Sarcasticgamer.com takes a look at the rage from Uncharted 2 fans that is directed at "low" scoring reviews of the critically acclaimed game.
From the article: "Naughty Dog's Uncharted 2 has released to world wide critical acclaim. It's charting at about a 96 on the fabled "Metacritic" review aggregator, which we all know is the last word in what is good for you. So, the game must be good. Right? However, some critics on the fringe, who have given their own opinions on Uncharted 2, have been met with wide eyed nerd rage over their ridiculously low review scores.
Raging idiotic fanboyism, or shoddy internet journalism? Can there be a winner between the two? Find out, after the jump."
Chris, Joseph, and Josh celebrate Active Quest’s 100th episode by discussing their favorite games of all time.
Nevada Dru from Bits & Pieces revisits Uncharted 2: Among Thieves to see if this legendary game has stood the test of time.
Currently playing Drakes Fortune on crushing, next will be to replay Among Thieves, but I'm sure it still holds up today.
I thought the originals were good, but not great. I understand that puts me in the minority here. That said, Uncharted 4 was freaking fantastic.
I think Uncharted 2 is a lot like AC2. Both games took the idea and basically improved it in every single way.
Cultured Vultures: What's your favourite moment from the Uncharted franchise? Here are 15 that got our blood pumping.
The entire final chapter of The Lost Legacy is the best setpiece in the series and it wasn't even mentioned.
Lol. For some reason that's how I picture the fanboys when they see a "bad score" (which means 9/10 oh noeez score)
Because a score is low and someone doesnt agree with it their a fanboy??? Good to know i guess.
article wrote by a xbot
An entire article on fanboys, FAIL.
9.0 :o lolz