Activision has published the first official, digital (not scanned) screenshot of Modern Warfare 2.
umm it's funny how COD is killing itself, AWFUL Graphics !! COD4 had better graphics than COD5 and now COD6 is going to have even worse graphics thand Cod5
The Gaymer Credit goes to Murderdolls :D
Lets hope that the quality of its gameplay is not like its visuals,which look bad for today's standards.
talking about graphics.
Don't these games run @60fps? If so, you can imagine why it loses out in terms of a graphical wow factor.
What I Mean By Fake Is Its Not InGame So I Dont Care. & I Don't Know How People Are Judging The Visuals? You Can Only Do That When You See A Picture Of A Gun Infront Of You
I thought that looked pretty good... Not Killzone 2 quality obviously but still looks great. I dunno why you guys don't like it
Im playing CoD for the intensity not for the gfx. CoD is the master when it comes to FPS. Im paying for the fun not for the eye candy and this is what CoD is all about! PS: ur console hardware didnt magically upgrade itself overnight so dont except better gfx each time they create a new iteration
Looks fine to me. They might have to cut back on some graphical features to make the levels more open but they have plenty of time to make visual enhancements to the game before November. This screen could also be from an earlier build of the game.
MAG does 256 player matches and still manages to look as good as Modern Warfare 2. Just saying, the graphics look like a step DOWN from COD4.
although we'll see if MAG can run at a constant 60 frames a second.
I dont understand why a shooter NEEDS to run at 60fps. Most shooters are 30fps locked and run butter-smooth.
Uh, MAG looks a little worse in my opinion. Of course it has a huge number of players so it can be forgiven, but just saying...
Lol. The trailer for Mag that I saw made it looks like a ps2 game. No detail, crappy textures. Or did you honestly believe that having 256 players wouldn't affect anything? What a joke.
mag looks like a psp game.
Both games look impressive. But, for all y'all. I'd rather play a game using stick figures but with amazing gameplay, Rather than amazing graphics with crappy gameplay.. But, that's just me.
I'll say it again, looks worse than CoD4. Meh. How utterly disappointing. Please IW, don't let me down, I'd love to lose another year to your FPS awesomeness.
In some areas it looks better than CoD4 + the game is still in development. Most importantly, it looks much better than WaW.
these are captures from the trailer. Wait for real footage to come out.
I agree with them. The game isn't complete. Wait for the final product.
how does that look bad lol then go play your "good looking" games with bad game play
I'll go play my good looking games with good gameplay. You know, games like Killzone 2, Uncharted, (soon will be playing Uncharted 2 & Infamous), MGS4, and the list goes on. I thought Modern Warfare 2 would be just COD4 with gloss but it looks worse than COD4 & COD4 was a huge disappointment to begin with. I'll still rent MW2 though. I just won't make the mistake of buying it like I did with COD4.
With graphics like this, i guess 360 just wont be impressing anybody It also runs at 60 meaning in theory at least, potential for even more in the way of geometry and detail were this a 30 frame game The point being that all this talk of far better graphics on what to my mind is obviously a slightly technically superior machine the PS3(polygon pushing at least), is somewhat dumb when all i can see here is so perfectly lush anyway From now on it just comes down to what machine has the more appealing games and how much of a bigger library exists for a platform This game is currently looking very nice though that's for sure
the game will be great either way, but I would've expected graphics on par with those of say...Operation Flashpoint.
it looks a lot better in motion than it does in screens.
You could make poop look good at 60fps.
Not much to go by so far, and we're still around six months from release...but we do know that at least part of the game is in Brazil.
COD4 a huge disappointment lmao....uncharted is repetitive, Killnone 2 controls are gay and MGS4 is a movie not a game. killnone 2 sells was a huge disappointment
"MGS4 is a movie not a game" I'm currently watching MGS3 by the way.
Those games you just mentioned woops every game in the 360 library. Halo 3 is really just Halo 2 HD. Gears was ok, but Gears 2 in reality is Gears 1.5....and that's about it for the 360 gaming library.
to be honest,that looks generic Looks like IW has reached its limit in terms of graphics and they got a lot of work to do on the gameplay of MW2 to make it worth it and really look like a sequel
please tell me your joking lol halo and gears 2 sold way more then the games I mentioned lol WAY MORE so stop being a queer I said MSG4 was a movie but if you think 3 was a movie that's fine. Just get the popcorn ready when you play 4
Sales =/= quality, you queer. Uncharted and Kz2 beats the sh*t out of anything the 360 has to offer graphically, and gameplay wise are better. The best looking game for 360 is that Gears 1.5 which happens to be running for an ancient unreal engine. Guess that sh*t console has reached its limits.
but the graphic not so impressive. maybe they think we are still in 2007!! wake up we are in 2009. but i bet we all gonna be impressed with the gameplay hopefully.
what I find strange is though, is that when it comes out they'll probably still rate it like 9.5 in terms of graphics even if the textures aren't that amazing... I can't help but believe that reviewers are just gonna praise this game like GTA IV
So your saying graphics = quality lmao some people these days are dumb, dumb fanboys, go look at ya ps3 games and have no fun ya queer
Actually in his defence, he did mention that the gameplay is better, so to him, graphics + gameplay == quality.
i would rather have graphics = quality that sales = quality
Farcry 2 outdid COD4/5 and even COD6 is no match. Hopefully the gameplay will be better than FC2 as was of COD4.
