790°

The myth that Xbox360 is maxed out is invalid now

VGArabia: There was a time when I wrote an article about how previous multiplatform engines like the Unreal Engine 3 (lots of Xbox360 exclusives also used the same engine) didn’t do the Xbox360 justice. Also, in the same article I said that upcoming games and upcoming engines are going to change this situation and you are going to see so much better looking games on Xbox360 than what we used to see from before. Guess what? I was 100% right.

Read Full Story >>
vgarabia.com
Shaman5060d ago

And i have been saying this all along and nobody listened...

5060d ago Replies(19)
kancerkid5060d ago

Anybody who thinks either of the consoles are maxed out knows little about the hardware involved and less about video game development.

saint_john_paul_ii5060d ago (Edited 5060d ago )

you know, microsoft getting rid of the requirement of allowing developers to program in Sub-hud doesnt isnt going cut it with such a statement, you know...

especially possibly 3/4's of the games there are probably leading on PS3..

FangBlade5060d ago (Edited 5060d ago )

And to think that it actually runs better and more stable on the PS3!
http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

Edit: why am I getting disagees? check the link, it's right there.

"(Oh, and in case you're wondering, Willits claims it's currently even more stable on PS3.)"

Domer255060d ago

It's N4G, that's why. People will disagree no matter what you link. Bubbles up brother^^^, its getting rough out here!

JANF5060d ago (Edited 5060d ago )

@ fangblade

"Oh, and in case you're wondering, Willits claims it's currently even more stable on PS3."

The key word in that sentence is "Currently", that doesn't mean the final build is going to be more stable. For references check all the multiplatform games already release, 95% of the time they run better on Xbox 360.

raWfodog5060d ago (Edited 5060d ago )

They just hate to hear any good news about the PS3. It will be just as good, if not better, on the PS3 and PC.

Bubble up, fangblade.

hoops5060d ago (Edited 5060d ago )

Game is not out yet to make that assumption...Ghostbusters is prime example of why you wait until the game is out ot make conclusions.

Edit below:

Thats what they did with Fallout 3 and the difference is HUGE between the versions.

TheXgamerLive5060d ago

this was just a comment he made b/c butt hurt fanboys like your selves would be upset if he didn't say it, also, it doesn't look as good on the ps3 as it does on the Xbox 360, it runs stable b/c as you well know ps3 games take ALOT more work to get up to par with the 360, so they have to put twice as many people working on it. BUT! The best version is the Xbox 360! How can i say that? It's what he used to showcase the game, didn't he? yep yep. bye bye little but hurt fanboy.

TheXgamerLive5060d ago

watch the 1up live demo, also done on the Xbox 360. when asked is one looking better than the others, he said NO, they all run at 60 htz., so enough, RAGE is going to be a hella sweet game on all 3 XBOX 360, PS3, and PC

poopface15060d ago

They said that to make up for their statement and they are trying to do that right now, Ill believe it when I see it.

The game isnt out, but the ps3 version will not have better fps than 60. It could be at 60FPS and better visuals too, but I wonder why they didnt show it?

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5060d ago
mcslick1015060d ago (Edited 5060d ago )

Devs should lead on PC and then port to consoles, that way we see real graphics and real comparisons and that way, each console version can be dumbed down so it runs at its maximum potential on that console. No more whining about which console is holding what back.

In reality, consoles are holding back the advancement of graphics.

BX815060d ago Show
SOAD5060d ago

Good point. I want to see what current high end PCs can do.

Rainstorm815060d ago (Edited 5060d ago )

Thats exactly what they do......damn near everygame is made on PC

Edit:
Oh ok you meant designed for top PCs hardware and not the Consoles ok......

mcslick1015060d ago (Edited 5060d ago )

You're saying that they build a game for PC and then dumb it down for consoles? That's not the case.

Just because a game is built on a PC, doesn't mean the the game pushes the boundaries of two GTX 480s. The game they built is closely monitored by it's lead dev console, to make sure that it gets a good frame rate on that console. That's what meant by 'lead console'. So in reality, no user is getting 'The Graphical Best Experience'.

rkimoto5060d ago

well it's obviously no secret that PC's are more powerful, but porting games from PC's to consoles is sometimes not the best thing for consoles, as it will always be better to develop for a single platiform if you want to get the most quality.

What I don't like about PC's is that there's new hardware coming out every 6 months, which makes it very inefficient since programmers almost never get to squeeze the most out of them, i.e. you can see the evolution in technical specs for PS2 games, you can see a noticeable difference in increased quality from the latest games from the ealier ones.

For that same reason, it's dumb to say that any console, or platform for that matter, is already maxed out, there will be always options to optimize hardware.

