270°

Could Microsoft Unveil A Portable Console?

There are various reasons to consider the possibility of microsoft entering the portable gaming market. Among them the fact that it has so far remained the only major (funtioning) console manufacturer not to do so. Most of the reasons have been explained in the linked article.

Read Full Story >>
stageselect.com
menoyou5865d ago

Why create an article to ask a question? This is not news. Report as lame.

dragunrising5865d ago (Edited 5865d ago )

Perhaps Microsoft's new handheld "is" the Zune HD. They never stated if it could play nice with XBLA or games for that matter. Of course, its just speculation, but interesting nonetheless. The device itself sports a Nvidia Tegra processor- capable of HD resolutions. I see no reason why we couldn't see iPod touch/phone type games and/or XBLA at the very least. Just for reference Hexic and Texas Hold em' up were included in the latest Zune firmware.

FreeMonk5865d ago

I hope not.

MS need to concentrate on getting a stellar A-star line up of games on the Xbox 360, including a good handful of in-house exclusive titles.

This is what Sony has in store for this years E3, and the MS will be shown up if they haven't.

Here's hoping MS have a great line up, my X360 is looking a little light on Class-A titles.

SaberEdge5865d ago

Baloney, I own both consoles and from where I'm sitting the lineups for both consoles look about equal.

So far this year, a similar number of exclusives were released for both consoles. The 360 had games like Halo Wars, Ninja Blade, Velvet Assassin and several prominent DLC releases. The PS3 had games like Killzone 2, MLB 09 and Infamous. Sure, the PS3 games averaged higher review scores, but nevertheless the numbers have been pretty equal and ultimately it is still going to come down to taste as to which games were better.

I like Killzone 2 and Infamous, but could care less about MLB 09 because I have no interest in baseball games. And honestly I have had just as much fun with Halo Wars and Ninja Blade as those two PS3 games. Halo Wars in particular is a very fun game, which, by the way, scored very similarly to Infamous.

The point is, the numbers of released exclusives are similar so far this year and we have more than half a year left. The second half of the year receives by far the greater proportion of game releases anyway. When you look at which games are actually known (or very likely) to be coming out this year, the two consoles have a very comparable number of games in their lineup.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5865d ago
qface645865d ago

personally i hope not 2 handhelds is crowded enough
personally i don't want microsoft joining in trying to buy their way to the top

DevastationEve5865d ago (Edited 5865d ago )

does it have to be about buying their way up? i mean you can't just admit that they've done well this gen? if not for microsoft's success with xbox 360 you'd all be playing FIRST gen ps3 titles right now, since Sony would've held back ps3's launch until they milked PS2 dry.

anyway, back on topic. i think psp and ds have it pretty much nailed. they have both ends covered, something flashy and something fun, and vice versa. a microsoft handheld wouldn't be advisable. stick with the zune hd and just let us download touch screen enabled xbla games to it.

qface645865d ago (Edited 5865d ago )

how would sony have held back the ps3 with the wii coming along? also they are still milking that ps2 for all its worth

anyways i wouldn't want the hand held market turning into what the console market has become
worrying if your gonna get a certain game that looks good because it might or might not be exclusive
wondering if one of your favorite 3rd party franchises might not even be on the hand held you like so much

exclusive this exclusive that blah blah blah

i mean it wouldn't really matter since i would buy it either way just so i could own em all
but still though

DevastationEve5865d ago (Edited 5865d ago )

you mean to tell me that the wii ACTUALLY would've forced Sony to go spend billions on a new processor and disc format and make promises of HD 4D and all that?

right.

edit at below:

yeah but where else was it going to go? in a console! okay, but if x360 woulda never been in development why would they make such a huge leap in technology? they could've easily done EXACTLY what nintendo did: release hardware with only slightly more power and just throw in some niknak inventions and voila.

to clarify, maybe they would've still worked on cell but not for use in a console, as there would be no reason to make such a leap in technology (and costs) for a console.

