PS3 Ghostbusters is 56% Xbox resolution, not 75%

Gamezine writes: "We just thought we'd set the record straight. We're not too much a fan of beating a dead horse, but our own mistake of reporting the PlayStation 3 resolution of the Ghostbusters video game as 75% of the Xbox 360 game has been picked up around the net."

[PirateThom]

Terminal Reality... what have you done?

[Ghoul]

gaming media what have you done ...

i have the ps3 version and i totally enjoy the game, it looks great.
if it hasent been all the media buzz i wouldnt even have noticed any problem at all.

.....-

[evildeli]

I thought I saw this story before on http://www.lensoftruth.com/...

[StanLee]

Seriously, this just shows that internally Sony has done a fantastic job of developing proprietary engines for their first and second party titles.

[Darkeyes]

lol here we go again.....

[Bnet343]

Wasn't this a PS3 exclusive?

[Blaze929]

who caaaaaaaaaares, either way the Xbox 360 version is still better than the PS3 version. No one should care unless you are a multi-system owner and if you are trying to figure out what system to get this game on, the answer is now clear the Xbox 360 version.

Now can we move on, had like 15 submissions for this little debacle in just two days already.

[iamtehpwn]

And even good PS3 Multiplatform games like Mirror's Edge, Call of Duty 4, and Dead Space---

You, my good sir, FAIL.

[s8anicslayer]

Who cares what version has the higher resolution, the devs had problems with the ps3 version and couldn't get that version up to par, doesn't mean it's less of a game, I have the PS3 version and I'm loving it, just food for thought, Halo 3 was supposed to be sub HD, does that mean it's any less of a game no it's one of the best selling games in existance, and my favorite of the triligy

[peeps]

in all fairness, looking at TR's track record. they've hardly released what i would consider 'blockbuster' (not to be confused with ghostbuster) titles.

It's a shame that the celebration of the ghostbusters series has to be with a terrible inconsistency in platform development, but really i doubt the average ghost buster fan cares that much do they? If your a ghostbusters fan in europe and not the sorta person who checks out gaming websites regulary, are they really gonna be there playing it going 'damn this resolution is only 56% of the 360 version!'

[cRaZyLeGs 93]

I thought it was only this because it was pre-release copy? Guess not.

[Hydrollex]

That company just pays everyone

[sajj316]

The blame is ALL Terminal Reality. There is no doubt about it. Has nothing to do with Microsoft, Dell, Apple, Nintendo, or any other company one can think of to blame!

[hay]

Ooh, that's uncool. Bad devs, bad! No dinner for you.

[popup]

The 360 is better than the PS3. The PS3 is better than the 360.

Both statements are true to a certain degree but if you remove all the games then they are both crap pieces of plastic.

If you only keep the exclusives then both are better than one.

If you only keep the multi platform games then whatever you happen to own will suffice.

If you want the best version and the choice of every game to play then become a true gamer and buy some more consoles and lose this childish fanboy penis envy.

FFS!

Where is the 'donate' button to help the 'Disagree Button Syndrome' sufferers?

[Christopher]

Put out a game using their new engine that will ensure that it won't get very far since it can't handle multiplatform titles?

[Tito Jackson]

WHOGIVESASH*T %
Tired of seeing this sh*t already.
Just like the swarm of BS Natal articles.
N4G sucks.

[Jinxstar]

I feel like 90% of the people on this site don't even own it and if it wasn't for the difference in the graphics no one would care at all... Modern Warfare having a difference like that might be an issue but... Really. It's just Ghostbusters.

[RememberThe357]

I can't even help but click on these stupid ass stories.

This is exactly why Sony shares tech between their internal studios; If you get stuck on something you just call someone who figured it out.

[ultimolu]

Seriously...WTF.

How does this ruin the fun of the game. Will people play the game or will they be playing count the pixels?

The 360 version is superior. Okay, whatever. This site has gone to hell...seriously.

[Pika-pie]

Killzone 2

[hay]

@popup: When you throw all games up you'll have pretty nice movie and music player, good linux platform for ripping and/or calculations or even a computer to some extent. From PS3 that is. Care to say the same about the other one? :>

[lokiroo420]

What they did was make a ps2 game for the ps3, and now they are trying to get away with it.

[Genesis5]

Well if it keeps going this way the next headline will be. PS3 Ghostbusters no picture only audio. I really don't care this is one developer who should ask for some programming help. I know what phenominal graphics the PS3 is capable of because I have played many fantastic looking games on it.

Even though I own 45 PS3 games this one I probably won't buy and the developers can blame themselfs for lost sales due to poor programming.

[Buttons]

the devs had problems with the ps3 version and couldn't get that version up to par, doesn't mean it's less of a game,
--

But it does mean that can't develop games as well as other studios.

[vhero]

OMG another ghostbusters article = N4G EPIC FAIL the ten people who approved this story are complete and utter idiots and should well away from this site in future!

[JasonPC360PS3Wii]

You Sony fans are on the last chapter of your excuse book.

[iANONYMOUS]

Who do you call? the ghostbus- uh, wait.. the media.
PS3 as lead platform, publish by Sony, yet, there's not a single support from Sony to guide them to polish the game more.

If I own a PS3, and if I wanted to blame something for it, it will be;
SONY lack of help, Hard to develop console, and bias developer.

3 years for nothing huh?
Cant say they are bunch of useless developers, the game on 360 looks good, just like any average games.

[Tarasque]

Come WTF is wrong with this site today. Come one Sonyfanboy's, just say it. MS paid TR to gimp the PS3 version.

[Forest Gumps]

the PS3 version of games be equal? We all know that it has less ram the 360 but can they not use those extra processors for something?

[Tainted Gene]

/chuckles/

[OGharryjoysticks]

I'll tell you what they've done. They just put a sh.tload of money in Sony's pocket. Don't think Sony doesn't get a piece from every version of Ghostbusters sold regardless of platform. That's why it's on every platform - so they can make more money. Had they kept it and made it for only Sony systems think of all the money they would be missing. There's God knows how many DS systems out there. The Wii has a ton out there. 360 owners buy everything. And everything in between. Sony isn't mad. They will gladly take all that free money and who knows, maybe they invest it in buying another game studio since they love owning more studios than all the other companies combined...LOL. Sony is laughing at all of us right now while making money off the 360 Ghostbusters game. Every fanboy trying to talk smack is putting his/her money in Sony's pocket...LOL

[SaberEdge]

If you have the choice get it for the 360, but if you only have a PS3 just get it and enjoy it. It's not the end of the world.