Developers that don't start programming with a PC have a financial decision not to, it's their business and they best know how to go at it.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5060d ago
The real killer5060d ago

And i syaing all the time it's maxed out.
There is no game looks like as Killzone 2 or Uncharted 2 to begin with it.

mcslick1015060d ago

Actually I'm pretty sure the majority of devs could scale an engine twice the power of KZ2 or UC2, but choose not to because they'll have less of a market, which is understandable.

Don't go saying that consoles can compare to PC. You don't have any where near the amount of features we have, yet. I think it will be a long time for consoles to even have 3/4 of what PC gaming can offer.

BTW, you don't have to have a €2000 behemoth to play games, only if you're going to develop games. €500 will build you a PC better than any console.

Heisenberg5060d ago

You said: "Actually I'm pretty sure the majority of devs could scale an engine twice the power of KZ2 or UC2, but choose not to because they'll have less of a market, which is understandable."

Now seeing as that literally made no sense, I was hoping you could elaborate... ?

WengYong5060d ago

They are talking about 360 not PC, duh of course PC will blow consoles out of the water in terms of graphics, but your notion that graphics equal better game is foolish. 1998, Metal Gear Solid dropped on the PS1, and blew everyones mind. Wasn't the graphics, but the experience that was fresh. A talented developer doesn't need to rely on graphics cards and over clocked CPUs to make a good game, that's whats actually holding games back to begin with. Art for example, with simple canvas and base colour paints a talented artist can create something truly remarkable. Sure someone with an air brush could make something look better, but it will never ever be a Mona Lisa or a Picasso.

The real killer5060d ago

"Actually I'm pretty sure the majority of devs could scale an engine twice the power of KZ2 or UC2, but choose not to because they'll have less of a market, which is understandable"

What a nonsens, Killzone 2 engine use only 55% power of the PS3 power, look how Killzone 3 looks? Do i need more to say?

The point is, there is no single game exclusive or multi platform pass Killzone 2 let alone Uncharted 2 or GOW3/GT5.

"Don't go saying that consoles can compare to PC. You don't have any where near the amount of features we have, yet. I think it will be a long time for consoles to even have 3/4 of what PC gaming can offer"

I did not mention the PC, but PS3 game can easy compare with PC games not the 360.

"BTW, you don't have to have a €2000 behemoth to play games, only if you're going to develop games. €500 will build you a PC better than any console"

I have a over 2000,- PC ;) But i can understand that.

hoops5060d ago (Edited 5060d ago )

Because Real Killer you know squat. A person like you who actually posted on N4G.COM that the RSX ALONE had 1.6 Teraflops CANNOT be taken seriously EVER.
Btw. Crysis 2 on consoles is already looking better than those games you just mentioned. But you and others WILL never admit it because it would than crush the theory you guys have made up.

PS3 games comparing to PC games in what aspect? Frame rates? No. Anti-Alaising? (Real Anti-Alaising)No. HDR in FULL Floating point precsision and not 10-16FP that all consoles use? No. Resoltuion? No. Draw distance. Hell no. Textures. No way. There is YET to be a game looking like Crysis 1/Warhead on the PS3 and Xbox360 with those physics. Not a single one.
When ANY PS3 or Xbox360 game can render THIS: Then come talk. No Console game looks like that and that was from 2007

Biggest5060d ago

"Actually I'm pretty sure the majority of devs could scale an engine twice the power of KZ2 or UC2, but choose not to because they'll have less of a market, which is understandable."

Yeah and I can dunk on a 30 foot high basketball rim. I choose not to because the NBA will have to go out of business. I like how it's their job to make better, and you think it's cool that they don't because they might have less of a market.

OpenGL5060d ago

Last I had seen there wasn't a single game on the PC that used FP32, so I'm confused as to why you're dissing FP16 as that is all you'll currently find on the PC as well.

As to the anti-aliasing issue, what does it matter if the game uses conventional MSAA or the newer MLAA techniques? The end results are both great and pretty comparable when it comes to image quality.

Obviously Crysis couldn't be done on consoles, but you're clearly grasping at straws with your attempt to explain why.

Perkel5060d ago (Edited 5060d ago )

@ hoops

yeah those screens from 2006-7 was about as real as FX in matrix. Both runnin on PC that you couldn't even buy then...

Even i can do 3D model on Maya with 1000000 of polys , question is in what year i could use it..

Today in 2010 we have only one graphic card that could run Crysis 1920x1080 16AA with 60 FPS.......

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5060d ago
Heisenberg5060d ago

It's close enough. You aren't gonna see any drastic improvements at this point, and the space issues add up to improving one area will likely mean making sacrifices in another areas. I'm sure you can squeeze more out of it, but the illusion that the 360 can rival what's possible on the PS3 is all but dead.

WrAiTh Sp3cTr35060d ago

There is only a certain group of people that says this kind of stuff. Its funny but...yeah its just funny. BTW, Gears 3 says HELLO!

