580°

1UP, FFXIII Cross-Platform Test: Which Version Looks Better?

1UP's Jeremy Parish writes: "It's still an impressive-looking game, no question, but when I went back from 360 to PS3 it was almost like someone had stripped a layer of grime off my TV. The PS3 version is just that much crisper and more colorful."

ClownBelt5590d ago

The article is just basically trying to find a way to justify why it gave both version the same score. Nothing big or huge so move on...

Will-UK5590d ago (Edited 5590d ago )

so they make it a seperate article why aren't any points being deducted.

I mean fair is fair other games which had bad ps3 ports got a lower score so why isnt the same happening here.

Shadow Flare5590d ago

So here's the question: if 1up see an obvious difference between the 2 versions, why have they not reviewed the game seperately??? They combined both versions into 1 review for the game, even though they say there's a CLEAR difference. Something really weird is going on.

I don't care what people think of me saying this; I swear MS has told/paid reviewers to not review the 360 version because its going to get slated for being noticeably inferior. And this is 1up's little way of saying the 360 version is worse. Seriously, WHY have they not said this in their review?

Pennywise5590d ago

If you guys don't think the treat of MS pulling advertising scares these sites from telling the truth about things... think again.

Call it conspiracy, tell me about my tinfoil hat... I don't care. I call it a proven fact from years of BS and nonsense. This is the final straw to prove to me that it is all lies and garbage.

ClownBelt5590d ago (Edited 5590d ago )

Check out their MLB 2K10 Review.

PS3 C+
360 B-

Shadow Flare5590d ago

Pennywise, there is no conspiracy. Not anymore. This is the final straw and its clearer then day. 1up here themselves say the ps3 version looks alot better yet it gets the same score as the 360 version

Microsoft has the gaming media by the neck

Greywulf5590d ago (Edited 5590d ago )

Always. Always. Always. Always. Always. Always. Always. Always. Always. Always. Always. Always. Always.

Theres no question about it. Again, call it a conspiracy theory all you want. There is no Lower mark for a Metacritic/360 score. Most of the big guys have already done their scoring (the sites that matter) The ones that go out of their way to complain about the texture filtering of the PS3 game ruining the experience so -.5pts. Yet when you have something as clear cut as this, the game isn't even HD for christs sake, you have no one saying word 1.

Again, call it a conspiracy just because some fanboys say it. But the fact remains that its not being treated the same way inferior PS3 ports always have and will be. I Called it out already, I knew no one was going to score the 360 version less. Lets be honest here..

MS definitely spends more for advertising/media relations than Sony. Sony doesn't spend 800 dollars to review halo for each reviewer. Its only natural that these guys are out to protect their business/websites. But at the same time these are the people that pretend they are credible journalists. They aren't. If you can't review the 360/ps3 versions separately, then they should no longer discredit PS3 performance/graphical issues and give the game the same exact score.

The media is suckling off of Microsofts teet. Its fine, but don't try to pretend reviews mean a damn thing in the future. Not after this, i could care less if Edge gives a ps3 game a 10/10. Theres an agenda behind it, for whatever reason. To look unbiased. The gaming hobby used to be good, and you were able to relate to reviewers and their opinions generally lined up with yours.

Now you have this stuff. Its garbage.

This is proof. 100% proof of the bias in the media against sony. For any future "tinfoil" hat comments, FF13 will always be the example of it. Thats why the usual suspects have been avoiding these stories. As if they are afraid of losing bubbles with their 9000 accounts. Its because even they have nothing to say about it.

Microsoft prides themselves on having higher rated versions of games. How about now? No, it doesn't matter. Give the same score anyway. This is almost sickening to know that the media is just so bent over backwards by MS. They jump into this industry and just rape everyone common sense with money.

This article is BS. Bioshock was marked down for having the same glitches from the previous title. Scores have nothing to do with that. Same gameplay, but texture pop-in was complained about. THe ps3 version couldn't even score higher with DLC. There are several instances of this, Bayonetta was the worst case scenario, but what about all the other titles before it where people are zooming into a texture to find a .5 score.

Will-UK5590d ago

"Which Version Looks Better?" most websites have said the 360 version look worse but still give the same score on the review.