It really is too bad that so many 3rd party developers have problems with the PS3, it's obvious that Sony's first party developers have a good grasp of the hardware and can do some amazing things with it.

[IdleLeeSiuLung]

or you can just not support shoddy work.

[maxcer]

@1.30
"Why can't the PS3 version of games be equal? We all know that it has less ram the 360 but can they not use those extra processors for something?"

the lack of ram will effect the texture resolution. you can have all the processors in the world but they don't hold data.this is why its possible to change the texture detail in PC games from low,mid to high depending on how much ram the graphics card has.

granted i'm no expert of this stuff, so don't take my statement as gospel. hell, i might be totally wrong abut this...

[Ghoul]

".this is why its possible to change the texture detail in PC games from low,mid to high depending on how much ram the graphics card has.

granted i'm no expert of this stuff, so don't take my statement as gospel. hell, i might be totally wrong abut this...
"

yes you are indeed very wrong, even though ram does have a significant role in texture resolution its not the neakbreaker. especially since the ps3 does have 512 seperated in 2 * 256 differently allocated then ont he more pc like 360.

i really dont have the time to explain who it works, but google is really your friend if you look fir background information about gpu programming and ram usage in realtime engines.

[Light Yagami]

lol. pretty funny since they praised the PS3 before.

[robotnik]

You smell funny, filthy criminal.

[user3915800]

LOL all the way to the bank.

What else its there, get over it the 360 its always superior.

But wait the ps3 version was develop for the ps3, but look how much better it looks on the 360.

Mad cow deceased has been noticed among PS3 fans.

Run for your lives here comes the droids.

My pants on fire quick get the pink dildo.

Please stop the bashing I cant take it any more Mommmmmmmmmmm.....

But what happened to all the games for 2009, I have been mislead.

I hate you all, sits and thinks about how to get them back, no luck.

Tonight I will hide and not answer the phone, wait who's calling.

I heard can you not leave me alone, droids wont stop.

[Model]

go back watching manga and jacking off on anime girls

[DevilDante]

Incompetent developers...

[Confused]

I thought the days of bad ports were over. It's been shown time and time again that the PS3 can totally out perform the 360 yet we get stuck with this half arsed effort.

I'm gettin it for the xbox...

[AlienGorilla]

Supposedly, the PS3 was the lead platform. How do you f*ck that up?

[StanLee]

Sadly, it wasn't a port. The PS3 was the lead platform. Or so the developers have claimed.

[Death]

Just because a game leads on the PS3 it doesn't mean it gets a higher budget. People tend to forget debs don't have unlimited resources. It's no secet the PS3 is the most difficult to develop on. It may have the most potential, but that comes with a cost. In order to keep both platform versions within budget, something has to give. Lower resolution does not affect game play which is the most important thing. This has really been blown out of proportion.

-Death

[AlienGorilla]

It doesn't have to be better, but if it leads on the PS3 and is ported to the 360 then the titles should look identical.

Seeing as how the PS3 is harder to develop for and harder to port to, the devs got all of the difficult part out of the way when they designed the game on the PS3. When they port it to the 360, there shouldn't have been such a discernible difference.

[shorttylad]

whats the point in wasting time and money on an awkward console with a smaller potential market?

None.

Now stop your moaning

[AlienGorilla]

Sounds like someone's bitter they didn't get a PS3 for Christmas.

Here, have a lollipop.

[shorttylad]

why would I be bitter? I have the best console available.. plus i can download any game I want (usually before its officially out) and play it at the cost of a blank disk - with full online capabilities.

HA

[hay]

@shorttylad: Wii? Yeah, it's really cool console.

[TheReaper42]

*hands shortty a tissue*

there there

[Death]

You are still going by the assumption that the engine will be completely different for the PS3 version. When you develop a multi-platform game, you still create a game engine that will work on both platforms. It's easier for devs to port from the PS3 due to the systems architecture. PS3 to PC or Xbox 360 is easier then creating a game for the PC/Xbox 360 then porting to PS3. Once a common engine is in place, then the title can be optimized for each platform. The "inferior" ports to PS3 are usually a result of limited optimization based on hardware differances. What might take a day or a week on the PC/Xbox 360 game might take a couple weeks or a month on the PS3. It's possible to do on the PS3 of course, but it becomes a question of time and money. These are the same factors that make Blu-Ray a non-issue this generation so far. The potential is there, but the extra cost to use it can't be justified at this time.

Anyway you look at it though, the game looks great and plays well on both systems. Not many people pause the game for screen grabs while playing. This really should be a non-issue since it doesn't affect the enjoyment of the game.

-Death

[YogiBear]

I'm tired of reading about this. The game is out and it's fun no matter what system you own. End of story.

[Kamikaze135]

I'm playing Lost Odyssey on my 360 and refuse to get any other game for it right now because I'll be distracted. I wanted it on my PS3 so I could take a break from Cross Edge, but it looks like that won't be happening, lol. Oh well, Blazblue is right around the corner =D

[table]

the whole thing has been blown out of proportion. If you like this kind of game just get it. Don't let a very slight minor graphical inferiority put you off.

[Statix]

I wouldn't call 540p (nearly the last-gen SD resolution of 480p) to be a "very minor graphical inferiority." This is not even taking into consideration the drastic drop in texture resolution on ~25% of the game's textures.

I've been hoping and hoping that the days of piss-poor, subpar PS3 ports were over. But games such as this (and even Riddick to a lesser extent) remind me that some developers out there still haven't come to grips with optimizing their code efficiently on the PS3 in order to deliver comparable visuals on all platforms. Which is a damn shame when said poor development affects a multiplatform game that I personally have been looking forward to.

[BlackTar187]

What did halo 3 run at? or perfect dark??

Just a question because i play those games with no issues i play ghostbusters on myps3 with no issues so again what does it really matter.

ohh 640P game must suck now your right im no longer glad i bought it. You see how silly that is its just ridiculous

Tomb raider ran at a lower res(not a great game) but the point is it doesn't matter if yuo run around and your exp. is ruined because of this i feel so sorry for you i really do.

if your not going to get it anyways get out of these articles if your hear to hate get laid sometime it will help

[darrensworld]

@Statix

actually lens of truth said the PS3 version of riddick was slightly better, peep:

http://www.lensoftruth.com/...

"PS3 escapes this Head2Head victorious due to the Xbox 360 having more rendering issues and less than stellar lighting. Either way it’s really nice to see that more and more developers are taking the necessary steps needed to make their cross platform titles closer."

