240°

Star Trek sets a new sales record on Blu Ray

Blu-ray.com reports : "In the week ended November 22, 'Star Trek' was the top-selling title on Blu-ray, according to Nielsen VideoScan First Alert, which also puts the Blu-ray market share for this title at 38%, breaking the new-release record held by 'Watchmen'. The research department of Home Media Magazine estimates that total BD sales for this title in North America were 1.1 million units (including sales to the rental market). "

iron_sheik5679d ago

38!!
soon it will be 50% and over for new titles
seems like Blu ray is killing off DVD faster than expected
and we had people who doubted Blu ray's success?
how things have changed with BD as well as PS3 :)

gaffyh5679d ago

I loved the Star Trek movie, and I am not a fan of Star Trek (but I am a fan of Sci-Fi stuff in general e.g. Stargate, Star Wars etc). I actually went with a friend to the cinema who hates everything Sci-Fi, and he LOVED this movie.

He actually said that it made him want to watch the TV series, so he started watching it, and realised it was a pile of crap and that the movie is a million times better than the series lol.

Timesplitter145679d ago (Edited 5679d ago )

Well you can't blame people who doubted blu-ray.

After Betamax, they DID have reasons to doubt, and there was also the fact that DVD had just recently become standard.

I hate it when people take a GUESS and then say "I told you so!" when their guess turned out to be true. There is just no way to know so any guess is as good (or worthless) as the other.

sikbeta5679d ago

Actually, Betamax died because SONY wanted to be an exclusive media, so others companies jump to VHS and made it an standard, this time is totally different, SONY is making the BLU-RAY an standard and share to other companies in exchange for royalties

SuperM5679d ago

You make it sound like there are no predictions better then other predictions, and that no matter what you think its just as likely or unlikely to occur as whatever someone else thinks. That is ofcourse total bullsh1t.

You see some people just take random guesses based upon nothing but their own wishes or whatever. And for them it will just be about luck wether they hit the mark or not. Then you have the people who think what is likely to happen and make their assumption out of that. Someone is better then others at doing that, someone outright suck and will always be wrong and someone hit the mark almost every time.

Back when the HD-DVD and Bluray were still competing it was legitimate to ask question wether or not bluray would be successfull or not, but after HD-DVD got out of the fight it was pretty obvious for anyone who had experienced bluray movies, that it would be a success.

HD content is here to stay, and bluray really doesnt have competition in this area. in 5-10 years maybe Digital distribution will start taking over, but even then you will likely see people chosing the physical copy over the download version, either because they prefer to have a physical copy, maybe it has higher quality. (downloads would have to be about 25gb in size if they are to have the same quality as bluray) or maybe they dont have a good enough internet connection for such big downloads.

Sorry for long post, it just kinda happened.

Timesplitter145679d ago

But the problem is that the best product doesn't ALWAYS win. There's a huge luck factor

raztad5679d ago

luck? not at all. What made BD successful was the PS3. I can say, I saw the BD victory coming. PS3/BD success or failure were tied together. Thats the reason of so many "The BluRay is teh doomz" articles, they were making their bets for the PS3 doom as well.

TruthBTold5679d ago

Sony had a lot of studios supporting the content exclusive to Bluray which gave them an edge on movie selection. With the PS3 supporting it even more people would not pass up the opportunity to try these new HD movies. I for one could not go back to DVD after watching some Pixar movies in 1080P. It is beautiful. Now I hope the prices for Bluray start dropping more so I can get my hands on some more BDS.

JoySticksFTW5679d ago

I just got my free PS3 streaming disk from Netflix, and the streamed HD content doesn't even come close (the HD choices suck at the moment too)

Treat your HDtv to Blu-ray. It'll love you for it :)

housegroove765679d ago

beta was a failure on the consumer side of things, on the broadcasting side its a different story. Im a broadcaster in the Air Force and we still use beta tapes. When we get requests from civilian news outlets asking for our footage, they almost always ask for it on Beta (beta sp) Its starting to change now with them asking for DVC Pro and some other formats, but I dont think we will be getting rid of our Beta decks anytime soon.

