260°

Ars Technica PSP Go review: Sony is charging you much more, for much less

Ars: "We've finally had a chance to get to know the PSP Go in detail, and here are our thoughts: this isn't aimed at a clear market, it's more expensive in every way, and it takes away the choice of gamers. When your older, cheaper hardware is better and more able than your new offering, you need to fire some designers.

The new, UMD-less PSP Go is an absolute dream for Sony. Since it lacks a way to play games purchased at retail, Sony gets to set the prices for every piece of content bought on the system. Who cares if the store down the street has a game for $10 cheaper? You can only get your games from one place; competition with discounting and used games is gone. Sony will now be selling you every game that goes into the Go's 16GB of storage, and without the ability to buy or sell used games, Sony now owns every single piece of the market with this system. And without an easy way to switch the battery for hacking purposes, piracy won't be as easy."

Read Full Story >>
arstechnica.com
BulletToothtony5688d ago

last i checked they still selling the old psp's, the fact that i can use my DS3 has sold me to get a GO eventually, nobody is forcing you to pick the Go over the other one.. stop with the sony hate already

WildArmed5688d ago

Agreed.
PSP GO isnt aimed at the market where they want to pirate games/ buy/resell game as the review talks about.

Its aimed at the more mobile market. For instance, college gets me to move alot during the week. Its a nice time pass to have this, I d/led new games while i was at college to play on my ride home while in class. Its very convinent to have 16gb storage hdd.
This guy seems to be review sony's market stragedy vs the PSP Go

coolfool5688d ago

Since when is a review Sony hate?
Since when does writing/reading a review mean you HAVE to buy the hardware?

This isn't Sony hate at all. It's just a review, nothing more, nothing less.

Megaton5688d ago (Edited 5688d ago )

Agreed with coolfool. Tired of this misconception around here that anything that doesn't put Sony on a holy pedestal is nothing but biased Sony hate. They're not infallible.

Most people have been saying this thing is about $50 too expensive since it was announced. I mean come on, it's $50 less than a PS3/360 Elite, and $50 more than a 360 Arcade/Wii. There's something fundamentally wrong with that.

AKNAA5688d ago

"Most people have been saying this thing is about $50 too expensive since it was announced. I mean come on, it's $50 less than a PS3/360 Elite, and $50 more than a 360 Arcade/Wii. There's something fundamentally wrong with that."

Why don't more people do this type of math when it comes to the apple ipod and itouch?! surely you all notice how pricey those devices are by now?!?!...

Megaton5688d ago (Edited 5688d ago )

This isn't about Apple, but for the record, everything they sell is overpriced. That's a universal complaint about Apple I've heard and agreed with for many years, so I don't see where you get the idea that no one ever criticizes them for their prices.

ReBurn5687d ago

So if an article isn't a gleaming review of Sony then it is hate? People need to get over it. The PSP Go is every bit as much of a social experiment as it is a hardware upgrade. As long as I have a choice of the current PSP that's what I'm going to stick with because I like to have more choice, not less. And there is less choice. Fewer retail games available at launch and only one way to get them.

I've had my PSP-1000 for three years and I love it. There's no way I'm going to give up the ability to buy discounted games at retail in favor of a single seller setting all the prices all the time.

SuperM5687d ago

Well for what ive experienced games sold on PSN is almost exclusively cheaper then games you buy in the store so i dont have a problem with sony setting the price.

DaTruth5687d ago

I just want a portable that actually fits in my pocket. I've had my PSP for four years and only have 2 UMD games. Can't stand walking around with this BRICK in my pocket! It is worse than those old Motorola flips! And I still have to carry my Ipod with it, because it is just not practical!

Also, DS3 will actually make me play some PSP games on my PSP, shooters are terrible on the PSP; I can finally buy Resistance!

Since I wasn't buying used games anyways, it won't make a difference to me.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5687d ago
whateva5688d ago

because if you get a 16gb player from them it's going to cost you about the same and it's not going to play PSP games

Superduper095688d ago

Well the PSP Go is what you called a "premium" product. So, it is for those people who have extra cash to spend on.

Personally, I am happy with my old PSP-1000.

diatom5687d ago

Agree.. My clunker psp-1000 is still going strong and still has the heft to pound in a few nails.

yoghurt5688d ago

I have a psp 3000, and I like the fact they have released this as another alternative in the psp family - I may upgrade one day

Its almost like all the journos think this is replacing the whole psps line-up, its not, its a premium version if you like that kind of thing

kraze075688d ago

Going from a PSP3000 to a PSPGO is a downgrade, not an upgrade.

ceedubya95687d ago

As long as UMDs are still available, there really isn't a need for the Go. Memory sticks will continue to get bigger, and you'll be able to download games from PSN anyway.

There is a pretty healthy amount of PSP games on PSN right now though for download. Pretty good list of games so far.

Rifle-Man5688d ago

I don't understand why Sony puts themselves in these situations. Even if they have a plan, they just come off as bumbling and directionless.

The problem with the PSP Go is that if it does just okay, it's great for PSP 3000 owners. If it does very well, it's a threat to the future of UMD.

