180°

Marathon is doomed — ARC Raiders is already a much better extraction shooter

Windows Central: “Embark Studios' ARC Raiders is the extraction shooter I've been waiting for. Here's why it's better than Bungie's upcoming Marathon.”

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
_SilverHawk_18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

This is silly. I think both games are amazing. Both games can be very successful at the same time and I hope they are.

z2g18d ago

I hate articles like this. “My opinion is all that matters. Click my stuff”. Both games will have their audiences. Some ppl like rock. Some ppl like rap. Not everyone is the same.

LordoftheCritics18d ago

Both are just another streamer game.

Killer2020UK18d ago

What's wrong with games suitable for streaming?

PapaBop17d ago

From what I've heard off friends who have access to both tests, Arc Raiders is leaps and bounds ahead of Marathon. Still as OW2 and Rivals prove, competition is healthy, hopefully Arc Raiders pushes Marathon to be a better game.

PanicMechanic16d ago

I don’t think I’ve seen anyone say “marathon is amazing”. At least, not people who’ve had first hand experience playing it

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 16d ago
z2g18d ago

So we can we can see into the future now? I’m sure ARC is fine, me personally? Far more interested in Marathon. Between known Bungie’s solid gameplay and world building to the aesthetics and concept, I’m all in on Marathon.

InUrFoxHole18d ago

Yeah but unfortunately marathon are both in the hands of gamers and one has been recommend for delay.

RaidenBlack17d ago

Its from the previews bub ... respective communities responded ... no studio adherence bull crap here.

jjb198118d ago

I played the Technical Test 2 earlier today and had a blast. I got thrown in an instance, saw a guy walking up some stairs, started shooting at him and watched him run for his life. It was funny until I got killed by some random drones. They're both different games and will have their space. Only the gameplay loop will tell.

pwnmaster300018d ago

Why do gamers/gamejournalist do this? We need to stop with all this doom article game shit.

lodossrage18d ago

windowscentral wouldn't have wrote this "piece" if Bungie was still owned by Microsoft.

And yes, I'm implying exactly what anyone reading this comment thinks.

RaidenBlack17d ago

Arc is genuinely good (from the Finals devs {ex-Battlefield} ), 'if' you like extraction shooters and got to play it.
Get that typical console-warring posting outta here.

lodossrage17d ago

It has nothing to do with "console warring". It has everything to do with windowscentral credibility.

18d ago
Show all comments (23)
320°

It’s Just Over For ‘Marathon’

Marathon has always been teetered on the edge of future failure, but now that seems set in stone after recent events.

Games_People_Play12h ago

Honestly, even if it was F2P, I wouldn’t play it.

_SilverHawk_11h ago

I can't wait to play marathon. It looks amazing to me

Kornholic8h ago

Couldn't agree more. Every single aspect of Marathon seems very unappealing.

raWfodog3h ago

Arc Raiders interests me a lot more than Marathon ever did.

RaidenBlack9h ago

Bungie stole all their lunch money

CrashMania9h ago

Paul Tassi is a known xbox/MS stooge.

Saying that, Marathon looks so meh to me, absolutely no interest at all.

JEECE8h ago

Once he wrote an article characterizing Horizon Forbidden West, which came out over a year after the PS5 released, as a PS5 "launch game." Assuming this was just a mistake, I pointed out to him that "launch games" for a console are widely understood to be the games that come out on the day of a console's launch or in the immediate window thereafter. He responded and told me that he understood "launch game" to mean a game that launches, which would mean that every game that releases on a console is a "launch game" for that console.

I've basically ignored everything he has said since then. But I don't care about Marathon either way; playing Hunt: Showdown turned me off this genre pretty much.

neutralgamer19929h ago

If I was running Sony why would I not try to have bungie reboot Killzone and have it as their Halo. Honestly I don't know how Sony could justify that 3.6 billion purchase price. Insomniac games at 256 million has been their greatest acquisition in Playstation history for what they have already delivered and what's the pipeline

Profchaos8h ago

The smart money would have given them killzone but they brought them to be a pillar of their live services investment and seeming have no interest in allowing them near a single player story driven game again.

Lightning774h ago

The bigger mistake imo is not having them do any SP projects. Just all LS stuff.

Also want to clear up some misinformation on my part about Marathon. It wasn't due to creative differences as to why Jade left it was due to early internal Play tests were reportedly not received very well. Which probably prompted her to leave. My fault on that.

Ghostwood9h ago

It does look like ass shit.

Would pulling the plug now make any difference or is Bungie thoroughly cooked regardless?

peppeaccardo9h ago

Since when Forbes is relevant for the gaming community?

Show all comments (22)
80°

Epic Games Asks Judge to Force Apple to Unblock Fortnite on iOS

The saga of the legal battle that sees Epic Games fight Apple in the attempt to bring Fortnite back to iOS has just gained another chapter.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
PapaBop8h ago

Damn, I'm going to need to restock my popcorn if this keeps up.

190°

New ‘Marathon’ Info: Bungie Morale, Launch Worries And Changing Plans

After a rough playtest and now plagiarism confirmation, Bungie is changing some Marathon plans and internally, things are bad.

Goodguy011d 3h ago

Wish they'd just go back to making a simple fps game like halo. As much as I loved destiny 1, it got absolutely stale and a chore to play after the sequel came out. I ain't got that kinda time to waste so much on a single game with it's crazy grind and raids.

Just make a great story singleplayer game with co op optional. Add in traditional classic pvp. Support with some new maps and weapons for a couple of years. That's it. Move on to the next game and make a new great singleplayer story sequel with it. Unfortunately every dev thinks an fps game needs to be fully live service and chase trends.

RaidenBlack19h ago(Edited 19h ago)

Or even go back earlier and make lore heavy Marathon(s) again, with similar gritty art style?

JEECE13h ago

In your estimation, what was the last fps game to follow the traditional release model (rather than live service) you described in your comment, and actually maintain a solid player base outside the immediate release window?

I guess you could say Warhammer Space Marine 2 fits that category, although it's playerbase is I'm sure much lower than what Bungie would call a success.

crazyCoconuts12h ago

Space Marine 2, despite not being huge, is still better success than this dead on arrival bull crap that we all knew would fail.
I'm not sure why having a persistent player base is required for success. Just make more money then it cost for you to make it.

Sciurus_vulgaris15h ago

It really sad that a dev would simply slap a classic IP name onto something completely unrelated. While I may come off as being overly pessimistic. I very firmly believe Bungie’s upcoming “Marathon” will not do well. It’s not getting the hype and engagement needed for a successful live-service game.

CrimsonWing6913h ago

We, uh, gonna start throwing in the towel for GaaS stuff, Sony?

crazyCoconuts12h ago

Not yet... There may be one or two studios yet that haven't been completely derailed

OhReginald1h ago

Nah at this point it's like fighting a hydra. Cut off one of the heads (Firewalk Studios) and another grows in its place ( TeamLFG).....

anast13h ago

I knew this game was a stupid idea.

goken12h ago

I wonder how many ways they want to take the same arena slap a different coat of paint on it and fail, before it occurs to them to try something else…

Show all comments (14)