640°

Halo Reach Proves Killzone 2's Worth To The Xbox 360

One look at Halo Reach and you can see it all falling into place. Halo 3 was good, it looked ok and played well but Microsoft needed something better, something to make people say "wow, look what the Xbox 360 can do!". with one look at the new footage and screenshots from Halo Reach it's easy to see that Bungie are really trying to push for something special now, something better than just another Halo game.

And it's thanks in no small part to Killzone 2 and the PS3

Read Full Story >>
lazygamer.co.za
FangBlade5566d ago (Edited 5566d ago )

Halo: Reach will be a fantastic game with a great story and gameplay, but comparing it to a graphical beast like Killzone 2 is just not fair.

BeaArthur5566d ago (Edited 5566d ago )

Personally I think all comparisons are stupid unless you are comparing an original to a sequel. Even similar games are different enough that trying to compare them is almost pointless. Halo 3 and Killzone 2 are two totally different games that play totally different from one another.

Bungie...do you ever get tired of being you?

Bungie5566d ago (Edited 5566d ago )

goddammit just stop it ,last time i checked Halo 3 won

Reach is in a league of its own

why are people trying to bring down Reach to KZ2's level

EDIT: sorry if i missed the sarcasm in this article!

Bereaver5566d ago

Well, actually, I have a different point of view on this. If you compared by power for each system, ps3 = killzone2, 360 = Halo : Reach, then yeah, maybe that would work. But, there's no way that Reach will look the same as Killzone2.

5566d ago
Jumping-Jack5566d ago (Edited 5566d ago )

Yes it does look very nice but like FangBlade said it's not fair to draw comparisons to them both just because they happen to both be shooters on opposite systems. Yes Killzone 2 looks better but it shouldn't really matter as long as Reach looks great in it's own right then I don't see what the problem is.

Chubear5566d ago

When it comes to sales Halo beats every other FPS out there, including Killzone, by miles... but when it come to every thing else game related, it is disputed by blind sheep fools alone that Killzone 2 totally SLAUGHTERS Halo to epic proportions.

A Cupcake for Gabe5566d ago

Halo Reach looks good. Not killzone good, but still nice. And it's nice to an actual nextgen halo game. ODST & H3 are graphically disgraceful. But the little extras are going to make Reach different. More dynamic controls, the 3rd person takedowns, the epic battles. These are the things that will make Reach good.

But in my opinion it goes
Halo
Killzone 2
Halo 2
Killzone
Halo 3
ODST

Hellsvacancy5566d ago

Halo Reach shouldnt b compared with Killzone 2 periosd, Killzone 2 gets compared with Crysis runnin on a high end Pc, u wont c any *Reach VS Crysis* articles

Reach should b compared with Resistance 1 or 2

Cold 20005566d ago (Edited 5566d ago )

Halo is a symbol, has become part of pop culture, record breaking.

What is KZ2...? If the KZ franchise were to stop existing tomorrow, nobody would care.

Anyway, KZ 2 is a corridor, straight forward, linear, heavily scripted FPS.

Reach is and open world, sandbox FPS and still manages to be a graphical powerhouse.
http://i50.tinypic.com/aagj...

HighDefinition5566d ago (Edited 5566d ago )

You think this is funny....you should read some of the comments in the Alan Wake Gameplay footage artical. Don`t get me wrong, Alan Wake look good (it`s my avatar for crying out loud) but cmon. Personally, I think 360 only people want a game to look as good as PS3 exclusives so bad, that their minds are playing trick on them. IDK I`m buying Alan Wake and any other game that sparks my interest. But, this is just getting pathetic. Just be happy w/ what you got, if you want PS3 quality graphics buy a PS3, it`s that simple. Cause as much as the 360 has shown it has some power left w/ Alan Wake and Halo:Reach, the PS3 has room to grow as well.

vhero5566d ago

Another one of these threads?? What are people seeing? It looks not much better than Halo 3 the difference is its actually gonna be in HD this time. That's what adding all them polygons did made true HD possible for the first time for a Halo FPS. The game barely compares to Haze let alone Killzone 2..

hay5566d ago (Edited 5566d ago )

@Jumping-Jack: "in it's own right"

It's almost like treating Halo as handicapped :D /JK

Remember people: Halo is about unparalleled gameplay.

