Approvals 10/3 ▼
TrevorPhillips (4) - 5540d ago Cancel
Monteblanco (2) - 5540d ago Cancel
Wriggy (3) - 5540d ago Cancel
dru888 (1) - 5540d ago Cancel
200°

PS3 Unreal Tournament 3 gets free DLC - enough to buy the game?

Gamer.Blorge:

"PS3 Unreal Tournament 3 gets free DLC - enough to buy the game? DLC, or downloadable content, can come in all different shapes and sizes. Some is free, some has to be paid for. Some will extend the longevity of the game, while some will simply add five minutes of entertainment. Some even has the capacity to turn a game from a maybe to a must buy. Which is what the new Titan Pack on its way to Unreal Tournament 3 could do."

Read Full Story >>
gamer.blorge.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

digimau5540d ago

In My Honest Opinion ..a DLC With Single Player Campaign is very Cool for UT3...

Downtown boogey5540d ago

And this is more than enough for FREE!

Dimitri5540d ago

I bought this game on day 1, after playing it for 1 week I sold it to game because it was simply boring. I am thinking about getting this game again when the titan pack comes out.

BGDad5540d ago

It sets the standard for FPS since it came out you dolt... Where do you think Halo come from? Seriously get a f'in clue.

Deathmath & warfare are both very good multiplayer modes on UT... Theres more guns than halo, more vehicles then halo, and MUCH faster paced than Halo.

kewlkat0075540d ago

Yet, there was all that fanfare surrounding Mods.

PirateThom5540d ago

The problem was, they were expecting PS3 owners to buy two copies of the game to make mods. 1 for PS3, 1 for PC. PC users aren't always going to cook the mods up for PS3.

Also, the game wasn't well recieved, so it didn't matter anyway. It was still a big leap forward for consoles.

faisdotal5540d ago

It was well recieved, it's got an 86 meta score out of 42 reviews.

Viper75540d ago

The biggest problem for Unreal was the competition. Not to mention the way it was way too old school for some ppl. The game itself is great but the fact that online mode only had Mods and stats to back it up wasnt enough.

After COD4 and Resistance among many others introduced gamers to ranking systems that where no longer only numbers but Badges, ranks, awards and some even have slight RPG elements in the play. Unreal lacked all those which made many ppl loose interest on the game. It was fun, but many ppl nowdays need atleast some sort of objective or a goal to keep playing.

Hopefully Trophies will give this goal for many gamers to keep playing and the game will get atleast some more activity.

The DLC does seem juicy and I see no real reason why some1 should not want to buy the game. Only problem is that theres this Killzone2 thats gonna be relased next week that might make ppl forget about unreal3.

Good thing I already have UT3 so I can play both :P

pixelsword5540d ago

Actually, the PC to PS3 support is very strong; in fact, one of the biggest modding communities for UT3 has a spot in Playstation's home

http://www.ut3mod.com/searc...

kwyjibo5540d ago

I really doubt that Epic were relying on PS3 owners to grab the PC version as well to mod it. It's just a way of PS3 owners to get a glimpse of the possibilities the PC modding scene gives.

----

And using free DLC to drive new players to your game, rather than trying to wring out more from, and divide your current audience - is what Valve have been doing forever. Other PC developers have been doing it too, but they're not as vocal about it (they should be) such as Kaos with Frontlines.

It's a good step forward to see this happening on the console side too.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5540d ago
TOSgamer5540d ago

I didn't get the game because of a lack of single player. But hey it retails for $20 now so I might pick it up. Sales seemed to have pick up since the announcement of this expansion pack. Amazon is all of a sudden back ordered on the title.

Downtown boogey5540d ago

It's admittedly a preparation for the MP but still quite engaging

kazan5540d ago

i tell them this >>> gooooooood morninggggg !!!

Show all comments (33)
140°

Tech Focus - Motion Blur: Is It Good For Gaming Graphics?

Opinion is divided on this one for sure! Is motion blur good for gaming? Why do developers include it?

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2129d ago
TheOptimist2130d ago

I hate any game that has motion blur and the first thing I do is switch off the motion blur in games. It just makes me nauseous.

XentaJones2129d ago

motion blur makes me sick... so its off.

OpenGL2129d ago

I agree with Alex here, many implementations are terrible but when it is done right it improves the experience.

2129d ago
TheSplooge2129d ago

I always turn it off. Along with depth of field.

Mr_Wilson2129d ago

Those plus vignetting, chromatic aberration, and film grain.

Show all comments (22)
90°

Let’s be Honest, DOOM Looks like the Best First Person Shooter We’ve Seen in Ages

Alex from GamersFTW writes:

“In all seriousness though, I feel like DOOM’s success will be measured by how much the game has to offer. Graphically it’s looking spectacular, and I’m sure the latest multiplayer trailer caught all of our attention. Personally, the game is beginning to remind me of those late nights playing Unreal Tournament 3, which is totally a good thing. This, in addition to the promise of user-generated content, is making DOOM look like the best first-person shooter I’ve seen in ages.”

Read Full Story >>
gamersftw.co.uk
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2960d ago
Shillmeister2960d ago (Edited 2960d ago )

The campaign looks brilliant, like a true nostalgia trip to the original DOOM titles of old! The multiplayer equally looks like a trip down memory lane to fast-paced and frantic arena games a-la Quake, and honestly the MP REALLY makes me want to the get game at launch to capitalise on the hype. Problem is I'm not overly fussed with multiplayer typically in games, they can get weary after a while, and buying a game solely for its MP is risky - especially on console - as it's heavily dependant on the community!

Rock to my left, hard place to my right..

EDIT: On the MP note, does anyone know if it'll have bots available, similar to Unreal Tournament 3? I still give that a quick play time to time with bots (and all the mad mutators).

c00lvilKid692960d ago

I’m exactly the same, usually multiplayer games are of no interest to me. But DOOM has sparked my curiosity, especially as someone who used to enjoy multiplayer first person shooters like Quake/Unreal. Totally understand your concerns about it being heavily dependant on the community, too. Which is just another reason they should include bots, in case the numbers need to be made up. I’m hoping the community will be good, considering the creative freedoms they’re handing over with the SnapMap thing.

2960d ago
esmittystud1012960d ago (Edited 2960d ago )

Its basically a "console" ahead, in terms of graphics, of another shooter called Homefront thats getting ready to release. LOL

wakeNbake2960d ago

Well thats just a low budget turd, no comparison at all.

mezati992960d ago

i am gonna have to agree with this

Show all comments (20)
30°

Game Music Daily Week 54

Great selections as always and they are...
Final Fantasy
Metal Gear Solid
Super Smash Bros.
Crypt of the Necrodancer
Unreal Tournament
Advance Wars
Payday 2

Read Full Story >>
ftg.operationsupplydrop.org
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3372d ago