Eurogamer Portugal published some exclusive screenshots comparing the two versions from Wanted: Weapons of Fate demo. Check them out.
Thus, "it" begins.... Anyway, sure that "no one cares" but 360 takes this one clearly. Not a fanboy comment, just a multiplatform owner comment, i want the best versions of my $60 spent games.
This is a rental at best.
oh the ps3 version comes with the blu-ray movie too, its called a hybred disc. half game half blu-ray. you want your 60$ well spent? i suggest u get the ps3 version : ) i will rent. oh and a little contrast added to your HDTV's settings will make the ps3 version = to the 360 version. : ) or could it be the RGB? o_O
"Not a fanboy comment, just a multiplatform owner comment" lol, yyyeaaaahhhhhhhh, right. I'll play along.
lol "Not a fanboy comment, just a multiplatform owner comment" lol, yyyeaaaahhhhhhhh, right. I'll play along. ______________________________ ____________________________ lol! I agree,I 'll playalong too
Yes, buy Weapons of Fate! Feed the maniacal movie games genre because they're all so terrible. If this is what your going to spend your $60 on, then by all means, do it. One is darker, one is lighter, and all of them require to take your fanboy glasses off. -True words spoken from a multi-console owner.
I'm sorry, this game looks and plays like utter crap, the movie is an insult to humanity. Want to use 60$ and feel like you've spent it wisely? ----> buy SFIV or KZ2. This is crap and its sales should reflect that.
That's totally not a fanboy comment. Lol.
in both versions. Why is the 360's gamma so far off? So much detail is lost in dark areas. Poor artistic choice. Then again, the 360's hardware is hard-coded to exaggerate darks and brights while damping middles to mask excessive banding in LDR and MDR rendering.
Owning more than one console doesn't mean you're not a fanboy. I've seen your comments, you are undeniably a 360 fb. You really should be checking out the other zone. On topic: They're the same for all intents and purposes.
Who cares. Why would i even glance at this game. Maybe because i have my face buried in Killzone 2
Is the game any good? I haven't tried the demo yet.
All I have to do to make the ps3 version ''better'' is make it so that I can't see a darn thing in the dark? *Changes light settings on tv* Best graphixs evar! lol
So, they're exactly the same bar brightness?
No, they both equally look worse than KZ2. I think more people are going to comment on this story than will actually buy this thing.
They obviously both look worse than Killzone 2, but which is the worst? IT'S IMPORTANT SO CONSOLE SUPERIORITY CAN BE DETERMINED BY MERE PIXELS!
yeah...if your a fanboy
View the pictures at full resolution to see the differences.
"View the pictures at full resolution to see the differences. " wich differences ?
The only real difference i see is the PS3 version seems lighter and the 360 version seems darker. Sometimes the PS3 version looks too light and sometimes the 360 version looks too dark.
This turd looks better on the PS3. Still a turd....
Ok, if we could get rid of any more of these articles, all blu-ray is dead articles, all can bla bla save the ps3 articles, in fact, any console comparison articles, N4G would be a happy place. edit: oh, and any "my mum asked Sony and they said they are not having a price cut" articles edit edit: oh and any 3/10 game review from "thisisn'tareal.website.b log.bu11sh!t.com.bedroom"
Never gonna happen. When the hottest stories on N4G are "Don't buy a 360", "Star Ocean Max out 360", etc. the other articles won't stop and will just fuel the anti-ps3 articles even more. I completely agree with you but also know this will never happen until the submission/approval system is revamped (which I hear is coming soon).
as long as it doesnt break the gameplay im fine. what bothers me is when they say you have to zoom, in ways you never would playing the game to see the difference :)
I noticed that if you keep switching between the face close-up shots of both versions while playing an MP3, you can make the character totally rock out to the beat whilst still keeping a calm, could-not-care-less face.
Very good observation!!
wow this game looks like crap
The Xbox 360 version is much darker than the PS3 one.
Both have same displaying, it's only a matter of settings. Activate Full RGB and Super-white on PS3 and you will have the same contrasts than on 360.
Hey point-dexter . Good on ya to notice the obvious. Let see if i can match you on obvious and relevant comment. Something that goes like this : They are both playable on your console of choice !
