Videogameszone reviewed Uncharted 2 for PS3. Pro's: - brilliant graphics - demanding, but no frustrating climbing sections - great cutscenes - ... Negative's: nothing
lol "Negatives: nothing"
I second that lol
I love that part.
no negative means its perfect right? I'm not questioning the review, i actually find it really funny.
No negatives = 93? Fail
No negatives, so why did they deduct points? That's like saying "That was amazing gin every way shape or form. Seriously i couldn't have had a better night even in my wildest imagination!...4/10"
The reviewer did not actually write "nothing". There were just no cons stated yet for the game as it was a partial review. But what's really funny is that they gave graphics and sound both 10's, and no grades for Controls and MP-----but ultimately gave a total rating of 93! They said it was just a partial review, and a full review coming up soon. I mean WTF! Why would you give out a total rating when you still have to give a full review soon. They could've just said "perfect,so far" or "n/a" for the scores. Even doing elementary math won't give you a 93 from those partial scores.
But still 93 out of 100, this is not true. If they said that the game has no flaws, gif the game a 10 .
@ Reviews are Politics ~ Agree 100 %....but how about this one for a twist! http://img268.imageshack.us... Funny how a game could have so much wrong with it yet gets a perfect 100 score huh? Bias...nah it couldn't be...right? /sarcasm
Wow, I am dumbfounded. Oner if I read that review without knowing the score I would have thought that mediocre sounding game would have got a 7. Oh, its Dan Shu, make that 9 point 5.
"Negatives: nothing" Score=93/100 I am not getting it
I am wondering this also
So a perfect game does not get 100/100? Whatever !
I guess a game can't be perfect if it's on the ps3...
*head explodes* ok i am definitely not one to pick apart reviews (especially a 93/100)...but seriously? negatives:nothing=93/100? well it's interesting logic to say the least.
A game can have nothing wrong with it and you just know your not going to play it forever so it looses out a little. GTA for instance, plenty of glitches but that doesn't stop you from playing it longer than a "better made game".
Um actually, it did.
= 93? i also dont understand
with the contradictions in reviews these days...no negatives = 93/100? Really? I would've preferred a lie even like long load times.
"These days"?.. it's been like this since 2005, just gotten progressively worse.
You guys dont get how german reviews go. theyre are mentioned in the article not in a category.
doesnt everyone get the negative?? its that the single player mode has to end sometime
Now I know I'm going to hate this game for having an ending...................Oh wait it has Multiplayer too. There goes the negative out the door too. By the way how come the score was dropped by 7?
93/100 seems like they liked the game but didn't really review it. Just threw out a number. If you can't find anything wrong with it then a 95+ is in order. A 93 says its great but has a few flaws, If there are flaws, can someone name them, cause every review I see can't find one bad thing in the game.
Take it they haven't been able to play the multiplayer as it got no score.
well if theres no negatives....then isin't it perfect? as in 100/100?
So than why doesn't it get a 10/10??? There must be something why they deducted .7 right??? I love these [email protected] sites trying to bring down the meta score for Uncharted 2 by being a moron. EDIT: Ohhhh it's a German site. Now that explains a lot.
and no negatives lol did they deduct points because it was on PS3 or because this amazing game had to end? either way i could see why people would fuss about this but it still a hell of a score. My question is why not a 95?
Well bam! it's a 5/10.....¬_¬ I don't care what this game gets it's a day 1 since Jan09. Just keep it real with the reviews will you?
i mean even if they didn't want to give it a perfect score couldn't it be 95? i don't understand how reviewers get number between the X0 and X5.
9.3? How? I swear it said no negatives. Not to sound demanding, but how do you get 9.3 out of a supposed perfect game with no negatives given in the review?
I noticed that the reviewers of this game are judging it EXTRA harshly, because they literally find nothing wrong with the game. So they're pointing out tiny little problems that, if existant in another title, wouldn't even get mentioned.
"Negatives: Nothing" Nuff said.
Asta Fidel Castro tiene mejor sentido commun que estos inteligentes que escribieron este review!!! :P :D
Im confused if there are no negatives, shouldn't the review score be higher than 9.3/10 ... for having nothing wrong with the game that seems rather low
Er so why isn't it a 10/10 ChatBot Reviewer??? Hmm... Anyway i LOVED the online beta!!! ;-P ;-P ;-P
For everyone complaining about the 9.3, they haven't reviewed the MP yet. So look at the SP as a 9.3 (guess it just wasn't long enough, no 32 player co-op or something?) so wait to hear about MP.
At this point, judge content not scores. You'll see how it reflects their review.
no negatives yet the game gets a 93/100. You need to learn how to review
Shouldn't it be an 100 then if there are no negatives. You gotta love idiots and their "reviews".
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.