Videogameszone published some impressive comparison screenshots of Crysis 2 and Killzone 2. In the first comparison shot is one brand new in-game screenshot of Cryteks upcoming Shooter.
Shots arent in full HD and which version of Crysis2 is being used for the comparison?
in the 1st comparison shot I gave the edge to Crysis2 but when I checked this one I had to scream " WTF with all the jaggies, Squared , Low Res Ground Textures on the Crysis2 shot?"
you really don't have an eye for this sort of thing do you...
pc version of C2 wouldn't be blatantly full of jaggies like the kz2 shot.
It's definitely on one of the consoles. They also say the consoles are nearly identical to each other. It's safe to say the jaggies will be present on both systems.
In my opinion
Both look like crap. Bad Company 2 on my pc looks better than those horrible screenshots.
comparing one my old crysis screenshots with crysis 2 is a dead giveaway thats it's console based http://7mtjgq.bay.livefiles...
@raz Not enough. I play my consoles on gaming monitors where as you know they show their full potential at their native resolution. When you start having to upscale on monitors you can see every flaw.. jaggie,low-res texture,blurriness to the max. HDTV's tend to be more forgiving.
KZ2 is plagued with these problems. Here's a comparison I did with my camera between 360 and pc versions of MW2 to see what I mean http://public.bay.livefiles...
Your hatred is making you to mix the shoots up. Crysis 2 screens are the one with jaggies. You can call KZ2 blurred but game got a decent quincux applied and it's fairly jaggy-less.
EDIT:
I see but dont forget KZ2 is "only" 720p (come on COD is 600p), what is the res of your monitor? They got to look blurred as hell and jaggies magnified.
@evrfigh bellow
Good you cleared it up. Sometimes it looked like it. It's true there are some annoying guys around but I come here for the LOLs so I dont care.
BTW, why I'm getting disagrees?
EDIT2: @champ
I do think the PS3 is capable of more. GoW3 upped the graphical bar and showed that more can be achieved.
Crysis 2 on console is a huge step back from Crysis 1 on PC.
And yea BC2 on PC looks better then both of those shots.
To those waiting on Killzone 3 or Uncharted 3, i dont expect the differences to be huge. K2 and Uncharted 2 already made very good use of the PS3 hardware. Let the games come out but i dont expect much more then this.
I also don't hate any particular console. I dislike the clueless 360 gamers because they fueled the DLC trend we see today. I dislike the ps3 fanboy because there is no reasoning with them. You'd get further discussing/debating gaming with a brick wall (they also have a lot in common with the apple zealot I probably am harder on ps3 fanboys because of this).
@Noctis OP wasn't sure which platform was being used to compare with KZ2. I used an example to show it wasn't the pc version. L2R Though I get the feeling any pc screenshots would send you into nerdrage.
@Raz Those screenshots of MW2 and Crysis were at 1080p which is my native res on this monitor. Ya KZ2 obviously doesn't look as horrible as MW2 does because it's 720p (pc monitors seriously are not forgiving if you don't use native res) but the jaggies are "noticeable". They don't stick out like a sore thumb but they are kinda disappointing.
Gow 3 has a fixed viewing angle, hence that is easy on the system.
However even in Gow3, the main character is the only thing that is using good looking textures, everything else looks blurry.
I think UC2 and K2 pushed the PS3 very well and had the PS3 more powerleft they would have surely bumped the ress upto 1080p which didnt happen.
Its not hard upressing a game if the system has more resources left over and i am sure sony would have wanted that as a marketing point if 1080p could have been acheived.
"However even in Gow3, the main character is the only thing that is using good looking textures"
You got to be playing GoW Collection man.
I'm sure as hell GoW3 is extremely sharp, and behaves like a fractal, ie sharp when the scale is titanic and sharp when up close.
"Gow 3 has a fixed viewing angle, hence that is easy on the system."
That excuse has to stop. GoW3 camera is fixed by design not because of limitations of the engine.
BTW, I dont feel like arguing about this for long. It looks like you already made your mind, and being a PS3 owner I got all the games you mentioned and I drew my conclusions already. Lets move on.