[Marty8370]

Total bullsh#t, watch the Gametralers game compare and they are identical. Even IGN said the same.

[XboxGirl]

Go buy it you'll love it. LOLOLOLHAHAHAHA

[TheMART]

Marty, go cry me a river. The PS3 version is sub HD, doesn't look identical to the 360 version, the textures suck, the reso suck, you get half the game as on the 360.

YOU GET FACKED!

[Why dis]

IGN

"the graphics seem to be a touch dumbed down on Sony's system. When you proton stream burns a wall on the 360, there's a black gouge in the wall that features smoldering embers and bits of fire. On the PS3, you get the fire and black gouge, but the little embers embedded in the cut don't make it."

You can tell IGN was afraid to go into detail due to the high profile nature of this title fearing bad blood from Sony and its camp.

http://ps3.ign.com/articles...

[Sez]

why bother. you guys have proved your point. this game looks like a ps2 game compared to the 360 version. no matter how many articles show this. they will try and find one to back up their claim or run to uncharted 2 or killzone 2 ( like they are the big billies on the block) just let them be. it's not like they have anything left to play until uncharted 2(since they only play AAA games and exclusives) comes out.

[Pennywise]

Next article: PS3 version is 25% not 56%. My bad.

funny thing is... PS3 GB players dont even know or care what the 360 version looks like. How does this affect them? Everyone I know that has played PS3 version likes it and recommends it.

[testerg35]

Riiiiiight... but you'll be the first one to post if it was the other way around.

[SeanScythe]

To be honest I was going to buy it but canceled my preorder and rented it. To my surprize if this game is 56% running it doesn't show. It looks good and crisp on my tv, I have HDMI and LCD 32" and it looks good. I don't see the blur, or problems that everyone says is wrong with the game. The only thing I hate is the loading screen for when you die, it's the same thing over and over.

[PirateThom]

You don't notice the blur because the quincunx anti-aliasing tends to "soften" the game when it's running, so it will be a softer version of the game. Problem is, when you take a still, direct image it does cause it to become horrendously blurry.

[Pennywise]

Testerg, looking at your comment history, you will be first to post when Aaron Greenburg poses for Maxim.

[jaidek]

Of course PS3 ONLY owners wouldn't notice or care. But those that don't play this whole "fanboy" game, would like to know the truth.

I originally was going to pick this up on my PS3 because it was supposedly the lead development platform. Then I saw these comparisons and we all know now that was a load of crap...

But it is worth saying that if you have ONLY a PS3, pick up the PS3 version. But if you have a choice, pick up the Xbox 360 version and stay away from the PS3 like the plague.

[locos85]

I don't even understand what you said. All I care about is the game fun to play or not. If it wasn't for any of these articles I wouldn't even know the difference.

[swinesucker]

Ehhh, it's worth saying that if you ONLY have a PS3 you should stay as far away from this ridiculous piece of trash as possible. Don't give the dev's a free hand here they have nothing to show for it.

[BlackTar187]

is you say dont buy it but this game was made for the fans only not to come up this would never have been released if it wasnt for the fans. If you say not to bu it because of this stupid little issue that people only seem to have a problem with here becasue it makes such a huge differnce but the missing items and effects on the 360 version dont get any attention at all. dont be sad if they did this all for the fans and something like this your gonna spew hate your under 18 and need to grow up im a huge GB fanbiy and to see jerks like you say stuff like that pisses me off it was made because people like me wanted it. It runs at a lower rez that is not noticable(AGAIN NOT NOTICIABLE WHEN YOUR PLAYING BY YOURSELF) to say to not support something done for people llike us the fans of these games is down right nasty and disgusting to say the least.

[YogiBear]

Your getting a bubble Pennywise.

[ChrisGTR1]

all thanks to the power of the cell

[Forrest Gump]

Dr.Phil,what are your thoughts on Vince Vaughn.

[BadboyCivic]

does this means the 360 is twice as powerful?

[error 74]

nowhere 2 be found

[36T]

They're not that hard to find fanboy. Try looking harder. Don't hurt yourself in the process, okay?

[Gue1]

This will cause a backslash of hate over the developers that will teach them to not make this horrendous games for the PS3 and even more after they said how great the PS3 was.

We already know that this is not because of PS3 hardware limitation cuz we have already seen multiplat games like Call of Duty WaW and Modern Warfare that are more graphically impressive than Ghostbuster running at 60frames per second looking great on both systems. We can even look at some first party games like Killzone 2 and Uncharted that goes beyond that for more of this convincing paragraph of mine:

http://lounge.moviecodec.co...

http://kineticninja.blogspo...

Uncharted 2 will shut-up all those fanboys that still didn't learn how powerful the PS3 is after seeing Killzone 2.

[Mr Face Creamer]

Again with Uncharted 2 and Killzone 2...

Don't you slaves ever get any new material?

[silverchode]

what does the 360 have?

[The Master Chief]

Xbox 360 has the best versions of multiplatforms which makes up 99% of you gaming library.

Also Forza 3, Alan Wake, Splinter Cell, Mass Effect 2, Gears of War 3 and I bet Halo: Reach don't look too shabby either.

Seriously I could give two sh1ts about little Sony games like Uncharted and Killzone, lmfao.

You guys are like a broken record....saying Killzone and Uncharted over and over.....they might BARELY look better than the 360's best games, they might not.(What else can you do?? PS3 is a joke and is constantly defeated)

Either way they are weak franchises, and 99% of your gaming library plays better on Xbox 360. With better online features and interaction.

[Arnon]

Uncharted? If anything, Metal Gear Solid 4 looks a lot nicer than Uncharted.

http://www.christopherhaugh...

http://download-blog.chip.e...

http://www.metalgearsystem....

As for 360 games?

http://xbox360.ign.com/dor/...

http://xbox360.ign.com/dor/...

http://xbox360.ign.com/dor/...

[Godmars290]

When its a middleware/dev issue and not about the hardware?

[INehalemEXI]

its a game made by a studio founded by an ex MS employee. This is just a sabatage jack move.

[Unicron]

Cuz dis is proof dat teh ps3 am doomed. Duh. Welcome to N4G! :)

[INehalemEXI]

How is taking a sony liscence ip and developing it on multiple systems and not taking the time to make it look proper on sony's system not a jack move?