They're making a Wanted game?
lol Anyway I dont expect much from this game. Didnt try the demo yet but i suspect its another Dark Sector. Pretty looking, good shooter, but just meh. Plus the curving bullets is Dark Sector's glaive, cool at first...then just damn boring
The concept of the game was interesting, and technically it could be nice, but it failed. First because of the camera. When you're in a spacious area, nothing wrong, but when it's more confined, like the level in the plane (cf demo), the camera goes crazy. It's even more disturbing when you go out your hideout, the character goes in the middle of the screen, whereas having a shoulder view. Sometimes it's ok but other times the camera is painful. Then, the AI seems very Army-Of-Two-ish, the game gives you some techniques to make stealth deaths but it actually hides very binary AI. And also because it's technically very unequal. The main character is ok but places are very flat, other characters are lowly animated and designed, it reminds me Rise Of The Argonauts. So definitely a not-buy for me, but the principle of curved trajectories made me want to see the movie, it sounds interesting.
ps3 has options to make it dark this has gotta be false images
Only a contrast difference.
There you have it folks. The PS3 version is better.
Played them both. Didn't care much for it. Both look like crap. It's just a matter of preference. solid or diarrhea.
Only thing different is XB360 is just darker . . there's just more contrast in the XB360 version. Other than that, the models all look the same, textures are basically the same. There are too many ppl that keep trying to show comparisons when in reality they're both the same. -.-
these pics are snap shots from a vid of both games running. the shots don't look to clear, do they have the link to the vid instead?
Aside from some differences in brightness and contrast levels (which can largely be adjusted on your tv), I think both versions look about the same. Personally, I think this game has some potential. I need to try out the demos.
So this is what we're reduced to now? Comparing DEMOs for for licenced movie games which no one will buy anyway until it becomes part of a 360 bundle at Christmas? Anyway, Blademask said it best, "they both equally look worse than KZ2."
Not great, but good. Hope it delivers more than the usual movie tie-ins. Yeah, I'm still talking about you Watchmen: The End Is Nigh...
The PS3 version ran better IMO, the 360 version was plagued with screen tearing. They both looked pretty much the same unlike the watchmen demo in which the 360 version looked better thanks to the anti-aliasing.
Xbox 360 version looks darker.... This game doesnt look that good though...
hold up... let me pull out my magnifying glass....omg it looks the same.
Yep, it's only a matter of brightness settings, no graphical difference whatsoever.
I couldnt really care (but yet i comment doh)
Well all i can say is this........ahh wait Smallville is on.
360 fanboys say it looks better on 360 ps3 fanboys say it looks better on ps3 gamers say who cares and play.
Its a fact that multiplatform games usually are more successful on the 360. Thats just that. I believe its because the 360 is easier to develop on. Graphically, 360 multiplatform titles look better than PS3, but its really a matter of taste. However, when it comes to exclusives, Sony dominates.
PS3 can be too light at times and 360 too dark at times. This has been shown in pretty much every single comparison I've seen. It's getting old.
Why do they keep porting XBox crap to the PS3 and say the Xbox360 is better. If you Look at it you can clearly see that the gamma is up on PS3 and the gamma is down on Xbox crap. The PS3 looks way better then Xbox crap. Who every made these pics need to go back to pre-school to look at pics again.
What is the score now 600 to 3?
PS3 version is money well spent.
One's lighter, one's darker, which one do you pick? The one with the blu ray movie
The only difference I see is that the game sucks.
this game is awful. looks like it took about an hour to make. it feels so clumsy and no skill is needed.
why the Xbox games always darker?? i mean PS3 and PC picture look the same However the 360 is darker than both? i have been noticing that recently
Stinky demo - This sort of cover/combat based game has a lot to prove in the wake of UNCHARTED (seeing as how I'm a PS3 owner, I can't comment on GEARS OF WAR) and this didn't even come close to delivering in my view. The demo was very dull and repetetive, with poor animation and guns that had little heft or power to them. I liked the film though.
the ps3 version is so MUCH BETTER, WTF THE 36+0 VERSION IS SO DARK
We are comparing demos now?
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.