HighDefinition5566d ago

McDonald`s is a pop culture symbol, that does mean it`s the best food you can buy.

Don`t be so sheepish

Cold 20005566d ago (Edited 5566d ago )

No that just shows how huge it is.

Seriously KZ is nothing compared to Halo.

BTW Crysis looks way better than KZ 2. Why dont you compare KZ2 to Crysis since according to the PS3 crowd the PC is a console just like the 360.

8thnightvolley5566d ago

its like comparing God and an ant... = HALO and killzone? .. whats wit that.? halo is like God of all console fps.. and fanbase is in the mega millions.. ppl even spend their lives trying to make a spartan armor.. and u wanna compare it with killzone.. loooool dont make me laugh.. lol killzone no matter how hard they try sorry to break it up to u folks but it aint never gonna reach the statue of halo.. EVER!. only if they mmm let say .. take sev out and put in some guy called john in a green armour called spartan 117 in killzone ok then it would be comparable at least the glory will rob off..

*stops rant*

5566d ago
zeeshan5565d ago

Oh dude, they are comparing KZ2 with Halo Reach. That's like comparing real life fruits (KZ2) with those fruity fridge magnets (Halo) you stick on your refrigerator!

WMW5565d ago (Edited 5565d ago )

"its like comparing God and an ant"
"halo is like God of all console fps"
Well that shows how sad 360 fanboys are they actually compare halo to god. everyone there is no point in commenting with this level of devotion to halo going on you will be basically talking to yourself. the halo fanboys are officially a cult and there is no denying that.

@cold
i call that a ff cult member what does that multiplate franchise have to do with ps3 owners?

@cold
how many consoles is halo on not made by MS? none. how many people bought halo 3? 10 mil. halo and the 360 are basically the same no halo no 360 period. ff has been on every platform genius those guys were most likely made because it was going to be held back( which did happen but mostly to the 360 version) if the 360 was more powerful and ff13 was exclusive to it they would of said the same stuff about it with a ps3 version announcement. use your brain buddy common sense won't hurt you halo is the xbox ff is just a franchise mostly associated with the ps.

Cold 20005565d ago (Edited 5565d ago )

Some PS3 fanboys were considering suicide when FF13 went muliplat caused a lot of tears...literally.

What do you call that ?
http://www.n4g.com/ps3/News...

EDIT: yeah right, so according to your logic a FF fanboy back when it was still an exclusive isnt necessarily a Sony fanboy but a Halo fanboy is necessarily a 360 fanboy...typical skewed PS3 fanboy logic. You dont even allow yourself to think straight anymore.

And you open your mouth about 360 fanboys ?! Lol.

beans5565d ago

I'm starting to get a head ache coming across dumb blind arrogant comments like yours. I've played many games and seen many vids like the rest and nothing on PS3 or 360 are in the same league as Alan Wake.

OT: Reach is shaping up nicely and hopefully soon we can see some new gameplay vids.

5565d ago
HighDefinition5565d ago (Edited 5565d ago )

If my IMO gives you a headache you got bigger problems than anything that has do w/ gaming bro.

I`m buying Alan Wake, I love Alan Wake, It`s not a God Send. Better get a Tylenol Beans!!!!! LOL!

Richdad5565d ago

It's important to see aspects like scale of game. Halo Reach has much larger scale than Killzone 2 and with features like Forge it hard to get to Killzone 2 in Quality.

Killzone 2 was not having such huge levels. THey were not small howsoever.

I think if capcom tries to make a game with same size of level with RE4 and DMC4 they will leave Final Fantasy AC CGI far behind in terms of graphics.

WMW5565d ago (Edited 5565d ago )

the desert map in kz2 is bigger then all open areas in any halo and has 32 players, around 8 or so turrets and air drones, lots of explosions from grenades and rockets, and zero lag and still looks better than everything reach has shown so halo has a bigger scale most of the time but when kz2 does open areas it still rapes halo so scale isn't an excuse for the lack of quality in reach if kz2's large multiplayer maps look better then single player areas in reach.

