450°

Why Insomniac's Move Is No PlayStation Panic

Insomniac Games, makers of Ratchet & Clank and Resistance are, as of today, no longer a weapon for PlayStation fans to wield when arguing about which console is the best. The studio is making Xbox360 games now too. But PlayStation and Insomniac fans, history says you shouldn't panic.

deadreckoning6665095d ago (Edited 5095d ago )

Why would anyone thk itd be a Playstation Panic? I don't remember Insomiac saying they were going to STOP making games for the PS3.

"Insomniac Games, makers of Ratchet & Clank and Resistance are, as of today, no longer a weapon for PlayStation fans to wield when arguing about which console is the best."

*sigh* Apparently this is just another fanboy article for hits.

D4RkNIKON5095d ago

Wait for it.. Darkmurder is coming to have a troll parade in this article.

BldyShdw5095d ago (Edited 5095d ago )

It"ll say something like. "Just a matter of time before all ps3 devs come to THE POWER OF THE MICROSOFT XBOX 360"

idk lol

Anarki5095d ago

People are worried incase they start making less quality games due to multiplatform.

They're a good developer and I just hope EA and xbox do not hinder their performance in anyway.

badz1495095d ago

WHAT THE HELL? it's a deal of 1 game, Insomniac retains the IP rights and it's coming to the PS3 as well! PS3 gamers will now have another IP from Insomniac as the addition to R&C and Resistance! how's THAT a panic?? stupid journalism is STUPID!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5095d ago
sikbeta5095d ago (Edited 5095d ago )

"Why Insomniac's Move Is No PlayStation Panic"

1· IG making a Deal with EA for 1 [ONE] IP and MULTIPLAT, Sony lose something with this Game that is Multiplat?

NO! cos It'll be for PS3 and x360

2· They're not Moving anywhere, IG have 2 teams Now, 1 can Make Multiplat Games and the Other still making PS3 Games

SnuggleBandit5095d ago

well i can think of 21 other reasons if ya guys catch my drift

Tomdc5095d ago

Correction ONE multiplatform IP they said. I love insomniac and I am not to bothered about this. at all really :)

I would like to see what new IP they come up with. Hopefully a couple will be emerging from them soon as they have 2 studios now!

So at E3 there will be resistance 3 hopefully returning to the roots of R1 rather than the sequel and potentially a new IP!!! yay!

niceguywii605095d ago (Edited 5095d ago )

Yet there are more damage control articles defending Sony than there were articles about Bungie hurting Microsoft with the multi platform move lol.

One game for now as they wait and see if the 360 base welcomes their work.

theunleashed645095d ago

yet i recall ps3 fans are very much welcoming this news not one
article have i seen a ps3 fan bash insomniac for going multiplatform
compared to the 360 or halo fanboy's meltdowns at their forums so
you ask me which is the worser damage control? the bungie news and you
see why you have one bubble also sony didn't state anything damage control like microsoft's statement some pathetic troll you turn out to
be.

IHateYouFanboys5095d ago

Correction - this is the START of them making multiplatform games. they said they work on a game by game basis, and you can be damn sure that every game they make from now on on that ISNT ratchet/resistance will be multiplatform.

its NOT just going to be a single game on 360 then back to Playstations exclusively.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5095d ago
blizzard_cool5095d ago

Well I'm not surprised by their move. They never went 1st party because they wanted to be able to do their own stuff how they want ( correct me if I'm wrong )

They're still fucking awesome so no worry.

ApocalypseShadow5095d ago

they were not owned by sony,but never made multiplatform games.but were free to do so.

no playstation franchise is leaving.

they still will make playstation games

any multiplatform game still comes to ps3.

they still stand for quality and won awards for company treatment of employees.

as a company not owned by sony,they need money.and want to reach a larger audience.personally,if you make an awesome hit game,it would have had the same effect.more like a mario game that reaches casuals as well.but oh well.their choice.

wonder what they are working on?

NightVyper5095d ago

@shaka
that's just stupid... I mean that might be one of the stupidest fanboy statements I have read in a while. I have feeling you don't get laid much.

