Approvals 12/3 ▼
jay2 (1) - 5062d ago Cancel
aceitman (1) - 5062d ago Cancel
necronzero (1) - 5062d ago Cancel
MainEv3nt 69 (2) - 5062d ago Cancel
SCEA_RULES (2) - 5062d ago Cancel
fr0sty (1) - 5062d ago Cancel
LordMarius (1) - 5062d ago Cancel
Seedhouse (2) - 5062d ago Cancel
frankymv (1) - 5062d ago Cancel
660°

Rumor: Kinect to have two versions, most expensive costs $189.00

VG247 has just been informed by an inside source close to Natal/Kinect that there will be two version of the camera controller when it hits the market.

The most expensive one will run you $189.00.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community5062d ago
frankymv5062d ago

that $189 better include a console

Imperator5062d ago

Yea, at that price this thing will fail hard. for 20 bucks more you can get a Wii... Heck, the new 360 may be around 200 bucks so for 20 bucks you get a brand new 360.. meh.

-Alpha5062d ago (Edited 5062d ago )

God damn MS is leaking worse than that oil pipe that you see in the news.

That's crazy, but the question is, what does it include and why is it different? How will that affect gamers? Does one have better technology?

I wonder how much cheaper the other version is. I think MS is targeting new gamers with the more expensive version. The general audience sees something like Minority Report and sees that technology to exist far in the future. MS will advertise it as if the future is already here, and for the low, low price of $189! I can definitely see casuals being impressed with that price, wouldn't you? They may see it as cheap, it's all the presentation of advertising and I sincerely believe MS will advertise Natal to casuals in a whole different way than they will to gamers.

As for hardcore or existing gamers I doubt they'd bite... but does that mean MS is serving the other version for them? And if so, why is it cheaper? I question if these two versions are identical or if one is a bundle. Hopefully the more expensive one really comes with a console, and if so then I expect it to be an Arcade model and I am assuming very much that we will see a price drop.

Anon19745062d ago (Edited 5062d ago )

Kinect is most likely the name Microsoft is going with for the social networking aspect of Microsoft's "Kin" smart phones. Chances are they're going to make this network available on the 360, hence the "Kinect compatible" label.
I might be inclined to think "Kinect" is the name for Natal if it weren't for the fact that Kin is the name of their phones. Makes more sense that Kinect is related to that.

I guess we'll find out for sure tomorrow, but methinks this site has just jumped the gun.

I find it a bit odd everyone thinks this is Natal all of a sudden. When Microsoft trademarked Kinect months ago, no one even mentioned Natal and all the tech sites theorized it's the social network associated with the Kin phones. I don't know why suddenly all these sites are so sure it's Natal. Doesn't the social network make more sense? Kin-ect - Con-nect, but for the Kin phones? Doesn't that make more sense?

Edit: Well shut my mouth. I just read the USA Today article. Kinect Adventures, Kinectimals, Kinect Sports. Looks like Natal is now Kinect. Not a bad name.

FrankenLife5062d ago

If the Kinect name is real, it very well could be region specific. It is a little too early to be calling it that.

sikbeta5062d ago

So, it's called "kinect"?, so where the hell "wave" came from?

2 version? why don't make 1 version alone, way to alienate the consumers, also $189 is too much for an add-on, no matter how good some people will try to make it look, average Joes will not pay that much for a Peripheral when they know for 11 bucks more they can buy the king of motion-crappy-control-gaming aka the wii...

Sevir045062d ago

http://www.computerandvideo...

"Microsoft's Marc Whitten has said that Kinect (formerly known as Project Natal) is "fundamentally different" from the motion control Nintendo introduced with Wii."

if this thing is priced at 189 bucks then kinect will fail and hard.!!! I cant believe they are gonna charge that much money for an over priced camera on upgraded Eyetoy technology... you are better off buying a wii with motion plus or a MOVE+PSeye combo for that money...

MS but you fail on this

Parapraxis5062d ago

@sikbeta, I think "wave" comes from their new packaging design.

Hideo_Kojima5061d ago (Edited 5061d ago )

Now do people see why Sony skipped on this idea? Maybe by the time PS4 is out this technology will be cheaper. Imagine a 3D camera + Move controller combo. It would be too good to be true.

