Red Faction: Guerrilla - Ps3 Vs 360 demo screenshots

Eurogamer Portugal published some exclusive screenshots comparing the two versions from the Red Faction: Guerrilla demo. Check them out.

Read Full Story >>
The story is too old to be commented.
Mandaspt3569d ago

Xbox 360 version more darker.

PirateThom3569d ago

Yep, that's about as far as it goes.

Adjust the contrast to suit.

3569d ago
N4Sony3569d ago

With that said, first two comments are best. Darkness about the only MAJOR issue here, just adjust. PS3 demo functioned perfectly. Loved it.

SullyDrake3569d ago

It isn't grotesquely dark, and is crisper; the 360 version appears to have a blur filter on it.

squidyj3569d ago

The only difference i saw was that the shadows on the 360 version have some fuzz on them and the ps3 again struggles with transparency effects forcing downrendering(a lot more detail in the explosion on the 360 because the PS3 is rendering that part of the scene at a lower resolution than normal then blowing it up because transparency effects require a lot of bandwidth that the PS3 is weak on).

LinuxGuru3569d ago (Edited 3569d ago )

There is a full-rez option...make sure to look at those instead of the half-size popup.

InfectedDK3569d ago (Edited 3569d ago )

Seriously there is no difference at all.
Adjust the lighting/contrast in-game or on your TV.
That's all folks!

RememberThe3573569d ago

But it's barely noticeable.

Marcelles253569d ago (Edited 3569d ago )

you can see the screen shots were taken at different times of day causing the 360 to be darker. the PS3 surprisingly has better textures. i think the fire screen was taken right when the thing blew up on the ps3 so it looks blurry and the 360 one was taken a little bit after. the 360 does do shadows better, the shadows are kinda like rubbed smooth on edges as where ps3 just has very fine kinda crappy lines
overall same ps2 style quality

Hellsvacancy3569d ago (Edited 3569d ago )

It shouldnt b Ps3 vs 360 screenshots it should b Ps2 vs Xbox the graphics r really really poor i expected alot better

I loved the 1st 2 games aswell

Andras843569d ago

There are no jeggies. What are you talking about??? Ever tried stop being a fanboy???

Only differences is that the PS3 version is lighter and the 360 version is darker.

LONEWOLF2313569d ago

Yep that pretty much settles it, the 360 version is darker.
Played it on the PS3 and its a pretty good game would of been better if it was a FPS though.

morganfell3569d ago

Hellsvacancy is on the right track. The game doesn't even rate on the rental list. 'Horrible' would be putting it kindly.

Brock Danger3569d ago

Pics look quite similar, in that they both look like an uninteresting third-person shooter. Haven't played the demo yet, but the videos looked...boring.

Pulling off third-person games has changed so much in the past few years, this whole set-up seems archaic and dated. This feels like it will play like Mercs 2, which was not exactly awesome.

It seems like the dev team had, "hooray explosions!" posted all around their office, along with some smaller posters that said, "hammers are cool too, kinda"

littletad3569d ago

I actually had to edit my reply, right before I posted it. I actually agreed with you BASED on your pics. But when I saw them for myself on their site, there were no jaggies? Did you do something to it? Pretty idiotic if you ask me.

Anyhow, the only difference is the lighting. 360 is darker.

slayorofgods3569d ago (Edited 3569d ago )

I am not getting your point?? What is the point of reshowing us the two comparison scans? It seems pretty obvious to me all the "sony fans" are dead on with the comparisons. All they said was that the 360 is darker, which it is. Other than that there are no big differences.

What did I miss?

y0haN3569d ago

The 360 version's lighting looks more natural and has less aliasing, but the PS3 version seems to have more detailed textures and will probably have better physics (I haven't got the PS3 demo).

Gue13569d ago (Edited 3569d ago )

I swear for my penis that I didn't do anything to those pics.

Look at the jaggies of the PS3 version:

Now look at the X360 version and you'll see that it doesn't have any jaggies:

-And now look at the same pics that I posted before, even the map on the left in the X360 version looks kinda blurry so, this is not something about the hour of day in the game.



All of them are direct from the site....

Now talking about my new record of disagrees, seriously, how can anybody disagree with facts again?

littletad3569d ago (Edited 3569d ago )

I went ahead and put the images to their original size, and yes, the jaggies did come up on the ps3 version. It's hard to notice these little things when they are re-imaged to a smaller size. You are correct in your observations. But your post didn't have to call the first two posters "blind". Not only that but it's a tiresome subject, which console has the best graphics for said game. But you used proof and stuck with it, I respect that.

Yohan? I'm confused, has physics ever been in an issue in multiplatform games. Despite jaggies, anti-aliasing, textures, and lighting; when has physics ever been noticeably different in a game?

DaTruth3569d ago

Ps3 and 360 fans united in their utter disgust of the graphics... er... everything in this game. Comparison on which looks the most bad. I'll probably pay tribute to the awesomeness of the first game when I buy this used after the price goes down.

phosphor1123569d ago (Edited 3569d ago )

Are they retarded!?!? Don't use f*cking jpeg compression! It looks butt ugly!

somerandomdude3569d ago

After printing out each picture and carefully analyzing each one under a microscope and counting the number of colors and counting every pixel in each slide and carefully blowing up each image to see the crevices of each item in every scenery I can now conclude that [insert your preferred console] has very slightly better graphics.

[insert the console you don't own]'s fanboys need to wake up and realize these very slight and unnoticeable differences.

GUNS N SWORDS3569d ago (Edited 3569d ago )

"You two sure are blind or something...

