Top
490°

Battle Plans: Microsoft Done?

GamingVice.net:

"This console cycle has been plagued by people jumping the gun with fanatical claims as to who's product is finished, who's thriving, and other such misconceptions. It was only but 2 months before the Game Developer's Conference that people were claiming the PS3 was going to tank and now no one can wait for a price drop. Now everyone claims Microsoft won't see the end of the year."

Read Full Story >>
gamingvice.net
The story is too old to be commented.
Lotard33482d ago

It's kinda ridiculous to think that any of the current systems would suddenly "die", especially within the span of this year.

XxZxX3482d ago

Yup, exactly, Who ever expect to Microsoft is 'Done' is an idiot.
Even if they keep losing, they will be the pesky sob that never go away until they gain the title. Don't expect to see them out anytime soon.

Too_Hyped3482d ago (Edited 3482d ago )

Well, nobody said 360 would 'instantly die' but since MS didn't announce anything in so many months, the only difference between the 360 and a dead console is that multiplatform titles are still coming on it.

MS silence is strange, looks like they either intend to give up or to announce a new console...

Dread3482d ago

@too hyped

i have been reading that exact post for the past three years at about the same time of the year by some random sony fan. keep dreaming

peace

Too_Hyped3482d ago (Edited 3482d ago )

@Dread : At that time 360 still had AAA exclusives. It has none now.

Every AAA exclusive is on PS3, and former 360 exclusives come to PS3 (Tales, Ninja Gaiden 2, Bioshock series). It used to be the exact opposite. See the trend ?

LONEWOLF2313482d ago (Edited 3482d ago )

Too_Hyped

But you also have to understand that the only reason WHY NG2 is seeing the light of day on the PS3 is cause the Itagaki-san is no longer with TN. Now as for 360 exclusives id rather wait to see over at E3 what it has in store rather than just assuming that the system doesnt have any. And you know what they say about assumptions.....just in case you dont know, ITS THE MOTHER OF ALL **** ups.

Bnet3433482d ago

It's only April bro, I'd calm down if I were you. E3 2009 hasn't happened yet so I'd hold on to myself if I were you and not get carried away.

"MS silence is strange, looks like they either intend to give up or to announce a new console... "

Announce a new console? No dice. Xbox 360 isn't Xbox 1. They're going to give life to the 360 longer then Xbox 1. To give up? lol. Dude if they were to give up making a console don't you think they would of stopped at Xbox 1 where they lost 4 billion? Come on man think before you speak. Now that the Xbox 360 has sold past 24 million which is what Xbox 1 sold, they already have new Xbox users, why stop now? Wouldn't make any sense.

morganfell3482d ago (Edited 3482d ago )

As a company Microsoft isn't close to where they want to be. Vista was a financial debacle and they are feeling the heat out of all corners, everyone from Linux to Apple. 80% of Microsoft is tied up in their OS and Office division. That is the company's meat and potatoes. If Windows 7 fails to make the impact Microsoft needs and other companies continue to make headway, Microsoft will be forced to trim it's non-core endeavors in order to protect it's main division.

If gaming were such an important part of the Microsoft plan and they were indeed doing so very well you would not have seen them slash their gaming division to a mere 3 first party studios.

As much as some may want to point at the 360 and MS game business and claim they are making money hand over fist that simply isn't true. Why? Because there is truth in action and the very actions instituted by Microsoft say otherwise. Their own measures bespeak of a company that is bleeding money like a stuck pig. All of the boisterous fan claims cannot negate the simple hard fact of Redwood's own moves. Actions that are reminiscent of Mortimer Duke, "Sell! Sell! Sell!"

Will the 360 collapse? Not this year but neither will it be a force with which to be reckoned as in the past. There is an age old expression, "Hell out of the gate but not much for the long run" That indeed is the issue we are witnessing here.

The 360 will continue to sell but with much decreased fervor. Their NXE attempts to lure Nintendo fans have failed miserably. Sales were not driven by attraction to NXE but by a cheap price. Microsoft opted for market share while Sony has chosen profit.

Everyone that knew what they were looking at with the MS shift could see Microsoft running from Sony. It was cleverly camouflaged because most people assumed they were merely attempting to grab a piece of the lucrative Wii market. While that is true their actions were also born of the realization the PS3 was beginning to find it's legs and gather strength. The massive Sony first part investments and evolving PS3 technology were something the 360 division knew they could not combat.

