Approvals 11/3 ▼
D R Fz (4) - 5511d ago Cancel
ThePlaystationFour (1) - 5511d ago Cancel
ThatCanadianGuy (2) - 5511d ago Cancel
Xandet (2) - 5511d ago Cancel
Axis (1) - 5511d ago Cancel
Marie (1) - 5511d ago Cancel
310°

Resident Evil 6 "could take up to 8 years"

Resident Evil 5's producer Masachika Kawata has revealed that Resident Evil 6 could be in development for up to eight years.

"We haven't decided whether we're going to make Resident Evil 6 yet. But if we do, it could take anywhere up to eight years, but hopefully only four."

Read Full Story >>
dpadmagazine.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

ThePlaystationFour5511d ago

That's a load of bull. How can you say it could take up to 8 years to make and hope to cut the development by 4 years? Maybe 6-7 years in understandable if there working hard. But 4 is just a load of poop.

KingKionic 5511d ago

lol at your comment. the game must have a in depth story . and i do remember capcom saying the next one will revolutionize resident evil series. lets hope its four we get to see it on next gen consoles :)

The Matrix5511d ago

WTF is this 8 years? A new game on a current gen system only takes 3 maybe 4 years. Assassin's creed, fallout 3, far cry 2 etc. only took about 3 years. Not to mention that a sequel only takes about 2 years since you already have figured out the system and have an engine. Perhaps they're talking about making it next gen (xbox 720, Ps4) which might be why they say 8 years but still...

Tomdc5510d ago (Edited 5510d ago )

I think he just said what he meant wrong. I think he was probably talking about the time till the next release, not development time =D

Ahah i loved the fact they "haven't decided" whether they make a new one yet! What Rubbish! Management will, no doubt about it! Think of all the money the franchise brings in!

solidsnakus5510d ago

awesome. ill be looking forward to playing RE6 and three human in 2015

Doppy5510d ago

The only way they can have a 8 year development cycle is by waiting until the next consoles come out. Other than that I call BS on this too. What are they Street Fighter now. I give them 5 years top for the next Resident Evil, and I'm sure we'll see a couple of spin off's in the meantime.

Ninja-Sama5510d ago

6 years for main game and 2 years for dlc they will charge for after release?

Sevir045510d ago

i really think they've revolutionize the series but they'll be long behind industry standard.. to me the pinnacle of Re was Re4, excellent and game of the year. 5 is nothing more than a HD mock up of re4, you cant repeat the same thing 2 and expect it it fly without being scrutinized.. this game just sucks.. as for they can take all the time they want, but in all honesty there will probably be a better series out there that does horror right by the time RE6 launches. right now, dead space totally pwn RE5 this gen. i'm glad they are going to go back to the drawing board for RE6 because 5 was. aweful

HDgamer5510d ago

Said DLC will be already on the disc and the file size in the online stores will be 56kbs

Dragun6195510d ago

Honestly, I think that would be a great idea to have 5 to 8 years development.

Since they have already decided to start again from scratch with Resident Evil 6, 5 to 8 years development can help them set some fresh ideas. Also It would give them more time to think of a good story, develop new controls, Include MultiPlayer, and give the series a must needed evolution on this console generation.
Not to say that RE5 wasn't good, it just felt like i was playing like gears of war or army of two with zombies. Other than that i do wish maybe if they can balance out between the action and the survival horror genre, like Dead space for example.

Also who ever the main character for the next game i hope they don't over do the design for the character cuz i didn't like the fact that Chris had massive biceps as Marcus Feninx. Not all Americans like huge muscles Capcom, seriously compared to Leon, Leon was more badass.

Tomdc5510d ago

anyone care to tell me why my first comment got disagrees? I dont mind I'm just confused as to the grounds the disagreements are on...

SL1M DADDY5510d ago

Is use the same graphics or slightly polished up a bit more, add some better animations and stop with the co-op single player campaign. Also, add back the attache cases and make the game scary again. Don't throw 50 baddies at me, make small rooms and corridors with one really nasty zombie coming at me. Oh, and that brings me to the last point... Make them zombies again for god sakes.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 5510d ago
Oztheboss5511d ago

The hell it will!

*shakes fist*

Shane Kim5511d ago

Good, I hope I'll never have to see this sh!t again. RE4 ruined the whole franchise for me.

killzone2ownsallfps5511d ago

return the danm zombies and survival horror capcom

beavis4play5510d ago

capcom doesn't have to re-invent the wheel here.
he11, i'd buy a remake of RE2 if they did it proper.

Sevir045510d ago (Edited 5510d ago )

this day and age you need intellegent enemies zombies are soo L4D.. if you are gonna make a story based horror survival game, Zombies just cant make it fun. you'll get tired of shooting and chopping the hords of mindless fodder. Zombies are good for multiplayer games...

killzone2ownsallfps5511d ago

yeha.... r4 and r5 is worts re of all times imo...

Show all comments (66)
140°

Resident Evil 5 - 15 Years of Being the Most Misunderstood Resident Evil

Resident Evil 5 launched 15 years ago today - and it continues to stand as a stepping stone from the good to the bad.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community49d ago
TheBrainZ49d ago

One of my favourites because of the co-op. Then Resi 6 arrived and the series nosedived further.

Knightofelemia49d ago

I enjoyed the game co-oping with a friend I know the game in solo the AI can be an idiot but RE5 is way better then RE6. I played RE6 with a friend if it wasn't cheap when I got I would have avoided RE6.

thesoftware73049d ago (Edited 49d ago )

5 was excellent, still play Mercs with my brother.
I would love a fully remastered RE:5, with some added, reworked content. The DLC for 5 was also excellent.

6 was awful.