qface645865d ago (Edited 5865d ago )

what are you talking about?
you do realize the billion dollar processor was in development before anyone even knew what a wii was

all anyone knew was the competition is bringing something out and we need to top that

qface645865d ago

do you realize what your saying up there?
if that was true then sony would have known as well as microsoft what nintendo was planning no one knew what the wii would be but nintendo

the cell was being developed way before the wii was revealed
sony didn't create the cell because of the xbox they did it to try and be the most powerful of the 3
even when the cell was being made sony didn't know what microsoft was planning with the xbox they went full power assuming ALL 3 competitors would do the same so they tried to top them including the next nintedo hardware that had no name at the time

and there was no way sony could have done what nintendo did since there as no way no one could know that even nintendo was going to do what they did

they went with power because everyone though microsoft nintendo and sony would all do the same

EYEamNUMBER15865d ago

im slow but even i understand what qface is saying

and it is true the cell was being developed before the new consoles were even revealed

DevastationEve5865d ago (Edited 5865d ago )

instead of bsing your way through this you COULD just admit that you don't want to give microsoft credit. that's much easier than to make me believe sony would've treated us all to HD gaming out of fear that the Wii was going to be a beast of a machine. it was x360 that did it. they even said it themselves that they'd be watching the launch and would delay the ps3 if needed.

you guys are ridiculous!

you honestly believe sony would've developed ps3 if there was no need to! you guys clearly have no idea what competitive business is. lemme give you a hint: it's not competition when you HAVE NONE! the reason to make new things is because you have to respond to the changes of the market. if you build the only machine to compete in that market you basically control when those changes happen. so it could potentially stagnate, as has been evident in MANY examples.

it took a restructuring of GM back in 73 to make smaller cars...would they have done it they didn't need to? and look today, as they have to do it AGAIN!

qface645865d ago

wow all of that and you still do not get it

ok THE PS3 AND THE CELL WERE BING MADE BEFORE ANYONE KNEW THE WII WAS GOIN TO BE UNDERPOWERED
IT WAS EVEN BEING MADE BEFORE ANYONE KNEW THE 360 WOULD BE A HD SYSTEM WITH POWER
do you understand what im saying now?
if what your saying is slightly true then sony must have used that crystal ball they have lying around to look into the future and see what the systems would have and what kind of performance they would deliver

when was this about giving credit
look at all of my post when did i ever say or imply that they didn't deserve credit they get credit from me for what they did with xbox live and i don't see any reason to give em anymore credit than that

tehReaper5865d ago (Edited 5865d ago )

Yeah I agree with ApocalyPS3. Microsoft was an underdog when the first Xbox came out. When Xbox released Halo and started to get a bit of market share, Sony started pumping out better PS2 games.

Same thing goes for this gen. PSN wouldn't be as advanced as it is now, Sony wouldn't be pushing it's developers to go above and beyond with graphics, and the PS3 would have a better install base. In fact, I think Sony would have put more interest in casual games to compete directly with the Wii for install base.

Microsoft deserves credit. If you deny that, go back to your bridge.

EDIT: @qface64

Dude, think for a second. The gamecube was considered the "kiddy" console(I didn't mind it, but that's how people talked about it then). If there was NO Xbox, what would be the point in bringing out a super powered console? Yes the Cell was in production either way, but do you think it was ALWAYS meant for gaming? The 360 was released a year before PS3 and Wii. Sony and Nintendo had a year to get their consoles ready to directly compete with the 360. Sony went the super route, while Wii went the casual route.

DevastationEve5865d ago (Edited 5865d ago )

this ISN'T ABOUT THE CELLBE!!!! IT'S ABOUT THE PS3!!!!

the question isn't whether or not they still would've built CELLBE!!!!! it's whether or not they would've built the PS3!!!!!!

we both AGREE that cellbe was in development for a while, but would they have still felt the need to USE it in the ps3 if x360 wasn't launched? GOING ON HOW WELL PS2 SUCCEEDED, without a doubt the answer would be NO!

edit at above:

thank god dem0n get's it. i have no beef with you qface but you have to reason here.

TheColbertinator5865d ago

The PS3 was in development long before Microsoft even considered making a successor to the original Xbox.I have no idea why qface64 is forced to explain his point over and over again.I have seen his comments and he is actually one of the most unbiased members of n4g

tehReaper5865d ago (Edited 5865d ago )

What point? This one?