Terminal Reality is a video game development and production company based out of Lewisville, Texas. Founded in 1994 by ex-Microsoft employee Mark Randel and former Mallard Software general manager Brett Combs

^^reality^^

[Statix]

Joke of a CPU architecture? Don't sound like such a blatant fanboy who has no idea what he's talking about. So is what you're saying is you're against progressive technology? Because in the near future, every CPU manufacturer is going to have similar CPUs as the Cell in terms of complexity and multicore configuration. What you're saying is you'd rather have simpler, slower, less advanced/progressive CPU technology until the end of time?

Another thing to take into consideration is that the PS3 has a slower GPU component than the 360, and this is probably the thing that affects multiplatform development the MOST, because the difference in GPU speed is where developers face the most immediate and obvious differences in game benchmarks. And most multiplatform devs LEAD-DEVELOP on the 360 in the first place, crafting the engine for the 360's GPU and CPU architecture specifically, and isn't going to spend the necessary time and resources to modify the game engine to effectively utilize the Cell adequately offset that difference in GPU power that already puts the PS3 at a graphical disadvantage in the first place. And we ALL KNOW that the PS3's power potential comes from the Cell. The problem is, some developers prioritize the 360 (w/ it's higher install base)... if a developer were to prioritize and lead-develop for the PS3 then it would be a completely different story.

In other words, bad multiplatform ports on the PS3 have NOTHING to do with the Cell being "hard to work with," and everything to do with all the technical factors and politics I mention above.

[INehalemEXI]

The PS3 GPU is actually faster 550 MHZ vs 360's 500 MHZ , it does not have the onboard eDRAM 360's gpu has though and the RAM is not unified. You can't expect to input traditional code in both systems and a game to come out = thats just not going to happen.

[YogiBear]

Meaningless Ghostbusters game? That movie made $250 million dollars in 1984. That is the equivalent of around $600 million dollars today. That is what we intelligent people call an important and lucrative licensed property. Halo wishes it had that kind of impact on our culture.

[nycredude]

here we go again. Media must have nothing to write about. so if the xbox version is 720p, then does that mean that the Ps3 version is running at 403.2 p? Give me a break.

it doesn' matter to me as I only have the ps3 version. I bought it early at a mom's pop's shop, played it and beat before any of these experts did and i enjoyed it so if they are trying (and they ARE trying real hard) to sway people to their precious xbox version then it's too late for me.

Edit: Pennywise that is what I am trying to say. If it wasn't for all these millions of articles, I wouldn't have even notice. it just seems like people are all getting their panties in a bunch for nothing. So the two versions are not identical we get it. At this point it's beating a dead horse.

how come we didn't have this uproar when COD 4 was found to have sub-hd resolution?

[Pennywise]

You played it and enjoyed it. At the end of the day, isnt that all that matters?

It wasnt broken... We already know PS3 is more than capable to pump out sick graphics. It is not the machines fault. It is the Devs fault.

[MGOelite]

WHY THE HELL DO PEOPLE CARE ABOUT A MOVIE GAME FFS!

[robotnik]

I agree, this game suck ass. Movie was OK. It's like quarreling about Rattatoulle, who cares about that piece of crap?

[TheMART]

Game sucks? Its rated about 8 out of 10. About the as GT5p, Heavenly Sword, Motorstorm 1&2.

So if Ghostbusters suck, those games suck also.

You're just butthurt over being facked in the arshole once again on your G@ystation 3.

[Dave2009]

Nothing really to see here just more evidence to show that the 360 is the far superior gaming console there's nothing Sony can do to change that.

[sajj316]

it might be ... but using Ghostbusters as an example? This only leads me to believe that PS3 was NOT the lead platform. PC was the lead platform ... and converted to PS3/360. It's similar to the past problems of PS3 code conversion.

Blaming PS3 hardware just shows ignorance and in some way says "Terminal Reality, you did what you can, great job anyway".

[taurus1]

The PS3 architecture is obviously way over terminal realitys' heads and they may have commited career suicide after this bonehead move. They embarrassed themselves as well as their fans but this is by no means a limitation of the PS3 hardware. When you guys put a game out like a few the Sony camp has then you can talk, until then STFU.

There are too many quality, exclusive, games coming out on the PS3 to deal with this garbage.

[nycredude]

The game is not garbage. It's actually quite good and represents the Ghostbusters movies real well! So it's not the most pretty game this gen (on either consoles) but it's one of if not the best movie based games out, ever.

if you are a fan of Ghostbusters then you can't go wrong.

[evildeli]

But it's fun to watch other people's misfortunes.

[TruthbeTold]

Teh PS3 teh suckz! Cant even bearly git ta 50% of what 360 can do. lulzerz...

Aren't we past this kind of thought process yet? Anyone who thinks that this is a PS3 problem and not a developer knowledge of the hardware problem is a moron. Plain and simple.

[LifesABeta]

well it really is kind of both actually. The hardware is difficult for developers to learn. You cannot really single one or the other out. If you read the article, Terminal Reality stated the PS3 has less RAM, if you understand how that works, that means less textures on screen, thus less resolution. There's going to be a sacrifice somewhere. Keep in mind to that this is a multiplat game so they just can't focus on one particular platform let alone the PS3. face the facts fanboy.

[error 74]

until the 360 put out a game
that looks 50% of killzone or uncharted
shut up 360 in not an real hd console
its the wii 2.0

[GMR_PR]

@ error74

"until the 360 put out a game
that looks 50% of killzone or uncharted "

I think they already have.

Killzon 2
http://ps3.ign.com/dor/obje...

Alan Wake
http://xbox360.ign.com/dor/...

and thats just one game X30 also have another great looking games like SC: Conviction, Forza 3, GEoW2, Mass Effect 2, etc....

dont be a blind fanboy both consoles have awesome looking games.

[sak500]

@error74/nasim/shmee/tanod007 and hundreds of other accounts

Go back to your cave you troll or go play your 3 exclusives in 3 years and leave all the good multiplats for cheaper console.

look at the self bubbling SDF here each member + bubbles not caring for one of the biggest titles to hit the current gen consoles. Only if you were not born before 2003 then you should not care. well i guess most of you were born during the internet revolution.

[LifesABeta]

PC version gets gimped with DRM and ships with no multiplayer. PS3 version has gimped graphics, Xbox 360 will have lower potential grpahics-wise than the PC, but the console version's have multiplayer. In my eyes, the game would be best gotten for the 360.

[jackdoe]

Terminal Reality... I still remember those guys bragging about how they could throw hundreds more enemies on the PS3 version if it were a PS3 exclusive. Lol. If you need to run the game at 56% resolution for a smooth experience, I doubt you could pump out more enemies.