CrimsonWing6949d ago

I never understood why the game was misunderstood. It was a fantastic game at launch and is still fun today to play. It’s as action packed as Resident Evil 4 was, yet that’s regarded a masterpiece 🤷‍♂️

chobit_A5HL3Y49d ago

it was "misunderstood" because they introduced co-op into the franchise at a time when people loved to have fake rage about co-op. like, you could play the game as a solo experience, but people chose to have their bandwagon rage because it was cool at the time lol

-Foxtrot49d ago (Edited 49d ago )

What the hell are you talking about? Fake Rage? Bandwagon? Come on.

You can play it solo but you are forced to carry around a shitty AI partner you have to micro manage. It wasn't as fun solo.

Co-op sucked all the horror, tension and suspense from the game because having a partner covering you was like a safety net. Enemy trying to sneak up on you? No sweat the AI will just automatically lock on, alert you while they shoot first telling you where they are basically.

It was the start of Capcoms fall with the Resident Evil series where it basically become an over the top generic action game which betrayed it's own survival horror roots. Least RE4 had a good blend of both but Capcom just went the wrong way with RE5, especially going off what they were going to do during the RE4.5 beta phase before co-op was added.

franwex49d ago

At least the game was a ton of fun tho. If the game was bad, the outrage would’ve been justified. They simply pivoted for a couple of games. At this point it’s bad because it’s called Resident evil 5? But if was called something else it would’ve been good? Please.

chobit_A5HL3Y48d ago

like i said: fake baby rage and bandwagon hate. res4 wasn't really that scary, either, and was already taking the series into more of an action-oriented direction at the time. 5 was a good game that people fake-hated because of co-op that you didn't even have to play lol hence the fake rage and bandwagon hate. i mean, it obviously did well enough for capcom to go ahead and make 6 the way they did, right? if 5 was so bad, they would have changed what 6 was during development. the difference is that 6 was actually just bad.

people "hate" 5 because res4 was so good, and 5 was just unfortunate enough to be its successor. like i said, 4 wasn't scary, either, and relied more on tension than horror, but it was already more of an action game. if you don't wanna like 5 because it's not scary or whatever- that's fine, but it wasn't meant to be strictly a horror game anymore at that point anyways. the gameplay was a lot faster-paced than 4, so saying that the ai helping you by potentially shooting someone that was sneaking up behind you is a moot point. there were more enemies that were more aggressive, along with newer threats.

5 isn't as good as 4, but it's not a bad game by any stretch.

Tody_ZA24d ago (Edited 24d ago )

What? I always thought RE5 had fake controversy because it was set in South Africa and you shot a bunch of black zombies. I live in South Africa and thought the game was absolutely awesome, played the whole thing co-op with my brother.

@Foxtrot I think you're confusing the garbage Dead Space 3 with Resident Evil 5. Resident Evil 4 was already a hyper action game and had zero fear factor other than the grotesque appearance of some enemies.

Show all comments (16)
50°

The Best Co-Op Horror Games You've Missed in Halloween

Try to cope with your friend through terror with this list featuring the best horror Co-Op games you can play today.

Read Full Story >>
altarofgaming.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community173d ago
270°

Complete Global Saturation! Is Resident Evil 5 Really the Best Choice for the Next Remake?

An exploration of whether RE5 is truly the most logical next step for a remake, or whether there are others in line who deserve their day in the sun.

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community209d ago
ocelot07209d ago

Remake of Resident evil outbreak as well as file 2. Same gameplay as the recent remakes. Choose what ever character you want to play as. With online co op.

DarXyde208d ago

I've been dying to see Outbreak come back for years.

Even RE Zero and Code Veronica would be excellent.

But for the love of God, not RE5 or RE6.

One they get around to the aforementioned games, why not remake the original Devil May Cry trilogy? That would be a much better use of time. At the very least, the first two games.

justsomeoffdude209d ago (Edited 209d ago )

code veronica should be the nest remake

neutralgamer1992209d ago

CV is good candidate for a remake but requires way more work for today’s standard. People look at CV through their tinted glasses. I think capcom wants to remake every game up till 6 and fix the plot holes so they can continue the series in one straight story path

Also not sure why only RE have to get remade when there are other capcom games that would be better suited for remakes like oninusha

DVAcme208d ago

That's PRECISELY the reason Code Veronica needs a remake. All the other RE games aged pretty well, considering the limitations of the time, but Code Veronica is the game that would be served the best bybremaking it because it feels so archaic these days.

neutralgamer1992208d ago

DVA

But it depends if capcom wants a big project or a quick remake. CV will require a lot more work than RE5

IMO they should remake other games before doing RE5

TheEnigma313209d ago

how many times do we have to say CV is the next best one?

CrimsonWing69209d ago

Nooooo! Why the hell can’t they do Code Veronica? I just don’t understand.

1Victor209d ago

RE5 is the closest to the bottom of the pot(a little smoky flavor but passable in a emergency) before we get to the burned crust that is 6 that not even the pigs would eat

CrimsonWing69209d ago (Edited 209d ago )

Unpopular opinion here, but I enjoyed 5 and 6. I just think, in terms of Remakes, the classics are the one that should get the treatment above the modern takes of the franchise.

Don’t get wrong, RE4 definitely was an outstanding Remake, but RE5… I just get less excited about a Remake for that over something like Code Veronica.

RaidenBlack209d ago

Nope.
Rather remake other past Capcom & non-mainline RE games ... IF they have to continue churning out Remakes.
I'd rather want a new 3rd person RE spin-off
Dino Crisis and Onimusha Reboot
New IPs after Pragmata ships

jeromeface208d ago

show this man the door... he overserved himself.

Show all comments (38)