BeaArthur5590d ago

Pennywise...you have a tinfoil hat?

Pennywise5590d ago

Bea, lol... not at the moment. I am using it to bake potatoes.

JOLLY15590d ago

You guys must be afraid to take the test....

Sigh5590d ago

I agree. 1up has no balls whatsoever to be honest and deduct scores off from the 360 version. Gamespot did it with Dragon Age, all 3 platforms, PC being the highest and 360 being the lowest of all three. Even Bioshock 1 PS3 was deducted points because it's frame rate wasn't as consistent as 360's, still playable. I'll never understand the gaming media today, never.

Oner5590d ago (Edited 5590d ago )

In before GR8 1 spams how he read one line of one BS review that said at one time a PS3 version cutscene hit 24fps ONCE and touts/commends MS for their 576p version...

5590d ago
sikbeta5590d ago

Basically, it's what I was saying...

All the Sites will give the same Score to Both Versions, in order to not downplay the x360 version and by that is not going to be like the Whole Bayonetta Blow-out and "da bad Version" stuff and The Problem is not HOW BAD the Port is, the Real Problem is How Bias the "Gaming Media" can be, to just throw Lies and pretend that nothing happened

Greywulf5590d ago (Edited 5590d ago )

to pretend you're some mature individual smoking a cob pipe on a website dedicated to gaming. Please, stop trying to act like the Fonz. You're a gamer, just like everyone else here.

I know you're used to being delusional about things, but at least have the courage to respond with dignity instead of acting like a child and making fun of others. You have absolutely nothing to respond with meaningful to the subject.

Might as well just call everyone butthurt and show how mature you really are right? Its annoying to see clear cases of favoritism in the gaming media. Especially since its a part of the hobby. If you can't respond intelligently why bother?

BeaArthur5590d ago

Dare I say who cares? I mean honestly guys, I understand that you feel like the PS3 gets a raw deal in these situations (and maybe it does) but does it honestly effect your experience at all? So they didn't do two reviews and give the 360 version a lower score, I mean anyone who cares already knows that the PS3 is the superior version. I see crap like this every time a game comes out. Lets move on and just enjoy whatever version you want to get.

Pennywise5590d ago

Bea, I would love to end all the bickering... but how fair is towards PS3 owners? Its like we are zombies with no brains.

Everyone keeps avoiding the 800LB gorilla in the room: METACRITIC scoring the 360 version higher than the PS3 version by excluding reviews from the 360 reviews. Edge gave it a 50/100... Apparently MC thinks its just for PS3.

Shadow Flare5590d ago

No-one's gonna lose sleep over this, there are far more important things in the world. But the ps3 has been getting unwarranted grief since the day it launched and it pisses me off when you can so clearly see the bias the gaming media holds. I hate seeing injustice and its just constantly in your face when it comes to the ps3. And this article is about as clear an example you can get.

BeaArthur5590d ago (Edited 5590d ago )

Pennywise...yeah but it has been like this forever and it's not going to change. And again, does it actually effect your gaming experience? Do you like the game less because metacritic has it at a slightly lower score? I understand the grievance but it's really like beating a dead horse at this point.

Shadow Flare...like I was saying, you can't do anything about it. It's like watching everyone shout at the rain.

OmegaSlayer5590d ago

F O! this reviewers.
They're lucky enough to have a work out of their hobbies and they still have a face like their asses in spitting lies to their fellow gamers, people that works hard to buy a game and deserve some sincerity.

They shouldn't review games, they should shovel feces.

Sigh5590d ago

Why would anyone shout at the rain? XD. Just find a nearby shelter, and it's settled. Like how the gaming media should with the 360 version and just be honest. Stop the bs, admit and take off the marks for being the inferior version.

AKNAA5590d ago (Edited 5590d ago )

It gets the same score because he's judging it as a gamer. The overall experience is nearly identical gameplay wise( can't really tell the difference when in Battles), so if there's no technical issues to affect your gameplay( like bayonetta) then there is really no need to deduct points when the only difference is just the cut-scenes/ CGI videos.