Dude why are you talking about cod6, we haven't even got to cod 5 yet. Oh wait you must think cod [email protected] is cod 5. Why do so many people think this?
The home of judgemental people.
They still got 6 months to touch up. I'm ok with a company reusing their engine if the art direction compliments it like Lost Planet 2. However that was just awful for IW to reuse their old 2007 engine from what it seems. At least make the appropriate upgrades so that I feel like I'm playing a sequel and not an expansion pack. Either that, or truly compliment the engine with a whole new perspective of environment. If MW2 was primarily based in Snow and ice levels and they used the old engine, then I'd be fine with that because it's a new perspective. I like how Treyarch used the CoD4 engine to make WaW and that was still an impressive looking game on its own. However if MW2 does the same setting and places like CoD4, then I better see some engine upgrades then so that I don't feel like I'm playing an old game, packaged in new shrink wrap and charged full price for it. You know, the "EA business model".
Ok it might not look as good as Killzone 2, but it still looks nice.
My eyes, owww my eyes. The game is so ugly it's hurting my eyes /sarcasm
IW is making upgrades, I know the environments are now destructible. Partly at least.
After playing Red Faction Guerrilla, nothing else in the industry can say their graphics engine allows for destructibility. If you are a dev out there and you wanna talk about your game having destructible environments, unless your game engine has the level of destruction seen in Red Faction, then I don't wanna hear about it.
Devs should be ashamed of themselves if they say they have destructible environments, and don't deliver past Red Faction's. When I am playing the demo, I destroy and rebuild sh!t instead of doing the objective. It is just too much fun man. It needs a little tweaking, but it is pretty impressive so far. An example would be, when you are knocking out the supports for a huge building, one pole in the center can hold the whole building up, but other than that one gripe, it is perfect.
theirs a demo!? Cool I'm going to go look.
/rant Red Faction's destructibility is a joke.. The game looks like sh!t, plays like sh!t, has a sh!t story and totally no immersion. Bland everything; enviroments, character design, enemy design, architecture, weapon design, mission design etc. The characters nor the weapons, verhicles or enemies have any sense of weight to them. The shooting mechanic sucks.. Some sh!tty physics calculated destructibility does not save this game from being a total turd. I'll take Battlefield: BC's destructibility over Red Faction's any day.. ps: The Multiplayer is a frakkin' joke. /end rant
Wow you really know a lot about an unreleased game, CoxMulder.
@Linux Perhaps I should have mentioned that my rant was based on the 2 demo's. IMHO, Red Faction has mediocrity and blandness written all over it.. The destruction didn't do much for me, yet it seems to be the only thing they've focused on getting right.
Obviously from the PC version, and it still doesn't look that good.
be honest now, the games gonna rock and i cant wait for it. If its not a ps3 exclusive on this site its never gonna get the vote from the many stupid ps3 fanboys on this site. MAG hehe dont make me laugh, this will blow every shooter out of the water and the mp if half as popular as the COD4 will keep us playing for years.
Looks about what i expected. Bring it on
First of all.. COD4 wasn't really known for it's graphics in the first place. The gameplay, story, and multiplayer is why I liked COD4 so much, not the graphics. Besides, the game is still far from complete.. But, I, for one, cannot wait for this!
"With graphics like this, i guess 360 just wont be impressing anybody" Dude these pics are form a PS3 website, maybe they are Xbox-360 shots I don't know, again I say this game looks fantastic, maybe I see things different to some of you guys but I have complete faith that this game will be fantastic and the visuals top notch.
They dont buy their exclusives, and they criticize every single multiplatform game. Sony fanboys dont deserve to be called gamers...
they must be planning on having a large amoung of players in online multi-player That screenshot looks like that GI Joe crap that is coming out soon.
every shot i see it seems to either show 3rd person perspective, or none at all. i hope they haven't mixed it up and gone all wanky on us.
Dammit, why has my earlier comment been removed!? I have a right to my opinion as much as anybody here. It's probably the SAME JACKASS SUM-B***H that posted the "Modern Warfare2 graphics disappoints" article. S***face!!
Damn, My bad. I posted on another Moder Warfare2 article and not this one. My post is still on that one. Guess I'm the shmuck, This time. LOL!!
Looks Like COD 4 has hit a wall as far as the Graphics Department. When you make a game the first thing you do is think about how much space you have to work with. Since DVD is the lowest common denominator when it comes to multiplatform games Devs will need to figure how to squeeze all the data onto one DVD. Add in the fact that the 360 has no standard hard drive games will need to be thumbed down. If MS had decided to included a standard Hard Drive then Devs would have been able to Utilize it for games. The 360 might still be able to match up against the PS3 Graphically.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.