Approvals 17/3 ▼
JamieReleases (10) - 5539d ago Cancel
TrevorPhillips (4) - 5539d ago Cancel
butterfinger (2) - 5540d ago Cancel
Aclay (1) - 5540d ago Cancel
230°

Resident Evil 5 Next Gen Graphics Last Gen Game play

By now, many of you have played the Resident Evil 5 Demo. It's apparent to most the demo has outstanding graphics; truly next generation graphics (current gen). It's hard not to think why Capcom would deliver on outstanding graphics, but deliver a horrendous game play. Sure this was acceptable last generation for various reasons. Take a look at what I mean.

Read Full Story >>
hiphopgamershow.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

blacsheep5540d ago

that was v good LAST-GEN game this is a new era*

Danja5539d ago

well alot of other games did the same thing..good graphics , same ole gameplay from last gen..so why rip this game apart...for it

I mean the control scheme is kinda lame , plus I would have atleast prefer to have the option to walk and shoot at the same time....but overall im still gonna give this game a rent b4...I just dismiss it....im too much of a RE fan to not atleast try it

GameGambits5539d ago

Personally for me RE5 Demo on 360 sucked, but on my PS3 it was top notch. Why? It had to do with how the controls sensitivity and aim was way more fluid and spot on for PS3. On 360 I always felt I was struggling with them and couldn't enjoy the demo, but on PS3 it was like an almost new game to me. Why this is, is not certain for me, but people who own both consoles and only tried the 360 version SHOULD redownload it on PS3 to give it a try. You might come away surprised like I did.

As for the, "Dead Space used RE controls, why was it not hated on," that's BS. Dead Space's enemies are one of the major differences to prove why the controls are different. In DS you don't aim for the smallest part on their body, the head, instead you are ripping at bigger things like arms and legs, tentacles, etc and the weapons are made specific to taking those parts out. The game had a long thought process I'm sure in adding the right tools for the right enemies. Aiming was also spot on and fast, because when you brace your weapon to your face with an enemey in that area, it will auto aim it pretty slick so you start off at a respectable spot to shoot at. In RE, where you point your gun, is where the bullets will fly, and won't help you out by throwing it a few inches to land shots.

Enemies in RE also react differently with stun motions, making follow up shots to finish off enemies fast, not a certain possibility, but in Dead Space it's much easier in that regard.

My biggest issue with the demo, both on PS3 and 360, is the fact you cannot reload as you move. This was where Dead Space won in some small way in a survival horror genre competition for controls. It's really annoying in RE to put so much space between you and a boss to go reload a rifle, and in a split second he's already there to chop you up. The areas given to move in within the demo were small too, so if you do give yourself enough space, you tend to corner yourself. I know from other RE games you will be able to upgrade reload times on weapons later on, but even then you will still have to fight the controls to reload efficently.

This game is far from GOTY material from demo content, but wait for the final product to deem it either way. I personally cannot wait to pick it up on my PS3 and have some fun. :D

qface645539d ago

i couldn't agree more for some reason playing the demo although the controls still suck on the ps3 as well they felt much better compared o the 360 version

im not bashing the 360 it just felt worse
mainly the whole side walk thing

nix5539d ago

though i hate HHG and "DLC>Exclusive" guy, i have to agree on this one. i wonder what took these people to capitalise on this topic, and why is there no "?" in the headline? lol.. q:

all the best to those who are going to buy it.
"press square to run"
"press square to jump"

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5539d ago
Helghast Slayer5540d ago (Edited 5540d ago )

LOL i've said it before and I'll say it again. As long as devs cater to the inferior 360 hardware, this gen will have nothing but gimped last gen games covered in "next gen" coating.

Microsoft Xbox 3605539d ago

Agreed. 360 man does not have anything to counter your statement, so instead, he calls you an idiot.

Helghast Slayer5539d ago (Edited 5539d ago )

I'm not the least bit surprised. That's the logic of a bot for ya. You'd have a better chance giving birth to a chimp.

nix5539d ago

even the bots in KZ2 are smarter than him.

cryymoar5539d ago

last gen was all joysticks and button mashing.
This generation leap in controllers is motion sensing. Wii and PS3 have it. But i don't understand all of the SIXAXIS hate. I TRULY LOVE THE SIXAXIS AND ALWAYS USE IT WHERE IT IS AVAILABLE! (except warhawk, THAT is hard to use, and SIXAXIS vs joysticks online is suicide.)