Thats pretty understandable, unlike bayonetta on ps3 which Looks garbage in every way compared to the 360 version...
Just look at the GOW collection... awesome HD remake, but the cutscenes were still PS2 quality, so did you deduct points for that?! Hell NO! cause the gameplay experience was still GREAT, not to mention smoother(60FPS) and better looking... get my point??

at any rate, its the best looking RPG on the 360 so lets not hate on there version while we enjoy ours.

Foliage5590d ago (Edited 5590d ago )

Some people seem to be missing the fact that the 360 visuals in gameplay are also far worse than the PS3, not just the cinematic sequences. Every aspect of the 360 version is NOT HD, while the PS3 version is fully HD (cinematics, movies, gameplay... all of it).

This isn't just a cinematic thing, the whole 360 version is gimped. This is easily in the top 3 worst ports I've ever seen, possibly number 1. It's so badly lopsided in favour of the PS3 version, it's not even funny.

BeaArthur5590d ago

Sigh...actually it's a very appropriate analogy. The point was that I am watching all of these people get pissed off about something they can't change.

Will-UK5590d ago (Edited 5590d ago )

While i understand the gameplay may be the same that does not excuse the fact countless other games have had points deducted on ps3 for being "blurry" and looking worse than 360 counterpart. So they have to draw the line somewhere and show fair is fair we took points from this game for looking worse so when we see vice versa we do the same.

GOW collection is a ps2 remake not a multiplatform game although i see the point you where trying to make it does not apply for multiplatform reviews as most of the time what happens in mulitplat reviews is a comparison between two platforms.

Also you should view some of the screenshots from the neogaf official thread it shows many differences, if i find the link ill post again or maybe someone else will post it.

doG_beLIEfs5590d ago

Just stop complaining about it. It just gives them more ammo. We know the truth and just like the mind of a Fixed Views viewer....no matter what examples and FACTS you bring to the table over and over, no matter how big the mountain of data is that proves your right...they will still defend their "choice or opinion" and crawl ever deeper into their fantasy world. I have learned that it is just not worth it, so what to do instead?

SUPPORT SONY, SUPPORT 1ST AND 2ND PARTY STUDIOS (there are over 20 combined 1st and 2nd party studios making games EXCLUSIVELY for Sony)
Plenty of games to play, and the more we buy the more Sony can make and the more money Sony can spend to make Playstation games even better.

FRACK 3rd party....I thumb my nose at yew, I fart in your general direction...yew silly fool.

Bring on the Sony exclusives that put these multies to shame in size, complexity, clarity, A.I., color, sound, playability, fun factor, and polish.

5590d ago
GrandTheftZamboni5590d ago

I just add 30% to PS3 review scores and 30% to PS3 sales on VGChartz and I get the accurate numbers.

TruthBTold5590d ago

I will never read a review from any of these websites anymore. I can't trust their opinion to be sincere and professional. I will look at the opinion of many gamers here that I trust more. I thank those who convinced me to buy Demon's Souls.

rockleex5590d ago

Because 360 had the better version.

We all know that if FFXIII had looked better on the 360, it would also be hailed as the ultimate RPG of all time.

Babylonian5590d ago (Edited 5590d ago )

"That being said, my review score holds true for both versions of the game, because I make a habit of reviewing *games*, not technology."

You mean like this.

PS3: http://www.1up.com/do/gameO...
360: http://www.1up.com/do/gameO...

Or this

PS3: http://www.1up.com/do/gameO...
360: http://www.1up.com/do/gameO...

Or maybe this

PS3: http://www.1up.com/do/gameO...
360: http://www.1up.com/do/gameO...

These 1Up hypocrit assholes should molest themselves with wooden battons.

Triella5590d ago (Edited 5590d ago )

Made by serious people :
http://www.gamepro.de/speci...

Those who still deny that PS3 version looks way better are the epithome of self-delusion.

And here is a self explanatory video : http://www.gamepro.de/index...

And they conclude by saying that PS3 version is more stable, where in the 360 version it's not unusual to encounter some little and big hiccups.