Very expensive... maybe the 2 versions mean one comes with a game and the other doesn't. I wouldn't pay more than $120 for Natal/Kinetic (WITH A GAME INCLUDED)

However last year MS said that Natal pricing will be similar to console pricing. Meaning it will be expensive and the price will go down over time...

Its not like a controller pricing that stays the same.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5061d ago
KillerPwned5062d ago

I would not doubt it that the most expensive comes with the console.

Parapraxis5062d ago (Edited 5062d ago )

I think you're probably right.

Surprised at disagrees.
Do people REALLY think that Kinect could be 189$ by itself!
O_o that's astonishing, I know MS often charges too much for peripherals but...really.

EDIT: Re-reads article. Lets HOPE this isn't true.

RememberThe3575062d ago

MS has been very competitive on the pricing end this generation and I wouldn't expect them to stop now.

Drac5062d ago (Edited 5062d ago )

That would be a big cash hit for MS if that's the case, but it's states above "two version of the camera" and the price is for the more expensive camera, so I think we're pipe dreaming about getting the camera and console for $189.

deadreckoning6665062d ago (Edited 5062d ago )

Wait. Is that for the controller alone?! NO WAY! If thats the case then Microsoft just screwed up...HARD.

EDIT: Idk, I think its bullshit. $189.99??? Why not make it $199.99? No. I don't believe it. I'll wait for the official word from Microsoft.

-Alpha5062d ago

I don't know about you but I'll take $189.99 over $199.99

Well I wouldn't take it at all at that price, but if I had a gun to my head...

DuneBuggy5062d ago

If its 189.00 for basically Natal and a Arcade together, that undercuts the Wii by 10 bucks right?

GiggMan5062d ago

I hope that's not right, even the hardcorest of fanboys can't justify that price...

Crusade5062d ago

How long have you been on n4g?

Ilikegames765062d ago

read Conlols, Green, and Omega's comments for reference.

Anarki5062d ago

FFS these people love to make false crap.
There was maybe a small leak of an image.... not every single aspect of the godamn product.

Montrealien5062d ago

well, compared to move, it is about the same price for a full experience with a few friends.

We will see.

Sunny_D5062d ago

There hasn't been a price for MOVE has there? Also, for about 20-50/ bucks, I could get an Eyetoy or PS EYE.

Montrealien5062d ago (Edited 5062d ago )

you are kidding right? it's pretty easy to figure out, plus this is ruffly the cost. A rep told us as he had move demo a month or so back.

here, big announcment, just for you.

Move (wiimote) plus pack in game, 59.99$
nun chuck, wireless, 29.99-39.99$

1 player right there.

camera 39.99

full bundle 99.99$

And that is fine imho.

Wildarmsjecht5062d ago (Edited 5062d ago )

Yea the bundle is supposed to be under 100 dollars, and include a camera, a game pack, and the Move controller. Granted no one knows what the standalone product will be. If you have an official link Montr id like to see it, but as I can tell:

A PSEYE costs between $30-40 (from amazon and other retailers)
So the move would be between 50-70 (if they include the packaged game as $10 MSRP)

But then again, where as with 3 or 4 friends it'd be around the same price for 4 people on NATAL, who's to say people want to buy that many.

@Rememberthe357

Thanks alot mate, i was looking for that link.

So in actuality, it's supposed to be about 70 US dollars for the combo pack...which makes me think the Move controller itself will be considerably less. Maybe 30-40 dollars like the PSEYE itself.

Montrealien5062d ago (Edited 5062d ago )

so roughly 200$ for four people to play. makes sense. about the same as the wii.

Edit: @below, don't forget to factor in the wireless nun chuck. I think it will be separate. I may be wrong though.

Wildarmsjecht5062d ago (Edited 5062d ago )

Yea, if the pricing is in fact 50 dollars. It could very well be 30 dollars like the PSEYE is. One thing that is an advantage about this, as I've stated above, is that for the people who don't plan on playing with 3 other people, they can just buy 2. Or there are people who just want to try out the Move or play with it themselves, then that's only 30-50 dollars. It's like controllers. From a consumers point of view, its more logical to buy 2 controllers if you only plan on having 2 people use it, instead of spending the *RUMORED* 190 dollars on Kinect that cud allow up to 4 (or more? Im not sure, someone confirm please) people, but not what you need.