I stated last December that the Holiday sales and first few months of 2009 would be the last hurrah for the 360 and that is indeed the case.

Microsoft can no longer stay in the cage with a Sony and their 20 first party studios. An extended knife fight with the PS3 right now, armed with Bluray and superior graphics capability would spell a quick trip to the morgue for Bill's legacy.

The 360 will try to rely on a low price point, past titles, and 3rd party support. The problem is that economical recovery, increasingly dated technology, the tendency of the public to desire the latest thing, Sony's own growing performance with multiplatform, and the innovations of the PS3 universe make such a plan mere assurance that the 360 will wind up as an also ran. A Sony price cut will spell serious trouble for Microsoft and anyone wishing to believe otherwise is simply increasing altitude before they are forced to bail out.

JokesOnYou3482d ago (Edited 3482d ago )

"I stated last December that the Holiday sales and first few months of 2009 would be the last hurrah for the 360 and that is indeed the case."

-ha ha The only problem with your latest "360 is doomed" prediction is that its been made all too many times before by ONLY sony loyalists, they were wrong then, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out you'll be just the latest hater making just another insignificant and very stupid prediction, hell I bet many of those past "360 is doomed" predictions included a few from your *other account. aahh but then again why would I even bother taking a guy seriously when he speaks as if his tongue has a sony tattoo on it. You're the same guy who believes ps3 has superior graphics over PC, http://www.n4g.com/NewsPend... lmfao, talk about delusion and brand loyalty clouding your judgement, I don't know if I should laugh or just feel bad that you're so brainwashed by the sony hype, either way its clear you need nasim type help.

JOY

AAACE53481d ago

I think alot of people are expecting for the same thing that happened to the dreamcast to occur again, but what they fail to realize is the dreamcast was ran poorly!

Sega only allowed the games they wanted. Not having madded really dealt a blow to the console. Not to mention alot of other well known games. Sony Nintendo and MS came with well known games and totally new ones, which cut off the Dreamcast life support.

That won't happen in this gen. Alot of gamers are mad and say that MS are buying games. It may be true, but the main point is, they are killing the Ps3's ability to dominate the industry.

Regardless of what you think of them, MS has brought a balance to the industry. And that means that all 3 companies will have to stay on their toes.

morganfell3481d ago

It is hardly a balance when unlike last generation, this time MS provided faulty hardware, a more closed development environment that actually limits gamer freedom and developer opportunity, and a hardware that retards the experience due to last generation choices made in features and capability.

Split sales does not equal balance nor is it necessarily the best thing for the gamer.

IaMs123481d ago

About your statement of the NXE is not entirely true. It was not made to attract just Wii players, if you werent aware most of the Xbox user base wanted a new look, and they gave them that as well as your statement of trying to lure new players which is understandable. Either way it wasnt really a fail many enjoy like myself.

Maddens Raiders3481d ago (Edited 3481d ago )

waiting to see the day. The day when the world recognized that the PlayStation® family of consoles would win yet *another console war. Not only did they win the console war, but slayed their opponents in the format arena as well. I knew it would end this way. Mission Accomplished.

Bravo Kutaragi-san

ZuperAmazingCooKie3481d ago

When you said "Redwood", did you mean Redmond?

Anon19743481d ago (Edited 3481d ago )

The 360 finished strong last year but managed almost zero growth in their core market as we see from the NPD numbers when all the dust settled. 4.6 million consoles moved in 2007, 4.7 moved in 2008, but what cost did Microsoft pay for dragging the 360 out of the doltrums with the price cut? Now it's hard to compare 2007 and 2008 revenue for MS games as the 2007 numbers are skewed by the hit they took due to the warranty but when we look at the holiday quarter of 2008 vs 2007, something is striking. MS games division brought in more money during the holiday 2008 season, increased sales and revenue but made 60% less profit than the holiday season of 2007. So, what changed? Only the price cut as far as I can tell.

Now, we know from the main company that is currently making the 360 (there were 3. The biggest quit last year due to Microsoft squeezing their margins) that the new Valhalla motherboards are due to ship this summer - was the price cut just to blow out old stock prior to the a new SKU or is Microsoft just banking that, by eliminating their profits on the 360 hardware they can move more units and make it up with software sales? A dubious strategy when you see companies like EA, Ubisoft, Activision, Take Two, etc all reporting that revenue for 2008 was almost identical between the PS3 and 360 despite the 360 having almost 40% more consoles on the market than the PS3.

