440°

The 10 worst videogames consoles in history

Gamevicio Brazil writes:

"Until we get the current Playstation 3, Xbox 360 and Nintendo Wii we had recovered from major fiascos. Below the Top 10 Worst Consoles of the history."

Translated by Google

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com.br
PirateThom5934d ago

Ah, Phantom, the future of digital distribution... :)

Elven65934d ago

I think they call it a PC now. :)

Jokes aside, the N Gage probably could have done better if they the made it more appealing or a full on handheld unit without the phone capablilites, kind of like what Apple is trying to do.

Gizmodo had potential, unfortunetly no product can survive admist corporate corruption.

s8anicslayer5934d ago

Virtual Boy, that thing was rediculous! Nintendo what were you thinking?

Cryos5934d ago

a reasonable, well thought out, non-fanboi list......

I'm impressed

mint royale5934d ago

TOTALLY AWESOME REPLY MAN THE 360 SHOULD BE NUMBER 1 AND STUFF

Snatcher5934d ago

The 10 best videogames consoles in history mate.

mint royale5934d ago

maybe. Personally for me it is

1.Nintendo 64
2.Playstation 2
3.DS
4.Gamecube
5.Dreamcast
6.Xbox
7.Wii
8.PS3
9.SNES
10.360

All of those consoles are masterpieces.

ApocalypseShadow5934d ago

you're saying 360 is on the 10 best consoles in history?

that's cool.as long as it's not on the list of

"10 best **working** consoles in history."

i would be upset then.carry on.

apocalypse................

GiantEnemyCrab5934d ago

Shadow my 360 works just fine and never had a problem. The worst console hardware in history for me has been the PS2..

Your loss if you miss out on the 360 but it is easily in the top 10 of the best consoles ever.

Snatcher5934d ago (Edited 5934d ago )

I played Call of Duty 4, then suddenly the sound was gone, I quit the game, then the screen turned black. I restarted my PS3, but...the machine could not read the disc. I tried another game, still did not work.

The second time. I was playing Littlebigplanet, then suddenly the screen freezed. I restarted the PS3, but the tv screen was black. Tried everything, but could not get it to work.

I hope it does not break again. I play my PS3 many hours everyday. The 360 did not broke on me, but I hardly play it now, because I got PS3 November 2008. I played 360 hell of a lot when I did not have PS3.

Zuhk5934d ago

I played Call of Duty 4, then suddenly the sound was gone, I quit the game, then the screen turned black. I restarted my 360, but...the machine could not read the disc. I tried another game, still did not work.

The second time. I was playing Halo, then suddenly the screen freezed. I restarted the 360, but the tv screen was black. Tried everything, but could not get it to work.

I hope it does not break again. I play my 360 many hours everyday. The PS3 did not broke on me, but I hardly play the 360 now, because I got PS3 November 2008. I played 360 hell of a lot when I did not have PS3.

Eiffel5934d ago (Edited 5934d ago )

"The PS3 did not broke on me"

???

Edit it so your story at least seems believable.

no-spin5934d ago

You truly are a troll
PS2 had problems within industry standards, 360 is a electronics fiasco
everyone i know has experienced this failure including me
MS ex-employees called out the knowledge of the crappy hardware, or do you think the 3 year warranty was an act of good faith?
if the 3 year warranty was not done, MS would have had to recall that piece of crap you call one of the best consoles.
Games are great and live is expensive, but good
The hardware is crap
and your post is a giant mountain of crap

TheAntiFanboy5934d ago (Edited 5934d ago )

The fact that the 360 still makes sales despite the RRoD fiasco, and the fact that a majority of people who suffer RRoD still remain loyal to the incredibly unreliable thing, is a testament to the console's viability and the strength of its warranty.

I've gone through what feels like a million 360's, and yet I still play it as proudly as my other consoles. You know why? Because the amount of fun that I have with it is worth the frustration caused by the RRoD.

Firstkn1ghT5933d ago (Edited 5933d ago )

My 360 has failed me once and my ps2 has failed me 4 times. Yeah! Sony ain't getting my money anymore.

nothere4135933d ago

I don't believe you even have a PS3.

They don't break like that. You're just trying to bash the PS3 because you have nothing better to do.

Mine had a Blu-Ray drive problem one time and I sent it in and got it back about 2 weeks later.

That's all.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 5933d ago
KingKionic 5934d ago

atari 2600...im sorry i had to say it.

Substance5934d ago

For it's time, it was an awesome system. I probably didn't know any better, but I remember staying up till 5 A.M. playing Maze Craze, Yar's Revenge and Dodge 'Em with my brothers.

It may suck now, but back then it was terrific.

free3sixty5934d ago

wow and none of the worst consoles were so bugged like the PS3.

weekly updates/ patches..90% game installs.. thats so last gen :/

agent0245934d ago

eat a d!ck bot.

dvd 9, rrod...fck the threesixty.

Queers of War5934d ago

and neither of them had a 33% failure rate like the 360, nor do they damage the media storage devices (like to 360 does to DVDs). not to mention the risk of overheating. the 360 should be on this list, #1 i might add.

