Guardian writes: "There are few better ways to boost awareness of a major game release than to generate some sort of media controversy around the title. Mortal Kombat probably didn't need such gory fatalities. Carmageddon probably didn't need quite that much blood. Last Autumn's Modern Warfare 2 certainly could have managed without the preposterous and unnecessary 'No Russian' airport mission."
Rockstar Games’ shiny new Red Dead Redemption port is now on GTA+, and you can play it while claiming some tasty GTA Online benefits.
Rockstar still strying to make GTA plus work
Should be $6 for the rdr game on sale not 6 bucks for a months playtime
One of my favorite games from PS3 generation. I have the remaster as there was a buy 2 get 1 free deal a while back but the price they are charging for the port is way too high although not surprising at all.
Improvements have been made to the stability of the game
I still think this release was a big waste of time. I would have been a day 1 purchaser if they had redone the game w RDR2 graphics. I still own my PS3 copy, so don't see the point in picking this up if it's minimally improved.
They should have released the game in its current state not the state it launched in. Obvious we all wanted this to be a expansion to rdr 2 given that the original map was already remade in the game lots of people though this was just going to be added in later as paid DLC.
Now the game runs at 4k 60 fps on ps5 and can be brought on sale it's actually worth playing.
At launch the game was priced far to high and was a ps360 era game that couldn't run at 60 fps.
I'm in no way a frame rate snob I defended games like tears of the kingdom in the past for being 30 fps experiences but rdr was a joke at launch
Red Dead Redemption II got an award for its continued support, despite barely receiving any updates since 2021
Troll /trōl/ verb
"fish by trailing a baited line along behind a boat.
gerund or present participle: trolling"
Example: Kotaku got trolled because they gobbled up the bait so quickly. They didn't pause and consider that the juicy bait might be a trap.
''.....while there’s fun and value to be had romping around Bethesda’s 1,000-planet-rich galaxy''
Did we play the same Starfield?
Do uh what’s up with Kotaku being so out of the mix like someone’s grandparent?
if people dont like something dont buy it. if you dont buy it you never have to witness the things that offend you.
in other news today
Jack Arnott story failed on n4g
not only is it an opinion piece but one no one cares about...
I will always buy every game made by Rockstar Games!
Every single game they release to this world is a priceless gem :)
All of this talk about 'didn't need this or that' is kind of annoying from an artistic perspective.
- Did Da Vinci need to represent male genitalia in his Vitruvian Man?
- Did Coppola need to show a life-like horse head in Woltz's bed?
- Did Burgess need to be descriptive with the drug use and violent acts described in A Clockwork Orange?
Whether someone thinks something is overboard or not, there is no clear identification of should or should not when it comes to art. I don't question a person's desire to present their work in one way or another, I only use my own opinion of the manner in which it is used to either continue playing/watching/reading what they've created.
it had a good story and the end was epic.but cos ppl want to find a quick way to get money and say there 'offend' i say bullocks sell the game then stfu end of.