INehalemEXI5060d ago (Edited 5060d ago )

The problem remains, MS has less 1st party studios, less unique engines = less technically impressive 360 games. Get on MS as5 about opening more studios.

It's like last year 360 fans excited about 3rd party games looking good. Ultimately 1st party games should be leading the way making 360 look like a beast. It's not like PS3 is never accused of being maxed. It's just that everytime that happens we see something else that obliterates that notion, Usually coming from ND, GG, Santa Monica, Polyphony etc.

We are just barely reaching the halfway point of the projected PS3 life cycle. I would hope MS keeps 360 competitive for years to come.

candystop5060d ago

MS has been keeping 360 competitive. Just because 3rd parties are pushing 360 doesn't mean its a bad thing. AS long as games like this look better than anything on PS3 I'm happy. Already Gears3, Reach and Fable 3 have blown me away. Not a bad showing from MS at all this year.

Skynetone5060d ago

tiger woods, just gets better and better every year

cant wait to see what they add next year

Moentjers5060d ago

@Shaman

sorry dude, I couldn't here you because i was blowing on the vuvuzela

candystop5060d ago

The PS3 version better look the same or better because if not the 360 is going to be known as the most powerful console this generation. This is simply incredible which makes me wonder how good Cryteks new game will be.

seij5555060d ago

Uh, no. Rage does not look better than KZ3, U2, GOW3 etc.

evilmonkey5015060d ago

Did anyone here even play crysis? that game sucks. All graphics and no gameplay. Plus that 2 second cool suit abilities ruined it for me.
And yes I play pc games too..

HDgamer5060d ago

I played Crysis and the gameplay didn't suck. You must've had it on easy.

St05060d ago

Consoles will never be maxed out, developers will always find a way to push better graphics out of current gen consoles, just look at how good games looked at the end of PS2 before PS3 arrived

MNicholas5060d ago

That's what happens when the console is easy to develop for. A homogenous CPU, unified GPU, and shared memory means that anyone and their grand-mother can max out the hardware. It's as simple as it gets.

That's why there have been no significant visual improvements.

Only a "difficult" console such as the PS2 or PS3 takes a very long time to "max out."

Are there any 360 games that even match the detail in Uncharted 1?

http://kineticninja.blogspo...

Actual in-game screen-shot (not cut-scene):

http://farm4.static.flickr....

http://farm4.static.flickr....

http://farm4.static.flickr....

http://farm4.static.flickr....

http://farm4.static.flickr....

8thnightvolley5060d ago

360 is not maxed out at all.. its just a point on MS cycle that its trying to do some mega big jump with kinect it hasnt even focused on uping the graphic capabilities of the 360 coz the way i look at kinect it would take alot to make it work and make sense coz there is alot gestures out there voice accents, fat to slim ppl and so much code to crap up that all its resources is focused on making kinect work.. but after that is done.. MS will then focus of making its first party studio do something special or maybe a 3rd party exclusive..

but generally.. 360 is not maxed out.. after seeing .. RAGE running 60 fps on a 360 with that kind of graphics that will make crysis1 run for its money.. naaa... this 5 year old box still has some juice.

MNicholas5060d ago

Almost everything in Rage is baked, ie., not dynamic. All games have some things "baked," even a game as dynamic as Killzone 2, but Rage is like a 1999 game with better textures and higher resolution.

The only interesting thing about the game is that instead of using lots of small textures they use one giant texture for the entire level and load it up as needed which means that there need not be any repeating environment textures.

Character detail, however, is repetitive and unimpressive. Lighting is unimpressive. Shadows are down-right disappointing. The water effects are atrocious.

With all the short-cuts they've taken it should be running at 60fps.

8thnightvolley5060d ago (Edited 5060d ago )

omg ... MNIcholas.. if u are taking japs a rage which by all means is a technical marvel being achieved on old consoles.. out of argument sake lets call out killzone2.. it was gray it was 30fps it was pre baked... *u see what i did there*
even with all these the game was a beautiful game but sure it had some question marks but it was good.. rage on the other hand is full of colour its a 60 fps game and with such high fidelity graphics that would make crysis2 quiver abit...

and now r days consoles are around the latter end of their ability to really do a major graphical leap... so its up to the devs to smartly programme games with limited resources even if they have to cunningly hide stuff or work things to look great so far it doesnt dull the over all quality and gameplay..which we knw GG did with kz2..

some call it a trick...
others call it being smart...

i pick the latter.. so far it gets the job done to wow the ppl and to make games progress ..

thewhoopimen5060d ago (Edited 5060d ago )

I have to say looking at Crysis2 (not Rage), there is certainly alot more juice than I thought still available left in the 360. However there still remains there is still some major tech missing in these "improved" demos that already exist and continue to exist in sony's 1st party titles. None of multiplats for example featured mocap and inverse kinematics which existed since 2008 on the PS3. I can't say much about Rage considering it's streaming an open world environment (and does so very impressively mind you), but Crysis 2? The animation is like watching Halo3. Polygon counts are still lower than comparable. what has improved greatly is high res texturing and better use of dynamic lighting. For example Crysis 2 features them on the weapon projectiles to really illuminate the environment and that's very smart.