"personally i don't want microsoft joining in trying to buy their way to the top"

Microsoft does have quite a bit of money, no one can argue against that. But they invested their money wisely. They brought an innovating online service to the console table, that is only getting better with time. If they can release a decent handheld with the same features, that would be amazing.

EDIT: And yes, the PS3 was in development. Why wouldn't Sony want to stay in the gaming scene? The thing is, would the PS3 be the same as it is now without the addition of Microsoft? I just don't think so.

qface645865d ago (Edited 5865d ago )

what does being seen as kiddy or mature have to do with having more power in your system?

your making it sound like that would matter in making a console if the xbox was seen as kiddy does that mean microsoft would have an underpowered console right now?

also there's no way of knowing if the cell would or wouldn't have been in the ps3 since they never really said if it was made for the ps3 from the start or just used on it later on

demon i think you misunderstood what i said
i was never talking about their hardware i was talking about the way they always try to snag away exclusives
that's what the console market has become its all about stealing exclusives its all everyone keeps doing back and forth
i wouldn't want the handheld market turning into what the console market has become

how about instead of investing millions snagging exclusive DLC or an exclusive game
how about investing that money into their first party developers which they greatly lack

KKanjiAnkh5865d ago

Demon
I agree Microsoft, does get some just dues for bringing somethings to the table.

Sony was gonna pump better titles anyways, you can look at the PS1 vs N64 vs Sega Saturn to see that, FFvii was part of that proof.

Sony never wanted to be apart of that dedicated casual service, they already did too much homework w/ the SNES & Genesis days, to even conceive to split their audience.

tehReaper5865d ago (Edited 5865d ago )

It has everything to do with it. When it was just Sony and Nintendo, the PS2 had a few nice gems. When Microsoft entered the ring, I remember the sleeping giant(Sony) waking up. At that point the PS2 wasn't living up to its' PS1 days. And then, BOOM: Awesome game here, amazing game there, graphics powerhouse over there.

I'm just basing my opinion on what the past shows. I'm not trying to discredit you, I just didn't like the way you stated your first comment.

EDIT: Yes, very true. It has been an exclusive fight since the start. The way I see it though, is I'd rather have Microsoft enter the handheld market and bring a truly innovative product with LIVE. If that comes at the price of a crowded market, oh well. If Microsoft doesn't do it, someone else eventually will.

DevastationEve5865d ago (Edited 5865d ago )

colbert, i agree that qface is one of the better members here. but if he or you want to believe that ps3 AS WE KNOW IT would've been built regardless of microsoft's intent with xbox 360 you're kidding yourselves.

for instance, wi-fi. who had that? WHO HAD THAT? NOBODY! so why would sony put it into their console? why would sony not only put that but also bluetooth AND a gigabit ethernet if NO other console had or intended on having such options? also, why would they have even bothered with PSN? they actually had supported a decentralized model before xbox live's SUCCES (not advent, since i'll yield that one to sega.net).

think qface...please think about it.

edit: i ran out of bubbles, but anyway thanks for the discussion guys. yes qface i'm complimenting you. we part as friends :)

qface645865d ago

HOLY CRAP am i getting complimented ='D

this is new to me most of the time i always get yelled at and get called a trol or something
my pm box is full of people saying F YOU and all this

qface645865d ago (Edited 5865d ago )

i had to go use number 2 haven't used the bathroom in almost 6 days
ehm dang i lost my train of thought gotta re read everything

wow part as friends o_O wut?
im still on N4G right?

i get no FYOU NOOB or what about a FREAKING TROLLS of course we can't forget the classic STUPID FANBOY

@demon
its cool it didn't seem like you were trying to offend me
will do i need friends i only have 4 xD i think or 7?

tehReaper5865d ago

If my comments came off as offensive, I'm sorry. I was trying to explain my view(as were you) on the subject. I misunderstood your first comment. Good discussion.

Add me on LIVE if you want and we'll play a game sometime.
My PSN account I list on my profile isn't my main. Message me on LIVE if you want my main PSN.

SaberEdge5865d ago (Edited 5865d ago )

There have nearly always been three players in the home console market and I don't see any reason why the hand-held market couldn't support 3 or more competitors as well. As a general rule the benefits of competition far outweigh any negatives.

