From StrategyInformer.com: "So the dust has settled on yet another E3. We saw games galore amid demonstrations of Microsoft and Sony's new attempts to break into Nintendo's motion-control videogame space. We saw Jack Tretton and Don Mattrick wow the crowd with what can only be described as megaton announcements which shocked and surprised the gaming media the world over. 2009 was a great E3, of that there is no doubt."
VGChartz's Mark Nielsen: "Upon finally finishing Devil May Cry 5 recently - after it spent several years on my “I’ll play that soon” list - I considered giving it a fittingly-named Late Look article. However, considering that this was indeed the final piece I was missing in the DMC puzzle, I decided to instead take this opportunity to take a look back at the entirety of this genre-defining series and rank the entries. What also made this a particularly tempting notion was that while most high-profile series have developed fairly evenly over time, with a few bumps on the road, the history of Devil May Cry has, at least in my eyes, been an absolute roller coaster, with everything from total disasters to action game gold."
3,1,4,5 to me, never played 2. 5 gameplay is amazing but level design was really disappointing to me, just a bunch of plain arenas, the story felt like a worse written rehash of the 3rd and the charater models looked weird ( specially the ladies ). Another problem with 5 was that there was not enough content for 3 charaters so I could never really familiarize with any of them
2.
Dmc.
4.
5.
1.
3.
God DMC2 was an awful game.
And in case this isn't obvious it goes worst to best
Order changes depending on your focus. I tend to focus on gameplay/fun factor, so...
5, 3, 1, 4, 2.
I really didn't like 4 but commend Dante's weapon diversity. The retreading of old ground was pretty unacceptable to me.
But even then... Still more enjoyable than 2 for me
Activision and Raven Software's 2006 action role-playing game, Marvel: Ultimate Alliance, has found its way to the Xbox Store.
Used to love this one, but X-Men Legends 1 and 2 will always be my favorites, especially Rise of Apocalypse. Would pay some good money to play it today with online multiplayer, back then I had no way to get a modem
I remember buying them dirt cheap on the PS4 and then a few days later I read they were delisted. I was wondering why the bundle was price so low and got my answer when that happened.
Sad to say this is one game franchise next to the Xmen that needs a sequel. I use to play the hell out of Xmen Legends and Marvel Ultimate Alliance. Was great when my cousin had the OG Xbox play with four other people and then playing online. Great games glad to see it reappear even though I own the discs love the mechanics of this game.
Misleading. This page is whats available for people who owned the game prior to delisting.
Plenty of unforgettable games have completely messed up their players throughout the years, all the way back from the PS1 days to the dark recesses of the modern internet.
yay another article based upon how microsoft apparently won
these articles are all to common on n4g
before the hating begins... the headline is a little off .. so to speak ... but yes balance between games shown at e3 that are coming out this year and the next year is key
More bull. Microsoft didn't win. They showed some cool stuff. So did Sony. So did Nintendo. I'm tending to think Microsoft had the worst show, but giving an honest reason why I can only say it's because they've been unilaterally proclaimed the victor in a competition that I think was very even, so I'm feeling the urge to over-criticize their offerings and support the under-dogs that nobody's giving the credit to.
The whole article though seems to be making it a competition between Microsoft and Sony, so, that's what I'll discuss. First of all, Sony had to worry about supporting the PSP and the PS3. They couldn't devote all of their attention to the PS3 like Microsoft could for the 360. Thus, it's already unfair: all these critics are completely ignoring the PSP side of Sony's offerings, and ignoring the fact that having a PSP means they couldn't devote an entire show to the PS3. I can see why they do this, because the PSP isn't competing with Microsoft, and everybody's decided that Sony is competing with Microsoft first and foremost, so since the PSP doesn't compete with any Microsoft product, they ignore it completely.
But really, it's about this comment: "Forza 3, Halo: ODST, Left4Dead 2 and Splinter Cell: Conviction are all coming in this year... Sony’s line-up was strong, but offered very little other than Uncharted 2 to look forward in 2009."
MAG, Ratchet & Clank Future: A Crack in Time, Demon's Souls, Afrika, Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2, EyePet? Just saying.
The only winner would be me or other gamers who found some things interesting and are now on our radar.
Non of them are winners, gamers are.
this guy needs to research the things in his article, just pure bo11ocks