I am tired of you goons who know sh!t about the development of the game. GOW3 has a fixed camera YES, but it wasn't a technical limitation, it was a DESIGN CHOICE. In fact in GOW3 there are places where you can control the camera and you can see around.
Just see the developers diary and in that look into where they discuss the camera... They clearly mention that the level guys actually give them fully loaded levels and then they create many camera modes of different angles and select the best out of it... You see, if the guys gave full control of the camera, the game would work, but they wanted to create a cinematic game and that is better achieved if the camera is locked and you see what the developer wants you to see.
GOW3 technically pushes the PS3 further than UC2 or KZ2 mainly cause it runs at 60FPS and looks better than UC2 at many parts... Stop downplaying something and give credit where it's due.
"However even in Gow3, the main character is the only thing that is using good looking textures, everything else looks blurry."
I would have thought you were genuinely debating, but I guess I am talking to a wooden plank... Blurry.. Seriously!!! What you game on a SDTV?
@evrfighter: i was refering to when you said "Both look like crap. Bad Company 2 on my pc looks better than those horrible screenshots."
I mean seriously, why not just tell people that the sun will rise again tomorrow.
Also i used to game on PC so PC having better graphics then consoles doesn't phase me the slightest bit, but here's a pat on the back for jumping to conclusions based on your assumptions.
/pat
Perhaps next time you can give a response that doesn't include your elitist attitude.
Killzone 2 still demolishes every game which is going to release. I just wish a teaser for Killzone 3. Graphics,Sound,Music,Animation ,A.I,Gameplay,Atmosphere is top noch in Killzone 2. Nothing beats it
I thought that Crysis 2 had the edge in the first shot, but that was just because of the character model. It was so perfect that I have to wonder if that photo was retouched, because EVERY shot after was dominated by Killzone 2. It wasn't even a match.
Poor Crytek. I would feel bad for them if they haven't gone all nuts with the PR lately.
all iknow is KZ2 looks sick on my bravia and no matter how good crysis looks i still dont like the game at all, not badass enought for me. and i didnt look at these screens btw, just browsed through the comments seeing so many people waste their time on debating this lol.
I'm not sure what they are comparing considering they don't have many in-game shots of Crysis 2 or even a video of Crysis 2 in action on the consoles.
Even if we did don't you think that the question of gameplay should take a front seat to the question of graphics regardless of comparison? If Crysis 2 is played anything like the first one then the game will be doomed to store shelves and only bought by the PC crowd to say the have the "superior version", although I'm not quite sure what PC enthusiasts are on about with that argument.
Instead of constant reports and comparisons about graphics I would love to hear if they fixed the A.I, the balance in gameplay, or have a more interesting story.
Why does people even waste time doing this. The PC version of crysis 2 " on the proper system" would crush anything a console could do, heck the first crysis would. And people and there GOW3 bandwagon of how graphically it is the best. And actually i am not that impressed by the fixed camera angle soft graphics and the constant changing of resolutions and frame drops of GOW3. I think clearly UC2 is on another level than what GOW3 is on. IMO there is nothing on consoles that touch UC2 as far as full package of what the engine is capable of.
Currently, the minimum PC requirements for Crysis 2 MIGHT be an 8800GTS...
While this is no indication as to which will actually look better, Crysis 2 vs Killzone 2. Crysis 2 will be using lower system requirements than Crysis 1, yet somehow will have better graphics overall. IMO, this means CryEngine3 will rely on multi-core CPUs for a more detailed environment.
BTW, PS3's RSX is said to be similar to a 7800GTX on 90nm.
we cant compare them just yet till crysis2 is out coz by any standard kz2 looks better .. fact!.. lets just ignore all this till its out then we can truely say
Since we are all being honest about what we dislike and like. I'd like to just state that I dislike KIA (know it all) types like you who think your words are somehow like gospel here. I also dislike PC gamers who cry and moan about consoles dumbing games down for them, meanwhile pirate everything and don't pay for anything.
