290°

Leak shows Sony XBR12, new OLED TVs

A leak today hints Sony is planning to tackle the high end of the TV market with at least two new XBR models and a long anticipated update to its OLED sets.

Read Full Story >>
electronista.com
aslucher5288d ago

I hope this is true! Sony needs to push the market with OLED. They need to, so the price will drop and I can get one!

socomnick5287d ago

Dont buy an OLED man, you would enjoy it for 2 years, then in the 3rd year the blues would die out and the picture would look like crap.

Biggest problem with OLED right now is uneven pixel lifespan.

Blues in particular last less than 1/3 of what the reds and yellows do on OLED panels.

aslucher5287d ago (Edited 5287d ago )

Hey ok I just found a great article. It appears that there has been a breakthrough. Well was I guess, which means they are still working on the problem and still my point is valid. People need to buy these lol. I mean c'mon I know the economy is bad globally but there has to be some rich ignorant people out there wanting to just get the most expensive tech just for bragging rights haha or poor people wanting to have the same rights and be broke, like me.

The article states that experimental OLEDs were created which can sustain 400 cd/m² of luminance for over 198,000 hours for green OLEDs and 62,000 hours for blue OLEDs

Which is a major upgrade. The average operating time for LCDs is around 60,000 hours. This brings it equal time to an LCD. However like you said each color has a differing life expectancy. I have made it fair by taking the lowest time, as this would be the time to upgrade because nobody wants a TV lacking in color.

http://www.cdtltd.co.uk/pre...

socomnick5287d ago (Edited 5287d ago )

http://www.hdtvinfo.eu/news...

Here you go, there are more articles out there describing it in more detail.

OLED sounds good if they can manage to increase the lifespan but at its current condition its completely messed up that some poor saps are gonna pay 4k dollars for one and 2 years later the picture quality will be total crap.

The problem is not the length that they last is that the quality of the colors diminishes over time.

After 2 years you will notice a change in color brilliance of up to 20 percent, and then another 17 percent in 2 more years.

With LCDS they dont really diminish in color quality they just die one day.

El_Colombiano5287d ago

OLED...doesn't that have a ridiculously short life span?

MAR-TYR-DOM5287d ago

the twelve stand for the 12k price tag.

In all honesty, these tv's are a beast but they are way overpriced even for high end tv market.

Marceles5287d ago

The TV in the picture in the article makes my XBR4 look old lol. I'm glad they're bringing back the glass frame though, that was one of the many reasons why I bought a BRAVIA

LukaX235287d ago

Sony advances in technology really fast, but that's not always the best thing to do. When the PS3 came out they had to sell it for less money than it's worth, and although that's probably not the case here, it won't matter. Only rich people will pay that much for a HDTV. I don't blame them, that thing is downright gorgeous.

socomnick5287d ago

OLED has uneven lifespan, the blues have a super rediciously short lifespan, meaning the quality of the tv will deteriorate really quickly.

OLED is not a good future for tvs.

http://www.displayblog.com/...

Much better future technology for TVS.

It would be drastically cheaper than LCDS, better quality, faster response times and above all its very scalable since its so cheap to manufacturer.

With this tech you could have 1000 dollar top of the line 60+ inch tvs.

Pekka5287d ago

Right now, OLED has quite short life span. Then again, LCD's and plasma displays had very short life span too when first models came out. Especially plasma displays had very short life span until just few years ago. So, they may find some solution for life span just like before. If they don't, then OLED doesn't have very good future.

Pekka5287d ago

@1.4: That technology is still just a theory because not even a prototype have been introduced. We have no idea yet whether technology actually works or not because there are no displays using that technology. And no tests about quality or life span.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5287d ago
KILLERAPP5287d ago

Why buy this when next year there will be a new one better and less expensive one.

TheBand1t5287d ago

Why buy any piece of technology, since there's always something that will be new and cheaper?

sikbeta5287d ago (Edited 5287d ago )

By that logic none of us couldn't buy a console this gen, because the next consoles will be better

Technology need to be supported in order to evolve

Major_Tom5287d ago

What's funnier is these are cheaper to make than CRT TV'S LOL.

badkolo5287d ago

I think ill wait until the new 3d tv's start to churn out.

if 3d becomes as big for movies and games in the way i think it will then why bother upgrading to oled if oyur set for now.