@beans
"Hopefully the gameplay add up and we don't get terrible controls like another similar game." alone in the dark, siren, or luigi's mansion? you have to be more clear AW is to unoriginal to make a statement like that and have people know what you're talking about.

beans5565d ago

"If my IMO"

Those 3 words just cured my headache! thanks
You see your other comments come across as if your telling us we don't get to have an opinion. Now that I see I miss understood your intent I feel much better and can take back my comment from earlier. Alan Wake In my personal opinion is the best looking game ever to grace consoles. Hopefully the gameplay add up and we don't get terrible controls like another similar game.

BISHOP-BRASIL5565d ago

Yes, PS3 and Killzone 2 (and so many other graphics showcase games) pushed Bungie to try a bit harder on the graphics department.

Halo fans always told 'gameplay > graphics' but the truth is it doesn't justify not doing graphics right, it's not like you couldn't have both.

Now, with that said, if people really want to compare Halo to PS3 games, try Resistance, Insomaniac are the guys with the arcadey, colorful shooter with aliens and absurd weapons.

I, for one, wouldn't care to compare. I stopped playing Halo at 2nd game (didn't like it at all, fair to say I didn't play online back then too), Halo 3 come out and it was a pass. Halo Reach mission in my view is being what Halo 3 should have been, not better or worse than PS3 franchises in anyway.

As far as now they are doing it right, get me excited about Halo again, althrough not my kind of multiplayer (I prefer tactical as Socom or Rainbow Six) the story, artstyle and visual effects of Halo were what put me in the Xbox at first place, this could pretty much be what make me buy a MS machine again.

DOMination5565d ago

They have to keep bringing this up because they are scared that their beloved KZ2 actually looks about 3 times worse than a game thats been in development half as long. I would be upset too if I only had a PS3 and saw the pinnacle of gameplay and graphics coming to 360 only.

WMW5565d ago (Edited 5565d ago )

the ones who brought this up was the 360 fanboys they always feel the need to prove themselves like a child who's parents are a shamed of them. "their beloved KZ2 actually looks about 3 times worse than a game thats been in development half as long. I would be upset too if I only had a PS3 and saw the pinnacle of gameplay and graphics coming to 360 only." LOL ps3 has more higher rated games then the 360 and the graphics crown has never been challenged post a pic of reach that looks this good or stfu and enjoy being second best. : )
http://i34.tinypic.com/22hz...

@beans
brown crap and rust really? that is what you're complaining about it is a desert genius. ok what is your excuse for this one http://blog.seattletimes.nw... you just keep telling yourself reach looks better maybe someone will hear your wish and grant it.

beans5565d ago (Edited 5565d ago )

Sorry mate but that pic looks like brown crap. It's got that milky grey like in other PS3 titles and really shows nothing more than rusted metal in the back ground. The gun looks good but Reach for a game that's not finished looks good as well. Heck even the gun handle looks blurry which is fine.
All I'm trying to say is your talk of KZ2 being much better looking off that shot isn't a good one.

edit wmw: hey look I'm not trying to argue or call you out in any way but that shot if you really look at it doesn't look that good. KZ2 held it down but now it's time to move on as things have progressed.

DOMination5565d ago

As already mentioned that screenshot is very average at best. That level in particular throws up some pretty generic gameplay. Poor lighting, poor shadows and terrible use of palette.

http://uk.xbox360.ign.com/d...

This is an ALPHA image of Halo Reach and already it's blowing KZ2 out of the water, not just in terms of quality but also with creative flair. The attention to detail is staggering and the world looks like some place I really want to visit, it's so much more and beautiful unlike the dead uninspired landscape and environment in your screenshot. I don't even know why it's being debated, it's so clear that we may as well call it a fact right now.

beans5565d ago

"ok what is your excuse for this one http://blog.seattletimes.nw... you just keep telling yourself reach looks better maybe someone will hear your wish and grant it."

I still like the setting and look of Reach much better. Bungie listening so trust me they will be granted. :P

arakouftaian5565d ago

I mean why not compare
kz4 on the ps4 with halo?

Let be fair
kz2 is runing on a 2007 computer
let run crysis on a 2007 computer
and tell me wich one looks better
i dont think you can en crysis in a 2007
computer can you?