ThatCanadianGuy5934d ago

"weekly updates/ patches..90% game installs.. thats so last gen :/"

Uhh..none of those things were on last gen consoles..

However,360 still uses a disc tray..
Even the Wii is more advanced then that..

heyheyhey5934d ago

yeah cause i was always downloading patches for my PS2 games...

umm.. NO! dumbass, those weren't around last gen

think before you type retard

JasonPC360PS3Wii5933d ago

PS3 should get a "good effort" award

nothere4135933d ago

Don't feed the troll, please.

No one is dumb enough to think that there were patches last gen.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5933d ago
GiantEnemyCrab5934d ago

Ugh, look at you... how original.

I disgree. The 360 is among the greatest consoles ever made, hardware aside. Game selection, feautres and online.

Snatcher5934d ago

GiantEnemyCrab + bubbles mate. 360 is a great console with great online and tons of great games that kept me entertained for over 2 years.

Sez 5934d ago

my 360 is going on 4 years now. never had a problem with it. other than the loud noise it makes.(which isn't a problem for me) for me the ps2 was the worst. after getting DRE three times and having to pay to get it fixed twice. i have never had system die on me since.

Show all comments (63)
290°

The Real Enemy of Gaming Isn’t DEI. It’s the CEO

From Horse Armor to Mass Layoffs: The Price of Greed in Gaming. Inside the decades-long war on game workers and the players who defend them.

Read Full Story >>
rushdownradio.net
jambola5d ago

maybe a real enemy is people who use terms like "the real enemy"
there can be more than 1 bad thing, t's not like a kids show with 1 big bad

senorfartcushion3d ago

This is very much a “dummy who volunteers themselves to the middle” comment.

The real enemy is a common phrase, people use it all the time.

Calm down.

jambola3d ago

i'm very calm
you seem very upset however

Notellin2d ago

You don't seem calm at all. Don't take this so seriously, you seem desperate responding to others defending your opinion that lacks any value or critical thought.

jambola2d ago

stop projecting
i'm not desperately dong anything, i'm tapping at keys on my keyboard bud

PapaBop2d ago

It's not like kids show with one bad guy? I present to you.. Bobby Kotick

ABizzel12d ago (Edited 2d ago )

DEI was never the problem and it was an ignorant take to begin with.

DEI is why games like Kena Bridge of Spirits, South of Midnight, and Ghost of Tsushima exist.

DEI is why we have a huge resurgence in Japanese, Chineses, and Korean developers producing games like Stellar Blade, Black Myth, and why Nintendo & Sony exist.

DEI is why more and more games have HUGE accessibility options with both Sony and MS fully behind this.

DEI was never a bad thing, the entire purpose of DEI is representation of all people, genders, disabilities, etc…

The problem was people used DEI as a default derogatory term to describe what they believed was forced representation, which allowed colorist, racist, sexist, misogynist, homophobic, and xenophobic fools to run away with the negative DEI narrative.

jambola2d ago

you don't get to decide other people's motivations
sorry to break it to you

ABizzel11d 8h ago (Edited 1d 8h ago )

To each their own, however, nothing you said invalidates why some people take offense to DEI incorrectly.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 8h ago
Sciurus_vulgaris5d ago

Executives seem to often have an obsession with perpetual revenue growth. There is always a finite amount of consumers for a product regardless of growth. Additionally, over investment is another serious issue in gaming.

Killer2020UK3d ago

The fact that they also rarely have any real expertise in game development compounds things. They'll look at what's been successful elsewhere, lack the knowledge to properly understand why they have been successful and then force a team to 'reproduce' their badly interpreted idea of that success.

We see it so often with sequels to games that were successful too. The team are left well alone, they have a break through hit and all of sudden the money men descend on the IP and completely railroad the dev team's ideas. Usually winds up being 'make the same game but MORE'

LoveSpuds2d ago

This is true throughout all of the corporate and public sector organisations to be honest. CEO's generally move amongst the corporate world without any need to have experience of a particular industry, they simply need to rely on their senior leadership credentials. A CEO of a retail giant will just as easily transition to a CEO role in the energy sector for example.

Not defending CEOs here to be clear, I think it's a huge part of the reason the western world is so fucked up. CEOs don't need to care about the sector they work in, in fact it's better if they don't care if they want to screw everyone to make profits.

GhostScholar3d ago

Companies don’t hire executives to break even. If the goal is breaking even then why start the company in the first place.

Soy3d ago

That's understood; it's getting record profits and expecting to always beat those record profits, and seeing anything less as a total failure. Then they lay people off and raise prices to reach those record profit levels again, just to sate shareholders. It's setting expectations way too high just to spike share prices, then inevitably falling short. It's feeling entitled to being more successful than everyone else. It's the CEOs doing all this to boost their own bonuses.

ABizzel12d ago

Growth benefits the company’s profits and therefore the company’s stock if publicly traded, which pleases the shareholders making them more and more rich, which is why Growth is always at the forefront of the vast majority of any publicly traded company.