I'm not saying Sony is any better at the moment when it comes to their current financial shape, but when XBL subscriptions are the only thing that's keeping MS games out of the red you know it isn't all smiles and sunshine in the Microsoft boardrooms.

HalfFireWater3481d ago

You mention that Microsoft has to cut out everything but their core of OS and software. But what is Sony's financial situation. Sony's music and movie division gets hit harder by piracy than MS and they have to keep bloated movie studio's, publishing companies and overpaid artists on their roles. Don't forget that Sony owns a few TV networks as well but VOD and the web is killing the networks revenue from adverts. Sony's only profitable area is games and that is thanks to PS2. That is why they placed Blu-ray into the PS3 to try and salvage their movie division, just like the UMD for the PSP. Sony is a corporation and at the end of the day they have to pay their bills. Sony is bleeding money just as bad as MS if nbot worst because they have allot of holdings. And don't forget every Vaio that they say, (like the one I am currently using) comes with a MS OS on it. Microsoft doesn't pay royalties to Sony for their product, not so much with Sony. Hell Sony started adding digital copies to their blu-ray sales just because they know they can't stop the pirates.

So to take your logic, if MS cuts off gaming to save their OS division, then Sony cuts off movies, music, TV to save electronics and gaming.

MS has the money to keep going, and if you guys knew anything is that MS killed the XBOX because it was the most exploited system in the history of gaming. What the modder scene did to that system made it foolish to keep it going. I heard of people with 750GB hard drives in their XBOX, that has over 200 XBOX games on it, plus hundreds of movies, tv shows, 1000's of songs, hell and it is a web browser with USB keyboard support and streaming video from the web with web radio access and home networking ability to stream even more stuff to your system. Pls don't use XBox 1 as any indicator of what microsoft will do with the 360.

If that was the case, then Sony do to pass history will come out with a system that doesn't allow a hard drive at all thus alienating yet another publisher's game (FFXI remember) just to push a new hardware format down their customers throats and inflate their sales numbers. Also when their is a problem, it will take a class action lawsuit against them to fix it. And Sony has already shown their lack of support because on my Sony Vaio with Blu-ray drive I couldn't play a blu-ray movie becuase my AACS had expired. Only for me to go to the website and hear that my drive wasn't supported. So you know what I donwloaded the pirated copy and watched it. Sony is putting all of their eggs in one basket and you guys are painting those eggs like the bunnys you are.

Anon19743481d ago

Sony has their own issues unique to their situation which is putting pressure on the company, but that really doesn't change what's currently happening with Microsoft. In a recent strategy update, Microsoft's CFO, Mr. Liddell reiterated MS's plan to cut 2009 expenses by $1.5 billion and reduce capital expenditures by $700 million from their plan laid out in July of last year.

JP Morgan's take on how the Xbox related to these plans were "While Xbox has been a bright spot, expectations are for the division to experience pressure. The company’s Xbox business continues to show solid unit volume, attach rate, and revenue growth performance, though
the financial impact to MSFT remains inconsequential. Microsoft is focused on penetrating televisions in various ways (i.e. via Xbox, Xbox Live, Media Room, etc.)"

Notice how nowhere in there did they mention what Sony was doing? It's because it doesn't matter when it comes down to Microsoft policy. If MS execs are sitting down at a table discussing their strategy and one says "Yeah, but Sony's not in great shape either," they're rightly going to look at him like he's a nutter.

Certainly doesn't sound like a rosie outlook for gamers.

JsonHenry3481d ago

Hopefully they are too busy working on another console.

HalfFireWater3481d ago

I should add you to my friends list because you have some sense in you. I may have been wrong to bring up Sony but I was only reply to Morgan's statement that MS is running away from them and that Blu-ray is a emerging success for Sony, yeah just like UMD....

Xbox is makeing money, just not what investors and speculators want, and in America and the world, speculators and even CEO's are losing allot of clout when they don't paint an accurate picture.

You bring up 7 more years, I don't know if i will be gaming as hard as I am in 7 more years, or if physical media will be around in 7 more years. Who knows, the next system may not even have a disk-drive with the way hard-drives keep dropping in price and the fact that rebuilding the us cable-fios infrastructure would be something equal to the us highway system in turns of putting americans to work again. That is speculation but if it is true, microsoft has a system that pirates haven't gotten around yet and that is they way they tie DLC to your profile-hardrive-xbox. They are more poised to deliver they next generation of games to gamers when the whole system goes digital. Everyone is testing the waters from tv, movies, music, and phones and everyone is getting on the digital band wagon. pretty soon we will see hi-speed interent jacks in every home just like we see with telephone jacks. If anyone is old enough to remember phones were not common place 25 years ago (I am thirty so I can go back that far) and was expensive as hell to just call down the street. Now that history lesson was to show that as tech changes and stuff gets cheaper or subsidized, more people get to use it. Digital download is the future, and that leaves MS in a very good position.

