1010°

PS3 and XBOX 360 Loading times

Which console loads the quickest? You might be suprised to see who waits and who plays! You'll have to watch to find out!

Read Full Story >>
gametrailers.com
Robotz Rule6670d ago (Edited 6670d ago )

The Playstation 3 load times are faster and if you disagree you are obviously a Xbox fanboy,just look at oblivion!

Good stuff "ASSASSYN 36o" keep it up!

ASSASSYN 36o6670d ago

I won`t dignify this one with a response.

SmokeyMcBear6670d ago

but uhhh you just did.. and you used you only bubble for it.. good job

SlippyMadFrog6669d ago

It's just proven with this video that Project 8 loads faster, why do you have to be an Xbox fanboy to believe it??? I think you just need to be not visualy impared to believe it. I hate it when people accuse other people of being fanboys whithout a vaild reason. Can you maybe post links to where it says that PS3's load times are faster in general? If you can't then it's only fair and logical to call you a sony fanboy. Actualy DVD's read faster than Blu-Ray and that is a fact. I realy hate people coming on here and posting without thinking and generaly making crazy statements. I now assume that you are 14 years old and only want attention.

m236669d ago

did robotz even watch the video?

DeadlyFire6669d ago (Edited 6669d ago )

The video makes perfect sense that the PS3 takes a few seconds longer cause 2x Blu-Ray isn't as fast as 12x DVD which the X360 does indeed have. 2x Blu-ray isn't much slower though. 4x Blu-Ray would blaze past 12x DVD in speed. Games can be optimized to run faster though on the systems.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 6669d ago
marionz6670d ago

i found motorstorm takes ages to load, especially when trying to select a car it takes a long time for the image to show up on screen befor you can select the next one
also its painfull waiting for RFOM to load
at the end of the day it doesnt matter because with time developers learn how to make games load faster, like oblivion on ps3 doubleing the data so the blue ray can load it quicker, if they didnt do that it would have loaded slower then the 360 version

GaMr-6670d ago (Edited 6670d ago )

Yea... I also saw a home video like this one of Gears running on a PS3 !

This is uncredible crap. lol sorry buddy

Keyser6669d ago

That's the bad part about this video, it's one game. Next someone is going to do the same thing with a PS3 game loading faster than the 360 and we'll have this argument all over again.

"Can't we all get along?" is too cliche...

"STFU" is too crude...

"Who cares?" is very appropriate. I have both systems but I'm not going to play them both at the same time. The was like 5 seconds different. If I had bought the game for both systems (which I wouldn't) and played them indepedently I probably wouldn't have noticed that. That video was at the start-up, not even ingame.

I'm certain that the next argument is which console is a deeper black, PS3 or 360. Doesn't effect gaming...

FordGTGuy6670d ago

Blu-Ray takes longer to read the disc and you can install games on the PS3 and you will have faster load times.

Xbox 360 has a faster reading capability and the better compression allows more information to be moved at once. You cannot install games onto the Xbox 360 to make the load times faster.

They are unfair comparisons because of the way you can separately setup each of them and they use a different type of disk drives and both reads the information differently.

GaMr-6670d ago (Edited 6670d ago )

I dont believe it...all this time I thought you were a biased prick...

Positive feedback from me . Well placed comment.

Cheers !!!

Eternal E 8086670d ago (Edited 6670d ago )

because were talkin from a hardwear stand point and it seems like the ps3 is slower and to say its not fair is wrong because theres a reason ps3 didnt have a core ps3 is because blu-ray wouldnt make up for its speed, its obvious why sony didnt use a removeable HDD because of blu-ray.

Blasphemy6669d ago

ps3s hdd is removable it tells you in the manual how to remove it to add a bigger hdd.

kmis876670d ago

The ps3 does have a hardware disadvantage in slower maximum read speed (although it does have faster minimum read speed), but it also has an advantage in harddrive caching.

Besides hardware, there is also a software aspect to which one loads faster, so that needs to also be taken into account. Since THPS8 for the ps3 is basically a port of the 360, it has an immediate disadvantage. Unfortunately, many upcoming games for the ps3 are also mere ports, but ones like Oblivion that are much more adapted to the ps3 hardware do show comparable loading times to their respective 360 versions.

Eternal E 8086670d ago (Edited 6670d ago )

but the only reason the ps3 version of oblivion is better because the devs had much more time to develop it on the ps3 then they did with the xbox360s.great game none the less

Nik6669d ago

They also have patches for X360 and you don't see X360 version becomes better after patching. Patch is released after PS3 version... patch = dev. time too isn't it?

hfaze6669d ago

Is due to hard disk caching more than anything... That's why Microsoft REALLY needs to drop the 360 Core SKU, drop the price on the 360 Premium, drop the price on the 20GB hard drives, and allow developers to REQUIRE the hard drive for their games..

I thought that was so goofy that ALL of the original Xbox'es had hard drives STOCK... But the 360 comes out with a model that doesn't have a hard drive, and devs are supposed to code their games as if the 360 DOESN'T have a hard drive...

Besides, $99.99 for a 20GB hard drive? Can you say GREED...

shotty6669d ago

What patch for oblivion?....there hasn't been a patch since last year. Also only certain things can be solved by patching.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6669d ago
Show all comments (108)
80°

Final Fantasy IX Music Special Live Stream Announced For 25th Anniversary

Do not miss the Final Fantasy IX Music Special Live Stream on July 7th! Celebrate FFIX's 25th anniversary with unforgettable music.

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
Goodguy011d 9h ago

And the remake announcement there probably.... hopefully

jznrpg56m ago

It should be there. All signs are pointing to it

150°

It exists and works: This is the portable Xbox 360

Its creator eliminated components that were not essential to speed up its development, such as the Bluetooth of the controls.

Read Full Story >>
en.generacionxbox.com
MaximusPrime_14h ago

Does it have red LEDs in case of failure?

6h ago
Reaper22_1h ago

I heard that a mobile version of concord is being released for it.🤭

80°

Split/Second Is The Explosive Racing Game That Deserved a Sequel

The Outerhaven writes: Split/Second was the explosive arcade racing game that outshone Ridge Racer and Burnout. That is, until Disney shut it all down before a sequel could happen.

Read Full Story >>
theouterhaven.net
OmegaSoldati21h ago

As a kid i had some heart attacks playing this game. The soundtrack right on point with those close calls. I love this game.

shadowhaxor21h ago

Agreed. I still love it and play it often. Still sucks that Disney was like, nah... this game didn't do well, when it did well against other racers and reviewed well.

MaximusPrime_21h ago

Split/Second was one of the game I enjoyed playing. In fact it's still the most popular video on my YouTube channel. It's a gameplay of Split/Second posted 15 years ago. This past month 25 people viewed it. Split/Second is a favourite amongst racing gamers worldwide.

AuraAbjure17h ago

This game was super awesome and hella fun playing split-screen with the homie. Trashing your friend’s car during split-screen competition using one of those QuickTime events was so funny haha

wesnytsfs14h ago

That and Blur both deserve a sequel, they came out within days of eachother.

Show all comments (7)