Get ready for Sucker Punch to guide you through an extended look at the new open-world adventure.
Ghost of Yotei and Death Stranding 2 could share the same spotlight later this year, especially if both dominate key categories at The Game Awards.
Meanwhile Sandbox "hold my baguette"
I have no doubt Ghost of Yotei and Death Stranding 2 will be great games but they'll have to be something very special to top E33
Ghost of Yotei is rated "19+" in Korea due to sexual content, gambling, and strong violence. The game is set to launch in October for PS5.
Details on the reference gathering trips that helped bring the studio's fictional depiction of Ezo to life.
I don't understand where this is coming from, they act like they failed in that department with the first game and that it was a massive issue for them when it reality they did so well on it a lot of Japanese devs praised it.
Are they scared western journalists are going to do the same thing they did for the first game where they don't outright say it but they give off the impression there's some sort of racist undertones with a game set in Japan being made by Western developers.
Well, you don't get a sea of pink sakura petals as shown in the thumbnail above.
I've literally been stood in an avenue of blossoming trees this week and, while you do get petals on the floor, it doesn't look like that. That thumbnail looks like someone spilled several cans of pink paint all over the floor.
I also took multiple photos.
Furthermore, that size and number of trees would not produce that volume of petals.
Don't believe me? Come out here. I'm literally a 5 min drive from fantastic views of Youteizan. Cherry blossom is still in full swing but will be over in the next week.
I'd be worried too if a bunch of fat old pron addicted right wingers went around pretending to be outrage at the "historical inaccuracy" in my game. Fake outrage causes financial harm, tho I'm sure the usual suspects will be up in arms by the release to feel outrage about a female MC.
So, without the benefit of seeing the initial article, did the writer misrepresent or make stuff up that the above commenters reacted to believing it to be true?
This was actually dumb.
Why even do this??
This didnt need to be in the SoP.
Who run this runs this shit lol?
I’m not going to watch it. I guess this is for the people who are on the fence or don’t know about it?