PaLaK-5590d ago

First post here and hey, I just noticed something that made me LOL... the Xbox 360 version of FFXIII has a higher metascore than the ps3 version!! LOL the ps3 version of bayonetta has a lower metascore understandably.. but for FFXIII the opposite?! This might be rubbish but laughing's good so oh well, it's just becuse the official Xbox mags have given the game 9/10 etc and it has like 6 reviews, because a lot of sites didnt submit a review for it but just one for the PS3. True gamers will know its bs anyway and which is the better version xD

mastiffchild5590d ago

AKNAA_No, I'm not having it at all. Bayonetta PS3 trailing it's 360 counterpart is TOTALLY the same thing as FF13 360 lagging behind the PS3 version. Fact is NEITHER poor port are unplayable or would offend anyone if they hadn't been told about things in the first place. I STILL chose to play the PS3 version of Bayonetta(though I didn't pay I would also not have had to pay for the 360 version as I was given them both as review copies that had been used for said purpose already)because the differences were so tiny that they didn't matter. Same will be true of FF13 from what I've seen of the cmparisons. The slowdown in Bayonetta PS3 was the most exaggerated thing ever, imo, and only something I really noticed a couple of times after playing the game through three times. the long loads, however,. were more of a pain but, again,. nothing game breaking and nothing anyone would b1tch about if they weren't told to. It wasn't worse all the way through or virtually unplayable and I played it before the patch as well.

Now, FF13 is worse on the 360 in a few areas, is crisper overall on the PS3 and there's no comparison between the sound-something very important to me in a FF game particularly is how the sound performs and the lossless audio on PS3 compared to the over compressed score on the 360 would be a real issue for someone like myself. However, again, I don't think I'd call it game breaking or anything. Another thing, and it bears talking about because people mention it and because it IS a difference and that's the multiple discs themselves-this is another thing that would matter to me as my kids and dogues are rough and three discs just multiplies the chances of me ending up not being able to finish the damn game! But is it something to dock points for-no, of course not.

I wouldn't dock points for Bayonetta PS3 OR FF13 360 and, more than that, would NEVER catch myself in the position of shame 1Up have found themselves in by basically printing an article to defend a double standard. I wouldn't dock FF13 anything but any site that routinely does it to PS3 ports when they're lacking MUST do it here or accept the accusations that come their way. It's only fair when virtually no port outside of TOB has been THAT bad that it really deserved a point lopping off on the PS3-or any platform for that matter. Most of the time I struggle to see any of the supposed differences and even when I can they don't amount to as much as is made out(like the two I've spoken of here)but to dock and then only do it in one direction looks bad.

I doubt 1Up have a knowing bias, however, as they probably have more ads taken by MS and their partners(stupid to needlessly offend your bigger advertisers in tough times like these and as a western site MS spend a lot on ads in sites like 1up-it isn't as if MS would or would have to say "we're pulling this or that if you don't say/do X or Y" anyway-the threat is there in the mind of the editor even if there's no grounds for it at all and as such can exist for little actual reason)and have their actions effected by that, they probably have a more pro 360 readership(being a US site it's highly likely most are 360 owners who read the site)so why would they pander to PS3 readers and NOT be softer on the 360 overall-it's a naturral thing to be soft on the things your readers like or, in this case, support their purchase of a console to some small extent-it's not bias in this case but just common sense if they want to keep their readers. This would change should the PS3 manage parity in the States but as the 360 is a US machine would take longer than usual, imo, for the "home town" console to lose it's slight edge. Whatever, I wouldn't call it bias that this happens but the double standards over docking points(which,. imo, was something they shouldn't have gotten into when all multis are aiming for parity and not to push either system at all)is a step too far and looks appalling-and worse when they cack handedly defend the indefensible.

It's just a bit weak and makes them look like they're really biased when they probably aren't and were just serving their readership as they see it. Any paper/mag with a market demographic would be pretty dim not to pander, slightly, towards it and anyone naively thinking that the media is above this is way, way off point-it's often a matter of survival in an industry where the desire for objectivity in it's purist sense is nowhere near as important as you'd like to imagine because of plain, cold economic fact. Again, it isn't bas-no way-but it IS a slight double standard you find everywhere and it's just that this point docking issue makes it look REALLY bad as it's so very unnecessary.Dock both or dock neither, imo.

itisa5590d ago (Edited 5590d ago )

I totally agree with both of you.

