40°

Playstation Move: It'll Move You

What makes the Playstation Move have the potential to be a lot more than a gimmick, is that they are not (they'ren't?) just making it for casuals, they are making it for hardcore gamers and casual gamers alike. Its precision allows you to do things that just wouldn't work well with the Wii, like online gaming or hardcore games like Socom 4, while still being able to have fun with not so serious games. It's taking motion controls to a whole new level.

Read Full Story >>
theplaystationmove.com
whateva5188d ago

that's one thing that the wiimote can be used for shooting games.

but there is other things that can be done with move that can't be done with the wiimote but shooting is not one of them.

Forbidden_Darkness5188d ago

Have you ever played a shooter on the wii? Its not really that fun and games like shooters dont sell well on the Wii compared to the PS3.

The Wii doesn't have that precision to play a game like socom anyways, not to its full extent, and the Wii's online is horrible at best.

Sunny_D5188d ago

Oh yeah baby, you know I like to move ;)

HaloReachGOTY5188d ago

I have nothing against the ps3 (Move) i think it's great to have a HD wii. Then again i'm more looking forward to Natal which is light years more Advanced and will revolutionize the way we play games.

Forbidden_Darkness5188d ago

Dont you mean Eye Toy Plus? How is it so advanced compared to the PS Move? I havent even seen anything besides smoke and mirrors for Natal thus far.

mrv3215188d ago

Your also looking forward to Reach so HD must not be your thing...

It's nice having an eyetoy for $100,

It will revolutionize video games IT REMOVED BUTTONS. I've seen more advanced NES controllers seriously... Buttons are a proven fact to be useful.

But hey look at me pointing out facts, like the fact that the burnout demo didn't even have analogue controls BRILLIANT.... it'll revolutionize games in a way we've not seen yet... it'll take them back a few generations. Light years more advanced? Than what the colossus, because I saw similar tech on the PS2.

Sunny_D5188d ago

Meh, somebody show that eyetoy video from 2002 or 2004 that showed the same light year features that Natal is supposedly showing.

zootang5187d ago (Edited 5187d ago )

The funny thing is Sony and Nintendo have both stated they could have gone with the Natal tech but chose not to. All MS have shown has been smoke and mirrors.

I got conned into buying a HD-DVD drive and 2 xboxs. What's that saying.... Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5187d ago
JRisburning5188d ago

Bungie trying to convince itself

Forbidden_Darkness5187d ago

I hope you all enjoyed what i wrote and stay tuned for more soon ;)

ALFAxD_CENTAURO5187d ago

I'm waiting the Survival Horror exclusive for Move.

Maybe they will show something in E3.

Forbidden_Darkness5187d ago

You may just be in luck, on one of the videos shown on the PS website, theres a glimpse of what may be a survival horror game, maybe?

Heres a link to my thread, scroll down to the very bottom picture and you'll see what might be a survival horro game:

http://forums.n4g.com/tm.as...

50°

Goat Simulator 3: Multiverse of Nonsense Preview - GamesHorizon

Goat Simulator 3's first DLC pack is here, and it's the greatest reflection of its team's bonkers approach to game design since the core game released.

Read Full Story >>
gameshorizon.com
130°

Red Dead Redemption 1 Isn't As Good As People Remember It To Be

RDR 1 was a great game, but the lack of screen time for some characters, boring horse riding, and lack of mission variety takes away the fun at times.

Read Full Story >>
tech4gamers.com
jambola17h ago

Yeah
It's as good as you remember
Feels like one of those "10 HARSH realities of Re-watching" articles

just_looken8h ago

I love how it seems a extreme few remember that red dead redemption is red dead revolver 2.

red dead revolver now that is rough red dead redemption for its time was groundbreaking and it still has way better cover system/dlc/mp content then red dead 2.

I remember all the bugs the game had day one like donkey lady so dam funny

Cacabunga1h ago

RDR1 is a legendary game!!!

Really how to cope with a slow news day…

just_looken24m ago

@caca

I know i said that

Oh boy let me guess no one here knows what red dead revolver is

Or you all never played version 1.0 of rdr 1 i bet its that so many on here have the stench of being in gaming for 10 years at most.

shinoff218316h ago

Junk article. Game was dope and still is. The swimming part sucks though.

just_looken8h ago

It does but the game was made originally for ps2 back after san andreas so for the dev window and timeline it makes sense.

just_looken15m ago(Edited 15m ago)

red dead revolver was back in 2004
https://www.gamesradar.com/...

after this they were making gta iv and a squeal that became read dead redemption

But you all will hate this because facts are scary

"Red Dead [Redemption] has been in production for six years (mainly because of horrible management/lack of direction due to fear of disrespecting Rockstar NY) and it will never get the money back in sales it cost to create for those six years," claimed another source.

From a 2010 article hmm what is 2010 - 6 hmmm

https://www.engadget.com/20...

The swimming in red dead one made sense for the time period and dev hell it was in

Again though it seems alot on here have 0 game knowledge before 2018.

-Foxtrot2h ago

I liked it a bit better because I didn’t think it had many “small nitpicky” things RDR2 had that on its own meant nothing but when a lot built up it was annoying. For example getting off your horse and you had to reselect your weapons again or walking around the camp slowly. None issues but built up with others sometimes it was a little frustrating at times.

Show all comments (13)
420°

Yes, that's Kara in season 4 of The Boys

Been watching season 4 of The Boys and find Firecracker's face familiar? As a gamer, where you know her from might surprise you.

Read Full Story >>
gamespew.com