Seriously, how the hell could this game have lead on the PS3? Besides that, nowadays, even 360 ports to the PS3 run at more than 56% resolution (most run at 100% of the 360 resolution on the PS3).

Not to mention, Terminal Reality had to take effects OUT of the PS3 version. So in addition to a lower resolution, you also get fewer effects! Seriously, WTF Terminal Reality?

[ZombieNinjaPanda]

Pretty bad when we've seen much better games coming from both systems, and these guys fail miserably trying to even port it.

Good job Terminal Reality.

[ross102]

this whole comparison thing is ruining gaming and creating stupid fanboy wars i got this today (in UK) on PS3 and it looks fine its stupid i wouldnt have even noticed if it wasnt for these stupid comparison sites get a life!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[nycredude]

Finally someone who sees things like I do. The comparisons are for fanboys.

[jaidek]

So holding developers to a standard is ruining gaming?

As soon as developers can consistently deliver a quality product on both platforms the better. Then the real war can begin, the war of exclusives. Then, the PS3 will be the sure fire victor.

[ross102]

no but theres more to life than graphical differences off stupid comparison websites that no one wud have noticed if it wasnt for them because from my experience of playing the game no matter wot platform you play it on

gameplay over graphics

[XboxGirl]

There's more than just graphics missing here numb nuts actual effects were missing from the PS3 version. That stupid comparison website saved me $60. Also as a die hard gamer who owns multiple consoles, these comparison are essential to me and my collection. I notice everything when I'm playing, and if the Graphics suck its a huge turn off from the start. Kinda like when I chose my girlfriends, yea the fist thing I look at is their face. Enjoy owing second best, because I don't.

[ross102]

numb nuts lol second i find it very hard at all to believe you have a girlfriend for some reason and third of all its a good game get it or dont or shut up about it

[IQUITN4G]

It's true most people wont have the first clue about any of these failings and in truth it really doesn't matter if they're having fun

A similar thing also happens when you mention the one thing 360 actually better than PS3, it's clearer visual output and generally higher textures

PS3 guys just wont let there be anything even remotely wrong about their beloved when in fact quite a few 360 owners happily admit to their machine of choice being a little less powered in comparison

Truth is PS3 does a few things better and BD storage is hardly a negotive(it can be got round easy enough on 360 of course) but the one strength 360 most definitely does have is how much more clear it all looks in comparison - it's a lovely difference when you go between the two.And it's still very powerfull enough to produce stunning visuals - people with 360's are more than happy

Any off topic here a bit but my point is a lot of you Sony guys do a lot of spouting about supposed superior visuals but it comes down to not only raw numbers but also how these images are dished up - PS3 is generally not as crisp no matter how much people keep denying this.Personally i like a crisper output but i also find PS3's poly pushing potential as impressive - luckily 360 pushes tons of polygons enough to keep me and many other 360 owners happy or bothered to care

Some people on here i even doubt have had the oportunity to check out direct comparisons anyway and just spout what other fanboys have

If i had this for PS3 i'd just enjoy it as it's still going to be good fun

But yeah people really should drop this PS3 has massive graphic advantage bs because people outside of sites like this can't hardly tell the differences between wii even

[Darkeyes]

Dude it all boils down to what the devs are capable in the end. Well at least after this, I can safely assume that no dev will risk puting out a sub HD multi-plat to a PS3. The GB devs thought that they would bring out an inferior version and no one would notice, but the even if one site brings out a comparison, we can safely assume that the article will be posted here and it's dooms day for the devs as a lot of people look into N4G comment section. Even the devs might be looking here and thinking what a crap job they did.

As far as PS3 being superior... Well yes it's superior in certain aspect cause only it is pushing the graphical envelop with games like Uncharted 2, KZ2, GOW3, Heavy Rain.... The main problem with 360 is that it relies on 3rd party devs who most probably use UE3. That doesn't mean 360 can't out a KZ2... It's just that no one uses an engine made from scratch whereas First party devs of Sony always do that. That is why people say PS3 is superior hardware wise. I can't believe the GB dev complain about the lack of RAM for Aliasing issues or textures after seeing Uncharted 2. The sharpness, textures all are unlike anything seen on a console at least. This is pure lack of talent from them.

Yup multi-plats do sometimes look better, but the recent ones such as RE5,SF4,UFC,Prototype,RFG... all look really similar to the point where it's hard to distinguish the difference between the 2 without pausing the video.

Frankly I don't care about GB as I am not a huge fan. But the lack of dedication from devs is what intrigues me. They should have scrapped it if they couldn't get it right. This just makes them look even more ridiculous.

People just are blowing this out of proportion. If this was GTA or COD, then I would have understood, I mean it's a movie licensed game... They always suck. It's just this media is getting ridiculous by the day. They will keep on beating the dead horse.

[Stryfeno2]

Damn, we get it already. Ghostbusters is better on the 360.

[Man_of_the_year]

I see what you did there....=)

[MGOelite]

lol even the bots are tired of hearin this.

[Man_of_the_year]

Yet the Droids keep coming back for more.

[Sibs]

It's still the same game...

[LifesABeta]

at it's core it's essentially the same game yes. I just don't get these console fanfags, one little flaw in their favorite console, or one little flaw they see in another they get all rowdy up. I mean the PC versions, not everyone is going to be running @ 1900 x 1200 with max AA and AF and the highest settings with a constant 60 FPS. Hell, I know some people with 15" crt's(for refresh rate advantage) that could only do a max of 1024 x 768 with low quality, that looks probably looks on par with it's console counterpart. But yet no one dogs each other for having a "low" spec system or "cheap" hardware. I just don't get console fanboys... go outside or something for once and stop comparing your console hardware that's already 3 generations behind.

[cmrbe]

the x360 version of Gostbusters is better than the PS3 version.

Can we now leave it at that and stop spamming N4G with these articles?.

Gezz all these hoopla over Ghostbusters. Freaking amazing. The game is a rental at best and yet people are talking about it like it was the next GTA. I really don't get it. Heck even prototype is a better rental than this game.

[Rifle-Man]

So for those of you who game on an IMAX screen, get the 360 version.

[sajj316]

lol, or sit 3 inches away from the HDTV

I guess you can't go wrong if you have an SDTV ...

[Close_Second]

Putting the technical differences aside, how does the game play? Is it just another movie tie in or something better?