Everytime I want to buy a Playstation 3 game,I will always take game from 1st/2nd party developer because of this media bias bullshit.This is the game that I've bought for my 1 month old Ps3:Warhawk,Resistance:FOM,Mot orstorm,MGS4,Little Big Planet,and MAG.I know some of them are really old,but it is helping Sony 1st party developer and most of them was better than what the media told me.

Seriously there is something really wrong about gaming media especially in US,but the sooner every Playstation fans realize that they couldn't do anything about it,the better this situation will be.

Instead,please buy Playstation only game.It's the only way you could save Sony.And please point this article and thousand other media bias related article to anyone that says you're a rabid Sony fanboy.

Pika-pie5590d ago

Sole 360 owners should be lucky they have this game at all!

Rageanitus5590d ago

xbox fans... this just proves that your evil empire pays to have over inflated scores.... I knew this when halo 1 2 3 came out....

I wonder why there is not much reviews for pc vs consoles.... reason MONAY...

then were gonna hear the flip side graphis and resolution dont matter its all about game play .... which in fact alot of games these days if you notice better graphics add to the ambiance and making the game better. ITs a nice balance of graphics and gameplay that add to the whole experience.

DaTruth5590d ago

Now we know why last gen when developers had no problem making better versions of multiplats for XBOX but this gen every game has to be "the same".

If you lost Halo ad revenue for your magazine because of a review you posted that was unfavourable to 360, you would lose your job!

Splinter Cell Conviction console exclusivity was "a business decision"; MS can promise us higher review scores in all major magazines!

snp5590d ago (Edited 5590d ago )

ed: meh, covered bellow.

Lord Vader5589d ago

It doesnt matter which version is better b/c this game is starting to seriously flop. All this time in Development, all this hype, & the games getting 8's = no AAA title here.

Personally, I'll be passing on ALL versions of Final Flounder XIII.

king1235589d ago

guys chill out it's just a f***in game

+ Show (39) more repliesLast reply 5589d ago
Pennywise5590d ago

Please tell me why they both scored 91 from your website.

Shadow Flare5590d ago

Its outrageous. A poor ps3 port gets slated but a much poorer 360 port gets a completely free pass

W.....T.....F

ALFAxD_CENTAURO5590d ago (Edited 5590d ago )

Why bother commenting, everyone knows PS3 Version is the superior version for a lot of reasons.

Facts are facts, a score or sharing a score for the other console, is not making the PS3 Version less or equal. We already know PS3 Version is the best to play this game, and is meant to be played on PS3.

Go to the Asian Sites, and you will see PS3 have better scores.

But here is America, so....

sikbeta5590d ago (Edited 5590d ago )

@Shadow Flare

WOW, now that I realise that's kind of Ironic in some way, don't you think... nah It's just THE BIAS of the Whole "gaming media" and "journalist", LAME...

Unbelievable how they throw Lies and Pretend that Both Versions are EQUAL, WTF!?

@ALFAxD

Even if you're Right 100%, you don't think is not FVcking Fear, I mean the Whole Bayonetta case was SO Blown Out of Proportion with sites like Eurogamer that coincidentally were talking about the game like if it was The Second Coming of God and now a Game so important like FF13 with the Sub-HD x360 version and no one is talking about that, there is no Complaints, everyone is acting like if both versions are identical, WTF!?

radphil5590d ago

@Shadow Flare

That's because the gaming media have been butchered to hell and back. There's already bias, so they figure they might as well stick to it. It's a US company, so it helps them vs ones like Famitsu where Nintendo and Sony are Japanese based.

This crap was started ever since we went into this gen of gaming. =\

Alcon Caper5590d ago

"My biggest concern going into the 360 version was that it would suffer from technical defects that would affect its playability, as in the PS3 version of Bayonetta. When a game sputters and chugs, as so often happens with cross-platform ports, it ceases to be fun. And the nice thing about FFXIII on 360 is that its combat is every bit as smooth as on PS3. Everything flows the same, the feedback is just as responsive, and all in all battles play out just as well as on PlayStation 3."

That's why.

Shadow Flare5590d ago

"when I went back from 360 to PS3 it was almost like someone had stripped a layer of grime off my TV. The PS3 version is just that much crisper and more colourful"

Alcon. That doesn't equate to both games getting the same score, though I suppose it would to you. The 360 version isn't even in HD for crying out loud

doG_beLIEfs5590d ago

Screw multi-platform games. Screw 'em all. I am done with them. The PS3 is SO FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ARRRR more advanced than the 360 that they should be classified as separate generations.

