Beefjack Writes: "With the hype surrounding Killzone 2, it is amazing to see what arguments are brought up within the gaming community. The article you are about read was written in a midst of rage and annoyance at the constant battle for consoles games exclusivity.
With Killzone 2 being the most technically and graphically stunning game to date it is easy to see why people are so eager to find flaws within the game. Halo 3 fans stand tall and declare the game is nothing special and that they have seen those graphics within Halo and Gears of War.
While I understand and can plainly see that Killzone 2, graphically, is an amazing game, I can also see why people will be drawn to Halo 3. Sure, compared to Killzone 2, Halo 3 is a technically inferior game but I am not here to prove which game is better, I am merely saying, why all the hate for each other?
The article is NOT saying which is better. I am stating the differences within each game. Both being sci-fi shooters, Killzone 2 and Halo 3 both fall into the same genre but they both have noticeable differences which will draw their own fans in with their own preferences."
KZ2 > halo3
~no contest~
im more into intence badass games, not haylow kitty games. : / ouch
are there any other games you haven't played yet and still want to compare?
Hated how Halo 3 ended finish the fight my a$$
Sorry, you can't properly compare games without having played them.
Halo 3 looks "too clean"
:)