[ross102]

better than i thought capturing ghosts is alot of fun and the game in general is much better than a typical movie tie alot to gain for ghostbusters fans its a solid game in its own rights alot of movie refrences for nostalgia too loving it

[shorttylad]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[yoghurt]

Sorry Ghostbusters isn't coming out on your system for a while, no need to be so bitter. Now get a life and write a new story.

[XboxGirl]

The Lens of Truth said exactly that in their post and they said it when they streamed the Ghostbuster comparison Live on justin.tv http://www.justin.tv/lensof...
Good job everyone for taking them seriously, could have saved some of you retards some money. BTW they did the Live comparison a week before the game was released.

[evildeli]

Well, a lot of people didn't believe them. They had to defend themselves http://www.lensoftruth.com/...

[beavis4play]

how many of these ghostbuster stories do we need?

[BubbleSystemSuck]

this isnt a PS3 issue...you can see really great graphics on PS3 games, like God of war, uncharted, uncharted 2, killzone 2, heavy rain, etc...
This is someting WRONG with the DEVS an the PORTS.

But this time the diference is so obiously... is a slap in the nuke for the PS3 users.

[JD_Shadow]

It isn't a PS3 issue officially since we know it can do ten times better than that.

It's the media that is trying to make it INTO a PS3 issue (look at Ars Technica's reporting of this. They blamed the PS3 hardware for EVERYTHING).

EDIT: In case you don't know the article I speak of, it's at:
http://arstechnica.com/gami...

[ApocalypseShadow]

the ones that hold onto this are the same ones that CAN see a difference with pixels and resolution for multiplatform games but CAN'T see the difference with bluray and dvd or ps3 exclusives to 360 exclusives.

"i'm buying the 360 version," is just like when we ps3 fans say,"i'm buying the bluray version."

if you're fine playing dvds on 360,then we're fine playing an average looking multiplatform game on ps3.

i mean look,they see ps3 games winning awards for graphics while their games only get noticed at 360 only game sites.no more "gears is the best looking game."long live unreal engine 3.hahaha!

they see uncharted getting awards,the see god of war 3 getting awards,they see GT5 having more cars,better looking cars,and it just rattles their cage.

they even see a PLAYABLE eyepet game while they have milo with someone in the back pulling the strings and shamming the public.they have ball kicking and a poor paint game while sony showed onstage more accuracy for painting,writing,and glimpses of gameplay *LIVE*

i would be rattled too if i saw smoke and mirrors and nothing truely ground breaking to show or look forward to while the other just keeps wowing with games.

apocalypse................... .

[Socomer 1979]

Its like its supposed to make me feel sad but i dont feel anything.
is this what denial feels like?

[SnukaTheMan]

Irony.

[Phish]

I own a 360, PS3 and Wii, so this is not a biased comment. In my opinion Sony dropped the ball on this. If you have devs out there that can make games like Uncharted 2 and God of War III, you need to step up and pay those devs if need be to educate others. This is where MS shines, they know how to interface with their devs, and they take the initiative to keep providing enhancements to their dev toolkits. If this keeps up it won't matter how much better the PS3 hardware is. People will continue to buy more multi-platform games on the 360. The increase in games this generation to $60 was to provide the HD experience, so its about time all Devs deliver. I'd personally be ticked if I bought and opened up the PS3 version of Ghostbusters after seeing these comparisons.

[thedarkvault]

Also the ps3 version is 25% of 1080p resolution.
Lazy devs

[Awesomeon]

JESUS CHRIST !!!!!!!! IT'S A F##KING GAME !!!!!!! Just play the damn thing and stop fussing over bull##it. Everybody needs to get a life. PS3 is hard to work for, do i see you doing better ? No, i don't. Besides, why is everybody complaining about some dumbass little details. "OMG THE EFFEXTZ ARE MISSING PS3 SUCKS MICROSOFT RULES". Who gives a flying rats ass. I love how every fanboy on here get pants on head retarded over a game. It's not even a first-party game, it's a third-party game. Burnout 3 was missing some effects on some system but i didn't care because they're small things thatn was barely even noticeable.

[spunnups]

Regardless, I'm going to atleast rent it for the PS3 and find out for myself. I bet ya I don't notice a huge difference. I'm a huge Ghostbuster's fan and nothing is going to stop me from atleast trying this out.

[Awesomeon]

besides, graphics are not everything you think it is. I LOVE how people just hate a game because the graphics suck. WHO CARES ?!?!? if the game is fun, i don't care about the graphics.

[tordavis]

Enough already!!! Jesus Christ!!

[Awesomeon]

I know right ?

[gamingisnotacrime]

If a gamer has only a PS3 on a nice HDTV and pays $60 for sub quality game is just not fair. I guess u have both, so do I but for those PS3 only owners this a absurd. At least lower the price in accordance to the lower quality. U always say that visuals dont matter, u used to have fun with pixel sword in atari or whatever but for the majority of us that buy HDTVs and HD gaming consoles it does matter a lot. Especially when the 360 version gets the HD look, and one buys the non HD look for the Same Price.

We gamers deserve better, developers have to step it up because for $60 i can get (at launch) Gears 2, KZ2, Uncharted, etc and those games deliver great quality and great content. Now we have to accept the $60 tag on sub par version of a game? No Way!

[Sheikh Yerbouti]

to me cause I only have a PS3, bought first because I expect it to be the better of the two systems both in power and graphics.

Moreso, I want to know if we can expect similar performance from other titles using Infernal Engine and if something can be done about it. So far, Terminal Reality is sidestepping the issue.

Gamebloggers like Mr. Bitbag may understand a little about games, but not consumer behavior. Graphics don't have to be a big deal to be a deal breaker. Companies get burned everyday by not appropriately setting and meeting expectations. It's not as if we have to buy these game.

So if you tired of the comments move on and don't reply.

[Captain Tuttle]

This a big deal because PS3 owners paod the same price as 360 owners for the game and got a lesser product. It's not the consoles fault, it's the developers.

[Phish]

Correct, and if more people actually cared that they received a lesser product it might force developers to take more time and get it right. To people that say, "well it's just a game", you are right, but this is a game site, so it is kind of relevant. I get it, you shelled out the cash for a PS3 so of course you are going to stand behind it, and that's fine. At least be ticked that the devs were lazy and rushed it out the door.

[Awesomeon]

Instead of being delusional fanboys, They should have just got both systems.

[gamingisnotacrime]

sub x360 ports to the PS3 is so 2007.

Too bad all the articles about this game are about the difference in both versions and not about the gameplay or story

[Miraak82]

i'm watching my roommate play iton ps3, looks fine to me

[TheMART]

As long as the superior version on a 360 isn't running besides it, yes it'll probably look allright.