I will not buy another mult-platform game again UNLESS 2 things happen...

1. No port from the 360
2. No GIMPING the game to make it workable on the 360

Until then, I will buy my games for my PS3 from 1st or 2nd party companies, that way I know I will be getting the best effort for the game I am playing. SCREW multies, buy 1st or 2nd party only. Sony has over 20 combined mostly 1st and some 2nd party studios cranking out great games no matter what some child-like website like Edge says.

Bring on GOW3, MNR, Joe Danger, GT5, Socom4, and the many other games that I did not list and those that are still unannounced like Starhawk or Syphon Filter.

FRACK the biased gaming media and FRACK 3rd party companies that dumb down their games to make MS happy.

radphil5590d ago

@Alcon Caper

Explain how Alone in the Dark got the same score by them, despite the PS3 version having gameplay fixes of the 360/Wii versions?

kwicksandz5590d ago

"That doesn't equate to both games getting the same score, though I suppose it would to you. The 360 version isn't even in HD for crying out loud"

how do you explain the ps3 version of Gta4 which was sub hd (640p) getting the same score as the 360 version?

pixelsword5590d ago

I can't remember myself, but I would say it's because despite the fact that GTA IV was sub-HD multiple reviewers said the PS3 version looked better, had less pop-in, screen tearing and looked less jaggy. It was from a long time ago, but I think those were the reasons.

snp5590d ago (Edited 5589d ago )

That's why.
-----

Do you really think so, though? How does it - the statement - hold up?

I mean the difference they give between the two versions of Bayonetta is A for the 360 and A- for the PS3, ie. the smallest difference they can assign using their scale.

Seems to me looking at this -

"When a game sputters and chugs, as so often happens with cross-platform ports, it ceases to be fun."

- would suggest a much bigger difference than putting a '-' on the back end of the other rating. That kind of statement aught to see an enormous difference between ratings, not what's really, a symbolic (this is the better of the two versions) type one. And symbolic differences in scoring should probably be consistent (as they seem to be for most games there besides FF13 - eg. Bioshock2, Tekken 6 etc.)

Either this quote is defensive hyperbole to smudge over the lack of reviewing consistency, or they've not marked down the PS3 version of Bayonetta enough. Having played Bayonetta on the Ps3 i'd argue the former.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 5590d ago
Fulensenca5590d ago

I wonder how much M$ is paying ...

ALFAxD_CENTAURO5590d ago (Edited 5590d ago )

Is America, you can't mess, you can but you shouldn't mess with the American Consoles. Still, we know they are not so good.

geth1gh5590d ago

why are so many of these f*cking articles up, when they have announced that the 360 version is a port from the ps3 version, and also that the 360 version will run in 576p versus the ps3s 720p in game and 1080p cut scenes?

seems pretty obvious to me, no need to waste your or our time with these articles.

Show all comments (144)
120°

Final Fantasy and SaGa series veteran Kazuyuki Shindo leaves Square Enix after 27 years

Kazuyuki Shindo, who worked on games including Legend of Mana, Final Fantasy XIII, and SaGa: Emerald Beyond, has left Square Enix.

Read Full Story >>
automaton-media.com
70°

The 7 Best Final Fantasy Characters: Unveiling the Legends

While FFVII ranks highly, there's more to the series than one game. Here's Chit Hot's picks for the seven best Final Fantasy characters.

220°

The older it gets, the more I respect Final Fantasy XIII

Alex Donaldson: "Hindsight is a hell of a thing, however, and in the years since Final Fantasy XIII, my respect for the decisions its developers made has skyrocketed. In the two Final Fantasy titles since we see both the brilliance and the folly in alternative approaches - and in Final Fantasy VII Remake, we get a more nuanced understanding of what FF13 was trying to accomplish from many of the same development leads."

Einhander1972550d ago

FFXIII is actually one of the best Final Fantasy games.

