Ken Griffey's baseball on it and all the great 3D games (which were still new and cool back then).

vgn245047d ago

Not every Wii owner is a little kid. In addition, you have to figure that a lot of people who owned the N64 now have kids of their own with Wiis. That means a lot of adult gamers who DID play the original.

Now putting Daniel Craig in Goldeneye is a complete screw up, but the remake isn't a disappointment.... yet.

Noctis Aftermath5047d ago

Well it is a FPS and that is what sells the best on the HD consoles, so putting it on the "family friendly" console is a pretty puzzling decision.

WrAiTh Sp3cTr35047d ago

I thought the Wii was owned by elderly people Meerkat. If thats the case, your whole statement is rather moot, lol.

The Meerkat5047d ago

Thats why I said PLAYERS not OWNERS.

Older people keep them in cupboards.
Only young people actually PLAY them.

Fail.

ChickeyCantor5047d ago

" I would imagine most Wii players were not even born when Goldeneye was released."

Ever heard of the terms: "Playstation generation" ?

Lots of PS3/360 owners never played this game either =)
And thats a sad fact.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5047d ago
Wrathman5047d ago

i think any shooter on the wii disappoints straight away.pointing is dumb.

MOVE is screwed

smash-brother-105047d ago (Edited 5047d ago )

metroid prime says hi

and so will socom when thats released

SinnedNogara5047d ago

You know you can play with the Classic Controller or GameCube controller in Goldeneye right?

GunShotEddy5047d ago

It should have been multi-platform because being a Wii-exclusive is just a plain bad idea.

N4g_null5047d ago

It's only bad for people that don't have a wii. What is funny is we where all playing golden eye when halo first came out and we still liked golden eye better.

All you guys complaining are hilarious. You complain about nintendo not being hardcore and bam now their own games are not good enough for their own system. Lol. Wow guys come on if you are so hardcore you will get the game on the wii because it's not happening on another system.

Lots of people where kids when they played the first one so why can the kids of today not play this game?

A n64 classic controller would top this off nicely. Stop the hate and have more fun guys

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5047d ago
na-no-nai5047d ago

lol the author just want better graphics on golden eye

N4g_null5047d ago

Let me think a remake in the same visual style with the same game play doesn't really need an hd system does it? Seriously I would play it even if it was n64 level graphic because the engine and game play where that much fun.

Anyway why put goldeneye up against killzone and halo? The younger gamers have their favorites now let us old schoolers have some fun.

NYC_Gamer5047d ago

i think nintendo owns the license...

Commander TK5047d ago

The rights for the Bond games r owned by Activision

na-no-nai5047d ago

they owned the license to golden eye 007.

beans5047d ago

If activision can lock down the same feel Rare did years ago I will be impressed.

Krimmson5047d ago

I think you overestimate Eurocom (the developer).
Play any of the previous Bond games Post-Goldeneye, including Quantum of Solace.

Did any of those games come even close to the feel of Goldeneye?

Fuck this, I'm going back to playing TimeSplitters. Now there's your modern day Goldeneye.

gtsentry5047d ago

activision must think that all the kids are going to stop playin super mario galaxy to play goldeneye

beans5047d ago

Well to be fair most of us were kids when Golden eye released years ago. This could easily be the game to pull the Wii only owners into the FPS genre.

IaMs125047d ago

Sorry but its Activision and the roll they are going on this will probably turn away people who have heard sooo much about GoldenEye from the past.

Show all comments (85)
260°

Do You Prefer Single Player or Multiplayer Games?

BY WIL HARRINGTON: From GoldenEye to Fortnite, from Zork to Horizon Zero Dawn, gamers have long had a vast selection of great single player and multiplayer options. Is one mode genuinely better than the other or is a balanced experience between both best? Let us dive in, shall we?

Read Full Story >>
growngaming.com
isarai346d ago

Single player or co-op, I usually have like one competitive MP game on the side I'll play for a couple years, BF used to be my go to but 2042 sucks and I haven't really found a good replacement

chrisx346d ago (Edited 346d ago )

I'll take Single Player over MP today, yesterday, forever.

Flawlessmic345d ago

Yep single player all day, everyday and twice on sundays!!!

1Victor345d ago

I prefer single player but don’t mind a fun addictive 3rd person shooter like Warhawk and Starhawk

RpgSama345d ago

Single player games 999 times out of 1000

blackblades345d ago

Always gotta have that 1 MP for that fun competive entertainment.

