1020°

Sucker Punch explain why they decided to redesign Cole in inFamous 2

Sucker Punch explain why they decided to change Cole’s look and personality.

Read Full Story >>
examiner.com
YourWrongIAmRight5479d ago ShowReplies(7)
raztad5479d ago

The old Cole was pretty good. I dont remember anyone complaining about him. Dont fix what is broken Sucker Punch.

-Alpha5479d ago (Edited 5479d ago )

I'm fine with the change, it just needs to be explained or transitioned properly. in Infamous 1 he was a pretty average character, no different than a Nathan Hale. He was a typical bald guy with a scruffy voice, and I feel SP wanted to add more personality to him. Whether that's a good thing or bad thing remains to be seen.

I believe they are just trying to make the character more presentable, look at Nathan Drake, there is a guy you can love, he has character. I like to think guys like SP and GG are evolving their characters for the better, and I'd like to think Uncharted played some sort of role.

Akagi5479d ago

More than likely, the facial structure will remain the same to a degree. But they'll change hair, build, size, and maybe even the voice actor.

palaeomerus5479d ago

Just say that when he refused to trigger the ray sphere a second time(make the good ending the official one) he managed to heal a little bit and got his hair back and stuff.

weazel5479d ago

Change can be good, but based on the explanation, this seems like change to maximise 'market share', and anything that's too 'street and self-consciously'target group led ends up sucking a whole heap of dogs ass.
Hopefully they can 'update' the image, whilst maintaining or developing the characters' core identity.
(Fingers crossed, 'cause I loved the first game.)

barom5479d ago

This is dumb. I figured the new redesign was some type of new character. I wouldn't mind a new main character but to say that he is Cole ruined a lot of it for me.

Why do people wish for these "pretty boys". They say dark and gritty but I see weak and coward. Cole looked a lot more raw and dark then this character for sure. These Tom Cruise wannabes should stop. Btw, in case its not obvious I hate Tom Cruise.

El Botto5479d ago (Edited 5479d ago )

He just looks a little older.

He was bold in the first part but I assume that was because the explosion burned all his hair away.

jadenkorri5479d ago

i guarantee this will not go over well, first of all, we know Cole as a average delivery guy given powers, not a skateboarding/extreme sports star. Sucker punch you just sunk to a new low to cater to the masses of people who didn't play your game and middle fingered the people who played Infamous and loved the story.

DARK WITNESS5479d ago

@ lagoonalight

I disagree. I am not really a fan of Infamous but I played and I didn't think much of the character modelling ingame, but Cole was not the problem.

Cole looked cool in my opinion it was most of the other guys that looked lame.

I personally don't like changes like this unless it is something that has a solid explanation within the context of the story.

I think I need to see the character modelling in game, but as for the art cover. na, I don't like it..prefer the old Cole.

HammockGames5479d ago (Edited 5479d ago )

The old Cole had an edge to him, and it had nothing to do with a manicure.

The new design looks like a metrosexual who got lit up when his electrolysis treatment went horribly, horribly wrong. NOT what I'm looking for in my gaming.

rockleex5479d ago

He was also very bitter, or at least that's how it seemed.

But he's had a lot of time to grow and become accustomed to the changes that he's been through.

He now looks a lot more confident in himself, his skills, and abilities.

As a person changes internally, those changes also show through externally. It just takes some time.

For example, as a teenager, I loved American Eagle & Aeropostale clothes because it expressed my character. But these days I love looking more classy with plaid shirts and flannels.

DaTruth5479d ago (Edited 5479d ago )

The original Cole(Kessler) had long hair. It is not a leap to believe that any Cole from another timeline could be different.

You guys are not thinking quantum mechanically, which is really what this games story is about!

If you wanted to assure that Cole would become a hero and fight the beast, it would make sense to go back to an earlier time and set him up as a hero prior to the explosion!

There are millions of possibilities why Cole could be different in InFamous 2!

jadenkorri5479d ago

im not minding the updated look, just not the character characteristic change from an average person to an extreme sports star, like cmon, Cole was not that before, just a regular delivery person, it would be like watching spiderman 1 with Tobey Maquire, then spiderman 2 with Christian Bale as spiderman/parker. Its just wouldn't match the character of spiderman in general.