We all know the pc is powerful, get over it. Who the fvck cares!? I spend all day at work in front of a pc I don't want to come home and game on one. Killzone 2 can hang with most of PC games with the effects going on. THe only thing that it can't hang with on pc is resolution. That being said I believe Killzone 2 will still look better than Crysis 2 (console) when all is said and done.
Crysis looks very good on ps3 and pc xbox is gunna pull a ff13 (looks shocking)
Now wait for killzone 3 better yet uncharted 3 E3 is very soon and all i can say is get a paper bag u will have to hyper ventilate before sony have done with there press
I think its hilarious fanboys think greyzone 2 looks so good. No color, horrible low res textures, cheap visual effects that fool retarded fanboys into thinking the graphics are good. The reason it is being compared to crysis 2 is because it is a console FPS, not because of amazing graphics. The level of detail in crysis 2 is 10 times more than that of greyzone, and it actually has some color. Besides, the first Crysis absolutely raped greyzone 2 in graphics, Crysis 2 on the PC and Xbox 360 will look even better.
You officially claimed yourself as a total jackass for saying AW is th best looking thing out there, Goes to show you dont understand anything about the allusion of AW. Im not gona say what it is hopefully you are smart enough to figure it out.
I never said AW is the best looking game out there, I just said it is better looking than any game on the FlopStation 3. Crysis is the best looking game.
I love how Killzone 2 is still a benchmark. Over a year old, and it has all sorts of fanboys jealous. The 360 fanboys hate that their pathetic console can`t even compare, and the PC fanboys hate that their games are being compared to a puny little $300 4 year old machine. Man, I love it.
Sad KZ2 is being used as a bench mark when there are a few better looking exlusives out there. Funny how bots havve to use KZ2 as a bench mark. Shows how aged and crappy the 360 is. I bet those shots we seen of crysis 2 is from the xbox version. I can see turning my head in that game with all those jaggies. Powerlines, trees, and edges in general just shimmering with a little head movement. LOL, damn out dated console.
They dont look PC quality at all. See how jagged they are, the textures are not impressive and the resolution seems low. See the pic provided by evrfighter above.
U dont even know that since when they show it off they use a PC and sometimes use an Xbox Controller.. Since its not made for Xbox 360 disc yet they have to run it on Pc.. and these screenshots are probz from a PC tbh
oh looks its a ps3 fanboy, lets all be fearful as he smites us with his cell processor is da best name that is so retarded we just ignore it.
lets all be fearful as he smites us with his cell processor name that is so retarded we just ignore it.
and finally, when he gives us the list of games he plays and how he has sexual relations with sony and microsoft with all the pride in the world we stand and stare at him as if he were God, praising him and kissing his feet.
or....
we could just admit that console gaming and pc gaming is stupid to put side to side, and if you do, you are most likely a console gamer with an ego problem
Im a pc gamer, and I could care less if Uncharted 2 is da best game eva, because I know it is, and if it REALLY made such a big difference to my life i'd go out and buy a €300 ps3 with a tv costing 1500 dollars which comes to 15300 when i knew i could get a pc with a lower price.
ut I'm not going to, instead I'd rather make it clear to you console fanboys...
no one gives a crap. if they do they already have the Ps3 ready to run those games and they will only agree with you anyway (like I and everyone else does as well)
thanks for stating the obvious, now go off to tell people swimming in the sea they'll get wet.
oh oops, i forgot, PS3 and 360 fans are the worst. please feel free do disagree with me =)
he has the right to his opinion...but this goes beyond opinion
Crysis 2 look ok but still KZ2 look much better so far from the lil gameplay and screen shoots
But I'm sure crysis will have better textures in a expensive PC but still KZ 2 will have better special effect and animations in the end Killzone 2 have much bigger and better tech behind but crysis can cheat and have better textures in a expencive PC
But I'm sure crysis 2 will be a good game it look like it will be a Hollywood like game very cinematic and not a boring open world like crysis 1 well some people like that kind of game. But for a acction shooting game I like the games to be cinematic and fun. Kind of like COD4 or KZ2.