PiTCHBLaCK5095d ago

What does this mean? anyone know? "Fake Sony spokesperson Kevin Butler will no longer be able to drop Insomniac's studio name as part of his fake talking points."

RememberThe3575095d ago (Edited 5095d ago )

So even though I am concerned and convinced that hey will eventually focus more on their own IPs, I think this is great news for gamers in general.

I have to wonder if Resistance 2 and A Crack in Time would have sold more if they would feel the need to make this move. Well, no use looking back when everyone else is looking forward.

Cajun Chicken5095d ago

I'm happy they're still going to work on Ratchet. The Ratchet series have been great through and through. They're like Sony's Mario now.

RememberThe3575095d ago

I really think the Sony needs to push the Ratchet games more. They are so good and there are a lot of people not getting their hands on them.

NightVyper5094d ago

I have a feeling this will be a try it and see. if it works out and most likely will they will start focusing on Multiplats but they if they fail they have sony to run home to. if i were them I would do it the risk and reward are certainly there while not really betting the farm.

Show all comments (74)
120°

Report: Marvel's Spider-Man 2 Villain DLC Spotted in Debug Menu

Marvel's Spider-Man villain DLC potentially spotted via the debug menu that surfaced from the New Game+ title update released recently.

60°

Video Game Leaks Suck For Everyone, Gamers Included

Ahmed from eXputer writes "Video game leaks have become a major cause of concern for Triple-A studios, as they're becoming increasingly malicious and dangerous."

240°

Adding First-Party Games to PS Plus Negatively Impacts Sales, Sony Data Confirms

In a leaked Sony Interactive Entertainment presentation, the company declares that including first-party games on PS Plus has had a “big” effect on “traditional sales.” As an example, the company mentioned that Horizon Forbidden West‘s sales “flat-lined” immediately after being added to PS Plus.

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
XiNatsuDragnel135d ago

That's smart Sony knows what's up with that.

Reaper22_133d ago

They are just stating the obvious. Of course a game is not gonna sell as much when gamers can get it for a fraction of the cost because of subscription service. On the other hand, a subscription service can extend the life of a game by making it available to gamers who want to play it but not necessarily willing to pay full price.

What works for Microsoft doesn't necessarily have to work for Sony and vice-versa. I'm glad we have some variety. Personally, I don't want 2 consoles who are doing the exact same thing.

Crows90133d ago

Price cuts do the same thing your describing. Subscriptions aren't bringing anything new to the table.

Crows90133d ago

It's not that smart. In fact...it's not smart at all. A dumbass could figure that out. If you give a game for free or for peanuts...why would anyone pay a lot for it instead?

It's like if you had the whopper menu at 7.99 and then the whopper menu at 1.99
Same damn whopper! What item you think most will choose?

The only ones that will choose 7.99 option are those oblivious to the 1.99 option.

Hedstrom133d ago (Edited 133d ago )

Yea! And to make more money if you are selling the 1.99 whooper you will have to lower the quality and make the ingredients as cheap as possible and take away the sallad and cheese. But you could pay extra to get that.

proudly_X134d ago

Clank was profitable after all

DarkZane134d ago

Would have been a lot worst if it was on PS Plus day one.

FIELDMARSHALL_P133d ago

How much does Sony or Xbox pay the devolpers to put the games on the services? Do they take that into account for profit, I don't know just asking. If we pay for online giving out some games is cool either platform. The companies must think it helps in some sort of capacity for accepting the deal I would think.

purple101134d ago

Oh dam
I even commented on someone who said it wasn’t.

Load of hallabaloo on the site indeed

REDGUM134d ago

To add to you're point, this is what I don't understand about the MS subscription service. If you're getting all the day one released games for next to nothing by using thier service how on earth are the developers supposed to make enough money back to create their next game/s?
Myself, and I might be of the few, but I prefer to purchase a game from a store or digital store at the recommended price, or wait for a discount if not completely sold on what I've seen of a game so far and get what I paid for than pay monthly, yearly etc subscription & get everything while the games themselves become less in all aspects due to less funds/resources. (Not sure if I've explained that properly or not)
If every company goes down the subscription based path in the future I see gaming overall dying to some degree for the non diehards I mean. Putting up older games etc that are inc in the service fees I agree with but not day one releases. Again, just an opinion.

