In that screenshot check pcgames.de compared the graphical differences between the PC, PS3 and Xbox 360 versions of Just Cause 2.
They did a descent job keeping them close. Obviously the PC is best but the two console ports are fairly close.
ps3 looks better imo
PC won hands down. That, of course, is not a surprise. Still love my exclusives on PS3 and 360 though.
1- PC 2- PS3 3- 360 between consoles, PS3 for sure : Better colors, less jaggies, better trees
as always xbox 360 version takes the lead
that was 2007 2008, now we are in 2010 !
i'm sorry for you but 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 the story repeats since bayonetta...but don't be mad, FFXII is better in PS3, that's one for you my friend.
^^^ Sorry bud but Bayonetta was not a 2010 game.
DON'T GO INTO THE OPEN ZONE. Potential spoiler for Alan Wake. Spoiler is in user's name.
PS3 you can save video clips to PS3 hard drive or directly upload to youtube 360 version does not have this
From the first set of screens http://www.pcgames.de/Just-... look at the distant tree lines and mountains, if you compare the "sharpness", it shows PC > XBox360 > PS3 but granted the difference could be caused by the screenshots not being taken at the exact same spot.
Is there even a comparison between 1080p+ on the pc version and the 720 or whatver the console is running at. 45usd on steam is a steal for a new game running maxed out. Its not my taste though, however if i had to play it id use the DS3 with this sort of game
Or maybe even a 5760p
Looks good on all platforms to me. I will be getting it for PS3, like I do with all my games. I only get games on PC if they aren't available on PS3. Haven't got a 360 but wouldn't mind one for SC:C and Alan Wake. May get one soon for those games.
I didn't know you could swim in this game.
I've played for 30 mins on all three versions of the demo and these SS as always don't show how the PC version has not only higher res, textures, and frames but things like the draw distance is much farther away from you. If you jump off a cliff, like you do at the start of the demo, on the console versions you see everything start popping in front of you which doesn't happen on the PC. The shadows are much sharper and don't have that low res fuzzy look like the ps3 and xbox have. Also the explosions are bigger and the smoke is much denser. Not that the xbox or ps3 versions don't look good but they don't look the same like these SS make you think.
PC will always look better, nobody argues that it doesn't. Personally though I don't have a gaming PC- I got a PS3. One thing I really think is cool for this game on the PS3 and I'm assuming the PC version is the record feature- so you can record your best stunts.
we have a record feature. It's called pressing F9 using FRAPS
PC record feature works on every game. PC it only does everything :P
you click the little link that makes em bigger lol But anyway they do all look pretty similar and I love seeing a game as open as this doing so well with the graphics.
Nothing new to see here... move along people
Aww No need to lie let the people see and judge for themselves.
Germans do video game comparisons more than any other people. If there is a comparison chances are it's from a German site.
It's a shame most of them are for sh!t.
Xbox360 version is superior due to a better GPU the ps3 version lacks the sharpness and shows jaggies due to older GPU which as u can see struggles and pop ups appear so often but still playable so shouldn't put of anyone purchasing ps3 version. GOW3 = 20fps KZ2 = 20fps all due to poor gpu = FACT.
false. Gow3 60-30 fps never dropping below 30 and rarely below 45. KZ2 @ a constant 30fps. I mean constant. gow3 & kz2 & uc2 & heavy rain - only bettered graphically by crysis, even I can admit that and I have a gaming laptop and desktop. (My laptop is pretty sweet tho :D )
Nice trolling. God3 and KZ2 do not run at that frame rate. The games are amazing and you are sad.
You stupid little kid, the GPU is way better than your gimped GPU from ATI, where is the Killzone 2 killer from your best GPU blatant.
Sweet. Just Cause 2 is so much fun. Obviously the PC is better but I don't own a gaming rig. But I'm glad the 360 version is better than the ps3 version. Sweeeeeet!
never mind thats steve balmers nuts. on topic: i liked the demo, may have to pick this up on one of my hd consoles.