DaTruth5479d ago

Please go back and play the game, in his memories when he was escaping he had long hair!

Marceles5478d ago

The new Cole looks like he should be on the Fantastic 4 now...and no thats not a good thing

ThanatosDMC5478d ago

Something about the beard/mustache pisses me off. Seems like he'll pick up little boys when he can or like he's from a boy band.

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 5478d ago
hay5479d ago (Edited 5479d ago )

@raztad: Agreed. I liked Cole. He was a bit too much with his voice and attitude at times, but nobody's perfect. I don't like, on the other hand, his new face if the concept art is true.

Gamingisfornerds5479d ago (Edited 5479d ago )

They can fix his awful animations. I've never seen a videogame character move (and especially run) so awkward!

barom5479d ago

no? play Alan Wake.

inFamous is a bit static at times but it has a little bit of fluidity at times. Alan Wake's is very robotic.

Gamingisfornerds5479d ago (Edited 5479d ago )

Yes, Alan Wake's animations are also laughable. Probably a close second after Cole.

And it's not really about fluidity or not. It's about the fact that Cole moves and runs like a complete retard. His stances are also very disturbing. I really can't understand what the hell the team responsible for the animations were thinking?!

40cal5479d ago

Cole's model and animations are some of the best to date, he seamlessly moves from position to position, like jumping off the building into a human bomb then two, three, four? kicks/ punches into a a dozen balls of lightning, hell throw some jumps back flips and rolls in there to for good measure, Yep seamless.

What game where you playing?

Gamingisfornerds5478d ago

So he moves seamlessly from one crappy animation to another? Impressive, lol.

I'm not playing any game atm, just finished..oh wait, you were being sarcastic. That's pretty clever of you, kudos! ;)

Eamon5478d ago

loool, yes Cole's animations are pretty nice and fluid.

But he feel like he was moving like a retard.

Can't wait for infamous 2!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5478d ago
gtamike5479d ago ShowReplies(2)
Tomdc5479d ago

i think a personality change is a cool idea but i prefer the look of the old one

raztad5479d ago

"Dont fix what is NOT broken Sucker Punch." Fixed.

I would like them to improve game image quality introducing MLAA and using higher res in-game models. Animations dont concern me because they look funny, it's like the game isn't taking itself too seriously.

chazjamie5479d ago

i bet u thats not even cole. doesnt even look like him. looks like a gay version of adam lambert if you ask me

LordMarius5479d ago

wtf, you people are retarded, the other Cole was the ugliest character I ever seen, freaking albino. Thank you Sucker Punch, more appealing and mainstream FTW

beardtm5479d ago

Infamous for me was the best game on the ps3. Looking forward to the sequel but to change the main character to be a more extreme sports or similar to nathan drake? Please no. I mean who actually likes those people? Uncharted was a Good game spoiled by a wee cocky shit head of a main character."woo yeah rock on" seriously!? Does anyone actually talknlike that? And if they do, do they know that they are a gimp?

Simon_Brezhnev5479d ago (Edited 5479d ago )

Yeah i dislike the change to i sure hope they let u choose the urban look. There are hardly any urban characters in games today.

darkdoom30005479d ago

Cole from infamous 1 looked too generic, if you saw a picture of his face you would easily mistake it for a random space marines.

his new look looks... odd, but anything to differentiate him is fine with me.

Christopher5479d ago (Edited 5479d ago )

The one complaint I remember about the old Cole, and tons of people in reviews complained about it, was his voice. I personally had no issue with it, but look at a lot of the old reviews and more than half of them made fun of it.

Though, if you played the whole game, you would see that 'change' really isn't an issue for continuity. Just depends on the type of change. I do expect him to let go of his old job of being a courier in the upcoming games, though, when it comes to his choice in wardrobe.

Davoh5479d ago

The main difference is a little bit of hair, not really much, as long as there's more electric attacks I'll be happy =)

wicko5479d ago

I don't really care either way. His character in the first game didn't bother me at all, but I'm not incredibly attached to it either.

mastiffchild5479d ago

Nah, nah, nah , nah. Nah. I'm fine with devs doing what they like-it's their plaything for gods sake but, tbh, that's because I don't assume I'll like every game I play yet when someone has bothered with what was a decent story(for the most part) in the first gamew I feel they're missing a trick by changing someone their core audience already relates to or understands. Cole's also meant to be a bit of an everyman. Y'know, he wasn't a big star of any kind, had few pretensions and the fact his parkour skills were put down more to him having them more as part of his job rather than being some extreme show off made him easier for most people to understand.