Motorstorm 1 & 2: to steer.
Socom: to lean and peak.
Resistance 2: to shake off fire and Chimera.
Lair: the best SIXAXIS experience i've ever had. Used for total flight controls.
LittleBigPlanet: To shake your head and body to do funny dances :"D

SIXAXIS needs more support, i have no problem with it. I don't understand why people are all over the Wii because of the motion sensing, but people laugh at SIXAXIS. Sorry kids but just because it's hard for you to play a hardcore game using all of your reflexes doesn't make it bad. Just practice and train yourself. Who DOESN'T want to be further immersed into the experience?!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5539d ago
Megaton5540d ago (Edited 5540d ago )

Best looking PS2 game ever made.

Danja5539d ago

ppl seemed to have missed what you were trying to say...

Cartesian3D5539d ago

:) .. they disagree with what ? he's right.. :P

mandf5539d ago

gow2 or ffxll were the best looking game on ps2 hands down. It isn't even debatable.

METtAL-GAMER5539d ago

Sorry but God of War 2 is the best looking ps2 game.RE4 is still awesome though.

Megaton5539d ago

For the 2 dim bulbs above me, I was referring to Resident Evil 5. You know, great graphics, last-gen gameplay, joke about it being a PS2 game? Har har?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5539d ago
villevalorox5539d ago

I'm not denying anything. But I like it the way it is. I like them controls. I don't mind em one bit. I do hope they give the option of fully customizable controls for the people that do not like it though.

Show all comments (68)
140°

Resident Evil 5 - 15 Years of Being the Most Misunderstood Resident Evil

Resident Evil 5 launched 15 years ago today - and it continues to stand as a stepping stone from the good to the bad.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community44d ago
TheBrainZ44d ago

One of my favourites because of the co-op. Then Resi 6 arrived and the series nosedived further.

Knightofelemia44d ago

I enjoyed the game co-oping with a friend I know the game in solo the AI can be an idiot but RE5 is way better then RE6. I played RE6 with a friend if it wasn't cheap when I got I would have avoided RE6.

thesoftware73044d ago (Edited 44d ago )

5 was excellent, still play Mercs with my brother.
I would love a fully remastered RE:5, with some added, reworked content. The DLC for 5 was also excellent.

6 was awful.

CrimsonWing6944d ago

I never understood why the game was misunderstood. It was a fantastic game at launch and is still fun today to play. It’s as action packed as Resident Evil 4 was, yet that’s regarded a masterpiece 🤷‍♂️

chobit_A5HL3Y44d ago

it was "misunderstood" because they introduced co-op into the franchise at a time when people loved to have fake rage about co-op. like, you could play the game as a solo experience, but people chose to have their bandwagon rage because it was cool at the time lol

-Foxtrot44d ago (Edited 44d ago )

What the hell are you talking about? Fake Rage? Bandwagon? Come on.

You can play it solo but you are forced to carry around a shitty AI partner you have to micro manage. It wasn't as fun solo.

Co-op sucked all the horror, tension and suspense from the game because having a partner covering you was like a safety net. Enemy trying to sneak up on you? No sweat the AI will just automatically lock on, alert you while they shoot first telling you where they are basically.

It was the start of Capcoms fall with the Resident Evil series where it basically become an over the top generic action game which betrayed it's own survival horror roots. Least RE4 had a good blend of both but Capcom just went the wrong way with RE5, especially going off what they were going to do during the RE4.5 beta phase before co-op was added.

franwex43d ago

At least the game was a ton of fun tho. If the game was bad, the outrage would’ve been justified. They simply pivoted for a couple of games. At this point it’s bad because it’s called Resident evil 5? But if was called something else it would’ve been good? Please.