Or. When kz2 was out
the ps3 cost 400
let compare how crysis looks on a 400pc
NeXT to kz2 can we?
We cant
so crysis vs kz2 is unfair
since you can upgrade a pc and you cant
upgrade a ps3

belive me if kz2
was for pc
im sure will make crysis
look old gen

bt still kz2 manege
t be a better game
thats play like a cgi
movie
and crysis is just one moré
plain fps that just looks nice

exnihilonihilfit5565d ago

It's not a comparison really, he's just saying that he feels that Bungie appropriately stepped up their game due to the graphical competition from Killzone 2. He's saying that Halo reach wouldn't look as good as it does if it weren't for Killzone because Bungie wouldn't have anything to strive toward. He's saying that there can exist a healthy rivalry between console exclusives that makes it so that developers for both systems strive for excellence and everyone benefits from top notch development. Sad thing is, all you are so petty that you can't realize that this guy is trying to find a common ground. This isn't a debate about gameplay or sales, so stop relying on the same tired fallbacks when the conversation is going in a direction in which you might feel insecure. Stop turning everything into an end all, be all debate about what is worthy and unworthy. Killzone's graphics are compared to Crysis, and Reach's graphics will be compared to Killzone's, it's to be expected, but just because one's aren't as good as the others doesn't mean that one is better than the other in all respects. Killzone and Halo have very different feels to them, and we can all enjoy them both. You guys who love Halo have no trouble getting just as much of a hard on for MW, so there's no reason why you shouldn't be able to be excited about Killzone other than jealousy, and the same goes for the Killzone lovers.

/facepalm @ fanboys.

Bodyboarder_VGamer5565d ago (Edited 5565d ago )

I just don't know what's the point of these comparisons because the most important thing in a game it's the gameplay, and Halo wins on that aspect. That's why so many people like the series so much and on top of that it has a really good art direction and story.

Killzone graphics are incredible but the controls are a mess. I had the game, beat it on the highest difficulty to get some trophies and sold it because I couldn't stand it.

DOMination5565d ago

God of War III doesn't look too bad but don't forget, N3II is coming out this year exclusively for 360.

beans5565d ago (Edited 5565d ago )

Good try but look at these pics and you can easily see how much better Alan Wake looks compared to GOW3. I guess you can now see where people are coming from lol.

GOW3 http://ps3.ign.com/dor/obje...
http://ps3.ign.com/dor/obje...

Alan Wake similar shot http://www.gamersmint.com/w...
http://www.gamersmint.com/w...

edit: heck look at the ground in the 1st 2 comparisons.

Edit below: Are you seriously that blind? Just so you know the daytime looks even better so why don't you quit pretending these shots don't look much better lol. Anyways no point in arguing with you because no matter what your going to spin it and run damage control. Oh and how long do you think your going to have light come from your gun? Obviously he already shot it which is why theres smoke! Gow3 on the other hand looks good but generic at the same time which is confusing me. I'm sure you can't even tell yourself those pics of GOW3 look better. Where are the feet to all the characters and why so grey? Anyways I'm done with you!

DaTruth5565d ago (Edited 5565d ago )

Lol! When I was a kid, I dreamed about how games would look in the future and playing life-like games; I didn't dream of how popular games would be in the future and playing games 10 million people are playing!

Your popularity argument is so weak and tired! Even the article makes no attempts at saying Reach looks as good as KZ2!

That being said, let Halo:Reach be Halo:Reach and let Killzone 2 be Killzone 2! I'd rather play Halo:reach than Killzone 2 copy!

@Above: You can't easily see anything, it's shrouded in darkness! How can you see anything in that pick! It is black and more black. Wish I could say the shadows look good, but there are no light sources! There's not even dynamic lighting from that burning guy!

marinelife95565d ago

When Gears of War first came out I said Wow that looks GREAT.

But I just don't see what the Halo/Alan Wake/Forza fans are seeing. They have solid next gen graphics but nothing spectacular.