Hedstrom133d ago

@REDGUM
You lower the quality of the games to make the process of making them as cheap as possible. You make them like f2p games with season passes and microtransactions. And over time you will make subscription more and more expensive.

BlackCountryBob134d ago

Also really interesting to see through to one of the sites they link to (Resetera) that the 2 cross gen titles in Miles Morales and Ghosts of Tsushima sold over 40% each of their first year in year 2, almost double what even the best performing games like GOW 2018 and Spider-Man did. Kinda seeing the cold hard numbers makes it really clear why they did cross gen games and remastered some of the later PS4 games to PS5 Directors Cuts.

Glemt134d ago

"“In year 1, Horizon Zero Dawn and Horizon Forbidden West were very comparable,” the presentation reads. “HFW was included into PS Plus at the start of Year 2. HFW saw an enormous influx of PS Plus players, but at the cost of flat-lining the game activations from retail sales.”"

So, the data shows there were fewer traditional sales, but it doesn't show us anything about how many people joined PS+? It does say there was an influx of HFW players, but it doesn't state how many of these players owned PS+ to begin with.

To conclude that it negatively sales is correct, but it doesn't mean less money is made. We cannot draw that conclusion until we know how many more people joined PS+ because of HFW.

mkis007134d ago

Well each ps plus account is only good for what? $15 per month max if they go monthly? There are a lot of reasons why even if a million new signups happened loosing out on the $60 gamesales is a worse.

Glemt134d ago

I think that's a good assumption, but that's what I was referring to. It's an assumption. If someone comes with hard data, we need the complete picture. The way it sits now we might draw the right conclusions, but we've proven nothing.

Crows90133d ago

If sales flat lines and subscriptions don't equal the same as said purchasable game then no matter how you spin it...less money is made on that game per player

TheCaptainKuchiki134d ago

MS's bet is that although it lowers traditional sales, it makes the services more appealing and millions of new people will subscribe if they see that good games are added to the service. And in the end, the subscription profit (not revenue) will outpace that of the traditional sales.

However even after 6 years they still haven't reached that point lmao

Shane Kim134d ago

Sadly it's just Netflix of gaming. They saturate the service with garbage just to keep releases on a regular basis and to keep players hooked to the service. It won't be sustainable in the long run.

Reaper22_133d ago

There are some really good games on gamepass. That's the problem with you guys who only think one way. I'm playing Remnant 2, Dead space remake, Tomb Raider, Forza, Far cry 5, Gears Judgement, Mass Effect 3 and MLB The Show. Now please tell me which one of those are garbage?
You sound like a hater or is it you are jealous at the success of Mictosoft with gamepass.

Crows90133d ago

@reaper

Far cry 5 and mass effect 3...also gears judgment was horrible

DEEHULK88130d ago

Netflix is the ONLY streaming service that is making a profit right now. In fact others are back to licensing their content to Netflix because that's a great revenue stream for them.

Crows90133d ago

Except that works for MS because most of their games barely break 1 million in sales ... They know this and try to throw shade and brag about how great subscriptions are because they were already not making much money at all.

Reaper22_133d ago

Nah, that's not true. Their games do sell. Games are getting more expensive to make and sometimes selling millions still don't make up for losses. Services like gamepass can be good for developers and the publishers. Games do sell on gamepass.

Crows90133d ago (Edited 133d ago )

@reaper

Nope. It is true. Just look at estimated sales for lots of their games across the board. Except for major titles like GTA most games barely sell on Xbox. At least back when physical was the majority...now with mostly digital maybe it has changed but their audience hasn't gotten bigger.

A few outliers but the majority barely sold.

DEEHULK88130d ago

If they didn't put their games on PC and Gamepass day 1 their games would be on the charts like the 360 days, but they don't want to do that and that's okay.

Show all comments (44)