360°

Gears 3 Is The New #1 Title For Xbox360, Thanks Epic

Unreal Tournament was a great multi-player franchise but Epic games needed something more, something special that can elevate to new heights in this industry. This project is named Gears Of War and it’s ready to take it’s place as the new champion for all Microsoft Xbox360 owners around the world.

Read Full Story >>
hiphopgamershow.com
deadreckoning6665479d ago (Edited 5479d ago )

LOL, I knew this was an HHG title when I saw it. Keep doing your thing man. IMO your the most entertaining/passionate gaming journalist out there. Can't wait for your E3 coverage in a week!

Mista T5479d ago (Edited 5479d ago )

Gears isn't even close, it's an ok series with men that look like they've been on steroids since birth.

and I hope you forgot to add in the /s cause I think you still have time to edit

ENTERTAINING? PASSIONATE? take your meds :P

Mista T5479d ago

forget it, too late to edit, you poor soul

PS360PCROCKS5479d ago

It's funny that lazy, fat people say everyone who has muscles is on steroids. I've heard that comment since I was 16. Do you not realize you just sound jealous with comments like that?

Boody-Bandit5478d ago (Edited 5478d ago )

"It's funny that lazy, fat people say everyone who has muscles is on steroids. I've heard that comment since I was 16. Do you not realize you just sound jealous with comments like that?"

So you attack his assumption with an assumption of your own?

The characters in Gears of War, if they were real people, with the exception of Carmine, would ALL be roiders. Especially Cole. You don't get to that level of thickness while being that cut without roids. I'm neither fat nor lazy and up until I was injured a few years back, lifted for the better part of 30 years. Now I am just a cardio guy.

I personally knew plenty of people that did roids and the effect it had on their bodies. They are not worth the health risk. My brother use to be a roider (for roughly 8 years) and now he is 42 with a bad heart.

Edit: Come to think of it Samoans might be the exception to this rule but last I checked the characters in gears are not that nationality.

LEGENDARY PELON5479d ago

Doesnt matter, their both only for the Xbox 360!

And their both Beast Games!

Bloodraid5478d ago

I've not even watched the video, because I hate HHG, but the comments here are absolutely hilarious.

All you ever see 360 users (fanboys in particular) is 'We have Halo and Gears [And Natal]'.

Now this article has turned all the 360 users against eachother. Most of what I've seen so far is people flaming Halo and saying Gears is awesome; or people flaming Gears and saying Halo is awesome.

Both series are on the same system, and are exclusive to that system. It seems that some people just like arguing about anything, no matter what it is.

8thnightvolley5479d ago (Edited 5479d ago )

u are kidding me right, HHG was chatting alot of crap i had to shut that vid.. i like halo as much as the next guy but i will call bs where is ment to be.. we all knw halo reach is getting new enemies at least so there u are chatting bs.. secondly..u just saying things we knw already who doesnt knw what next gen gaming is all about besides its more like current gaming coz we next gen is not out yet.. we have been in last gen's next gen for 4 plus years now.. all i kept doing was looking at the pics of chicks on the site that is the only thing i was remotely intrested in..

edit ... to think gears3 is the next big title is pure bs.. i love gears dont get me wrong but how can EPIC be better than bungie ARE U F.CKING KIDDING ME? ... epic games lag and fail alot more time compared to bungie and bungie are very good in presentation and dont leave any stoned unturned b4 giving the game to the public... just coz bungie is multiplat doesnt make halo a lesser title than gears... i bet once 343 studios get a good grip on the title halo4 will still rule over gears..
gear3 i hope will not be broken for once especially in the MP.. coz i am fedup with changes every other weekly update on gears thou the current update seems to reduce the general lag...

so no gears is not the number one title on 360.. far from it.

telekineticmantis5479d ago

First off Bungie got major inspiration from Epic in the creation of Halo Unreal tournament ring a bell does the sounds of "double kill" not give you that Unreal deja vu. Epic games are big time trend setters in the indurty especially when it comes to shooters