More growth = More Money and the people at the top want all the money they can get. I can’t really blame them anyone would love to see their profits go from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands, to multi-millions it’s almost like a gambling addiction.

But it also goes to show someone how morals can go out the window for a lot of these people, and how amazing some CEOs are when they catch this early and provide a balance solution that takes complete care of their employees across the board while keeping the business sustainable IE: Insomniac Games ALWAYS on the best places to work list. The rest of the industry could learn.

jambola4d ago

honestly, the "real" enemy of gaming, is ourselves
if nobody bought horse armor, shitty dlc would have died almost overnight
if we stood firm and nobody bought games from companies that were bad with layoffs, it would be solved
we're the idiots supporting awful business practices, we are the ones enouraging it

TiredGamer3d ago

I think the reality that we don't want to convince ourselves of is that without the rise of "horse armor" and DLC, game budgets would have essentially stagnated (smaller teams/smaller games), or game prices would have risen much more dramatically than they have. There was an incessant drive for bigger worlds, infinite detail, and hundreds of hours of "gameplay" over the last two decades, that while perhaps a natural evolution of things, needed a suitable funding stream to accomplish.

HyperMoused3d ago

What...CEOs make tens of millions and that doesnt include SLT etc etc...we now have multiple editions of games, in game currency, MT's, battle passes.....and what do we get..worse game than what was coming out 20 years ago....dont drink the cool aid, its this nickel and dime crap that is absolutely leading us to gaming destruction.

senorfartcushion3d ago

This is the worst possible answer to this conundrum. Blaming the masses is blaming the only people who are constantly “told” to buy.

Consumers are the only ones not to blame here. People make their own choices all the time. Disney movies are bombing and DEInis being blamed. Has that been enough to put Disney out of business? No and it never will.

Christopher3d ago

Disagree. Businesses are able to do what they do because people are bad consumers and don't think critically about purchases. Disney got away with doing shit stuff for years and it's just the last year where people got tired of it. It's not like it didn't work for 5 years or so for Disney to do the things they've done. They'll just move onto another way to get people to see movies and it will be just as bad but more profitable until people wake up and realize it.

TiredGamer3d ago

Consumerism drives business behavior. It's not so much "blaming" as it is observing behavior. The point I'm making is that the direction that games have gone are driven by the spending. Consumers are spending on DLC and they are driving the expectation of more glitz and padded out (lengthier) games. If they continue to pay, they will continue to drive that direction until a threshold is reached that forces a change in behavior.

senorfartcushion3d ago

Corporate advertising is the most powerful force on the planet.

This is N4G for god sake, every day there are arguments between people who are Team Xbox and Team PlayStation because they’ve been convinced that having an identity built on paying money to Sony and Microsoft matters more than having one as individual gamers who can play whatever they want.

And THEN we get to the corporate advertising part: to play whatever you want is to sink MORE into the advertising pits, making it so that you can more than one specific product.

jambola3d ago

ah you're right
they were told to buy it, it's clearly impossible to avoid that
if enough people stopped supporting, it would stop
disney not stopping would only be because enough people didn't stop

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3d ago
victorMaje3d ago

Agreed. I’ve been saying for years, announce you won’t be buying the upcoming game because of the practices of the previous game, then you only have to stick to your guns once, see how quickly things change for the better.

We have to unite in what we shouldn’t purchase.

jambola3d ago

just imagine a world, fifa came out worse, nobody buys the next one until they see proof it's better and stick to it
or games being forced online for single player and nobody buys it
things would change so fast

HyperMoused3d ago

Just like scooby doo, you have shown us the real monsters are us

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3d ago
Inverno3d ago

Greed and greedy people have and always will be the main issue for everything wrong in the world. Everything is a product to be exploited for monetary gain. Even when there are things that could help progress us along for the sake of making our lives easier that thing must be exploited for monetary gains. Anything that tells you otherwise is propaganda to make you complicit.

coolfool3d ago

I've never thought "DEI" (although the way most people use it doesn't match it's real definition) is the problem with games. Good games have continued to be good when they have a diverse cast, and likewise, bad games have continued to be bad. There isn't a credible example I've seen where a diverse cast has been the direct cause of a game being bad.

Show all comments (51)
70°

Why We Partnered With St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital

Matt Miller: "Every subscription to Game Informer now raises funds for St. Jude. We want you to know what that means."

Read Full Story >>
gameinformer.com
thorstein7d ago

I subscribed to this not knowing about how some of the proceeds go to St. Judes.

Really cool that some of the money goes there.

Even if people don't subscribe to the mag, it might bring people to the charity.

jznrpg7d ago

One of the main charities my wife and I donate to. They help a lot of children and being a parent of 5 children I can’t imagine what those parents go through. I’ll probably get a sub to GI because of St Jude and of course because I love video games.

80°

Dungeons and Dragons is About to Break a 6-Year Trend

Though Unearthed Arcana's content primarily consists of subclasses and spells, WOTC's latest UA drop is set to shake up Dungeons and Dragons' future.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com