150°

Xbox Cloud Gaming Introduces 1-Hour Limit for Free Sessions

Xbox has implemented a one-hour session limit for free Fortnite players on Xbox Cloud Gaming, sparking questions about its strategy.

Read Full Story >>
clouddosage.com
Eonjay74d ago

So the obvious issue here is that Fortnite is free so...why would you pay a sub to play it?

spicelicka72d ago

The game is free and you are free to downloand and play it for free. The sub is to be able to cloud stream it. It would be great to be able to stream it for free for people that want to, but it makes sense from a business perspective. It costs them money to host streaming servers.

Eonjay72d ago

We yes, of course it make sense for the business. I was speaking from the consumer perspective.

grashopper72d ago

That’s like saying why do I need to stay at the hotel to get the free breakfast? The breakfast is free I shouldn’t have to stay in a room.
I’m amazed they ever did it for free.

Profchaos74d ago

The problem isn't the game itself it's that it is incredibly expensive to operate these cloud workloads so I'm actually surprised they offer anything for free in this realm let alone having a cap on the time.

Also I'm not the biggest fortnite fan but I was under the impression it already ran on everything from phone to switch to console wonder why you'd chose to stream the game when you can play it natively

Eonjay74d ago

Actually there is a real practical reason for offering a free trail and that is to allow users to test their connection and latency. Yeah I have reservations about streaming anything competive.

gold_drake73d ago

isnt fortnite free to play? lol

DivineHand12573d ago

I would love it if they made xCloud available in the Caribbean.

Show all comments (10)
70°

SAG-AFTRA Files Over A.I. Darth Vader In Fortnite

SAG-AFTRA Files Over A.I. Darth Vader in Fortnite claiming this was done without notification and has filed accordingly.

spoonard1d 18h ago (Edited 1d 18h ago )

It's just a complaint, not a lawsuit, and it's completely unwarranted.

Garethvk1d 18h ago

I said filed which they did. Filed a complaint.

VersusDMC1d 16h ago

James earl jones sold his voice for use for Darth Vader after his passing and his estate said they approved it.

So i don't know why SAG is getting involved as it makes it seem like they are going against james earl jones wishes or just wanted a cut...

Garethvk1d 15h ago

They are concerned about A.I. replacing live talent. It's an unusual stance as you are correct; he left his voice and his family approved. The union is saying doing this versus using a live actor sets a bad precedent going forward. The use of A.I. has been a huge issue in the recent labor deals.

VersusDMC1d 12h ago

Well this is also an interactive AI Darth Vader that would have made live talent impossible unless they think a actor being in Fortnight 24/7 is an acceptable solution.

They should concentrate on cases that are possible to be done with live talent and that haven't been given blessing or sold by the original actor(for which they should have the right to sell)

Eonjay1d 9h ago

"James earl jones sold his voice for use for Darth Vader after his passing and his estate said they approved it."

I have to say if James approved this after his death... that would be... um...

Do you mean he approved it while he was alive for when he passed?

VersusDMC1d 7h ago

It's reported that he gave permission before his death and his estate(which i asume is his family) says so as well.

spoonard1d 1h ago

Because SAG-AFTRA are trade unions. They are the Hollywood mafia protecting their profits from anything they feel could undermine them. It's all about the almighty dollar, not artists.

Christopher10h ago

James Earl Jones doesn't own the character, though. He essentially said the owners of the IP can use his voice however they wish, not everyone.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 10h ago
90°

Epic Games Asks Judge to Force Apple to Unblock Fortnite on iOS

The saga of the legal battle that sees Epic Games fight Apple in the attempt to bring Fortnite back to iOS has just gained another chapter.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
PapaBop2d ago

Damn, I'm going to need to restock my popcorn if this keeps up.

150°

Apple blocks Fortnite’s return to the App Store, Epic Games CEO points out obvious clones

Epic: "Apple has blocked our Fortnite submission so we cannot release to the US App Store or to the Epic Games Store for iOS in the European Union. Now, sadly, Fortnite on iOS will be offline worldwide until Apple unblocks it."

DazaMc3d ago

I hope they never let it back in, don't bite the hand that feeds you bitch!

mkis0073d ago

Judge already gave them the win.

jznrpg3d ago

They did win in court, but so far the result is the same. It will be interesting to see if anything changes.

mkis0072d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Isn't that contempt? As I type this as a potential juror

Christopher8h ago

To note, they technically ended up right where they were before. No one won in this. Just a ton of money wasted to end up right back where both companies were before.

z2g3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Lmao 😂 Fortnite tried to bully apple out of its own existing policies so they themselves could make more money off apple users - then they threatened to pull Fortnite from apple. then apple said “we’re the most valuable company in the world, we’ll do it for you”.

Epic f**ked around and then found out. Lmfao.

porkChop3d ago

"so they themselves could make more money off apple users"

That's not even true. Epic was allowing in-game purchase of V-Bucks for 30% cheaper by removing the portion that would have been Apple's cut. Epic was still making the same amount of money, not more, but they were trying to let users save money.

JEECE3d ago

It's so wild that people fawn on Apple for behavior they would lambast any other company for. Just shows how good Apple's marketing is that people will change their views in any direction to support them. It wasn't so many years ago people were attacking Sony over much milder actions related to Fortnite monetization.

PapaBop3d ago

Poor little Epic playing the victim card. I mean if any small company tried to do what they did, they'd be permanently blacklisted from app stores.

Show all comments (11)