GamePro: Eat Lead: The Return of Matt Hazard Review

GamePro writes: "As a tongue-in-cheek spoof of action video games, Matt Hazard fails. There are some geniunely funny self-referential bits but the developers just didn't take it far enough. It also suffers from some design issues, chief among them pathetic AI, boring boss fights, and a general lack of polish. It's ironic then that Eat Lead actually ends up being a half decent action game, even if it does fall victim to some of the same cliches that it tries so very hard to make fun of".

The story is too old to be commented.
DelbertGrady3548d ago (Edited 3548d ago )

I hoped this would fare better. Doubt any of the other big name sites will give it better scores. Such a good plot. Yet, I won't write it off completely until I've tried it myself.

Beast_Master3548d ago

I think I will give this a rent. I never anticipated high grades but I like the plot setup and of coarse Will Arnett and Neil P. Harris. Not a whole lot of replay but a fun play through I am sure.

Major_Tom3548d ago (Edited 3548d ago )

I'll be renting there will be some guaranteed good laughs in this game.

If a game fails, why is it being given 3.5/5? Failure would be 49 or lower would it not?