Another One5479d ago

Ha...haha...hahaha wow. Sorry HHG, but you are wrong again. Gears hasn't and wont pass Halo. Bungie's games are more polished than Epic's and aren't broken on day one. Halo has sold more and is/was more of a console pusher than Gears. There's just no way of justifying your statement.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5478d ago
Cajun Chicken5479d ago

I have no idea how Gears can EVEN come NEAR to the gameplay of UT.

xTruthx5479d ago

I think he has only played ut3 xD

Raf1k15479d ago

I think most console gamers have only played UT3 which is a shame really and I think Unreal 3 is well overdue. I'd love for them to work on that.

poopface15479d ago

the only unreal games Ive ever played alot were Unreal and Unreal Tournament. I loved UT alot for online and bots.

I like gears for the SP and Co-op.

edhe5478d ago

UT was uber, i clanned in it for years but it's a niche title, and too god damn fast for console.

It needs to be totally reworked to work in today's arena. Gears is a perfect fit, slower gameplay + coop & giblets \o/.

I just wished in UT on console they'd changed dodge from a double tap to a combo button + move. Controls are poor imo.

xTruthx5478d ago

I'm talking about HHG, not you xD

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5478d ago
dizzleK5479d ago

halo and gears as flagship titles, no wonder i despise the 360. i just don't fit the fat, 12 year old, slipknot listening, daddy hating demographic these titles aim for. gears is seriously just utterly brainless shit.

Raf1k15479d ago (Edited 5479d ago )

Brainless yes but you can't deny the fun that can be had in those games. It's nice to have the option of playing a game like that once in a while just as I like to watch a brainless action flick every now and again.

edit: @ Mista T, that's a fair statement but TBH I kind of like the design choice they made to make it play like that. It makes a nice change to all the fast paced shooters around which is shame since I don't have a 360 lol. The first game was great though. I enjoyed that.

Mista T5479d ago

honestly I love brainless shooting but Gears is just too slow paced for my taste

karl5479d ago

i even agree with all u said.. but

why would u insult slipknot...

SOAD5478d ago

Slipknot's idea of music is to play their instruments very loudly while simultaneously shouting over the track.

Granted System of a Down does the same thing in many respects, but I love SOAD for some of their more eloquent music like Lonely Day,

Chapulin5479d ago

I want to see both games in action before I say anything.

dirthurts5479d ago

I don't care what a review says, or how good screen shots look.
I gotta see that gameplay before I can make a judgement.

EVILDEAD3605479d ago (Edited 5479d ago )

Did you see what happened when the Beta dropped? Look Gears WILL be anticipated by all of us..but the HALO fanbase for the 360 is second to none..anybody who has ever been to a midnight launch of ANY Halo since H2 knows what I'm talking about

Halo Reach is going to drop the axe on ANYTHING over Live for the next year..and we haven't even seen the campaign yet..Although, Zombie mode on COD:Black Ops is going to eat my life away in November

Who cares though..Bungie and Epic FTW..love both franchises..life is good..

Evil

NumeroUno5479d ago

Haha Gears ahead of Halo? Not by a long shot...

Show all comments (48)
40°

XBLA Classic 'A World of Keflings' Is Coming to Steam, and There's a Demo

"Back in the innocent days of 2010, A World of Keflings was a fairly popular successor to A Kingdom for Keflings. I even wrote about it a few times in 2012! But the world of humans moved on, and NinjaBee's city-building/adventure game was last seen on the ill-fated Wii U in 2014. Fast-forward to the dark year of 2025, and not only is A World of Keflings coming to Steam, but there's already a playable demo! Perhaps the cheerful, no pressure gameplay that the Keflings bring is just what we need nowadays," says Co-Optimus.

Read Full Story >>
co-optimus.com
290°

The Real Enemy of Gaming Isn’t DEI. It’s the CEO

From Horse Armor to Mass Layoffs: The Price of Greed in Gaming. Inside the decades-long war on game workers and the players who defend them.

Read Full Story >>
rushdownradio.net
jambola3d ago

maybe a real enemy is people who use terms like "the real enemy"
there can be more than 1 bad thing, t's not like a kids show with 1 big bad

senorfartcushion2d ago

This is very much a “dummy who volunteers themselves to the middle” comment.