For me, personally, the hand-held market feels kind of stagnant right now. The kinds of games I want to play aren't being made with any regularity. I think part of the problem is that the DS and PSP aren't really direct competitors with one another. There is some overlap, of course, but to a large extent each hand held appeals to a different kind of gamer. I bought a PSP, for example, but my choice was never down to buying a PSP 'or' a DS.

As far as this idea that Microsoft is doing something wrong by buying exclusives, well, this nonsense needs to be laid to rest. What I mean is this: all the console makers buy exclusives. The exclusives don't just make themselves, after all. Each console maker has a different approach to "buying exclusives", but make no mistake, they all buy exclusives.

Fundamentally I fail to see the difference between a company like Microsoft that approaches a developer and says "hey, let's make a game together...here is what we are offering on our side" and a company like Sony that says "hey, we like your work...we would like to purchase your company and have you make all your future games exclusively for our Playstation platforms". In either case the company on the other side can choose to accept the offer or not.

Now, if Microsoft is so evil for paying for a one time exclusive from a developer, thus restricting access to that game to users of their console, wouldn't Sony be just as evil for buying out a development studio and permanently restricting access to ALL of that studio's future output?

The fact is, consoles need exclusives to survive and compete. And the only way to get them on your console is to pay somebody to make them. The approach might be somewhat different between the various console makers, but the end result is the same.

To criticize Microsoft for entering into agreements with developers to create an exclusive game or franchise, while not criticizing Sony for the outright purchase and control of a studio and all its future content is irrational and inconsistent.

tehReaper5864d ago

Yeah, I def. agree. I don't understand why everyone is always dissing Microsoft for buying exclusives when Sony pushed out money to buy first party devs. I mean, what's worse, one game, or an entire studio exclusive?

There is more than enough room for Microsoft in the handheld market as long as they bring something different. DS has the casual different way to play, PSP has the hardcore games, but where is the medium? I think Microsoft could be that medium.

+ Show (18) more repliesLast reply 5864d ago
-MD-5865d ago

If it had 2 analog sticks I would buy it in a second.

Game13a13y5865d ago

personally, FPS is just not the genre to be had on a handheld no matter how good is the control. the screen is too tiny and the graphics are too bad that most of the time, u can't make out what you are shooting at.

Shadow Man5865d ago

and I bet it will not have 2 analog sticks. GRRRRRRRR

-MD-5865d ago

And why would you bet that?

5865d ago
Show all comments (55)
130°

The director of the original Silent Hill: “I look forward to seeing bold interpretations.”

Keiichiro Toyama—the creator and original director of the 1999 Silent Hill—shared his personal thoughts on the recently announced remake by Konami, reflecting on what the project means to him after more than two decades:
“I felt something similar when the game was adapted into a movie. It deeply moved me to see the names of the characters and locations I had created come to life visually, even though I wasn’t directly involved. That wouldn’t have been possible without the continued support of the fans and the dedication of the developers who’ve kept the series alive.
I’m really looking forward to seeing how the remake evolves this time. With the advanced technology we now have, I’m sure I’ll be surprised by how the game is reimagined. Since the original was built for the first PlayStation, there will naturally be challenges—like the camera and controls—but I’m eager to see bold and creative solutions to those elements.”

Read Full Story >>
www-alhub-me.translate.goog
senorfartcushion1d 9h ago

Haha Not only is bold and creatively not what the industry wants, it’s not what most people want.

They want to get scammed and pay twice for a thing they already own.

jznrpg7h ago

I’m sure many would want bold and creative done well, but that’s easier said than done. I like variety so give me a little bit of everything, done well of course.

Nightcrawler891d 8h ago

Hope they use his vision in the game

Inverno1d 7h ago

Was the SH2 remake even bold? Or was it more or less just a 1 to 1 over the shoulder remake?

Scissorman15h ago

it was not. it greatly expanded the areas and puzzles to the point where it felt like an entirely new game. the enemies and boss fights were given a MASSIVE upgrade. the abstract daddy fight in particular was incredible. and the team added two new endings.

Pedrof1d 7h ago

I wouldn't hold my breath on "bold".