360 fans are a lot safer comparing their games to other 360 games.

marinelife95565d ago

MS better drop as many games as they can before Sony begins releasing Killzone 3 footage.

tick tock tick tock

5565d ago
hennessey865565d ago

iv got a ps3 aswell as a 360 and ill say uncharted 2 is a graphical beast but killzone 2 hell no. the high rez gun and nice lighting didnt cover up the bland textures the horrible controls (mag plays alot better)uninspiring levels and the fact the game looks like its being renderd in black and white only the ps3 fanboys cant see it halo reach is far more detailed in evry way and you no the game play will be way beyond anything killzone could dream halo 3 played better than killzone 2

ape0075565d ago

competition is great oh so great

keep it up sony and ms, you make me happy

multicosole owners are winners

fanboys especially n4g fanboys are bunch of desperate and totally insecure persons

Saaking5565d ago

By the time Reach comes, KZ2 will be nearly 2 years old! By that time, there will be FAR better looking PS3 exclusives. Sad thing is, Reach won't look better than KZ2. lmao.

GiantEnemyCrab5565d ago (Edited 5565d ago )

I have to kinda agree. Halo doesn't really need to prove anything.. It's a runaway success and critically acclaimed. Killzone 2 is a great game but is not even in the same league as Halo when it comes to popularity and influence. Killzone 2 biggest claim to fame is it's graphics and with anything looks are fleeting... I'm already seeing better visuals in other games and it has already been retired by UC2 as the best looking console game.

Competition is good though and I agree with the article in that KZ2 upping the visual bar in FPS has made Bungie work harder on that but that's where it ends.

"multiconsole owners are winners

fanboys especially n4g fanboys are bunch of desperate and totally insecure persons "

So true Ape. The biggest losers this gen are the children who are holding on so tight to their one toy over some adolescent pride. This includes all these faux gaming sites that seem to pollute N4G.

Spydiggity5565d ago

This really is old. I don't think MS has any interest in Halo doing anything like Killzone. Halo breaks records and sets standards. Killzone is a piece of crap shooter that looks nice. and, it really only looks nice if you choose to ignore everything other than lighting and depth of field.

Killzone 2 is the only game i've purchased this generation that i've traded for something else. Contrarily, Halo still has more people playing it at any given time online than people have played killzone 2 all this year.

If ps3 fanboys are really so insecure that they need to keep justifying their console of choice by comparing record and trend setting games to games that not only have done nothing new, but have broken controls, no online community, and no interesting weapons, memorable plot points, story, acting, settings etc...then maybe it's time to rethink their choices and just break down and get the system already.

i have both systems, and let me tell you, you get the best of both worlds and you never have to make excuses for the games you wanted to be great but turned out to be junk.

Hotel_Moscow5565d ago

lots of sony fanboys here i feel @ home

Shepherd 2145565d ago

"Bungie needs to get off their butts to put some real effort into it."-Article

Wow, last i checked Bungie puts more effort into supporting Halo 3 and loading Halo 3 to the brim with fantastic features unheard of in any other console title, something no other dev does.. Yea, Bungie needs to pick it up i guess. /s

+ Show (46) more repliesLast reply 5565d ago
THC CELL5566d ago

someone is on crack mixed with thc and some drug i dont now how to spell today

Killzone gfx can only be beaten on ps3

hoops5566d ago (Edited 5566d ago )

Crysis Two on consoles just make a lot of fanboys eat crow this year.
Below:
It will be one funny day if Crysis 2 looks better then all thegames on the PS3 and Xbox360. A game coming from Crytek...I would not doubt it.
I personally think some people are scared as hell that the console version of this will look better then U2, Reach and other console games.

Chubear5566d ago

Oh please, Crysis 2 is only going to look mind blowing on PC. The console version will look no better than what we've already seen from many well done multiplatform games graphically like Bioshock, Assasins's Creed, Modern Warfare etc

8thnightvolley5566d ago

crysis2 on consoles make ur fanboy comment look so retarded.. lool...

ps.. its multiplat lool

Kleptic5565d ago (Edited 5565d ago )

these arguments are always lost because fanboys don't even understand what makes killzone 2 special on a technical level...if you are bored, watch the tech interviews on GT for killzone 2...there is a whole series of them...from mo-cap and sound design...to physics implementation and having the cell render 40% of a given frame (yeah...thats nuts...)

you are a blatant idiot if you think killzone 2 will 'easily' be topped on a technical level...but the arguments are always related to just how the game 'looks'...mostly by people that never played it...screen shots and short video clips give a decent idea of what to expect...but it trivializes what the point of an article like this is really about...