MS won't abandon their games yet because they haven't given their all to the 360 yet. Hell we have AT&T and Applesuing skpye because people are putting it on their Iphones and using them to call overseas instead of paying the high as int'l rates. Tech changes and even new stuff gets old.

There is a tech race going and the race is about getting content to the consumers. One side is using a old, archaic model that people want to physically own their items (Blu-ray, DVD) and the other side is saying lets stream, download-pipe it to the consumers and they can store it any way they want. The winner has not been made yet but with netflix raising the subscription price for Blu-ray rentals, the lines are being drawn in the sand.

We as gamers are also in this battle. MS is losing games to pirates via the web, every new games is on some scene or torrent even before it reaches the stores, but hell that has been happening to movies and music already right. The new wolverine movie hit the waves already. And if you believe Fox News and the BBC, pirating is here to stay, but with MS xbox 360 model they can control the content with XBL and even PSN for sony. Those networks are the only true DRM control areas, and they play games. Where does that leave blu-ray which has been cracked already. Once the world gets on broad-band and I can get a 2 TB hard-drive for $150.00, why would I buy a movie again?

3481d ago
Corepred43481d ago

ok so from your statement your pretty much saying that bluray is a failure like UMD? if you think that something is wrong with you, not the UMD part because yes its true UMD is stupid. and your saying the only thing keeping Sony alive is the PS2! LMAO come on man...

TheRealSpy3481d ago

so much pointless speculation. I haven't noticed any changes. People seem to be buying and enjoying all 3 systems.

and i really wish ppl would stop saying ps3 has a "10 year cycle." they never meant that they wouldn't release another system in that time. they just meant they would support it somewhat after a new console releases. just like with ps2. when ppl say sony plans to release a new system in 10 years, it ruins their credibility. if you can't figure out at this point that a new console launches every 5-6 years, there's no hope for you.

DaTruth3481d ago (Edited 3481d ago )

Next console cycle will be all profit for Sony, as they have brought down the cost of the Cell, Bluray and XDR ram and these will all be viable tech for the next gen(improved Cell, four layer disk). So my question is, how is MS gonna keep their console cost low if they are using other companies proprietary tech(Given that MS is not a hardware company)?

IcarusOne3481d ago

It's the best when the PS3 cult plays the faulty hardware/RROD card. They say it with such snide derision. What none of them realize is that they should be on their knees kissing the feet of the RROD. Because if it weren't for that massive clusterf#ck, the PS3 would have been dead in the water before it even set sail.

SkyGamer3481d ago

I am really baffled by why someone would think having all of those first party studios open and paying all those expenses is a good idea in this economic crisis. Are you kidding me? Who has more to lose?

A. MS who owns several IP's and have certain companies make the game where they shoulder the financial burden and still pay HUGE royalties to MS or . . .

B. Where sony owns a bunch of first party studios where sony has to shoulder the financial burdens? OK so it won't appear on another console, (excluding PC where MS gets royalties on Direct X and Windows), and they don't sell as much as they planned?

Take killzone 2 for example. I am sure that game cost over 75 million dollars to make. That doesn't include the packaging or shipping. You don't make that much money (profit) and you still have to pay all the bills for that studio, such as rent, electricity, employee wages, etc.

I know everyone wants to defend their company/console of choice but in the realms of business, MS is better. A lot more investment firms and better people in charge at running the WHOLE business better. MS has way less overhead and expenses than sony and make SOOOOOOOO much more money.

Like I've said before, just because you have a million ps3's doesn't mean that it is worth 399,000,000 dollars. I am sure there are a million HD-DVD players sitting around but does that mean that it is worth 199,000,000 bucks? I think not.

Bottom line is that having all of those first party studios does definitely have it's drawbacks.

+ Show (21) more repliesLast reply 3481d ago
swiftshot933482d ago

The Xbox 360 already surpassed original Xbox numbers, therefor making it a success.

Their gaming division still hasnt made a profit, which is why they will continue in the industry, they invested too much to just leave.