Maybe I have an issue with the word "extreme" as whenever I hear it all I see is Bam Effin Margera and his inbred family of walrus men. Christ, that guy makes me so ashamed to be a former skater that these days I wouldn't dream of admitting it and only even play Skate in the wee small hours where my kids can't tell. Anyway, point is I fear this is a lot of marketing led BS rather than something that fits an EXISTING character. I mean they seem to want to make him a bit more approachable and lighthearted but he's been thrust into this nonsense and seen a host of people he knows(and more he didn't)die horrible deaths. Christ, his GF died and he knows an even bigger evil is on the way! What in the world has he got to be more chipper about? It just seems like a bad design choice to me-simple as that.

I suppose, for gamers, it'll boil down to whether you liked the original game and the first design for Cole as to how you see this new one-if you liked him you might well need, like me, some convincing beyond what sounds like shallow market share seeking mouth grease. Idon't seethe need for the direction, I don't see any sense at all in the direction and why do they think more of us will relate to someone who was into the danger(and was EXTREME) beforehand? The whole hook was that he didn't choose this and people were suspicious of him on top of his confusion-he needed a dark edge and I fail to see how he would possibly have cheered up a great deal following the events and reveal in the first game.

So, yeah, it's up to them and all but I really question the wisdom of how and especially why(I suspect) they're doing this. Doesn't anyone remember the gruesome Emo BS we suffered when PoP tried to get some cred? Well, this is a similar worry and one that had alarms in my mind ringing as soon as the two words "street" and "extreme" were used. When I noticed "extreme sports star" I really started worrying as Ijust don't believe many game devs are "street",would know it if it bit their arse and find it even more mindblowing that they don't realise anyone who they might regard as "street" would never be heard dead using the word in the way they just have! Let alone thinking they could understand anything "extreme"!

Whatever, I stand here ready to be proved wrong and, hey, we can't love everything we play but I've just started really thinking they may be messing this right up. I'm all for change IF it's needed and if it's good but this just doesn't make a great deal, if it makes any, sense at all to me. I just hope that I'm wrong or they decide to change tack again.Also, I think the new Cole looks bloody cheesy.

Heisenberg5479d ago (Edited 5479d ago )

The old Cole looked more badåss... I'd rather a grumpy badåss than a snarky douche. Hopefully they pull it off though, it's too good a series to fück up the main character. But where do they come up with Tony Hawk as an example of some one gritty, or street. The guy is a rich, skinny little white boy... not that there's anything wrong with that per se, but...

Please, don't turn Cole into a wise cracking, high fiving skater boy with a ton of lame one liners. Keep the character dark and somewhat quiet, the kinda guy you wouldn't wanna fück with.

LethalChickens5479d ago

The new cole looks much better. Evil new cole will probably look like old cole.

Ven10005479d ago

I'm sure when it's all said and done both good and bad cole will look badass. And the gameplay will be great too!

mellowyellow5479d ago

What if this isn't the old Cole. Maybe it's the older Cole, Kessler. The best way for this to work, imo, is to give us that Cole for a prequel-esque game to flesh out that alternate universe.Then end it setting us up so that both Coles, not Cole and Kessler, find themselves in the same universe and ready to fight that evil person that killed Kessler's family together in a third game to finish off a trilogy. That way you piss nobody off and you're set up for what would be a pretty kickass game. /end wishful thinking

nan05479d ago

Are they serious? If he looks like this I'm not even buying it. Everybody is trying to tip off of UNCHARTED's sucess.

It didn't succeed because the main character was a wuss with balls that would only drop in certain situations. It succeeded because it was original and different. I don't want no ghetto ass rapping, raping, sports shit. They're probably aiming it towards kids now.

This better be a joke.

P.S. Kessler was bald too.

Downtown boogey5479d ago (Edited 5479d ago )

I absolutely disagree! Cole was a hideous character though the game was otherwise excellent. Good job taking note Sucker Punch!

EDIT:
Wait, what... They made him MORE GRUMPY???!!! My dear, dear lord...