Killzone 2 still does stuff even Uncharted 2 didn't...the physics based animation system in character models is, and will be, completely on its own until GG makes another game...No game has anything close to it...but its also somewhat subtle, and most people wouldn't even realize how complex it is until spending significant time playing the game and noticing what happens when you fill an enemy with bullets countless times...

the lighting in killzone 2 is BY FAR the most complex of any game to date...any game...not even the original Crysis has as many real time dynamic lighits on screen at once...helghast eyes cast ambiance onto surrounding objects...muzzle flares create real time shadows around everything...grenades and explosions burst light out realistically, which also casts shadows around everything as it should...

The game has procedural wind that effects everything realistically...recent halo reach interviews have bungie stating about their new physics engine for particles...where they can have thousands of sparks on screen at once with physics, where as they could only have 100 in Halo 3...awesome Bungie...GG did that a year ago, AND had those thousands of sparks effected by wind and physics impulses from explosions...Not just in single player...in multiplayer too, with 32 players running around...this effects everything from running and physics based objects on the ground...to the procedural sky...which is not a simple static back drop like nearly every other title, but a dynamic system that has volumetric clouds and multiple layers all moving independently...with rockets and air bursts all casting light onto said clouds...fire up the game and sit on salamun bridge and stare at the sky...if the game had only that technically, it would still top nearly every other console game this generation...

killzone 2 did fall short in areas...the voice acting and story were underdeveloped...and the controls turned a lot of people off (which was later addressed, but still not perfected for many)...but it NEVER failed visually...and over delivered on every single technical front...if you like the art style or overall look of other great looking games...so be it...but don't undermind just how impressive killzone 2 is on a technical level...that 50+ million dollars was used somewhere...

GiantEnemyCrab5565d ago (Edited 5565d ago )

@3.1: Don't forget about Metro 2033.. Everyone who has laid eyes on it said it's amazing visually.. Time to buy stock in crow meat.

Kleptic: Great post and yes the tech behind the graphics is just as important as the texture resolution, etc. I disagree on the lighting however, Halo 3's HDR lighting is the best in the biz and while KZ2 is no slouch I don't agree that it's the best.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5565d ago
SUP3R5566d ago

After all this time people still only read the headlines and comment? Only to look stupid in the comments section.

This is not a comparison of both games.
READ PEOPLE!

BeaArthur5566d ago

The funny thing is that it even implies it's not a graphical comparison in the title.

ZombieAutopsy5566d ago

Good points, when Developers release graphical beasts such as Kz2 it makes other Dev's have to go that extra mile....sad thing is though most dont seem to even bother trying but i have faith Bungie will deliver something much better than Halo 3 this time around.

Show all comments (173)
130°

Why Guerrilla Games Shouldn't Abandon the Killzone Series

Hugely disappointingly, it seems that Guerrilla Games, developers of the Killzone and Horizon series, may be done with Killzone for good.

Read Full Story >>
thenerdstash.com
IAMRealHooman204d ago

1 was fine, overhyped as a " halo" killer
2 was a graphical beast at the time, and felt heavy
3 was good a refinement of 2 but not much else. weird audio issues environment were to quiet
shadow fall was pretty but bland

OtterX204d ago (Edited 204d ago )

Shadowfall had great Multiplayer though. Too bad the campaign was meh at best. It did have the occasional great moment sprinkled in.

TheNamelessOne204d ago (Edited 204d ago )

I played through 2/3 multiple times. I played through the original once, but it felt pretty lukewarm for me. I couldn't be bothered to beat Shadow Fall. I got a couple hours in and just went "I'm done". Never touched it again. It was awesome on the tech side, being a launch title, but it didn't even match up to the first game when it came to actually having fun playing it.

Rude-ro204d ago

3 in 3d was an amazing experience to be had.
Although not many experienced it as intended for good reasons.

just_looken204d ago

You forgot the ai advancements on the playstation 2 killzone one you could have a full team of bots doing everything even playing the objective that was a big thing.