Show all comments (19)
150°

Let's Be Real, There Is Nothing "Micro" About Microtransactions Anymore

Microtransactions have gotten ridiculously overpriced in recent years, with titles now offering cosmetic skins worth more than some games.

Terry_B23h ago

Yup..this is 100% the sad truth

z2g2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

The elephant in the room tho is personal accountability. It’s easy (albeit basic) to blame the big, bad corpo, but microtransactions wouldn’t be where they are if gamers didn’t spend money on them. As it stands the MTs usually make more than the game. Publishers know raising game prices will cause backlash, so they do MTs to compensate. But the adult conversation is consumers determine the success of products with their wallets. So if MTs are a huge thing, it’s because we as consumers told them we like them by giving them a lot of money for them. So if you don’t want them to be a thing, convince your fellow gamers to stop buying them and expect that games will be decently more expensive. You all can disagree all you want, but reality is a bitch, and eventually you have to live in it.

anast43m ago

Trying to convince people is the least realistic thing. If we are trying to be adults, actual action is what changes things not "convincing campaigns" on platforms owned by the people 'you' are going against. It's madness and idealistic.

isarai15h ago

I mean except for the amount of content you're paying for.

Hugodastrevas4h ago

There never was, the only time I paid for a microtransaction was on Blacklight Retribution (PS4) and it was because I enjoyed the game a lot so I felt the devs should get something for all that entertainment (€5 "membership")

-Foxtrot3h ago

The devs wouldn’t get that though, that shit goes straight to the higher ups who do f*** all let’s be honest.

Hugodastrevas2h ago

Probably, but I wasn't as cynical back then and €5 wasn't a big ask to get the guns with grinding instead of renting them, and the game was good (still is on the PS5/4)

CrimsonWing692h ago(Edited 2h ago)

I couldn’t believe what Blizzard charged for horse armor and cosmetics in Diablo 4…

I remember back in the day when a season pass was $15 and you got everything included in it. Now, I see them at $60 and you still don’t get everything.

Shane Kim2h ago

As soon as gaming wasn't deemed nerdy anymore, and reached the casuals this happened. We're smart, but casuals play mobile games and other stuff, and don't really have anything to compare. They think gaming is supposed to be like this and pay for in game purchases.

Show all comments (11)
110°

It's good SLI is dead and buried - and my wallet agrees

Kevin writes: "Multi-GPU gaming was one of those things that seemed like a good idea for as long as it lasted. I mean honestly, the idea of a modular approach to graphics upgrades – be that SLI or CrossFire – was brilliant. I repeat, the idea was brilliant."

darthv722d ago

Im old school... when i hear the term SLI, I immediately think of 3dfx. I still have a pair of 12mb Monster V2's in an old rig. I never tried out the more modern take on SLI or Crossfire for that matter.

Vits2d ago

I mean, it was mostly for bragging rights. It was a very temperamental tech that improved with newer iterations, for sure. But folks like myself, who have used it, probably recall that troubleshooting was an integral part of the experience and the value that you got out of the setup was really low.

However, none of that mattered because it looked sick as hell on a well-built PC.

Wretchedstain2d ago

I remember doing my research at the time 😂 I got 2 GTX 460's, as they in SLI were meant to be better than the 480 at the time. Not all games were optimised at the time, which meant some games meant setting them up for 1 card alone. Never forget the time I came home from night shift, turned on my computer like normal, went and made a cuppa, come back and it was still off. Tried to turn on again, and one of the 460's caught fire... good times.

shaenoide2d ago

Why ? For the price of two SLI cards you only get one RqtX card now...

OpenGL2d ago

Exactly what I was thinking. When SLI was around an Nvidia flagship card was $700, less than half the price of their current flagship.

90°

Our favorite midrange CPU for gaming has over $200 off and it has never been cheaper

If you're after a powerful midrange processor for your gaming rig, this AMD Ryzen CPU could be your best bet now that it's 35% off.