Show all comments (8)
220°

Phil Spencer Teases 2026 As A "Really Special Year" For Xbox

2026 will mark the 25th anniversary of Xbox, and Phil Spencer has teased it as a "really special year" for the games division.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
TheEroica9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

You got downvotes by pathetic gamers for feeling hopeful about good games coming out next year. Imagine how small your brain must be to downvote someone excited for future gaming joy? It is pretty neat to see people's world view blow up in front of them as they realize Microsoft has put themselves in a driver's seat that Sony hasn't been able to touch all generation.... What's even more pathetic is the same people downvoting you are the same people wishlisting Microsoft games on their ps5s 😂

P_Bomb9d ago

“Imagine how small your brain must be to downvote someone excited for future gaming joy?”

My dude your post history shits on EVERYTHING. You never have a good thing to say about anything lol! 🤣

PanicMechanic8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

“Getting ready for those GaaS reveals! Sony is a shadow of themselves this gen.”

You literally said this a couple of days ago. Start applying the clown make up, you hypocritical jester

derek9d ago

Yep we'll see, they have alot releasing next year.

RaidenBlack9d ago

NGL, next year might be one of the best years in gaming ... starting off with RE9 and GTA VI ...
and then all the good games that's been cooking
Pragmata, Sands of Time, Saros, Gears E-Day, 007 First Light, Blood of Dawnwalker,
Mortal Shell II, Onimusha, Marvel1943: Rise of Hydra
current-gen only Infinity Ward's CoD, Duskbloods
+ My guess: Wolverine, Exodus, Mudang, Crimson Desert, Clockwork etc ...
~ seems like it might get too stacked

1Victor9d ago

@rokos:”Hopefully “
I downvoted you not for been hopeful but because I have seen the same “NEXT YEAR WILL BE SPECIAL “ comment for the last 10+ and hasn’t seen anything special from Microsoft.
I hope next year will be the one that everyone been waiting for since the last 3 years of the Xbox 360, it have to be after over $80 billions spent on acquisitions.

Lightning779d ago

So the new excuse is they don't count because it's from the ABK now huh. I guess all those 3rd party games count even less because they don't own them. According to your always crappy logic.

InUrFoxHole8d ago

Lol. You haven't seen anything special? Do you even game?

OtterX9d ago

Always with the "next year..."! 😂

neutralgamer19929d ago

I don't know they have delivered this year and even last year. And they have a lot more content in the pipeline right now than anyone else. We can't just keep hating on MS

Indiana Jones
South of midnight
Avowed
Flight simulator
Hell Blade 2
Minecraft update
Gears of war reloaded
Indian Jones:expansion
Gears E day
Clockwork revolution
Fable
Doom the dark ages
The outer worlds 2
Grounded 2
Call of duty

OtterX9d ago

How many of those titles were just buyouts of companies that were going about making their games anyways? *Throws cash - "Oh look what we made!"

dveio9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

This list, that's been posted again, and again, and again in every single topic like this, contains almost nothing, literally almost nothing from Microsoft's own creational thoughtprocess.

It's a bunch of former 3rd party IPs.

Now even slowly returning to Playstation in some cases like Indiana, Hellblade, probably Starfield soon too, after they were made exclusively to Xbox on purpose.

Due to Microsoft's lack for own IP material except Halo & Forza. Which, the lack of, was the sole reason for all of it to happen in the first place anyway. Please don't pretend it wasn't.

And just look at all the games that come from Obsidian alone.

You really think Obsidian wasn't already working on Avowed and South of Midnight even without Microsoft buying Zenimax?

Microsoft delivered nothing but cheques.

OtterX9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

@dveio THIS. Lol, this dude thinks Call of Duty wouldn't exist without Microsoft! smh 😂

neutralgamer19929d ago (Edited 9d ago )

Common narrative I see often — that Microsoft shouldn’t get credit for the games its studios release because they “just bought them.” But this viewpoint ignores key context and sets a double standard that other platform holders aren’t held to

No one is saying these games wouldn't exist at all without Microsoft. But let’s not pretend that having a trillion-dollar company backing a studio doesn’t make a massive difference. Obsidian never had AAA funding before the Xbox acquisition. Pillars of Eternity was crowdfunded, and their resources were always stretched thin. Now they’re working on Avowed, with proper support behind it.