Edit: @Above

I've never heard mention of it being seperate to be honest. As for as I know, it was to be placed together. I think they scrapped the idea of using the DS3 in conjunction with the wand, and since the Archery game that has been previewed is rumored to be part of the bundled game, it would be silly to leave out a piece that looks to be crucial.

liveActionLeveler5062d ago

Yes that would equal the price of the Wii but not that you still need a ps3 console for move.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5062d ago
Inside_out5062d ago (Edited 5062d ago )

Open the flood gates...it's rolling now...waiting all day...$190 must be a joke...c'mon..I have all the consoles, 2 360's...that's too much...I hope that's a mistake...I hope the Kinect/360 arcade thing is still $299...That might be the scam right there...sell it with a console for almost the same price...kill 2 birds with one stone...like the new 360...looks really sharp...why not just keep Natal as the name...moving on...info coming in by the second...luv E3...

niceguywii605062d ago (Edited 5062d ago )

The more expensive one will come with games or some sort of compatible Natal motion Wand and Sub controller not yet announced. This supposed leaked info IMO confirms my gut feeling about Natal accessories. We will know in 55 minutes.

SillySundae5062d ago

Hi! Is there a countdown somewhere that will reveal the price?

-Ikon-5062d ago

K-asuals
I-nferior
N-ew
E-lectronic
C-rappy
T-oy

Total fail i told everyone would NEVER be under $100

absolutecarnage5062d ago

of all this rumor crap and everybody throws their hands in the air and believes it right away. unless it comes from Microsoft themselves shut the hell up .

And No This Inside source doesn't count

B-Real2065062d ago

Tonight's big Xbox 360-themed Cirque du Soleil performance will be co-hosted by iCarly's Jennette McCurdy and MTV's Sway Calloway.

BannedForNineYears5062d ago

Since when is it called "Kinect"?
I thought that was a rumor. -_-

Philaroni5062d ago

@ Alpha

Question is will Sony follow suit if this is in deed a new system with a lower price point. Its been proven Sony can out sell MS at the 'same' price point but not when MS is lower then they are. I know for a fact MS makes a good deal of every 360 sold enough so to do a major price drop this year.

Nykamari5062d ago

What do you mean by that? Sony can't out sell MS at this price, dude get out 2007. That headstart MS got means nothing now. I hope Natal turns out ok, I may pick it up for my kids. The price means nothing to people that's willing to try something new!

Philaroni5062d ago

Sorry my bad I was thinking the Xbox would be that price. LOL brain fart moment there.

Blacktric5062d ago

A classic Microsoft accessory pricing. It won't sell unless Microsoft gives hardcore players something to look forward to. We've only seen Natal working with casual games and nothing else. We saw Move with both casual and hardcore games and it works perfect for both types. Two choices left for Natal; go hardcore or gtfo.

IdleLeeSiuLung5062d ago (Edited 5062d ago )

Even right before the event, they still manage to sneak out some more new rumored information! WTF!

zeeshan5062d ago

That rumor sounds sooooo a rumor that will never come true. I mean $189 for an accessory? Plus two versions of Kinect (I hate the name by the way) makes no sense. Devs won't like the fact that they will have two different Kinect platforms and try to make their games work on both. That's just plain bull*

I know that M$ loves to rip off their consumers (what with the huge price of hard drives, wifi etc) but even they are not THAT stupid to smack a $189 price tag on an accessory. Or.... are they?

chaosatom5061d ago

I thought that it couldn't get any worse

+ Show (17) more repliesLast reply 5061d ago
jay25062d ago

The price rumors (and the prices GAME's been coming up with) are horrible. But they're beaten by the game titles that support it (That we know so far.)

No deal for Kinect.

nilamo5062d ago

I can only shake my head in disgust...

Tony-A5062d ago

Jesus Christ....