[tordavis]

A single console PS3 owner will not SEE that they are getting lower resolution. They only know this because of the media.

[Sheikh Yerbouti]

anyway because of the same damn media. We find out about it's features, gameplay, etc. all because of the media. Our purchase decisions are formulated using information from the media. The media said it would optimize what the PS3 can do.

Then we go over to a friends house and SEE it on their XBox too. No one's that naive. Not everyone will care, true, but some do at various extents. Don't fault them for doing so.

[REPLOID24]

i'll be honest, it sucks a bit that my ps3 version of the game isn't the best. however, I just wanted to see what akroyd and ramis came up with. it's like the unofficial sequel to the movie. if I had fun with mega man 9 which has sprite based gfx, this doesn't really matter. now, if the controls made the game unplayable that would be uncalled for.

[Pandamobile]

Both look like crap.

[testerg35]

Probably, but according to this the PS3 version is "crappier" :)

[xg-ei8ht]

StanLee
Sadly, it wasn't a port. The PS3 was the lead platform. Or so the developers have claimed.

Actually i've already found out, PS3 was never the lead platform and the devs never stated as much, not that it helps, but they did say they had a good PS3 engine. Well that didn't quite work out.

And i don't blame the 360 folk for the remarks, it's funny tbh. But watch the water section of ghost busters, the 360 is in slowmo. wtf is up with that.

But in all honesty, when everyones going on about textures this and fx that. I'm playing the uncharted 2 beta. And it just LOL'S over this and any 360 game. And it's just the MP beta.

[cherrypie]

@1.1

No one said you cant play the PS3 version, nor that it "looks bad".

It's just not as good as the Xbox 360 version, and it doenst look as good.

That's all.

[Awesomeon]

oh, can we for god's sake, stop this ? It's like beating a dead horse. Seriously, if someone haven't been staring at their tv too much, they wouldn't have noticd it and we wouldn't have this ridicouls crap. Just play the game. It's ghostbusters for god's sake !!!

[testerg35]

So PS3 fans say its not about the graphics, but as long as you enjoy it. Then why the hell did you even bother to upgrade from PS2. Hell that's the best console there is and tons of awesome games.

[commodore64]

Yeah.

I am hearing that a lot from the Sony defenders.... "it's not about the graphics"

The problem is, it is in the same breath that the Sony fans then bring up KZ2 and UC2 graphics, thereby negating their previous assertion.

But for ghostbusters it's not about the graphics... it's about the gameplay?

weird.

[Rusted]

Wait a minute! wait a minute!... so... the 360 version is the inferior right?

[LostDjinn]

I haven't posted on N4G for a while.
I've been watching it go to hell instead.
Can any of you answer a question for me?
How is it that when TR was interviewed about the "infernal" engine three months ago none of you "experts" posting over the last few days had anything to say?

http://www.n4g.com/dev/News...

If any of you had actually checked out what was going on back then you'd have know this game, developer and engine were suspect. Did anyone have anything to say though?

For god sake! The article explains how the engine is supposed to work. PS3 lead platform? Not according to TR months ago. Assets are created and then... you know what? I don't care. You guys have fun looking stupid.

[Sheikh Yerbouti]

You are one of the few who seem to understand that there is a bigger issue that just graphics of just one game! Ghostbusters is being used as a soapbox to promote this engine.

As with the Unreal Engine, I think cross-platform engines are unreliable due to the PS3's architecture being complicated. The Infernal Engine is all platforms except DS. So I'm suspect of it. I'd rather see PS3 specific engines promoted, but I appreciate the devs dilemma.

I would like to hear more meaningful and intelligent debate instead of the rants and the whining about the whining. You get hints, but everyone is feeling defensive.

[TheDeadMetalhead]

I'm sure that tomorrow the PS3 version will be at 37% the resolution, then the next day 25%...

At this point I'm willing to bet that 99% of these articles are complete BS. If you look in the two screenshots the two versions are practically identical.

http://www.gamezine.co.uk/o...
http://www.gamezine.co.uk/o...

What is the difference? The pattern in the carpet is slightly blurred in the PS3 version. Wow, big deal. The vending machine, the characters, and the lighting look the same.

Bottom line; just stop your b!+(#ing and enjoy the damn game. >_>

[The Preacher]

The bottom line is .....

Go on with your life, there are other things to worried about beside the game.

[stryx]

Everyone knows that it doesn't matter what they say on the internet. All the skepticism that people are bothered with is fulled by the media. The internet media has gotten out of hand and sites like Lensoftruth.com and other sites that do side-by-side comparisons of games are the fuel that feeds the fire. They know that these comparisons will draw attention so that is why they push all this garbage. I've played both the PS3 and the Xbox360 and both of them have their positive aspects.

Anyone that is, will or has built a computer knows that the higher the system specs, the better the game looks graphically. The 360 has more memory but a weaker processor. The PS3 is the opposite.

The only thing that can be said time and time again is "If you don't know what you're talking about, then don't talk about it." Why is it that I have seen 3 different postings about the resolution of the PS3 version of Ghostbusters? Who's correct, Lensoftruth, Gamerzine or Thatgamingsite? If you can't agree on anything, then no one is correct. Corraboration is vital in getting the facts to everyone, not speculation.

[Unicron]

Anyone else find it hilarious that almost everyone is getting screwed in some way, and neither the PS3 nor 360 owners get the splitscreen co-op campaign of the Wii edition?

But hey, gotta love MULTIPLATFORM DEVELOPMENT!

[aueslander]

WHy whenever looks come up fanboys of the sony devination bring up God of War, Uncharted, and GT5 when non of them are even out yet? I mean come on.

Also, even if GT5 looks like teh bestaz game eva, Sony screwed their fanbase. mean they have you pay $40 for prologue, which is essentially a DEMO and then will charge you another $60 for the full game. Tell me that aint screwin with their fans.

[AngryTypingGuy]

I know we all have our chosen sides, but I don't get why we laugh at each other for resolution. Don't both consoles upscale? We might be able to pick out differences if we pause the game and scrutinize it, but if you do that, then you're a little obsessed. One version may or may not look a little better than the other, but it won't be enough to get upset about.

[ozhuerta]

Amen...

[Jack Klugman]

even worse than they thought glad I didnt waste money on the ps3.

[Halo3 MLG Pro]

WHO YA GONNA CALL???? THE 360 VERSION!!!!