FACTUAL evidence5478d ago

Why would you change the old cole? He was cool, laid back, and smart. I'm going to honestly say i am disappointed. What's next? Going to turn sly cooper into a groundhog?

aaronisbla5478d ago

they never said he is a extreme sports star. They only compared him to those guys in terms of the stuff he is capable of since he could climb like that before he got his powers. He still is the cole that delivered packages for a living

avengers19785478d ago

I was a huge fan of Cole and don't think they needed to change him. It's one thing to change the look, but don't change the personality.
So what's next completely redo the gameplay, through out the old story. Now i'm not sure if Infamous 2 will be as good as one.

Immortal3215478d ago

cole aged and matured little bit, and got himself a new outfit.

+ Show (19) more repliesLast reply 5478d ago
Rucury5479d ago

"more appealing, more compelling..."
He was pretty cool, in my opinion.

The only thing I hope they fix is the voice-sync. For some reason I always saw the characters in horrible sync with their voice actors... I don't know if anyone else noticed.

bym051d5479d ago

Why mess with what's not broken? The original Cole was pretty cool.

twostep185479d ago

yea im scared they are gunna mess this up with a "new cole"
i mean they are comparing the new him to travis pastrana, and tony hawk
hes gunna end up being a dude bro =/

Show all comments (137)
100°

Infamous Franchise Deserves Another Chance From PlayStation

Sucker Punch rejuvenated the superhero genre with Infamous, a series that focused on the pure fun of wielding destructive powers.

Read Full Story >>
tech4gamers.com
shinoff2183349d ago

Atleast release a remaster trilogy or something to gage interest. I'd buy it. With that said I'm pretty over superheroes at this point. Infamous is still dope as fk though so it'd be a buy

isarai348d ago

Omfg i would go apesh!t for that 😩

jznrpg349d ago

I agree but games take 4-6 years to make so who knows when they would do it? After Ghost of Tsushima2? They could have something else in the world as well in early production who knows.

mkis007349d ago

It's a shame Sucker Punch finally figured out a good open world formula only while making Ghost of Tsushima. Infamous 1 and 2 were great for their time, but Second son felt too much like a checklist in It's design. I love the hell out of all 3 games (2 and 3 are just so damn good, while 1 shows it's age and the ps3 struggles), but I would love to see how they would do another infamous with all they have learned. Wouldn't hurt to release a remastered collection either.

Demetrius348d ago (Edited 348d ago )

This series, days gone, will continue to get ignored by sony, luckily we still have the horizon series, sly cooper not getting pushed anymore, speaking of that I'm bout to get on my ps2 and play some sly 2 anyways lol, but seriously I never woulda thought back then sony would ever cold shoulder most of their franchises I'm actually surprised they're still letting ratchet&clank be around

Show all comments (8)
230°

The inFamous games deserve more love from Sony

The inFamous games are an important part of PlayStation history, but the series is in limbo and playing older entries isn't exactly easy.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
LucasRuinedChildhood474d ago (Edited 474d ago )

Would like remasters of 1 and 2. I enjoyed them much more than Second Son.

1 & 2 had more of an emphasis on climbing and the traversal requires a bit more effort in a good way. It was rewarding. Second Son made climbing mostly obsolete so they put little effort into it. The traversal was just great in inFamous 1 & 2. There's a reason Sunset Overdrive copied and improved upon the induction grind mechanic.

Reminds me of how I felt about the decline of parkour and the well designed tombs (basically Prince Of Persia levels) that we saw in the Assassin's Creed games.

The story and atmosphere were also much better in 1 & 2.

Electricity is just a brilliant superpower for an open world city. It perfectly fits just like webslinging does in New York and it has many applications.

Cacabunga474d ago

For sure.. one of my favorite Sony licenses

Shane Kim474d ago

Loved one and two. I actually liked the story as well.

Minute Man 721474d ago

The standalone DLC was a sweet

jznrpg474d ago (Edited 474d ago )

I enjoyed Second Son but it was too short. The first 2 were great though

-Foxtrot474d ago

Second Son was alright but didn't touch the first two games

It felt short and lacking in comparison

Also I really thought Reggie would have made a better protagonist, someone who is anti-conduit as much as him and ends up becoming one would have been interesting to see. I kind of enjoyed his character throughout the game as his development.

badz149474d ago

why is it right now, the thing I want the most from Sony is to release remasters of inFamous (1,2 & SS), KZ (1,2 & 3), Resistance (RFoM, 2 and 3) and Motorstorm (1,2 & 3)??