The real enemy is a common phrase, people use it all the time.

Calm down.

jambola1d 22h ago

i'm very calm
you seem very upset however

Notellin1d 10h ago

You don't seem calm at all. Don't take this so seriously, you seem desperate responding to others defending your opinion that lacks any value or critical thought.

jambola1d 10h ago

stop projecting
i'm not desperately dong anything, i'm tapping at keys on my keyboard bud

PapaBop1d 10h ago

It's not like kids show with one bad guy? I present to you.. Bobby Kotick

ABizzel11d 8h ago (Edited 1d 8h ago )

DEI was never the problem and it was an ignorant take to begin with.

DEI is why games like Kena Bridge of Spirits, South of Midnight, and Ghost of Tsushima exist.

DEI is why we have a huge resurgence in Japanese, Chineses, and Korean developers producing games like Stellar Blade, Black Myth, and why Nintendo & Sony exist.

DEI is why more and more games have HUGE accessibility options with both Sony and MS fully behind this.

DEI was never a bad thing, the entire purpose of DEI is representation of all people, genders, disabilities, etc…

The problem was people used DEI as a default derogatory term to describe what they believed was forced representation, which allowed colorist, racist, sexist, misogynist, homophobic, and xenophobic fools to run away with the negative DEI narrative.

jambola21h ago

you don't get to decide other people's motivations
sorry to break it to you

ABizzel11h ago(Edited 51m ago)

To each their own, however, nothing you said invalidates why some people take offense to DEI incorrectly.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1h ago
Sciurus_vulgaris3d ago

Executives seem to often have an obsession with perpetual revenue growth. There is always a finite amount of consumers for a product regardless of growth. Additionally, over investment is another serious issue in gaming.

Killer2020UK2d ago

The fact that they also rarely have any real expertise in game development compounds things. They'll look at what's been successful elsewhere, lack the knowledge to properly understand why they have been successful and then force a team to 'reproduce' their badly interpreted idea of that success.

We see it so often with sequels to games that were successful too. The team are left well alone, they have a break through hit and all of sudden the money men descend on the IP and completely railroad the dev team's ideas. Usually winds up being 'make the same game but MORE'

LoveSpuds1d 11h ago

This is true throughout all of the corporate and public sector organisations to be honest. CEO's generally move amongst the corporate world without any need to have experience of a particular industry, they simply need to rely on their senior leadership credentials. A CEO of a retail giant will just as easily transition to a CEO role in the energy sector for example.

Not defending CEOs here to be clear, I think it's a huge part of the reason the western world is so fucked up. CEOs don't need to care about the sector they work in, in fact it's better if they don't care if they want to screw everyone to make profits.

GhostScholar2d ago

Companies don’t hire executives to break even. If the goal is breaking even then why start the company in the first place.

Soy1d 23h ago

That's understood; it's getting record profits and expecting to always beat those record profits, and seeing anything less as a total failure. Then they lay people off and raise prices to reach those record profit levels again, just to sate shareholders. It's setting expectations way too high just to spike share prices, then inevitably falling short. It's feeling entitled to being more successful than everyone else. It's the CEOs doing all this to boost their own bonuses.

ABizzel11d 8h ago

Growth benefits the company’s profits and therefore the company’s stock if publicly traded, which pleases the shareholders making them more and more rich, which is why Growth is always at the forefront of the vast majority of any publicly traded company.

More growth = More Money and the people at the top want all the money they can get. I can’t really blame them anyone would love to see their profits go from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands, to multi-millions it’s almost like a gambling addiction.

But it also goes to show someone how morals can go out the window for a lot of these people, and how amazing some CEOs are when they catch this early and provide a balance solution that takes complete care of their employees across the board while keeping the business sustainable IE: Insomniac Games ALWAYS on the best places to work list. The rest of the industry could learn.

jambola3d ago

honestly, the "real" enemy of gaming, is ourselves
if nobody bought horse armor, shitty dlc would have died almost overnight
if we stood firm and nobody bought games from companies that were bad with layoffs, it would be solved
we're the idiots supporting awful business practices, we are the ones enouraging it

TiredGamer2d ago

I think the reality that we don't want to convince ourselves of is that without the rise of "horse armor" and DLC, game budgets would have essentially stagnated (smaller teams/smaller games), or game prices would have risen much more dramatically than they have. There was an incessant drive for bigger worlds, infinite detail, and hundreds of hours of "gameplay" over the last two decades, that while perhaps a natural evolution of things, needed a suitable funding stream to accomplish.