When I first saw the Go I was so excited I nearly pre-ordered it, but on further examination (I even made a pro/con list) the 3000 emerged as the victor based on price, screen size, cost of games, etc. The Go wins in one area: size. Oh yeah, and you can save the state of your game.

iceman065687d ago

In Japan...it has been this way with technology forever. Size really does matter to the Japanese gaming market. Anytime something is shrunken in size...they just eat it up! This is regardless of whether or not things are improved...or it is just smaller!

Show all comments (49)
60°

From Sim Racing Star to Real-World Winner: Nathan Williams Triumphs at Oulton Park

Nathan Williams from Bebington has made a dream leap from virtual tracks to real-world glory, clinching victory in his debut race in the OT Coupe with Toyo

130°

Devil May Cry Games Sales Surge After Netflix Success

Sales of games in the Devil May Cry franchise have surged as a result of the new anime adaptation's success. DMC 4, DMC 5, and the DMC HD Collection have all reentered Steam's Global Top Sellers. Devil May Cry 5's player count jumped from around 2,000 concurrent players to just over 13,500 players in the span of a few days. Devil May Cry 4 and the Devil May Cry HD Collection have also seen similar sales boosts in the past week.

The success of the Devil May Cry anime adaptation—and to a lesser extent, the Onimusha TV series—serves as early proof the company's multimedia expansion strategy in action, showcasing how Capcom is leveraging its game IPs beyond consoles and into streaming platforms.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
Snookies1218d ago (Edited 18d ago )

Lol, well... Better late than never, I suppose. It's a wonderful series. Devil May Cry V was truly something special (despite my small nitpick on the overuse of one particular level.) I still think it's probably the best action game ever made. Not sure if I'll check out the anime but I've been rocking with the games since the start of the series.

isarai17d ago

Deserved, DMC is peak hack and slash, and despite it's awareness, the sales numbers should be higher imo for what it does.

CrimsonWing6917d ago

I really was expecting to hate this show with Nero voicing Dante and all the changes they made, but cringe forced cussing aside, I really enjoyed the hell out of it.

Lexreborn217d ago

I am guilty as of yesterday lol I bought the HD collection on Playstation and the definitive edition of DmC for 20 bucks yesterday. Granted, I already own them on PC and Physically and just wanted a convenient spot because I was planning on doing a sit down at the TV playthrough with my son.

Then I realized I could just use my Asus rog(offline mode) and Steamdeck we play our own games at the same time. And I give him tips as we play through them. I will likely do DmC on the PS4 though because that doesn't play the best on steamdeck. Otherwise we would play in my office on my ps5 pro or gaming desktop. That is to cluttered though....

Anyways, I'm super excited to go home and play DMC1 with my son tonight!

340°

Final Fantasy 9 Remake Seemingly Teased by Square Enix

Square Enix's latest post on X features a quote from Final Fantasy 9, suggesting a Remake announcement could be imminent.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
raWfodog20d ago

I wonder if it’ll be a Remake or simply a Remaster though. Remake suggests a complete rework and overhaul like with FF7.

Jigga6920d ago

I have read it will be a remake but only one game.

Cacabunga20d ago

Remaster is already out.
Remake will blow my mind!! I didn’t play this for a very long time and day one collector edition. One of the most memorable games from PS1

PixelOmen20d ago

FF7 is a lot more than just a remake. It's a more like a re-imagining bordering on a reboot/sequel. There are plenty of remakes that are not just remasters that don't go anywhere near that far. Examples include Demon's Souls (2020), Resident Evil (2002), Tony Hawk 1+2, etc.

jznrpg20d ago

It’s been rumored a long time now so hopefully it is soon.

GooGobbler20d ago

is 9 really the best in the series? i'm not into FF but i heard a few fans make that claim

LiViNgLeGaCY20d ago

Even though it's not my PERSONAL favorite, I would say yes, it's the best game in the series.

Shane Kim20d ago

7 & 9 for me. It's a lot more simple and charming than many other FF games, but still has layers of complexity. It also have my (and many others) favourite character in any FF, Vivi.

Snookies1220d ago

6, 7, 8, 9 & 10 are generally considered the best of the series. That was the golden age for Final Fantasy. They're all quite different from each other though. So it's impossible to really say which one is the "best" in the series. Since their tone, setting, characters, world & gameplay is always changing.

Nittdarko19d ago

You hit the nail on the head, I think the reason 6-10 are considered the best is because they all excel at something unique and stand out
6 is very much the majora's mask of the FF series, it has a massive cult following and has the best villain
7 is the face of FF and a general entry point into series and the first 3D FF, the materia system is 10/10
8 is the dark horse and the most adult and the junction system is the most complicated out of the series (my personal favourite)
9 is the most charming one and although it has dark moments its generally quite light hearted and feel good
10 critically I would say is the best one with the best single player story to any FF and the graphics leap was insane from PS1 to PS2 and whenever I recommend an JRPG I say FF10

Kakashi Hatake20d ago

Not at all, good but overrated. I have no idea why.

FinalFantasyFanatic20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

7 for me, most would say 6 or 7, but FF9 was well known for being underrated, even for it's time, I rank FF9 pretty highly, even if it's not my favourite.

Snookies12 pretty much has the right idea, you can't go wrong with the golden era of Final Fantasy.

Dudebro20d ago

9 was the last great traditional ff game.ffx was great but it was the beginning of the end.ffx paved the way for what we know as ff today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 19d ago
Show all comments (34)