PSX Extreme writes: "At this point, just about any animated film is capable of raking in the big bucks in movie theaters. The latest "Ice Age" is no exception, but there's never any guarantee the corresponding video game will be any good; in fact, history tells us the game typically falls well below expectations. Thankfully, we've seen some better efforts in the past year and provided the developers could nail down some decent gameplay that would entice fans, they might have a winner. For the most part, Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs doesn't do anything unforgivably wrong, but at the same time, it doesn't quite hit the mark. The control for one character is just fine but it falls short for other characters, the camera can be troublesome and the repetitive nature of the gameplay gets tiresome."
Looking to boost your gamerscore? Miles Messenger brings us a list of 10 games which you can easily unlock all the achievements within a few hours of play.
why would i just buy a game to boost a fictional score that does nothing for me?
whats the point of 1k'ing? does it give like a 200 points boost? ive got 2 games suck at 985 with 2 achiev each worth 10 and 5. dont see the point of wasting 100+ hours on em.
GFB writes: "Ice Age 3: Dawn of the Dinosaurs is a movie title, this means the expectations are pretty low and yet this title is decent. Ice Age borrows heavily from established franchises and does nothing to separate it from the crowd but its winning factor is it isn't broken. Sometimes its all one can ask of a game and compared to the last twenty years of bad movie titles simply working is a tough expectation."
The Game Guys have officially opened up voting for the 2nd Annual Game Guys' Gamers' Choice Awards. Everybody who votes is entered into a contest to win one of five system-specific prize packs. Each prize pack contains two system-specific games and one accessory, except for the PC prize pack which contains three PC games.
Is it sad that I care less about the actual voting than I do winning the free games?