TotalPS3Fanboy5679d ago

Wait. I mean, HD-DVD was doomed.

calis5679d ago

"I loved the Star Trek movie, and I am not a fan of Star Trek (but I am a fan of Sci-Fi stuff in general e.g. Stargate, Star Wars etc)."

I had never seen a Star Trek movie/show ever, and I am a fan of Sci Fi as well, but I bought the movie on Blu-Ray and really enjoyed it.

Kassanova075678d ago

I was really surprised how good this film was. Never doubted Blu Ray inevitably taking the market over. Developers should utilize it more ala Batman AA.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 5678d ago
Lucreto5679d ago

The movie looked superb on blu-ray. For a fan it is a must have.

iron_sheik5679d ago

crisp picture quality.cant just get better than that.
Now where are those doom and gloom BD articles

morganfell5679d ago

The movie looks great but I wouldn't say it is a must have when many die hard fans view it as a bastardization of the canon.

DaTruth5679d ago (Edited 5679d ago )

It practically hurts my eyes to watch DVD on a big screen now and upconversion is no help!

@Morgan: I kind of like the twist. It leaves him(JJAbbrams) open for his own creative design and not locked in to the future that was already written. Almost like a new Star Trek series with similar characters. But I wasn't a big fan of the original, so I can't really see it their way! I did watch every other Star Trek though and the movies.

Ju5678d ago

That whole movie is just a setup for a new show yet to come. I am sure about it. New re-launch with up to date tech and fresh young cast - and the freedom of an "alternate reality".

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5678d ago
RedDragan5679d ago

who cares about the North American sales?

Worldwide sales would have been a better topic considering BD Player Sales in Europe are much higher than in the US and Asia combined.

I will agree that it is good news that it is doing well in America, but America has been fairly resistive to BD thus far.

RedDragan5679d ago

why the disagree from someone?

Worldwide sales will be more impressive and a better talking point. This world is not just America you know.

redsquad5679d ago

Well, I hated the film itself but do admit that STAR TREK is a showcase title for the format.

Dutch Boogie5679d ago

Transformers 1 and 2 where the showcase for the blu ray format. Avatar will join them soon.

blackpanther255679d ago (Edited 5679d ago )

You can say the movie sucks but visually on Blu-ray that movie is insane and thats the reason I bought to show off my PS3 to my friends.

EDIT: @below

Yeah i bought as well. It really does look good and the sound quality is off the charts

RedDragan5679d ago

WALL-E looks awesome as well.

Clarity is out of this world!

Antan5679d ago

Aside from Wall-E, i think the absolute pinacle of visual clarity is withoubt doubt Benjamin Button! Staggering.

DaTruth5679d ago

I really can't believe the difference in Pixar animated films! I thought it wouldn't matter, but the quality is still far better.

I have a DL version of Wall-E that looks Bluray quality too. 8 gigs with surround sound and it turned out great!

Aquarius5679d ago

PLANET EARTH?
Die Hard 4.0?
FFVII: Advent Children Complete?

RedDragan5678d ago

I guess there are many showcase title's now, just watced Moon.... oh my god!!!!

Finally all the producers have got the transfer process nailed down!

I love Blu-Ray!

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5678d ago
nix5679d ago

oh.. Blu-ray.. what is this? i thought this format was dead long time back...

piramides305679d ago

You're wrong. Dvd is dying and Bluray is growing.
CES'T LA VIE.

MONOLITHICIDE5678d ago

i know, i was expecting star trek to sell amazingly on hddvd, havent seen this one yet though i heard it was really good.

Show all comments (71)
290°

The Real Enemy of Gaming Isn’t DEI. It’s the CEO

From Horse Armor to Mass Layoffs: The Price of Greed in Gaming. Inside the decades-long war on game workers and the players who defend them.

Read Full Story >>
rushdownradio.net
jambola4d ago

maybe a real enemy is people who use terms like "the real enemy"
there can be more than 1 bad thing, t's not like a kids show with 1 big bad

senorfartcushion3d ago

This is very much a “dummy who volunteers themselves to the middle” comment.

The real enemy is a common phrase, people use it all the time.