The_Hooligan473d ago

All great choices. I would like to add Warhawk/Starhawk to that. The multiplayer in Warhawk was amazing. I am surprised Sony hasn't looked into MAG either. That game was ahead of its time.

Maybe Sony should make an internal studio like Bluepoint games and all they do is remake/remaster these amazing games, even going back to PS1,PS2,PSP, Vita portfolio. And because of the recent articles suggesting cost cutting, budget issues and releasing more games on PC, they could do that with these remakes/remasters. Do a day one on PC and PS5. At the end of the day Sony or any other company is going to do what makes them the most money.

Kiryu1992473d ago

Would love a remastered collection on PS5/PC

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 473d ago
kpgs474d ago

Wouldn't the onus be on the consumers? If they bought the Infamous games, then we'd have more games from that series.

KwietStorm_BLM474d ago

Infamous has sold millions of units. People have been asking for more. They aren't interested. Just like people have been asking for more Resistance or even a remaster collection, but insomniac isn't revisiting that either. Likely never getting a new sequel since they're a Marvel studio now.

LucasRuinedChildhood474d ago (Edited 474d ago )

No. Infamous was successful. But after a few entries (which are taking longer to make these days) a lot of Sony studios move on to new IPs. That's not a bad thing at all. They don't need to make inFamous games forever, just like we didn't need new Sly Cooper games forever.

But people would like to be able to easily play them on current hardware which is reasonable. Same for Killzone, Resistance, MGS4, etc. Good games shouldn't be trapped on old hardware. It's good that Bluepoint ported Uncharted 1-3.

kpgs474d ago

I'm not saying it wasn't successful. I enjoyed playing all 3 entries and DLC. But like you said, people move on, studios move on. But I don't think I've heard people asking for more Infamous in a long time.

Profchaos474d ago

The franchise was popular we got quite a few games but Suchet punch wanted to beach out I think that's why we got ghost of Tsushima over infamous 4

Tbh ghost is a fantastic game I'm not complaining about that but I'd love to see infamous handled by another team

jznrpg474d ago

Id take GoT2 over Infamous right now but after GoT2 or maybe 3 if they go trilogy I’d like a new Infamous.

badz149473d ago

that's the problem with Sony that puzzles me A LOT! they have studios specifically specialized in remastering and remaking old games for new gen hardware, but we are getting very few of them. SoTC, Uncharted collections, Demon's Souls Remake, TLoU Part 1...and?? that's it? why aren't they giving their old games new lease of life on the PS5 for the new generations of gamers to enjoy? they clearly have the expertise. for god sake, I can even accept lazy porting like Nintendo are doing for theirs if I have to.

FinalFantasyFanatic473d ago

There are a lot of games that consumers have been asking Playstation for, Playstation won't do it, so a lot of these developers have gone and made it themselves by any means possible such as Kickstarter (e.g. Armed Fantasia, Penny Blood, Ratatan, 100 Heroes, ect...). Developers have even asked if Sony could help them out with porting/remasters some of these older games for Playstation, they said no.

Crows90473d ago (Edited 473d ago )

Um...dude like you say that as if nobody bought them....the devs went on to do ghosts after 3 infamous games....3

People ask for new resistance and new infamous at every moment where it makes sense to mention it.

Having a remake of 1 and 2 would be very welcomed I'm sure.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 473d ago
chicken_in_the_corn474d ago

I would love to see a new game but a feel that would get a response similar to Saints Row.

TravsVoid474d ago (Edited 474d ago )

If they keep any of the characters from the previous games I think it would do fine unlike Saints Row which decided to replace fan favorites with less likable replacements. I wouldn't be surprised if that decision caused a majority of their buyers to be new to the series rather than returning players. I will say though, if Infamous Second Son or the first two Infamous games were remade I would be a day one buyer on PC.

ocelot07474d ago

Loved all 3 of them. I couldn't get on with the vampire spin off though. Wish they didn't move away from cole but I didn't mind the other character.