In killzone 2 they always flanked you and when available used the high ground.

Playing killzone 2 no hud 5.1 audio was/is awesome

MDTunkown204d ago

They should finish Horizon story first

darthv72204d ago

I dont mind if someone else takes up the mantle for the KZ franchise. We are several years removed from the first game. It certainly could use a remake to gauge interest in the rest of the series. I know it has its fans... Im thinking of how a proper reboot can rekindle that old dormant flame and bring in a new generation of fans in the process.

just_looken204d ago

You forgot killzone mercenaries on the ps vita but it was the worst selling sony game for awhile there.

Yui_Suzumiya204d ago

Yeah, a remake would be pretty awesome

anast204d ago

They should let it go or sell it. No use spending millions on this project.

LucasRuinedChildhood204d ago

Would like a new IP before Horizon 3. Just because games take so long to make these days.

Show all comments (21)
50°

Master Chief becomes a Pokemon Master in Halo 3 Pokeball mod

A new Halo 3 mod turns the iconic Master Chief into a Pokémon % Master as functional Pokeballs come to the game.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
just_looken205d ago (Edited 205d ago )

That is very impressive to skip the article here is the direct link to the video
https://x.com/GashnorOffici...

Full animiation then a code change to make the target that comes out of the ball to be in the same class unsc not a easy thing to do.

350°

PlayStation 3 Games That Desperately Need a PS5 Remaster

The PlayStation 3 may not have been the strongest generation for Sony, but there were still some diamonds in the rough that deserve a revisit as PS5 remasters.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
OtterX433d ago (Edited 433d ago )

Even if they could just remaster and put on PSVR2, some would still look great as VR titles and could do a whole lot to bolster the headset w these exclusives! I'd imagine the investment of reworking these titles into VR would be way less than building new games from the ground up, and they could be amazing experiences, and VR often makes flat games feel fresh again. The Resistance and Killzone games are particularly what I want to see!!

Rude-ro433d ago

I played killzone 3 in 3d and it really changed the game per being immersive.
In vr, that would be even more awesome.

darthv72433d ago

Funny you mention that... my son wanted to play some PS3 games in 3d on my PS tv and he was blown away by how good KZ3 was. It really was a great addition to the game. Im surprised there have not been more 3d games from that era being ported to the PSVR/VR2.

_SilverHawk_433d ago

resistance 1-3, killzone 1-3, uncharted 1-3, uncharted golden abyss, folklore, socom 4 , motorstorm, twisted metal, MAG, heavenly sword

Cacabunga433d ago

Killzone 2+3
Sly Thieves in Time
Crack in Time
God of War Ascension
Motorstorm
Modnation racer
Infamous 1+2

Profchaos433d ago (Edited 433d ago )

Killzone trilogy in VR would be amazing bonus points if they offer shadow fall.

There was a psvr1 Killzone project that supermassive was working on at one stage which wasn't up to scratch and Sony brand it back in house I was hoping we would see that on psvr2 eventually.

Personally I'd love to see some more love or acknowledgement of psvr2 from Sony in general it was a expensive headset and Sony barely acknowledge it's existence

seanpitt23433d ago

The amount of work needed to remaster these games wouldn't be beneficial on a financial and business sense.. MGS4 would probably be the best bet as it would need the least amount of work!

Iceball2000433d ago

YEAAASSSSS! I miss this franchise and wanna play it so bad again.

Father__Merrin433d ago

The time is perfect for a resistance fall of man game campaign coop multiplayer

InUrFoxHole433d ago

The resistance series is str8 trash to me. Socom 3 I would welcome. Or killzone MP.

Marcus Fenix433d ago

A Resistance reboot will be awesome

Michiel1989433d ago

That's what Bungie should make, Ill keep saying it until it happens

1Victor433d ago (Edited 433d ago )

Resistance was ok but Warhawk and Starhawk was better and kept me coming back for almost a decade of fun and petty revenge on the loud mouth unskilled players 🤣
Edit I loved capture the flag dropping the pot on the flag carrier was extremely satisfying as well as transforming your plane in bot form and stumping them to death 😱

433d ago
Michiel1989433d ago

Resistance was the best co-op fps I ever played after L4D2

Show all comments (52)