PhillyDillyDee345d ago

Im the exact same. Used to play BF all the time until they ruined it.

isarai345d ago

I miss that awestruck experience when I'd play BF4 in my ps4 for the first time, or the extremely defined classes of the bfbc games

Markdn345d ago

Yeah I prefer single player, but I do like the way destiny let's you casually drop in to public events and leave whenever, don't like the crucible mind.

neutralgamer1992345d ago (Edited 345d ago )

single player games

MP games are like work now with their seasons and battle passes. For most with family, work etc, there just isn't enough time to play

Notellin344d ago

Yeah then you throw in esports and twitch and there is no way I can keep up. The kids are getting practice and watching film.

Knushwood Butt344d ago (Edited 344d ago )

These days almost exclusively single player, but I have over 600 hours in Uncharted 4 MP.

Last thing I played online was Returnal co-op with randoms.

You know what? I could play Returnal again and I have 250 hours on it.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 344d ago
-Foxtrot346d ago

Single Player

Having developers create rich, lore filled worlds and giving us great single play driven stories always appeal more to me. When developers do multiplayer games it always feels the effort just hasn't been put into it, like they are expecting replay value and overall fun to come from gamers gaming with each other, especially with close friends.

Rather having a well crafted level that will capture you and draw you in they'd rather create a short generic like level which you need to grind over and over with your party. It's like they are hoping you are so distracted playing with your friends, talking amongst yourselves that you won't realise and when you finally do click on and start to get bored they'll flash a shiny new update or expansion in your face which really is just the rest of the game you WOULD have gotten it if was purely single player.

The reason for that is by playing by yourself you don't have any distractions and you are concentrating more on the world on screen. You then start to notice if the gameplay is short, repetitive, not fun, buggy, generic etc which is why developers have to try harder when doing single player games. I always feel that's why developers want GaaS titles because it doesn't mean more money for them but less work as you drip feed the game content.

IMissJimRyan345d ago

Both.
I like tits growing games like jrpg and rage inducing games like Rocket League.

sadraiden345d ago

Genuinely curious what you meant about "tits growing games like jrpg".

IMissJimRyan345d ago

It's about my own tits. They grow when I play those games.

GoodGuy09345d ago

Singleplayer. But it is fun to play pvp/e MP at times.

Show all comments (84)
110°

Are There Too Many Remakes?

There’s been a lot of remakes in 2023 like Resident Evil 4 and Dead Space with plenty more on the way, and Kurt can’t help but ask: is this a good thing?

ZeekQuattro355d ago

Short answer. No. Long answer. Hell no!

isarai355d ago

Nah, actually without a lot of these remakes I would forget why I loved gaming in the first place. So hard to just get a straightforward complete game out the box these days, remakes help fill that void considerably

jambola354d ago

no
there's hundreds of games every year
a handful are remakes
maybe it's because they are good remakes they stick with us

outsider1624354d ago

Not until we get
MGS4
Tenchu 1 and 2
SOCOM
KILLZONE 2
im sure there are other gems. These are a few of my favorites

merlox354d ago

Why not a remake or a remaster of the Resistance series?

RaiderNation354d ago (Edited 354d ago )

I mean, Ive enjoyed them. So I cant sit here and say there's too many. For the most part they've all been very good remakes. As long they remain of high quality and people are buying and enjoying them, I think its fine. They help fill the gaps between new releases. This year alone Ive beaten The Last of Us Part 1, RE4, Metroid Prime Remaster, and Dead Space and I loved every single one of those games.

Show all comments (18)
150°

Goldeneye on Xbox Game Pass is a bitter disappointment

Compared to the abandoned 360 remaster, this re-release is a painful reminder of what could have been.

MIDGETonSTILTS17437d ago

It still blows me away that Xbox couldn’t secure online multiplayer for this…. Like, why even bother then?

Number1TailzFan437d ago

Both versions should've had cross platform online play, and both versions should have been the unreleased remaster, with optional original n64 mode.

_SilverHawk_437d ago

Remove " goldeneye on" and it'll be a correct statement

Profchaos437d ago

It should have been the cancelled rare remake that was a total rebuild of the game but we got poor emulation instead

CobraKai437d ago

I didn’t know it existed until i this version came out. OMG. I want that remake.

warriorcase437d ago

You can play it on PC via emulator and it's pretty good. The remake was shelved when Nintendo blocked it's release because it was Xbox exclusive at the time and Nintendo being part owner of the title wasn't having any of it.
The licensing right for Goldeneye are a mess.

badz149437d ago

$70bil to splurge on ActiBliz, they can't even get right what they already owned!