But why would they have two versions?

jack_burt0n5062d ago

article says with and without motorised auto tracking.

qface645062d ago

maybe one version will be the camera itself and another one will be like a bundle that comes with natal compatible games

Show all comments (119)
20°

Joy Ride Turbo - The Beginning of the End for Xbox Kinect

Joy Ride Turbo launched 10 years ago today. The first title was Xbox Kinect exclusive, yet this sequel failed to support the device at all.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community699d ago
300°

10 of the Biggest Video Game Hardware Failures Ever

Cultured Vultures: "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal, and no matter how much developers might try, some gaming hardware just fails to hit the mark. We’ve compiled a list of 10 gaming hardware fails, and boy did some fail hard."

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community821d ago
Knightofelemia822d ago

I would label the Power Glove, Kinect, and that Tony Hawk skateboard more as hardware addons hardware failure would be like the Virtual Boy and one day Stadia.

Magog821d ago

Kinect was bundled with every Xbox One and inflated the price on an already underpowered and low RAM machine so for the One it wasn't an accessory as much as a white elephant.

CaptainHenry916821d ago (Edited 821d ago )

Definitely the RROD but that power glove had a lot of issues as well. The Kinect just didn't work

821d ago
CrimsonWing69821d ago

Hardware add-ons are more like RAM or a video card, basically components that enhance capabilities or performance of the computer.

If you really want to get technical the Kinect is more of a peripheral device, kind of like a keyboard or mouse to a computer.

ThatsGaming821d ago

The person in this article obviously is not up on their gaming history....

Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Coleco Gemini, Commodore 128, Commodore Amiga, Atari 5200, Atari 7800 were all massive failures and in most cases cost their companies participating in future gaming generations.

Gamer79821d ago

Sega saturn (successful in Japan) and dreamcast were not failures.
Seems like you're not up on you're gaming history

septemberindecember821d ago

@Gamer79

How in the world are the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast not seen as failures? They both sold around 8M each, which is much lower than the ~30M that the Genesis had sold before it, and even the Master System before that. They were both the worst selling consoles in their respective generation (PS1, N64 outsold Saturn, PS2, GC, and Xbox outsold Dreamcast). Both of the consoles were incredibly short lived. The Saturn was discontinued in every territory but Japan after just three years. In Japan the console was discontinued after six years. Meanwhile the Dreamcast was discontinued worldwide in 2001 after launching in most territories in 1999 and in Japan in 1998. The failure of the Saturn and Dreamcast lead to Sega pulling out of the hardware market. Which, by the way, all of this occurred when Sega was massively dropping the price of their consoles quickly to compete. Sega was hemorrhaging money at this point.

None of this indicates a successful console. Saying the Saturn was a success because it did better in Japan is like saying the Vita is a success (they both sold around the same amount of units in Japan). Even the Wii U outsold these consoles worldwide.

Magog821d ago

The picture should be the 360 RROD. When I think of gaming hardware failures that's what springs to mind. Kinect and it's bundled price tag definitely hobbled the already underpowered Xbox One though for sure so I would give it a close second place.

porkChop821d ago (Edited 821d ago )

That's not what the author means by failures. It's about hardware that failed in terms of sales (Wii U) or just failed to deliver on its promise (Kinect).

Magog821d ago (Edited 821d ago )

Given that the 360 had a year head start, much easier hardware to develop for, was cheaper, and still ended up in third place I think it qualifies especially when you factor in the frustration and huge losses incurred by RROD.

porkChop821d ago

Selling over 80 million consoles isn't a sales flop. We get it, you don't like Xbox, but that doesn't mean the 360 is suddenly a failure.

Rhythmattic821d ago

Porky....
You know how many people I know bought a 2nd or third 360 due to RROD? Even when MS had to confront the issue with replacement systems, my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in, and waiting for a replacement.,,..,..
If that's how you consider it a win... OK.. but so is having 5 , of which 3 don't function.... Its a win win....mwhahahahaha

porkChop820d ago

"my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in"

You're acting like it would take months. When I sent my 360 in I got a new one literally 5 days later. As soon as MS had tracking confirmation that you sent yours, they'd send a new one to you the same day. No one is going to spend hundreds to buy a new console instead of waiting a week. I swear you guys pull some of the dumbest shit out of nowhere and think people will actually believe it.

