There’s been a raging debate about the meaning of first-party, second-party, and so on among gaming enthusiasts for eons.
For the longest time, it was assumed first-party games were those published by the platform holder and made by internally owned studios, while second-party titles were those titles still published by the platform holder but made by non-owned studios.
Former Sony Interactive Entertainment executive Shuhei Yoshida has shared how his feedback played a role in the success of Gran Turismo.
To this day, anyone that plays a GT game for the first time and doesn't have experience with this kind of game will crash at the first corner, so not really sure what Shu is claiming here. I literally saw this happen a few months ago at an event where they had GT7 with VR2 up on a stage and members of the public got to try it out.
Square Enix talks about developing Final Fantasy VII Remake Intergrade for Nintendo Switch 2 in a behind-the-scenes interview.
Why do we think this is coming out on Switch 2 before Xbox? Any thoughts? The S2 is not more powerful than the Series S so it’s not a ‘lack of power’ issue. Perhaps the sales forecast is higher on S2 than Xbox so that’s maybe where their priority lies?
Bandai Namco has some impressive titles for those attending PAX East and fans should be thrilled to see the games.
First party = Internal studio.
Second party = External studio. Platform holder has funded the games development and owns the IP, but not the studio.
Third party = External studio. Game is not initiated, managed or funded by the platform holder.
I though Second Party meant Nintendo is having Bandai Namco making a Donkey Kong or a Starfox game