HyperMoused1d 17h ago

What...CEOs make tens of millions and that doesnt include SLT etc etc...we now have multiple editions of games, in game currency, MT's, battle passes.....and what do we get..worse game than what was coming out 20 years ago....dont drink the cool aid, its this nickel and dime crap that is absolutely leading us to gaming destruction.

senorfartcushion2d ago

This is the worst possible answer to this conundrum. Blaming the masses is blaming the only people who are constantly “told” to buy.

Consumers are the only ones not to blame here. People make their own choices all the time. Disney movies are bombing and DEInis being blamed. Has that been enough to put Disney out of business? No and it never will.

Christopher2d ago

Disagree. Businesses are able to do what they do because people are bad consumers and don't think critically about purchases. Disney got away with doing shit stuff for years and it's just the last year where people got tired of it. It's not like it didn't work for 5 years or so for Disney to do the things they've done. They'll just move onto another way to get people to see movies and it will be just as bad but more profitable until people wake up and realize it.

TiredGamer2d ago

Consumerism drives business behavior. It's not so much "blaming" as it is observing behavior. The point I'm making is that the direction that games have gone are driven by the spending. Consumers are spending on DLC and they are driving the expectation of more glitz and padded out (lengthier) games. If they continue to pay, they will continue to drive that direction until a threshold is reached that forces a change in behavior.

senorfartcushion2d ago

Corporate advertising is the most powerful force on the planet.

This is N4G for god sake, every day there are arguments between people who are Team Xbox and Team PlayStation because they’ve been convinced that having an identity built on paying money to Sony and Microsoft matters more than having one as individual gamers who can play whatever they want.

And THEN we get to the corporate advertising part: to play whatever you want is to sink MORE into the advertising pits, making it so that you can more than one specific product.

jambola1d 22h ago

ah you're right
they were told to buy it, it's clearly impossible to avoid that
if enough people stopped supporting, it would stop
disney not stopping would only be because enough people didn't stop

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 22h ago
victorMaje2d ago

Agreed. I’ve been saying for years, announce you won’t be buying the upcoming game because of the practices of the previous game, then you only have to stick to your guns once, see how quickly things change for the better.

We have to unite in what we shouldn’t purchase.

jambola1d 22h ago

just imagine a world, fifa came out worse, nobody buys the next one until they see proof it's better and stick to it
or games being forced online for single player and nobody buys it
things would change so fast

HyperMoused1d 17h ago

Just like scooby doo, you have shown us the real monsters are us

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 17h ago
Inverno2d ago

Greed and greedy people have and always will be the main issue for everything wrong in the world. Everything is a product to be exploited for monetary gain. Even when there are things that could help progress us along for the sake of making our lives easier that thing must be exploited for monetary gains. Anything that tells you otherwise is propaganda to make you complicit.

coolfool2d ago

I've never thought "DEI" (although the way most people use it doesn't match it's real definition) is the problem with games. Good games have continued to be good when they have a diverse cast, and likewise, bad games have continued to be bad. There isn't a credible example I've seen where a diverse cast has been the direct cause of a game being bad.

Show all comments (51)
80°

It Has Been Over 2,500 Days Since The Elder Scrolls 6 Was Revealed

It's been officially over 2,500 days since The Elder Scrolls 6 was revealed, and fans are still waiting for more than a logo and a mountain range.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
jznrpg2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

It will come out in another 1000-2000 days or so. I’d rather they remake Morrowind. After they added quest arrows, sprint button, making stats lesser and the big nerfs to spells Elder Scrolls has been too simplified. They could change that with ES6 but I don’t have much faith in modern Bethesda. I would love to be wrong

clevernickname1d 19h ago

Wait until he hears about Star Citizen...