chobit_A5HL3Y42d ago

like i said: fake baby rage and bandwagon hate. res4 wasn't really that scary, either, and was already taking the series into more of an action-oriented direction at the time. 5 was a good game that people fake-hated because of co-op that you didn't even have to play lol hence the fake rage and bandwagon hate. i mean, it obviously did well enough for capcom to go ahead and make 6 the way they did, right? if 5 was so bad, they would have changed what 6 was during development. the difference is that 6 was actually just bad.

people "hate" 5 because res4 was so good, and 5 was just unfortunate enough to be its successor. like i said, 4 wasn't scary, either, and relied more on tension than horror, but it was already more of an action game. if you don't wanna like 5 because it's not scary or whatever- that's fine, but it wasn't meant to be strictly a horror game anymore at that point anyways. the gameplay was a lot faster-paced than 4, so saying that the ai helping you by potentially shooting someone that was sneaking up behind you is a moot point. there were more enemies that were more aggressive, along with newer threats.

5 isn't as good as 4, but it's not a bad game by any stretch.

Tody_ZA18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

What? I always thought RE5 had fake controversy because it was set in South Africa and you shot a bunch of black zombies. I live in South Africa and thought the game was absolutely awesome, played the whole thing co-op with my brother.

@Foxtrot I think you're confusing the garbage Dead Space 3 with Resident Evil 5. Resident Evil 4 was already a hyper action game and had zero fear factor other than the grotesque appearance of some enemies.

Show all comments (16)
50°

The Best Co-Op Horror Games You've Missed in Halloween

Try to cope with your friend through terror with this list featuring the best horror Co-Op games you can play today.

Read Full Story >>
altarofgaming.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community167d ago
270°

Complete Global Saturation! Is Resident Evil 5 Really the Best Choice for the Next Remake?

An exploration of whether RE5 is truly the most logical next step for a remake, or whether there are others in line who deserve their day in the sun.

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community203d ago
ocelot07203d ago

Remake of Resident evil outbreak as well as file 2. Same gameplay as the recent remakes. Choose what ever character you want to play as. With online co op.

DarXyde203d ago

I've been dying to see Outbreak come back for years.

Even RE Zero and Code Veronica would be excellent.

But for the love of God, not RE5 or RE6.

One they get around to the aforementioned games, why not remake the original Devil May Cry trilogy? That would be a much better use of time. At the very least, the first two games.

justsomeoffdude203d ago (Edited 203d ago )

code veronica should be the nest remake

neutralgamer1992203d ago

CV is good candidate for a remake but requires way more work for today’s standard. People look at CV through their tinted glasses. I think capcom wants to remake every game up till 6 and fix the plot holes so they can continue the series in one straight story path

Also not sure why only RE have to get remade when there are other capcom games that would be better suited for remakes like oninusha

DVAcme203d ago

That's PRECISELY the reason Code Veronica needs a remake. All the other RE games aged pretty well, considering the limitations of the time, but Code Veronica is the game that would be served the best bybremaking it because it feels so archaic these days.

neutralgamer1992203d ago

DVA

But it depends if capcom wants a big project or a quick remake. CV will require a lot more work than RE5

IMO they should remake other games before doing RE5

TheEnigma313203d ago

how many times do we have to say CV is the next best one?

CrimsonWing69203d ago

Nooooo! Why the hell can’t they do Code Veronica? I just don’t understand.

1Victor203d ago

RE5 is the closest to the bottom of the pot(a little smoky flavor but passable in a emergency) before we get to the burned crust that is 6 that not even the pigs would eat

CrimsonWing69203d ago (Edited 203d ago )

Unpopular opinion here, but I enjoyed 5 and 6. I just think, in terms of Remakes, the classics are the one that should get the treatment above the modern takes of the franchise.

Don’t get wrong, RE4 definitely was an outstanding Remake, but RE5… I just get less excited about a Remake for that over something like Code Veronica.

RaidenBlack203d ago

Nope.
Rather remake other past Capcom & non-mainline RE games ... IF they have to continue churning out Remakes.
I'd rather want a new 3rd person RE spin-off
Dino Crisis and Onimusha Reboot
New IPs after Pragmata ships

jeromeface202d ago

show this man the door... he overserved himself.

Show all comments (38)