In case some of you haven't read up, the big word these days with level design on Sony's 1st party development is dynamic levels. Ie moving levels that interact with gameplay. I am not talking about riding a circular train track on a flat surface going around and around. Levels are rising, sinking, and twisting to affect gameplay. I don't think I have seen it in any of the multiplats mentioned thus far. You can see a little of that going on in KZ3 with the floating icebergs, but the best example has to be both God of War 3 and Uncharted 2's levels. Perhaps Crysis2 will showcase this, who knows? But I don't think so given what they've just "managed" to achieve on all consoles.

avengers19785060d ago

How can anyone be excited about 360 after that press conference. Sure they had better looking games then they did a year ago, but still not up to standards that have been set on Sony PS3. Plus Natal"kinect" was lame, super lame.

EvilBlackCat5060d ago (Edited 5060d ago )

RAGE WON THE E3 PERIOD

NOT HALO REACH

NOT BORINGZONE3

NOT GT5

NOT BRINK

NOT MEDAL OF HONOR

NOT CRYSIS

ITS ALL RAGE NOW

NOW SUDDENLY MGS SUCK RIGHT LOYALISTS?

PS3 loyalists
Stop bashing and start talking about new ideas and what you want and what you dont want in the games that way the developers will know exactly what we want.

Its pure logic that graphics are going to be better every single year but what about gameplay? so instead of wasting your damn time complaining and fighting about graphics why not discuss about fncking gameplay and ideas.

TO ALL P.R. bastards at the web and specially here in n4g GET THE FnCK OUT!

ImmortalLegend5060d ago

As a owner of both consoles I must admit that PS3 fans tend to exaggerate the difference in graphics. I mean the PS3 exclusives like God of War 3, Heavy Rain, UC2, look great, but they are not a shit load better than some of the games you see graphically on the 360. They make it seem as if the games on the 360 are like gameboy pocket and the games on the PS3 are like PSP (sorry can't think of another comparison XD). In conclusion, yes the games look a little bit better than games on the 360, but not horribly better IMHO.

Consoldtobots5060d ago (Edited 5060d ago )

lets ignore all this bloviating by butthurt fanboys and get to the point shall we?

despite all this hootin and hollerin about the 360 having "graphical muscle" left (as if that's the only thing that makes a game good)it doesn't really address the problem does it?

Abysmal storage solution

Non existent first party studios

a motion control platform that is looking like a complete disaster in the making

MSs inability to be original or innovative (360 slim anyone?)

with all the things going against it as a platform does arguing over one multiplatform game "proving the 3-6tee isn't maxed out" really mean much?

I think not, you be the judge.

Silver3605060d ago

have nothing to do with the 360 being maxed out. The games that were put out that looked inferior than PS3 first party games has more to do with those developers for MS having their talent maxed out. As we can see now you can't blame the console you can only blame the developers and their attitude of it is good enough. They should have been trying harder since Uncharted 1.

+ Show (18) more repliesLast reply 5060d ago
ArcFatalix5060d ago ShowReplies(1)
alaa5060d ago

The games featured in the article are some of the best looking games at E3 2010 and all of them are on Xbox360.

5060d ago Replies(1)
Duke Spookem5060d ago

Oh wait...It's from that garbage arabia site. This article is irrelevant it seems. Almost thought it was a HHG article for a second.

halojunkie5060d ago Show
Show all comments (209)
90°

Shenmue: Reclaiming the Path is a fan game coming out September 16th.

Shenmue: Reclaiming the Path is a fan game using Dreamcast-era visuals, and tells a new story within the Shenmue saga taking place in both Hong Kong and Guilin. Its expected to release on September 16th.

Inverno3h ago

Something about recreating old school graphics in an era of HD high poly photo realism just hits a spot. I'm not nostalgic cause I mostly played GameCube and GB/A, but it's a visual style that gets over looked even by indies.

90°

6 Fun Games Where You Actually Play As The Bad Guy

While the mainstream media always sees things turning in favor of the hero, here are 6 games that own being a bad guy.

Profchaos43m ago

Pretty much all of these games listed are based around a morality system you don't have to be bad and you don't have to be good.

It seems to have left out some real amazing games like red dead redemption 1/2,ass effect and true crime la/ny

70°

New Expansion EVE Online: Equinox Will Empower Players to Seize Control of Nullsec

CCP Games has unveiled an ambitious roadmap for their sci-fi MMO EVE Online in 2024, headlined by the massive Equinox expansion set to launch on June 11th.

Read Full Story >>
cgmagonline.com