Tight footage of CryEngine3 on the PS3 from GamesCom 2009.
oh resistance! how i wish you ran on the cryengine 3
But will admit that this engine is looking pretty good! I will say this though, if you have a PC that can run it, run it on that because Crysis on the PC is still a glory to see compared to any console game.
lol Syronicus getting disagrees from fools who haven't played Crysis on a decent PC. It makes perfect sense to get Crysis 2 on PC if your PC can handle it unless you've got a reason not to (e.g. you might have mates you want to play with on your console).
wat idnt understand is tht yea evrything lookz gourgeous but then again any game developer can make crazy design but its the action tht takes it down y cant they show a war battle or sumtin massive with explosion everywhere so tht we could really see what t cryengine can do because all i see so far is one guy walkin and shooting at water
I hope - with actual games... the developers can alleviate the texture pop-in that can be seen in the tech demo.
http://brightcove.vo.llnwd.... For HD ^^ Looks good imo. Could use some work though. Probably best played on PC.
Hope this replaces the UE3 for both consoles as the "go-to" engine for developers lacking the time/money/resources/talent to make their own in-house engines.
Hope all you like but it won't happend... not matter how much you or I or eveyone wants it but the truth is UE3 is popular for a reason and one of those reason aren't it's graphics. It's because it's easy and cheap and the result isn't half bad and if a developer wants they can make a great looking game on UE3 look at Mirrors Edge or Gears 2. If I UE3 allow developers to focus on mechanics, gameplay, variety I'm all for it but most games I'm affraid are simple mediocore games.
can't wait to see for real on ps3.
but at aprox. 1:54 in the video notice how that blue barrel just popped up like BAM! Also how the water reflects on the surface when swimming under water needs a lot of work, Its a tech demo so I cant knock it too much. All in all Its nice but nothing mind blowing "yet" but it does show potential.
Xbox 360 is much better! PS3 is much better! Me: No! Both are the same. All Finished. =)
Thats the last thing we need.
For other developers complaining about the PS3, take a good look at this and take note. Isn't an engineer's job to innovate and be attached quickly to new technology? Again sorry if I sound ignorant
To me, you don't sound ignorant at all.
You don't and you're right.
well said. Its complicated, so they should actually try get over that bridge so it becomes easy.
to want devs to get the most out of the consoles their games are running on. Any ways, damn that tech demo was so boss. I can't wait to see different dev teams utilizing this engine for their future games.
The demo was great. This should also make it easier to create your own maps on PC.
Actually looks really great.
Awesome! Look when the player shoot at the tree and it fall down, its a lot better then Crysis 1 (Or Cryengine 2), it fall down with more 'reality', faster.
It is really impressive.
I think that it looks better than Killzone2 which is a compliment to the team behind it and to the 360(since they are apparently both the same). I would have loved to see Haze on this Engine. I really think free radical could have made an awesome game if they didn't have to bother with their own engine and could just focus on the gameplay.
looks hot. by the way, aside from graphical glory, was crysis actually good or just visual poon?
i thought it was really good. had a nice feel to it, and the ability to use the environment and pick any object up was really intuitive and changed the way you played a shooter. imo felt as realistic as it looked
Way to many PC guys going on about how much better it'll look on PC Blah blah. We know already. You built your $1500 rig and your happy you can run crysis, and crysis 2 or whatever and your still comparing to consoles. For the cost of those graphic cards, i should think you would run crysis etc well. The 8800gtx alone was $650 on release. and people moan about the cost of all that's in the PS3. Then you go on about textures. Most newer GPU'S have 786 - 1gb+ ram PS3 has 512mb same as 360 PS3'S OS uses more ram then the 360 os. thus it doesn't have as much texture memory. Done and Done.
Man does look awesome! Man they should of lobbed a grenade into the shack for a bit more physics and explosion viewing.
Author: Cube, 08/18/2009 God that looks like ass, cry engine 2 on PC looks better than that crap. it looks like cryengine 2 on low detail settings. Oh wait that is what they did took cryengine 2 and took all the detail out and made it look like ass to run on consoles. It all makes sense now there is no new engine. Retard much.
No, he's right other than the "low" detail comment. It runs on a mix of low, medium, and little bit of high PC settings. (Low textures, medium other stuff, high shaders.) They had to make a completely new engine to be able to scale it down for console hardware, but they did a good job of it.
OH MY LORD !! Would you look at it!! OMGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!
Really dont see any diffrence between the pc and the consoles.Too my anyone who says it looks better on the pc is a damn grapfic whore,because the diffrence probably is only like shades an stuff.But thats MY OPINION
Looks good on both. The 360 version looked much darker though. Did the guy demonstrating it explain why and I missed it? I dunno, but this engine should forge some gorgeous console games for both platforms!
http://www.youtube.com/watc... CLick hd. Must better viewing. Enjoy.
I think Killzone 2's graphics look better. I just hate the style of Crysis' graphics.
Looking great based on this little video clip.
can you hear them sing ^^
There's a lot of pop-in, but looks good otherwise.
Killzone 2 looks better. I'm sure the cry-engine 3 will be good, but not Killzone 2 good.
On consoles, maybe. CryEngine 2 is still miles ahead of KZ2 or U2.
Looks like medium PC settings. Looks pretty damn good for console hardware.
Certainly has me licking my chops. My PC can barely run CS:S, so...
It' higher then medium settings, just seen other footage is most of the dx10 is included, only thing that is lower is draw distance and texture amount. Only to be expected on 512mb ram. Well done Crytek..
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.