DefenderOfDoom2474d ago

Loved 1 and 2 , would definitely love a new INFAMOUS single player campaign.

Show all comments (39)
310°

Nixxes Software Can't Go Wrong With An Infamous Remaster

Nixxes' Remaster focus could set the stage to resurrect many obscure titles like the karma-centered, superpower-fueled sandbox of Infamous.

maniacmayhem691d ago

Infamous remaster? How about an Infamous re-Boot! This is one game that doesn't need a remaster, it needs either a proper equal of a reboot of the original. And since Sony is currently in development with Marvel, i can totally see them having guest marvel characters to appear in Cole's world.

BanginTunes690d ago

This is one of the worst things I have ever read

1Victor689d ago

I would prefer Warhawk or Starhawk ether or both will keep us fans happy for a looooooooong time

The_Hooligan689d ago

Warhawk would be awesome! So many good memories playing that game on PS3. They could do a massive 50v50 mode, battle royal with last Warhawk standing, classic 20v20 mode, so many options.

shinoff2183689d ago

I'd rather infamous. Sonys got enough online bs in the pipeline. No need to add more.

1Victor689d ago

@shinoff I disagree with you both of those games was extraordinarily fun to play just the satisfaction of transforming your plane into a bot and stomp a enemy then transform and fly off on Starhawk was a experience that hasn’t been replicated since.
The game was extremely valanced to the point you could go against a tank on foot and win with the ratchet or 1 shot a plane doing a massive attack with your tank. In Warhawk you could pick up half your team and fly them to a base and take it over but those are experiences you had to play to know how awesome those game was even YouTube videos don’t do justice to those game.
Anyways I’ll stop here or I’ll run out of words to post a wall text taking about those games

Christopher689d ago

Here's the thing, infamous and *hawk are such different games and with different audiences that Sony could... do both at the same time? Nixxes doesn't need to be involved in the shooter (that would be new for them I think since they usually do SP games) but someone else could and Nixxes could share support with development/engine needs.

shinoff2183689d ago

1victor

Ya know Christopher is right they are completly different games. Me personally I don't value online games I just don't care for them. Hell in another bubble I probably enjoy them. In this bubble nah I just prefer single player unless I'm playing Mario or Mario party with my girl and kids or something.

1Victor688d ago

@shin of course I know Chris is right but the games have to be approved first before assignment to a studio I didn’t mean this studio in particular making those game I meant the approval process and Sony harder push on MMO games.
I’m just one of the millions of players that loved those game and a top 800 word wide ranked on Starhawk and proud owner of its platinum trophy

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 688d ago
DankSinatra689d ago

A remaster would allow people who don't have access to a ps3 to experience the game since there's so many stuck on the ps3 that are exclusive to the console and Sony refuses to invest in backwards compatibility

darthv72689d ago

Who doesnt have access to a ps3? There were over 87m of them sold. They are cheap and easy to find. Just like wii and ps2.

shinoff2183689d ago

Or maybe it's just not ready yet, ps3 was a different kinda animal.

DankSinatra689d ago

@darthv72

Not everyone is willing to go out and buy a ps3 for a single game or a handful of games when they have a ps4 or a ps5. A port or remaster would actually help. Younger audiences who did not grow up with a ps3 would have exposure to these games that Sony has essentially left behind on the ps3 due to them not investing in backwards compatibility. If they would do backwards compatibility then we wouldn't need to shill out more money for the same games. Something I actually applaud microsoft for (the only thing they have done that's good).

zaanan689d ago

Agree, and PS3 is getting long in the tooth, so failure rates will be going up. I had to send my slim in for repair years ago.

shinoff2183689d ago

I had a couple extra dollars and came across I guy selling ps3s for 50. I bought all 4. Just felt it was a good deal. Now if I could find controllers. I swear I can't find any cheap controllers around me

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 689d ago
jeromeface689d ago

go back to marvel avengers, sounds like more your cup of tea

KwietStorm_BLM689d ago

You know what, now that I think about it.. yeah none of that makes any sense.

TheKingKratos689d ago (Edited 689d ago )

Lol 😂😂😂

Christopher689d ago

Yes to a reboot, absolutely no to Marvel characters in it.

maniacmayhem689d ago

*either a proper equal of a reboot of the original. *

Damn, there needs to be an extension on the Edit feature.

