Top
370°

Why the StarCraft 2 Specs Can't Be Real

They were leaked and denied, but that does not have to mean they are not real. However, StarCraft: IncGamers has sent its tech-spech blood hound at the specs, and he has found out just what's wrong with the specs, and why we were given incorrect ones.

Read Full Story >>
starcraft.incgamers.com
The story is too old to be commented.
Leord3182d ago

In so many words:

Blizz fail :P

Cogo3182d ago

On the other hand: I had no idea it was actually physically impossible for the specs to be real.

Very interesting read I think.

Leord3182d ago

Yes, I agree, especially as that Kalos fella found the source of those stats...

kalos3182d ago

Well I've seen rumours of more leaks and accidental slipups on their site, I've beginning to suspect they are doing it on purpose to get some media attention and tension before the Beta unveilling. Very sneaky of them.

Perjoss3182d ago

right, because bliz games really need hype and media attention

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3182d ago
Cogo3182d ago

It would have been awesome if they WERE real, though...

Ocelot5253182d ago

no, cuz the overall graphics would suck if they were real, even if the recommended specs were for the lowest setting to run the game at 25fps. even the PS2 owns these minimum specs

Recka3182d ago

Well Highly scaleable engine might mean just that

Cogo3182d ago

Well, perhaps not *impossibly* scalable. Not sure it would be worth the development time.

Rather: I am SURE it would not be worth it!

JonahNL3182d ago

Already expected it, there's no friggin' way the system requirements were that low. I expect a lot from Blizzard, but they're not miracle workers.

kalos3182d ago

Indeed; I was just suprised nobody raised the fact before that the Geforce 2 doesn't even support what we've been told time and again to be the bottom line. The poor card is toast!

Leord3182d ago

If they could do that, I wish they would spend their time trying to solve world hunger instead.

I mean, a miracle could be better used there ;)

Cogo3182d ago

Are you the same Kalos as the writer of the article?

kalos3182d ago

That Kalos and this Kalos is the same. Bubbles if you agree? :D

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3182d ago
DJDarkstar3182d ago

Quite interesting. I knew that was low but yeah, Good spot by Kalos on the Impossible bit hehe.

Show all comments (21)