ur gayzone 2 didnt even sell yet you talking about ppl going silent....its not even one of the ps3's top 5 selling games...thas extra soft....its nothing but eye candy but gameplay garbaaaaaaage!!!
but keep in mind Killzone 2 is old and i played it a few days ago and it does look amazing.. even though some textures can be blurry ( but they might just not have loaded )
I understand that you are a PC fanboy and hates that a non PC game looks this amazing Killzone Mach GCI gameplay not only grafics
Killzone 2 is more than just great grafics and textures is great gameplay, animation, sound, 3d tech ,eviroments art details, physic tech, great realistic lighting tech ,great blod animation; amazing history, great online .ragdoll body anymation.
Crysis is just great textures, nice lighting , sound,physics tech,moods, simple 3d tech? and I can't think in no more.
Actually I kind of disagree. My KZ2 wasn't blurry, looked flawless and the art style was fantastic. Crysis looked incredible on very high end machines at the time, but was short and boring as hell. I mean come on. 4 hours? Weapon customisation was good idea but nonetheless game didn't offer much above microsandbox when you could only screw around the "world" breaking stuff.
crymod.com on the phone, he wants to explain you how PC games work.
And I DO NOT EVER deny KZ2 quality. It's a great game, and you are right, the arts is awesome. I still find it blurry though. You know, like "hey we add 10 filters so it looks less rough"
@chak_: Filters and other tricks are clever way to make the game look more appealing with less resources. Crysis reigns photorealistic gameplay but that's not entertainment for everyone. Consoles, well, need/must/want to use tricks.
Look at Alan Wake, Gears, GT4, Mass Effect or even KZ2. It wouldn't look that good without post-processing, darker image, grain filters or certain other modelling tricks like throwing off typical human body for the sake of artificial suits. Crysis2 will reign graphically on PC, just like original was, but as usual, It's pretty much always unfair to compare two different games.
its a PC gamer, lets all be fearful as he smites us with his graphics card name that is so complex we can't comprehend
then let him throw these specs at us that leave us in awe and melt our face
and finally, when he gives us the list of games he plays and at what settings with all the pride in the world we stand and stare at him as if he were God, praising him and kissing his feet.
or....
we could just admit that PC gaming and Console gaming is stupid to put side to side, and if you do, you are most likely a PC gamer with an ego problem
I'm a console gamer, and I could care less if Crysis 2 will be superior on PC, because I know it will, and if it REALLY made such a big difference to my life i'd go out and buy a €500 PC
but I'm not going to, instead I'd rather make it clear to you PC elitists...
no one gives a crap. if they do they already have the PC ready to run those games and they will only agree with you anyway (like I and everyone else does as well)
thanks for stating the obvious, now go off to tell people swimming in the sea they'll get wet.
oh oops, i forgot, PC fans are the worst. please feel free do disagree with me =)
he has the right to his opinion...but this goes beyond opinion
Shots arent in full HD and which version of Crysis2 is being used for the comparison?
in the 1st comparison shot I gave the edge to Crysis2 but when I checked this one I had to scream " WTF with all the jaggies, Squared , Low Res Ground Textures on the Crysis2 shot?"
http://www.videogameszone.d...
so yeah KZ2 looks better. but then Again I dunno wich version of the game is being used.
Well, in the words of the great Ric Flair: To be the man, you gotta beat the man.
hm sony should make a deal with them to port crysis 1 and 2
onto 1 blu ray disk
i think killzone looks better
Crysis looks very good on ps3 and pc xbox is gunna pull a ff13 (looks shocking)
Now wait for killzone 3 better yet uncharted 3
E3 is very soon and all i can say is get a paper bag u will have to hyper ventilate before sony have done with there press
I love how Killzone 2 is still a benchmark. Over a year old, and it has all sorts of fanboys jealous. The 360 fanboys hate that their pathetic console can`t even compare, and the PC fanboys hate that their games are being compared to a puny little $300 4 year old machine. Man, I love it.