The PS3 version has a lot of jaggies but it looks clearer and has better lighting.

The X360 version has a lot less jaggies but it looks blurrier and darker.

edit: Good job at disagreeing with facts moron. =)"

"PS3 version has the edge
It isn't grotesquely dark, and is crisper; the 360 version appears to have a blur filter on it."

omg, that's antialiasing, (2x from the looks of it, maybe more i don't know) ,the 360 doesn't use blur

(look at the top of that small stone blockade)

edit, 360 has a slight "AA" advantage of sorts, well to know what 2xAA looks like will use "mirror's edge" as simple comparison.
that's 2xaa.

Ozzyb3569d ago

This game is far from impressive.

I did not murder him3569d ago

I agree with you the 360 version has better contrast making it not as washed out looking. The PS3 version is also missing detail. Sony needs to get some exclusives out fast I'm sick of not having anything to play on my PS3 because of this. Time after time the 360 comes out on top.

Ozzyb3569d ago

I hope you're being sarcastic.

I did not murder him3569d ago (Edited 3569d ago )

Get real.

Strange. From these pics the PS3 version's main character seems more crisp but the 360 version has more detail and better contrast. To me it looks like they got more from the 360 overall.

I'm willing to bet the PS3 version is not doing something the 360 version is doing while the game is playing. The PS3 version is probably not pulling off some visual effects the 360 version is but they had a little to work with although not enough to match the 360 version they made the character crisp with the little they had.

SL1M DADDY3569d ago

1) I was a silly fanboy

2) I thought this game was any good to begin with

3) Unicorns flew out of my butt

In any case, the game is not even on my radar. It just looks generic. Maybe a bargain bin game?

manwich253569d ago

360 may be darker but the explosions look miles better than the PS3

raztad3569d ago (Edited 3569d ago )

I dont get why you guys bother comparing the graphics of a crappy looking game. It's like to say yours looks worse than mine. This is beyond me.

Obviously visuals are not the selling point of this game, lets hope the gameplay make up for it.

+ Show (30) more repliesLast reply 3569d ago
Raoh3569d ago

sigh.......................... .....

Flipgeneral3569d ago

What was the game (worth mentioning) which had huge discrepancies between the two?

Can't we all just get along!?

slayorofgods3569d ago (Edited 3569d ago )

Just wait until ff13. People will be zooming into the scans just to point out slight jagged edges that are otherwise imposable to identify. It really is a funny process worthy of a sigh!

edit - my mistake people are already doing that.

Ozzyb3569d ago

that there's a pixel in the 8th boss's ass, in FF 13, that is 1/4 of a shade darker on 360 than PS3. I think it's clear which version I'll be getting now.

diefor3569d ago

For me Xbox360 better look.

Dimitri3569d ago

How about ...

You own an XBOX 360 so it looks better even tough the PS3 looks more detailed.

TheIneffableBob3569d ago (Edited 3569d ago )

They're more or less the same. The PS3 version is slightly more detailed with better filtering in some areas while the 360 version has better shadows and anti-aliasing.

cayal3569d ago

How about you both shut up.

Malacath3569d ago

I played both demos.
I actually preferred the look of the ps3 version which is unusal for multi-format games.
The 360 version didn't look as crisp and was darker.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3569d ago
lociefer3569d ago (Edited 3569d ago )

ps3 have more rocks / 360 have more sand , ps3 have better lightning / 360 has rrod after 3rd screenshot

GayStation33569d ago (Edited 3569d ago )

The PS3 screenshots have framerate issues.

Cajun Chicken3569d ago

lol. All logic just left the Open Zone.

PR3DAT0R3569d ago (Edited 3569d ago )

Man i have heard a lot of retarded stuff in my time but screenshots having framerate issues absolutely tops the list, do you even know what framerate is? its the number of frames to a unit of time like FPS frames per second, now how you managed to think you can capture bad framerate on a picture is beyond me, the ONLY way you can see bad frame is through video, ingame or slow motion. Your utter attempt of trying to insult the playstation is just pitiful you just make up a load of bullsh*t to fulfill your satifaction, to you it doesn't matter if it makes sense it just the simple fact you think your being smart, well let me break it to you...your not!

360 man3569d ago (Edited 3569d ago )

who are these sony fans tryna kid



oh man its unbelievable

Gue13569d ago (Edited 3569d ago )

Those screens are too tiny 360man.

The same screens you're posting but bigger:



BTW these are the only pics were both versions look similar, nice way of spinning this. But now look at this flat textures on the X360. lol



Look at the terrain were the woman's walking on the PS3 version... Now look at the same place on the X360 to see flat textures! YAY!

This is what's called nitpicking? Lol But that doesn't change that the X360 has some flat textures here and there combined with blurrynes while the PS3 version has come jaggies here and there. =)

ambientFLIER3569d ago

Predator, have you ever heard of sarcasm?

Btw, yes, the ps3 screenshots do have frame rate drops. It's awful!

somerandomdude3569d ago

screenshots having framerate issues? I guess that is why he calls himself gaystation; his arguments are packed with (that stuff you pull out your a$$)

LeonSKennedy4Life3569d ago

Gaystation was kidding.

How can you take that seriously?

He's just a guy on here who likes having fun.

Take a joke!

Traveler3569d ago

I thought the 360 version looked better in some shots and the PS3 looked better in others. All it really comes down to is contrast differences. For all intents and purposes they look exactly the same.

JasonPC360PS3Wii3568d ago

5gb of this game will need to be installed to the PS3 just to have it play in 15fps and only 6 people will buy it.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3568d ago
Zeus Lee3569d ago

For me comparison useless.