Regardless, none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about.

Rhythmattic820d ago (Edited 820d ago )

Porky
"You're acting like it would take months"
Sometimes it could.. FFS.. 'Strya here...
Best turnaround I reckon was 2-3 weeks.....
Either way, My mates experiences still exist.. So Sorry, no point trying to earn Xbox Achievements when it doesn't feature in what was a situation you never dealt with,,,,
3 of my friends would disagree (overall, 10 extra Xboxes purchased)
Regardless.. MS sold a lot of 360's that was due to this reason.. That is sales. Fact

"none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about."
Headline says HELLO !
Oh and "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal," that's enough to pass this on without taking your article bias into consideration.....
As for the rest.... Ok.. But you've actually gone out of your way to give MS a Pass... Fap on.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 820d ago
Aloymetal821d ago (Edited 821d ago )

Yup, and because of that big fiasco MS had to fork out 1 billion but knowing them I think they're very proud of the 360, it's the only time a MS console reached 80mil+ sales, RROD played a big part of that and a record they will never break again.

Rhythmattic821d ago (Edited 821d ago )

So true.. Even when MS accepted they where caught out in the biggest lie of any generation, The wait for a replacement was outweighed by just buying another, and having one be returned as a backup, which, btw, generally failed on first swap.
I own honestly can't believe MS tards are just supporting , or arguing why and what MS did by just dismissing it....

lonewolf10821d ago

Lol I had the Atari Jaguar, surprised its "competition" the 3DO isn't on the list too, both as "popular" as each other.

SullysCigar821d ago

Lol same. Played the crap out of Aliens Vs Predator and Tempest 2000 .... aaand that's about it really!!

lonewolf10821d ago

Sad but true that was pretty much it.

Kurt Russell821d ago

Agreed, I never actually saw a 3DO make it to retailers in the UK. At least the Atari Jaguar was sold for around 6 months.

lonewolf10821d ago

It made it to some my brother got one, fared just as well as the Jaguar so most probably hard to find in general.

darthv72821d ago

3do had way better games. Jaguar not so much. Neo Geo sold less than both and yet isnt considered a failure. Go figure.

LWOGaming821d ago

Stadia is a weird one. It hasn’t sold at all well but in terms of how it works it’s still miles ahead of Xcloud in terms of stability and performance. Xcloud is still a way behind and that needs sorting but it will be in time. Stadia for me is one of those things that will go down as a what could have been moments. With better marketing it could have been a roaring success. I still play it and it remains the best place in my opinion to play CyberPunk 2077. Only platform I have played it on without having any issues at all. The tech is great. The concept is fine. Marketing terrible. Shame really.

Magog821d ago

The sales model was awful. They should have teamed with an existing player to allow for local and cloud access to games or a gaming subscription service.

LWOGaming821d ago

It was a strange mess from such a huge company, as I said, as a system it works really well but without gamers it’s nothing. Such a waste,

LWOGaming821d ago

The Xbox One was Microsoft’s Nintendo Wii U. Undercooked, undersold and just an unholy mess. The thing is with any of these failures is to learn from them and thankfully both Nintendo and Xbox did just that to the benefit of gamers everywhere.

Show all comments (39)
120°

Pivotal Decisions in Gaming History - Xbox Goes All-In on Kinect

Xbox 360's Kinect had flopped yet Microsoft insisted on mandatory Kinect for Xbox One, driving the price up and alienating their potential customers.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community998d ago
darthv72998d ago

the tech was pretty damn good but their focus on making it the centerpiece was not. Had they opted to keep it as a secondary or even tertiary device, it may have found new use for AR/VR.

PrimeVinister998d ago

Maybe. But they were two early for VR and too late for motion control

998d ago Replies(2)
Godmars290998d ago

Their focus was marketing metrics. Information gathering for targeted advertising. Also "event curating" or head counting for special TV events. If MS had had their way with always online and mandatory Kinect pre COVID, as and during it they'd likely be turning into dominant presence in many Western homes. Be getting subsidized by Disney and other streamers as well as the NFL.

Thing was, Kinect as an actual game system, its games, just weren't ready. MS moved on it too soon. Thankfully.