Ninja Theory’s Hellblade: Senua’s Sacrifice was made by around 20 people, using borrowed equipment and doing mocap in a boardroom. It was a passion project held together by tape and willpower. Today, Hellblade II exists because they were given resources, time, and freedom — something many developers don’t get unless they’re owned by a company that believes in their vision.

ZeniMax (Bethesda’s parent company) was in real financial trouble before the Microsoft acquisition. Reports and insider accounts have pointed out how much they needed a cash infusion. And while some people want to write off Xbox’s ownership of Bethesda titles, they forget the alternative could have meant layoffs or even closures.

The same goes for Activision Blizzard. Would you really prefer the company to stay under Bobby Kotick, after all the documented workplace misconduct and toxic leadership issues? Say what you want about Microsoft, but their acquisition brought accountability and change to a company that desperately needed it.

At the same time, Xbox gets hated on for doing what every major company does. Sony bought Housemarque, Bluepoint, Insomniac — but no one says Spider-Man 2 “doesn’t count” because of that. Why does Xbox get treated differently for acquiring struggling or undervalued developers and giving them a chance to thrive?

And the idea that Xbox locks games away is outdated. They're pushing cross-platform releases, cloud gaming, Game Pass, and backward compatibility more than any other platform holder. They're not forcing all studios into live service. If anything, their upcoming lineup is less GAAS-heavy and more focused on narrative and creativity — Avowed, South of Midnight, Clockwork Revolution, Fable, Perfect Dark, Towerborne, and others show real variety.

Whether people like it or not, Xbox is now the biggest publisher in the industry and owns the most gaming IPs. But what matters more is how they treat their studios. Most of these teams were previously stuck making AA games with limited scope — now they’re getting the tools and support to aim higher.

So when people say “Microsoft didn’t make those games,” they’re missing the point. It’s not about who started the studio — it’s about who enabled them to do their best work. You don’t have to love Xbox to admit they’ve helped a lot of developers and are taking a player-first approach.

Instead of writing off everything they do, maybe try recognizing the good they’re doing for both devs and gamers. At the end of the day, we should want more studios to succeed — no matter who owns them

BeHunted9d ago

I'm surprised Clockwork Revolution (BioShock meets Dishonored) isn't getting more media attention. The game looks interesting and reminds me of the old RPG games.

anast9d ago

The only good game on that list is Flight sim. The rest are either average or will be average. It's not a good look for MS.

TheEroica9d ago

My god.... Look how many comments are upset about microsoft's successes... 😂 This may be my new favorite thread. Not one gamer saying thanks for all the goodness coming their way, just bitter anger and downvoting the very games they themselves will purchase throughout 2026.... Sony really worked you guys over this generation.... Condolences.

DivineHand1259d ago

@neutralgamer1992 You said what needed to be said.

I have heard for years from older gamers that fanboys are the biggest issue with any fanbase. They will defend or gloss over negative news as long as the correct logo is on the box and they bash the competing platform no matter how much good they are trying to bring.

Right now their advocacy for PlayStation is elevating that platform so high that Sony no longer believes they need to do anything to satisfy their loyal fanbase like they did in the PS4 days.

I just hope most of them will eventually start advocating for themselves and encourage others to do the same. No one should blindly support one platform because these companies do not care about anything other than profit.

neutralgamer19929d ago

Hunted

And first proper game done by the studio with proper AAA budget and saying it will be released when ready

Anast

I believe we went through this before that you are objectively wrong. Meta critic, user reviews, game sales. In Playstation top 10 best selling games were 5 from Microsoft studios

Otter

No this dude is saying so many other studios wouldn't be thriving without MS money and people would be getting abused physically and mentally with Bobby kotick and his side kicks

Also maybe look up how the original founder of Bethesda and zenimax was kicked out of his own company by his best friend lawyer. So that was always a shady place and had been struggling financially before MS paid a premium of almost 7 billion

Eroica

I use to be a die hard Playstation fan and now I only have a Pc. I see how these fans are so toxic. They just can't handle any positive news regarding Xbox. When the best selling games on playstation are Xbox titles. Look at Forza horizon being best seller and that's years old game by MS. I guess ms don't deserve credit for that success too since they are the only company in gaming making acquisitions