Calm down.

jambola3d ago

i'm very calm
you seem very upset however

Notellin2d ago

You don't seem calm at all. Don't take this so seriously, you seem desperate responding to others defending your opinion that lacks any value or critical thought.

jambola2d ago

stop projecting
i'm not desperately dong anything, i'm tapping at keys on my keyboard bud

PapaBop2d ago

It's not like kids show with one bad guy? I present to you.. Bobby Kotick

ABizzel12d ago (Edited 2d ago )

DEI was never the problem and it was an ignorant take to begin with.

DEI is why games like Kena Bridge of Spirits, South of Midnight, and Ghost of Tsushima exist.

DEI is why we have a huge resurgence in Japanese, Chineses, and Korean developers producing games like Stellar Blade, Black Myth, and why Nintendo & Sony exist.

DEI is why more and more games have HUGE accessibility options with both Sony and MS fully behind this.

DEI was never a bad thing, the entire purpose of DEI is representation of all people, genders, disabilities, etc…

The problem was people used DEI as a default derogatory term to describe what they believed was forced representation, which allowed colorist, racist, sexist, misogynist, homophobic, and xenophobic fools to run away with the negative DEI narrative.

jambola1d 23h ago

you don't get to decide other people's motivations
sorry to break it to you

ABizzel11d 2h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

To each their own, however, nothing you said invalidates why some people take offense to DEI incorrectly.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 2h ago
Sciurus_vulgaris4d ago

Executives seem to often have an obsession with perpetual revenue growth. There is always a finite amount of consumers for a product regardless of growth. Additionally, over investment is another serious issue in gaming.

Killer2020UK3d ago

The fact that they also rarely have any real expertise in game development compounds things. They'll look at what's been successful elsewhere, lack the knowledge to properly understand why they have been successful and then force a team to 'reproduce' their badly interpreted idea of that success.

We see it so often with sequels to games that were successful too. The team are left well alone, they have a break through hit and all of sudden the money men descend on the IP and completely railroad the dev team's ideas. Usually winds up being 'make the same game but MORE'

LoveSpuds2d ago

This is true throughout all of the corporate and public sector organisations to be honest. CEO's generally move amongst the corporate world without any need to have experience of a particular industry, they simply need to rely on their senior leadership credentials. A CEO of a retail giant will just as easily transition to a CEO role in the energy sector for example.

Not defending CEOs here to be clear, I think it's a huge part of the reason the western world is so fucked up. CEOs don't need to care about the sector they work in, in fact it's better if they don't care if they want to screw everyone to make profits.

GhostScholar3d ago

Companies don’t hire executives to break even. If the goal is breaking even then why start the company in the first place.

Soy3d ago

That's understood; it's getting record profits and expecting to always beat those record profits, and seeing anything less as a total failure. Then they lay people off and raise prices to reach those record profit levels again, just to sate shareholders. It's setting expectations way too high just to spike share prices, then inevitably falling short. It's feeling entitled to being more successful than everyone else. It's the CEOs doing all this to boost their own bonuses.

ABizzel12d ago

Growth benefits the company’s profits and therefore the company’s stock if publicly traded, which pleases the shareholders making them more and more rich, which is why Growth is always at the forefront of the vast majority of any publicly traded company.

More growth = More Money and the people at the top want all the money they can get. I can’t really blame them anyone would love to see their profits go from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands, to multi-millions it’s almost like a gambling addiction.

But it also goes to show someone how morals can go out the window for a lot of these people, and how amazing some CEOs are when they catch this early and provide a balance solution that takes complete care of their employees across the board while keeping the business sustainable IE: Insomniac Games ALWAYS on the best places to work list. The rest of the industry could learn.

jambola4d ago

honestly, the "real" enemy of gaming, is ourselves
if nobody bought horse armor, shitty dlc would have died almost overnight
if we stood firm and nobody bought games from companies that were bad with layoffs, it would be solved
we're the idiots supporting awful business practices, we are the ones enouraging it

TiredGamer3d ago

I think the reality that we don't want to convince ourselves of is that without the rise of "horse armor" and DLC, game budgets would have essentially stagnated (smaller teams/smaller games), or game prices would have risen much more dramatically than they have. There was an incessant drive for bigger worlds, infinite detail, and hundreds of hours of "gameplay" over the last two decades, that while perhaps a natural evolution of things, needed a suitable funding stream to accomplish.