I also sort of was disappointed at the time, never as much as the bandwagon. But really all the fantastic 3D rendered cutscenes and I actually liked the characters and the story though convoluted was actually fantastic and the ending was extremely emotional. So much budget and time were put into that game Square had such big plans, I actually have always felt kind of bad for how things played out.

I have been thinking for years how great it would be to get all three games on one disk for PS4 or 5.

Nyxus550d ago

I always liked this game, and I agree, a rerelease for current gen would be nice.

Shane Kim549d ago (Edited 549d ago )

Gotta take off the nostalgia glasses. It's the worst FF. Shiva as a bike, I mean come on.

Elda549d ago

Shiva as a bike is strange but saying FFXIII is the worst FF is not at all a fact, that's simply your opinion.

Terry_B548d ago

*One of the 3 equally bad FF's

DivineHand125549d ago (Edited 549d ago )

When I got my series X a year ago, I bought FF13 for nostalgia reasons but ended up being disappointed. When I first played it around the time it launched, I didn't have a lot of experience with final fantasy games, so I enjoyed it. Fast forward to when I played it again, I found that the game had many unnecessary filler moments instead of just giving us meaningful content.

The game is also very linear and a quote on the article said it best. "It is like a sewage pipe that leads to the ocean until it opens up on Grand Pulse."

The story didn't make much sense either and I believe it is my mistake as I played the FF7 remake on PS5 prior which is a night and day difference in terms of pacing, storytelling and likeable characters even though cloud is aloof.

FinalFantasyFanatic549d ago (Edited 549d ago )

Probably was a mistake to play any of the golden era FFs first (e.g. FF6 through FF10), it makes it harder to enjoy some of the FFs that aren't as good. I think FF12 was where major issues with the series started becoming apparent, and it just got worse from there.

FinalFantasyFanatic549d ago (Edited 549d ago )

I didn't really care for it that much, the only saving grace was that it had a better story than 15 (overall it was better than 15) and possibly 12, and even then, you had to read some of it through primers, like reading a book. Plus the battle system was reasonably fun for what it was, even if it was more the spectacle that was exciting for me (e.g. summoning). And to be fair, the 13 trilogy got better with every games, I still don't like Snow though.

Gamingsince1981548d ago

Ff13 is only good if you haven't played a ff before, or any other games that are decent for that matter.

-Foxtrot548d ago

It is in fact no way the best Final Fantasy game, it's one of the worst

Linear corridors, Cutscene, Fight, Cutscene...rinse and repeat

Dialogue and characters are pretty bad, especially Lightning as the main FF hero, they literally said they tried to make a "Female Cloud" and they failed.

Story was pretty awful

I could go on

I think the only alright thing that came from the game was the music.

Elda548d ago

That's not a fact that's your personal opinion. The game sold 11 million copies between its 2009 release up until 2014 including critically reviewed as an 8 out of 10 or an 80 out of 100. The game does have some issues but it's not at all a fact as one of the worst FF games.

-Foxtrot548d ago

Elda

Not just mine mate

A large majority

So….

Traecy548d ago

N4G commenters such as yourself aren't the majority. The game was well received.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 548d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 548d ago
gold_drake550d ago (Edited 550d ago )

i liked the game alot but i didnt like how they handled the terminology.

i dont mind reading data logs but it had soo many.

but i always loved the music and how it looked. the battle system wasnt too bad either.

but i like 13-2 more :)

i still dont understand why we never got a remaster of the trilogy

Eonjay548d ago

Xbox kinda did. Besides the video files of course which are still best on PS3 due to bluray.

Snookies12550d ago

XIII is a pretty solid game, but XIII-2 is WAY better. XIII-2 was one of the few games I decided to go for a Platinum trophy in, early on. Had so much fun the entire way through getting it too!

Eonjay548d ago

Totally agree. FF 13 was okay but 13-2 is my favorite FF game ever.

shinoff2183550d ago (Edited 550d ago )

I hated this to when it released. I haven't much liked a ff game since ff10 as much , aside from ff7remake. I decided to give it another shot on my series x since it's not on a current ps and was liking it quite a bit(just takes me some time to get over things ) until star ocean 2 remake came out I was all over that.

Square should definitely remaster it or something for ps4 ps5

KillerB549d ago

my favorite jrpg trilogy ever

Show all comments (44)