[Troll-Killer]

The PS3 fail train just keeps chugging along. :D

[Persistantthug]

Currently, Killzone 2 IS graphically the "highest benchmark" for console games.

Is Gears of war (either of them) looked upon as the current "highest standard" of console gaming tech?

NO.

Killzone 2 is the CURRENT standard.

Before that, Uncharted was. And next up.......UNCHARTED 2.

Next up after that? I suspect it will be either GOD OF WAR 3 or Gran Turismo 5.

Why are there no XBOX 360 games in this running? Why does it seem as if PS3's games are all competing against THEMSELVES for this "tech crown"?

Because they are, apparently.

Just food for thought, Troll-Killer.

[Troll-Killer]

If Killzone 2 is such an amazing achievement...and it must be, because all PS3 fanboys cum in their panties just talking about it....why hasn't it even sold 2 million copies yet? That's less than 10% of PS3 owners. Say what you want about Gears 1 & 2, but they each sold over 4 million copies, within the first 6 months. Killzone 2 is just a "trophy b1tch" for Sony fanboys: all show, no substance. Who cares if a game wins tech awards, if it doesn't sell to it's intended market? Developers sure as hell don't ; they'd trade all those awards for $$$ any day of the week. Too bad Guerilla bet on Sony...and Sony decided to spend their marketing $$ on PSP Go and yet another 3rd party failure in Ghostbusters.

Just food for thought, silly fangirl. :)

[iANONYMOUS]

Oh really?
KZ2, again with that sh*tty games..
The production of that game cost $21 million..
Of wait, the sales havent reach 2 million yet..

GTA4 2 DLC for 360 cost $50millions..
The first DLC, yes, has already give MS their share of profits..

Gonna start bragging about Killzone? Go on,
I'll go brag about sales and Fun times.

[Persistantthug]

Why would "sales" mean anything to me? I don't know about you 2, but I don't own any Sony stock. Do you own MS stock?

If sales is your personal "indicator" of a something that's good, then I suppose you think MCDONALDS is awesome, right?

McDonalds sells well, do they have good food?

Honda Civics sells well, and while acceptable to many, I wouldn't consider that a "GOOD" car....Do you?

By that same Token, lots of crap movies sell well, almost every year, especially in the summer, but they don't win Oscars......they win MTV awards.
lol

Whether you like Killzone 2, personally or not, that's your business, but it still is a technical achievement and is considered the PINNACLE of current console gaming tech.....period. Moreover, the game before that(Uncharted), after that (Uncharted 2), and likely the game AFTER THAT (God of war anyone...how about Gran Turismo 5), will follow in it's footsteps with technical marvels for console gaming, even rivaling the BEST of PC games. I just find it interesting they are all PS3 games.......don't you?

[NNNW]

Killzone 2 is very fun haha. Sorry off topic.

[tuglu_pati]

@ Persistantthug

"Honda Civics sells well, and while acceptable to many, I wouldn't consider that a "GOOD" car....Do you? "

Right there i knew you didn't know what you were talking about. Hondas are very good cars, go check the costumer reports. That why the sell pretty well because they're good.

when something, anything, sells good is because it is good, Killzone 2 was a great tittle because of the graphics but that was it, it lacks in all other departments.

[Persistantthug]

Ok, tuglu_pati.....

I'm glad that you savor McDonalds food, adore Honda Civics, and cherish MTV awarded movies.

Who am I to argue that those aren't uber......

You like what you like, right?

Good luck with that, tuglu_pati.

[tuglu_pati]

^^^ That reply was weak try harder next time.

[Persistantthug]

This is another "movie game", so to speak.

Why? Why would I buy GHOSTBUSTERS? I'm an original, meaning, I saw the movie back in 1984 (and loved it), and this game screamed "suckage" from the start.

If any of you say, "yeah, I always thought this was gonna be great, and I want(ed) it from the start". Well, for better or for worse, you should get this game then, and for better or for worse, you deserve what you get.

[bilbobob]

is how pr*cks like Jason360 soon come crawling out the woodwork. So TR cannot handle the PS3, guess they wont be getting my money or hopefully anybodies with any sense.

EPIC FAIL for the PS3. Yeah right. Because the console has no fantastic looking and playing games. Should we name them, why bother, its been done so many times before and the Xbots are not listening anyway.

One question tho. If this site is so pro sony as some of you believe, then how come this constant ream of Ghostbusters sh*t stories on PS3 have been approved and dominate this site this week.

Wake up and smell the coffee boys. The guys who mod this site are playing everyone for suckers. Next week it will be something anti M$ and the crap will swing the other way.

For N4G, the hits keep coming!

[news4noobs]

the oh so powerful ps3 and its mighty exclusives that aren't exclusive and also look like a wii version at best. LOL! so many former sony customers have learned it and more and more are learning it everyday, sony and gaming = big no no!

[ArcticWolfUK]

killzone 2 makes all xbox games look ugly

why do people care? ghostbusters looks sh!t anyway

[likedamaster]

Of course it does.

Kz2
http://ps3.ign.com/dor/obje...

Alan Wake
http://xbox360.ign.com/dor/...

[ArcticWolfUK]

whats that meant to prove? lol the aint even gameplay screenshots
but tbh killzone still looks better

[Silber]

Oh Please let Ghostbusters Grpahics NEws finally die - Its really annoying to read this 3 times a day...

[Persistantthug]

error post

[neogeo]

im installing the game right now to my PC. guess how much i paid:)

[Meryl]

@ ianonymous the ps3 audience has a wider interest in games it just doesn't live off fps games which explains why killzone has not sold as many copies as quickly as gears did, we like a whole range of different games.
besides i still think the fact that they have nearly reached 2 million already is pretty good, it will reach at least 3mil in its lifetime probably even up to 4mil dare i say

[Si-Pie]

I wouldnt worry if I was a PS3 owner as the game doesnt look much different than the 360 version. If im not mistaken but didnt Tomb Raider Underworld run in a higher res on the PS3 than the 360? I wasnt bothered about it I just enjoyed the game.

[rmedtx888]

Obviously Terminal Reality's engine is not that good. It probably doesn't do a good use of the PS3 processor. I bet it will not be easy to license it. It is not the PS3, just their engine. Just look at Uncharted 2.

[Persistantthug]

error post

[air1]

so why did ppl stop buying/playing kz2?

[ArcticWolfUK]

cause they couldnt hack it, everyones used to cod's easy noob friendly gameplay

[Ashriel]

lawlz who cears teh game suckedf though, it's naot ps3 excluzive