HyperMoused2d ago

What...CEOs make tens of millions and that doesnt include SLT etc etc...we now have multiple editions of games, in game currency, MT's, battle passes.....and what do we get..worse game than what was coming out 20 years ago....dont drink the cool aid, its this nickel and dime crap that is absolutely leading us to gaming destruction.

senorfartcushion3d ago

This is the worst possible answer to this conundrum. Blaming the masses is blaming the only people who are constantly “told” to buy.

Consumers are the only ones not to blame here. People make their own choices all the time. Disney movies are bombing and DEInis being blamed. Has that been enough to put Disney out of business? No and it never will.

Christopher3d ago

Disagree. Businesses are able to do what they do because people are bad consumers and don't think critically about purchases. Disney got away with doing shit stuff for years and it's just the last year where people got tired of it. It's not like it didn't work for 5 years or so for Disney to do the things they've done. They'll just move onto another way to get people to see movies and it will be just as bad but more profitable until people wake up and realize it.

TiredGamer3d ago

Consumerism drives business behavior. It's not so much "blaming" as it is observing behavior. The point I'm making is that the direction that games have gone are driven by the spending. Consumers are spending on DLC and they are driving the expectation of more glitz and padded out (lengthier) games. If they continue to pay, they will continue to drive that direction until a threshold is reached that forces a change in behavior.

senorfartcushion3d ago

Corporate advertising is the most powerful force on the planet.

This is N4G for god sake, every day there are arguments between people who are Team Xbox and Team PlayStation because they’ve been convinced that having an identity built on paying money to Sony and Microsoft matters more than having one as individual gamers who can play whatever they want.

And THEN we get to the corporate advertising part: to play whatever you want is to sink MORE into the advertising pits, making it so that you can more than one specific product.

jambola3d ago

ah you're right
they were told to buy it, it's clearly impossible to avoid that
if enough people stopped supporting, it would stop
disney not stopping would only be because enough people didn't stop

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3d ago
victorMaje3d ago

Agreed. I’ve been saying for years, announce you won’t be buying the upcoming game because of the practices of the previous game, then you only have to stick to your guns once, see how quickly things change for the better.

We have to unite in what we shouldn’t purchase.

jambola3d ago

just imagine a world, fifa came out worse, nobody buys the next one until they see proof it's better and stick to it
or games being forced online for single player and nobody buys it
things would change so fast

HyperMoused2d ago

Just like scooby doo, you have shown us the real monsters are us

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2d ago
Inverno3d ago

Greed and greedy people have and always will be the main issue for everything wrong in the world. Everything is a product to be exploited for monetary gain. Even when there are things that could help progress us along for the sake of making our lives easier that thing must be exploited for monetary gains. Anything that tells you otherwise is propaganda to make you complicit.

coolfool3d ago

I've never thought "DEI" (although the way most people use it doesn't match it's real definition) is the problem with games. Good games have continued to be good when they have a diverse cast, and likewise, bad games have continued to be bad. There isn't a credible example I've seen where a diverse cast has been the direct cause of a game being bad.

Show all comments (51)
80°

It Has Been Over 2,500 Days Since The Elder Scrolls 6 Was Revealed

It's been officially over 2,500 days since The Elder Scrolls 6 was revealed, and fans are still waiting for more than a logo and a mountain range.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
jznrpg3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

It will come out in another 1000-2000 days or so. I’d rather they remake Morrowind. After they added quest arrows, sprint button, making stats lesser and the big nerfs to spells Elder Scrolls has been too simplified. They could change that with ES6 but I don’t have much faith in modern Bethesda. I would love to be wrong

clevernickname2d ago

Wait until he hears about Star Citizen...

80°

Silly Polly Beast: A Silent Girl's Fight for Freedom • VGMM

Play as Polly, a silent girl on the run from her dark past in this neon-soaked psychological horror shooter.

Read Full Story >>
videogamesmademe.com