Atticus_finch998d ago

Sorry but it was incredibly bad for gaming. The thing barely worked as intended and the games were broken shovelware. And let's not forget all the lies from Xbox to try and sell it. What happened to Milo?
It's like Xbox it's a perpetual lying machine.

PrimeVinister998d ago

I had almost forgotten about Milo. It looks so unbelievable in retrospect. How did anyone believe it?!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 998d ago
TheEnigma313998d ago

Kinect requirement, TV focused, DRM, and $100 buried Xbone before it even stared.

PrimeVinister998d ago (Edited 998d ago )

I think Kinect was the worst of the bunch. They reversed DRM overnight and try to play down the TV stuff when they realised it made them look disinterested in gaming.

Kinect stuck around for six months, preventing sales and making more and more people upset when they dropped the Kinect and the price.

Atticus_finch998d ago

Don't forget the inferior hardware which affects their game development to this day.
And the constant boasting and lying that hasn't change very much to this day.

kayoss998d ago

I was kind of excited for the kinect. It had potential. That was until i tried it at one of their Microsoft store. The thing was so laggy and worker who was there, had no clue what he was doing. It kind of made rethink about buying an Xbox One with Kinect.

PrimeVinister998d ago

I had already been turned off of the idea by Kinect for 360. Even when it worked, the games were bad and showed no potential.

Wii made you understand what they were going to do with it within about 10 seconds of Wii Sports. It went on to become a bit of a joke but at least it worked and had a purpose.

Thundercat77998d ago

The damage to the Xbox brand was so hard that til this day they are just the last place brand in the market.

PrimeVinister998d ago

Totally. They haven't been really all that relevant since.

Godmars290998d ago

That has to do with repeatedly failing, having to reaffirm only to again fail at creating a competent flow of decent games.

@PrimeVinister:
Until Game Pass and BC are mentioned. Only for the point to be missed.

kayoss998d ago

thats because they dont know what they want to be. A gaming console, Television, or a gaming service?

Godmars290998d ago

@kayoss:
They wanted, expected, to be Steam. To have everyone coming to them and paying for the privilege. That's the exact mentality on display when they tried to push always online.

brewin997d ago

Its sad because the Xbox one version of Kinect was actually pretty solid. Not for motion games, I couldnt care less about those, but for the other features that are now commonplace in the gaming ecosystem. Things like voice control and optional motion features in games. Stuff that Sony did with the PS camera was pretty sweet and they could have done some of that stuff with Kinect.

The tech was pretty sweet when implemented right though. Who remembers the implementation in Dead Rising 3?! You could lure zombies away by saying stuff into the kinect, it was a bit hokey at first, but it actually enhanced the game significantly once you learned all the different voice commands. There was and still is nothing else like that!

The focus on TV seemed to be an issue for people, but the TV pass through had some real potential. They could have had cable companies giving the XBone out instead of cable boxes! I understood what they were trying to do, but they needed to show the games too, and thats where they lost the core gamers. Being able to jump right to a sports event or TV show with out leaving the console was actually a pretty cool thing. I spent many nights switching between NHL games or TV shows and jumping right back into my games seamlessly, just by telling Kinect to do so. It was better than people care to admit, but I loved it!

People say XBone had no games, but on launch I got Dead Rising 3, AC Black Flag, Watch Dogs, Killer Instinct, Battlefield 4, Forza 5, and Ryse. That was actually a pretty solid lineup in hindsight! Then later on it got gems like Quantum Break, Dead Rising 4, Sunset Overdrive, Gears 4 and 5, the Ori games, Rare Replay, Forza Horizon 3/4, State of Decay 2, ReCore (SUPER UNDERRATED GEM), Halo 5, Halo Wars 2, and all the great 3rd party stuff as well! I dare anyone who sat on the Xbox One to go back and give it a shot now.

It was actually a pretty great console all things considered. Yes the PS4 had better 1st party stuff, stuff that MS just couldnt top or even compete with, but there are some really great games that a lot of people missed out on that they would probably really enjoy if they actually played them. Thats why I recommend a Series S and Gamepass to a lot of people, as its a great way to get an awesome lineup pf games for super cheap!

Show all comments (22)