I'm a PS3 fanboy, but in all honesty, the 360 version looks superior.
i'd agree with that. ps3 version still looks good. but anyway, despite this game actually having gorgeous graphics, the real reason to buy this game is the amount of fun you can have playing it. If i do pick it up for pc (better graphics, especially water since i'm an nvidia owner :D) i'll prob wanna plug my controller in tho. always feel it works best for tps games
I'd agree with that too. I am also a ps3 fanboy, but fair's fair: the 360 version simply looks better. I am just glad FFXiii is better on ps3, because the inferior ps3 mutiplat trend during 2007, 2008, 2009 and early 2010 has been quite demoralising.
that's what you get when 360's lead. how times have changed though eh? suddenly it seems developers are making ps3 the lead platform...
"I am also a ps3 fanboy" Wow, that is such an utter and blatant lie that it's almost funny. You're actually the complete opposite.
Well, to be honest, I am also a massive ps3 fanboy. Leading multiplats on ps3 hasn't made any difference in the past. Most of the ones hat were led on ps3 still looked the same or better on the 360. Witness Ghostbusters, for eg. Thus the trend of inferior multiplats, which people said had finished in 2007, seems to continue to this day. Not to worry, just like you guys, my ps3 allegiance is also unshakeable!
Yeah, PS3 texturs are sharper, things look more 3D, Colours are a lot brighter (in a good/nateral way, they seem darker but the 360 ports too fake). The first screen shots far too blue for the 360.
Disagreer, look at this pic for example. http://www.pcgames.de/Just-... See the motion blur and flat textures on the left of the 360 port?
the screenshots are taken from different 'moments' are you saying the 360 version is worse cus it has motion blur in that screenshot?
HAHAHA the shot in the PS3 version the vehicle is stationary. LOL. No wonder the textures are more sharper in the PS3 version. What a dumbass!!!! LOL.
The pictures are pretty bad. The actual game looks quite a bit better...Just throwing that out there.
Yep, got the limited edition pre-ordered for Friday (for PC), loved the demo, it's ashame it's on a 30 min count-down though.
In a way yes and no, I'm saying look at the colours and textures, look how objects are 2D. motion blurs a trick to hide those kind of issues.
This demo reminded me of Mercenaries 1
Okay well that's you... What do you say about the guy below you? lol Anyway I doubt that spoiler is real. The game still has like 2 more months until release.
So alan wake kills his wife? How do you know?
Here's some reading from Motion Bluring, you might find it intreastng. http://www.talula.demon.co.... and here's Nyquist frequency's info. http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
I highly doubt that's a real spoiler. The game still has what? Two months to go before being released? How could he possibly know that? I call bullsh1t.
that's the real outcome but that fool should not have done that. Review sets are out that's how we know, but again that was an idiotic move
So it's basically like Silent Hill 2. Whatever. I will probably still get mind f*cked by Alan Wake even if that spoiler is real.
PS3 version allows you to save video clips to PS3 hard drive or directly upload to youtube Xbox 360 version does NOT have this
Pc versions looks the best clearly. But the next best looking version is debatable because they are very close. I give the slight nod to the PS3 version over the 360 version.
i actually like the blur engine added to the ps3 multiplats. jaggies and anti aliasing kills my momentum to play these games so this blur effect helps alot but since i got alot of games already to play for ps3 ill rent this one when im done with god of war 3
There is no motion blur in the PS3 version.. which is nice because sharper picture is always better.
I just played the demo, and wow, this is a bad looking game. On PS3 anyway its like a bloomy Warhawk.
Yes, The PS3 version is definately the best version out of the console versions.. PS3 has vSync enabled at all times so less frame tearing.. whereas 360 drops this feature to increase frame rate when lots of action is happening on-screen all at once.. 360 version has motion blur in order to hide the low fps count.
due to huge draw distance increase...no pop-in, 16 - 32x q anti aliasing and TRUE HD (instead of whatever pseudo-hd res the consoles are running ( 576p?? lol) but... they all look kinda weak... And those cutscenes... Atrocious "hey..i'm mercenary guy...you pay in tacos...i fly around with grapple hook"
wow all that hardware and 15%-20% better graphics?
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.