Some impressive comparison screenshots between Sniper: Ghost Warrior (Chrome Engine 4) and Crysis (CryEngine 2).
Looking very very good.
i would love to play a mmo with this quality :)
checked project e:st....wow the art is amazing, thx for telling me about the game :)
I don't get the point of this. Having a jungle with trees and sun light with water makes good graphics? Crysis looks impressive even on the indoor. Awesome animation,Textures and advanced effects is what that is needed. I know the potential of COJ 2 Engine. It will look like BFBC2 at max. Killzone 2 quality is what every developers need to do. Killzone 2 is just breathtaking
Jesus H christ, it didnt take long before someone mentioned KZ2 even tho the article has nothing to do with that game what so ever.
KZ2 is really breathtaking and its the first game for GG on ps3 (learning processes)-imagine how KZ3 will look like :)
Killzone 2 looks good but it can run rather sluggishly sometimes. Uncharted 2 looks better and runs rock solid. Lets face it though, neither touches Crysis (2007) with settings bumped. We have yet to really see ingame Crysis 2 properly, on PC, full whack settings have we?
Maybe Killzone 2 looks great because it's bloody narrow as hell. Cryengine was able to render an entire free-roam island with top texture quality, lighting effects, physics effects, explosion effects, etc. Try making a sandbox game with the KZ2 engine and THEN compare it with Crysis.
that game was the greyest in history so please it's not smart to compare it, lol. Both engines are looking great, chrome is being used on the soon to be released Sniper:Ghost warrior 360, and well we all know crytek 2 is very powerful.
The thing is though is that some people seem to think that everyone else thinks that KZ2 is the best looking game ever, and I am been perefectly honest with you when I say that to me it looks nothing special, the special effects are quite good but the enviroments and textures look bland and dull, this is no *anboy comment, I actually do not like how KZ2 looks, I have been more impressed with the new Battlefield, that's right I think it looks better than KZ2, and this video of the Chrome Engine engine looks much better IMO, nobody is saying you have to agree with that but at least accept that others have their own opinion also and the more I see of KZ2 the less impressed I become, sorry if you do not like it but that is my view.
is best looking game ever i just agreed with meetjhu nor i was pushing my opinion in anybody. But from what u say KZ2 textures look bland and dull!!thats wrong its idd KZ2 game some low textures in some places in the game but the high quality textures are outstanding (HD uncompressed textures) and looks a lot better than BFBC2 (even in max sittings).
This is the best video i can find, since the one you posted seems to be bad quality. MAKE SURE TO CLICK ON THE HD buttton on the lower right hand side to get the 1080p picture! And this is all in-game, i should know since i own it(both KZ2 and BFBC2).
German gaming journalism = [email protected] screenshot comparisons.
N4G needs an upgrade, I have more problems embedding videos these days, I used to be able to put them side by side WTF, anyway look at the videos I posted, KZ2 does not look any better online or off IMO than the new Battlefield.
Chrome-Engine looks good and is not far off CryEngine 2 but Crysis and Crysis Warhead are still the best looking ever. Crysis 2 with CryEngine 3 will then be the best looking game till Project Offset
Project Offset is as good as vaporware, buddy.
For the record I think UC2 and GOW3 are worthy of the hype.
If you are talking about me perhaps you can elaborate, just in case you are not talking about me I will keep it nice, firstly I said I don't see KZ2 graphics being as great as some do and that I think BBC2 looks better in my opinion, then to show that I am not a *anboy I paid a complement to two other games on the PS3 which I think do actually look as good as they say they do, and BTW I think Alan Wake looks just as good if not better (HD or not HD) than all the games I just mentioned. If that's not good enough for you then perhaps you need to climb back on your mighty pedestal and come back with another pointless comment that adds nothing more than to start some pointless argument, I mean at least say somthing which actually relates to what we are talking about.
HOLD ON GUYS. this was a comparison useing call of jurez. notify when watching the video it was a video not in gameplay. also notify that apart from demostrations on the cryengine being used crysis is also been demostrated for demo purposes. having said that ive bought played completed call of jurez admit its nice looking game but so is many games out there. but ive also played crysis.useing the cryengine 1 going buy a pc hardware graphics card its flawless against any console. HOWEVER knowing wot crytek can do. i do beleave the best is yet to come. we have seen no gameplay videos of crysis people just alot poop of people compareing images and demo build videos. i say wait for a actually ingameplay footage. personally i beleave crytek will bring a new lease of life to consoles. on multiplayer side for that reason we shouldnt be compareing but.being greatfull
Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood doesn't look quite as good as Crysis on the highest settings, but it runs A LOT better. I mean, you can max Call of Juarez and average 60fps even on an old 8800GTX. You can't max Crysis and get 60fps on a GTX 480 or a Radeon 5870.
You know some of the games being produced on consoles right now are so impressive, then you look at some of the specs on the new Graphics cards and you have to ask yourself what the games on PC really could look like if pushed to the limits like consoles are being now.
I admit CryEngine 2 looks the best overall. If there is a game made with CryEngine 2 and say put it up against Alan Wake, or Red Dead Redemption, or UC2, or ME2, or Halo Reach. I can't say I would buy it first. They need to show more than pretty tech demos. I takes more than a powerful graphics engine to sell. People want the full experience. Graphics,GAMEPLAY,GAMEPLAY,so und,music and story. I have yet to see anything beyond graphics with CryEngine 2.
Oh great. Another almost randomly chosed German "X Vs. Y" screenshot comparison via google translation. Why not do a 'Kingdom Hearts on the PS2 vs. Battle Chess on the Amiga' comparison as well?
The funny thing about crysis, was the demo(benchmark), it was actually part of the smoothest thing about the game, there are sections where the detail gets heavier and the fps drop. Crysis is a great looking game, not in every area. But on medium it looks pants. On max it looks excellent, i think crysis 2 will look better.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.