Elven63482d ago

Correct, especially when the console is ontrack to making a profit the way things are going, don't let bedroom market analysts tell you anything different.

Godmars2903482d ago

Yes it broke the million mark in Japan, but what real worth does that mean when TOV owners are breaking their discs? How does something like that reflect on future sales?

Forget the hole that the Xbox1 dug MS's game division in, or that the RRoD is still cutting into the 360's profit margin.

Anon19743481d ago (Edited 3481d ago )

Usually, in business you would consider something a success if they made money. That's a generally accepted business principal when you consider the goal is to make money. I don't see how Elven 6 can figure the 360 is on it's way to a profit.
The original XBox, a system I was very fond of, lost billions. The 360 selling more than the Xbox doesn't automatically make it a success.
Now the since the 360 was launched, MS games have lost 3 billion dollars up until their first profitable year in which they reported a $400 million dollar profit. Since then revenue has gone up but their profits are far down from when we saw the division turn their first profits in 2007. Even if they were still able to make $400 million every single year, it would take them over 7 years to break even from what the division has lost since the 360 was introduced.

Do you think the 360 has seven years left in it at this point?

Now it has been discussed recently in financial circles that MS may pull out of the console market next gen and focus on software, an area they know but this is just speculation and I'm with swiftshot93 on this one. I think MS has too much invested to pull out.

And before the classic defense of "But, Look at Sony!" switching the focus over to what Sony's doing doesn't change a single thing regarding Microsoft's current situation with the 360. Sony has their own problems. Try to focus here.

Sonyslave33482d ago

yep MS done even doe they are outselling the ps3.

Too_Hyped3482d ago

Barely outselling PS3 with a basically free console is not a success at all. They had to cut the price in half because PS3 was killing 360 in sales before september. Nothing to brag about. Plus, 360 is already dead in Asia.

MGOelite3482d ago

was it ever alive in asia?

Too_Hyped3482d ago

MGO : lol you're right. Actually I should have added 'and was never alive to begin with'. Fixed.

heyheyhey3482d ago

"SALES!!! FVCK YEAH SALES!!!!"

haha

barely outselling a console with a $200/£170 lower price tag and twice the advertising is not something to brag about

the moment Sony cuts the price, the PS3 will sh!t all over the 360... and then what are you going to say? no games, no sales argument... maybe you'll just resort to bragging about a paid-for online service that's getting less and less superior by the month

and if Sony don't cut the price? who gives a sh!t... the PS3 will always have a better line-up of games and other content

II Necroplasm II3481d ago (Edited 3481d ago )

heyheyhey, you really need to go out doors sometime.

Really.

AngryTypingGuy3481d ago (Edited 3481d ago )

I can't for the life of me figure out what makes people think that the console with the higher install base, that more profitable to sell is going anywhere, especially by the end of the year.

Even when Sony lowers the PS3 price, the 360 will be ok. As we've seen in the past, what will happen is the PS3 sales will heavily spike (and during this time period fanboys will cry doom for the 360) and then they'll level out. Then eventually MS will respond by lowering the 360 price. Then 360 sales will once again spike (and during this time fanboys will cry doom for the PS3) and then they'll level out. This will repeat into the next gen, and eventually they'll both be fazed out, and when that finally happens, fanboys will claim it's because they couldn't survive and that they were giant flops. Because for some reason, people like the word "flop". It's amazing how pathetic some video game fans are.

Microsoft Xbox 3603481d ago

You need to follow your own advice.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3481d ago
OGharryjoysticks3482d ago

I have a feeling Microsoft is more focused on its next system than bringing original games to the 360 now. Maybe they will fork over a fat wad of cash to a 3rd party to get a game they weren't supposed to get at one point so some might celebrate, but honestly I won't be surprised if they let people know when the next system comes out at E3.

hunter213482d ago

indeed and who knows what theyre hiding'

yz2503482d ago

with the economy like it is right now, and the fact that the 360 is older, the price point(S) of the 360 have helped it during these times.(especially in NA) if microsoft we're to release a new console before the economy is really strong again, then they will lose their price advantage completely.

i'll wait to see what microsoft/e3 has in store for 360 before i judge. when microsoft goes silent then you can bet somethings up, because usually they aren't too silent lol

my 2 cents lol

GiantEnemyCrab3482d ago

Very good article even though it only seems to speak of common sense.

Too many gamers ready to jump on the condemnation or "uber-awesome hype" band wagon. Give MS a chance to speak and anyone thinking the 360 is done is mistaken.

3482d ago