"Either a proper sequel or a reboot of the original"

And people aren't with Cole interacting with cameos from Marvel? Especially with Sony making Spider Man and Wolverine?

Why exactly would that be a bad idea? Especially with the multiverse being a huge deal and all.

Christopher689d ago

***Why exactly would that be a bad idea? Especially with the multiverse being a huge deal and all.***

There's enough Marvel. Let's not spread it everywhere and let other IPs be their own thing. Please.

neutralgamer1992689d ago

Infamous 1-2 collection would be amazing on current generation. God of War 1-2 and PSP games also playable on PS5 Yes please. And last but not least MGS4

There are so many great games which are on PS3. We need them to be remastered and released for current generation.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 688d ago
GoodGuy09691d ago

Idk why sony hasn't done remasters for 1+2 yet. Such great gems.

RaidenBlack691d ago

I'd like a Killzone 2 Remaster.
Keep the visuals style as is ... just improve the LoD and the resolution

ArchangelMike689d ago

Now that COD is in Microsofts back pocket, it's time for Sony to start investing in it's own 1st party shooters. I loved Killzone - even Shadowfall. But Yeah Killzone 2 was the high point of the Franchise.

ClayRules2012689d ago

Yes. KZ2 was the high point of the franchise and a strong, solid and just bloody fantastic shooter! Had so much fun those days with the game.

Neonridr689d ago (Edited 689d ago )

Shadowfall was my first introduction into the series as the PS4 was my first Sony console. Maybe compared to the others it was not great (personally I don't know), but I had a blast playing it and found it quite enjoyable. I'd love a Trilogy Remaster though so I could go back and enjoy the original 3 for the first time (with a new coat of paint + updated controls)

shinoff2183689d ago

Naw were good. There's plenty in the sea

zaanan689d ago

It’s about damn time for a Resistance trilogy remaster!

long-time-gamer689d ago

Most def the highest point of the franchise, the music, gameplay and story was awesome

ironmonkey689d ago

absolutely right! killzone has been quiet long enough since ps4 release date.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 689d ago
long-time-gamer689d ago

man id love a killzone 2 remaster, its one of my favorite games of all time, but who knows what shape that code in and where its at, prob wont happen under jim ryan though! you can keep your fingers crossed though and see what happens but GG is all about Horizon now

Vits690d ago

There is a lot of the PS3 era that I would love to see ported/remastered. But, unfortunately, they are probably not commercially viable and I have no idea who owns the rights currently. Stuff like Sire: Blood Curse, White Knight Chronicles, Tokyo Jungle, Folklore, etc.

Infamous on the other hand was never a series that I found good or interesting. Especially when compared with other contemporaries like Prototype. But, given how bare the subgenre is right now, I would dig a remaster.

BehindTheRows689d ago

Sony owns Siren. I can’t speak for the rest.

As for inFAMOUS vs Prototype, I feel the opposite. inFAMOUS mopped the floor with it, quality and gameplay. Just felt far more polished. That said, I enjoyed Prototype’s powers a little more.

Vits689d ago

Fair enough, I agree that the production values of inFamous were higher. But I found it to be a snore-fest.

darthv72689d ago

...no meed. Sony could add ps3 support to the 5 and then people can play loads of games already available. No streaming required. Rpcs3 could be adapted to run on the 5... it would solve so many problems.

Vits689d ago

No need, because they instead could do these two other things that they have shown no interest in doing? Sure.

Shane Kim689d ago

But then they couldnt charge you for remaster (even though I would love one for infamous) or charge you for PSN premium.

darthv72689d ago

It would be even funnier if the series x gets rpcs3 support and can play the ps3 games while ps5 still cannot (not without streaming them)

shinoff2183689d ago

Don't most people still have issues with rpcs3. It's not as stable as alot of emulators out there. From what I've read

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 689d ago
zaanan689d ago

My kids and I had a fun time in Tokyo Jungle!

long-time-gamer689d ago

prototype def was not on the same level as infamous far as gameplay or graphics

Pocahontas688d ago

It was legitimately bad game.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 688d ago
isarai690d ago

Infamous, Resistance, and killzine are so ripe for a remaster, I wish Sony would make it happen.

Show all comments (74)