Forget the fact Sony paid 3.6 billion for bungie and MS 6.9 for zenimax. Which investment has turned out better

Destiny and marathon with a lot of controversy

While zenimax output is nothing short of amazing compared to what bungie has released

crazyCoconuts9d ago

Yeah it's tricky. "Xbox" has morphed to mean different things to different people.
Console, now Windows, GamePass, and the cross platform games. There's a mix of attitudes towards all those things individually, and maybe an overarching attitude towards MS. But can't argue that the game companies MS recently bought continue to flourish, and GamePass PC has been a great value over the last year.

InUrFoxHole8d ago

@OtterX
You're the dude mad at your exes new guy. She's with someone else... get over it.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 8d ago
Lightning779d ago (Edited 9d ago )

They've had good output so far. So waiting for those games shouldn't be a problem.

Who cares if they're buy outs of companies or whatever excuse you want to make. They're games that are being distributed to other console. Play the games and enjoy it instead of fanboying or complaining.

ocelot079d ago

They going to be a he best and biggest publisher on Xbox, Playstation and PC next year. They not really said anything about Switch 2 though spite claiming to be big supporters.

quenomamen9d ago

If you call making one last Xbox before going full Sega, as Great. Then yea.

TheEroica9d ago

Doesn't feel like you're paying attention to what's happening.

RhinoGamer889d ago

It will be, his net work will hit 50 million and he plans to buy a new mansion in Cape Cod. Thanks everyone! #failup

Show all comments (40)
250°

Halo: Combat Evolved Remake reportedly planned to release in late 2026

Xbox Game Studios' Halo: Combat Evolved Remake is reportedly planned to release in late 2026 to celebrate 25 years of Xbox.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Goodguy0112d ago

Dear God it's been 4 years since infinite and no official update on anything lol.

Tacoboto12d ago

No official update on anything?

They replaced studio leadership
They changed the studio name
They announced the change to UE5
... all while supporting Infinite

The support to Infinite isn't what it originally should have been but they've still been providing tons of official updates over the years, and as recently as two months ago added a brand new weapon.

GamerRN11d ago

I think remaking Halo Combat Evolved, and going to 2 and 3 again, will help give the studio an idea of how to make a Halo game feel like Halo again

Tacoboto11d ago

Infinite did feel like Halo, that's not what the complaints were...

The complaints were almost literally everything else. Monetization, netcode and desync, the campaign structure, story, and single biome, the weaker-than-expected post-launch content.

InUrFoxHole11d ago

Gotta agree. Infinite felt like halo.

Profchaos12d ago

Dev times in modern days 4 years of silence isn't unheard of when things are running smoothly.

And around 6 months ago 343 did show a tech demo of ue5 using halo assets so it's not radio silence.

Given all the shake ups i am more surprised we're getting anything next year at all.

RaidenBlack12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

They coulda started with Halo 3 remake ... I know Halo CE remaster was not proper with the art style but still, remaking after a remaster seems dull, when Halo 3 and Reach have started to show some age.

PhillyDonJawn12d ago

Yeah I hate they used Halo reach artstyle. Hope this remake feel authentic yet fresh

--Onilink--12d ago

Probably the simplest to work around with. They are reportedly doing it in UE5, so its just as much an Anniversary thing, as its probably the studio getting familiar and setting up their tools and processes in the engine with an actual game, to facilitate the development of the next Halo

Profchaos12d ago

I'm guessing combat evolved has a smaller scope in general the later half of the game features a ton of backtracking and reused assets making it a easier game to remake on a deadline

Its also a better choice if this is the first game to be multiplatform mind you I think it's pretty much a given that anyone with a passing curiosity has played this by now in some way be it pc or brought a used console for a few bucks

darthv7212d ago

This will likely come to PS5 at the same time. 25 years of XB.... shared with PS.

Obscure_Observer12d ago

It´s gonna be among best sellers on PS Store next year regardless.

raWfodog11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

I would love to see Lost Odyssey come over to PS5. I would definitely buy that again. That was the first game that I played on my 360. Loved the story and battle system. One of the best JRPGs of all time in my opinion.

Show all comments (27)