190°

Analyst Expects A $399 Price For Base Nintendo Switch 2 SKU

Analyst David Gibson expects a 399 US Dollar price for the base SKU of the upcoming Nintendo Switch 2 console.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
anast103d ago

Too much for for this, but it will be better value than the Steam Deck.

Inverno103d ago

Where did the Steam Deck touch you?

103d ago
InUrFoxHole103d ago

Read your comment 🤣🤣🤣 29315;

Babadook7103d ago

@Womba

Maybe he is talking about hardware? Price per spec?

103d ago
Cacabunga103d ago (Edited 103d ago )

I will get switch 2 day one .. i know Nintendo will deliver top quality single player games

Rockstar103d ago (Edited 103d ago )

Yup, anast hates the Steam Deck apparently.

To each his own I guess...
I know I love mine.
Switch 2 day 1 for me as well, good times!

anast102d ago

I have to verify your comment first. In the meantime, you can play Banana.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 102d ago
Eonjay103d ago

Obvious value based on price is always subjective, of course, but I thik if Nintendo truly doesn't plan to price cut the Switch... having a Switch 2 at OLED+$50 seems like a good deal to me. One assumes that Nintendo will be making a profit off this on day one.

thorstein103d ago

And it's really not a bad price point for a console/ handheld in one.
Regardless, well all know at the upcoming Direct.

anast102d ago (Edited 102d ago )

It's not subjective because we can measure specs, performance, hardware, cost, access, and etc. Subjective means we can't measure it.

darthv72103d ago

That's only $50 more than the OLED. I have no problem paying that.

thesoftware730103d ago (Edited 103d ago )

anast,

You don't know what the system is worth lol,

You don't know the exact specs, what games, or what features the system has; all you officially know is how the system looks. But yeah, you know it's "too much for this."

The solid thing to do is to wait and see what is on offer, then make such a solid claim. A good example would be how I waited to see what the PS5 Pro offered and then knew that I did not think it was worth $700.

DodoDojo103d ago

Anast just hates Nintendo, it doesn't matter how good or bad the system is.

anast102d ago

@730
I have to verify your comment first. In the meantime, you can play Banana.

@Dodo

You're bias has misinformed you. I am saying something good about Nintendo here. Namely, it being a better value than the Steam Deck.

Inverno102d ago

I have close to 1000 games plus delisted games I pirated, they all work. Idk why you gotta be told the same thing over and over, I hope you aren't a grown arse man cause that's hella childish dood.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 102d ago
DivineHand125103d ago

$400 may be pushing it. It would be priced too close to it's competitors.

Xbox series S $290 MSRP is $300
Xbox Series X digital $430 MSRP is $450
PS5 Digital $400 renewed on Amazon
PS5 Slim Digital. $450

I know the OLED switch is $350 but that can be acceptable because it has an OLED display. If the switch 2 offers less performance than the above due to voltage and battery requirements, then perhaps they should be targeting $350.

darthv72103d ago

to be fair... all of those can be found for even cheaper than what you show via 2nd hand markets is people are so inclined. it is also interesting how the only one that is a refurb is the 5 Digital in your listing but whatever.

103d ago Replies(1)
CrimsonWing69103d ago (Edited 103d ago )

Look, if a f*cking PS5 Pro is $700 then $400 makes total sense for Nintendo’s next-gen console. I don’t know why people are saying it’s too much… like wtf?

Eonjay103d ago (Edited 103d ago )

Probably because if we are being purely objective,the Switch 2 has GPU, CPU and ram bandwidth is much lower than an Xbox Series S which is priced at about $300. It is also apparently on an older cheaper node process. There is no world (even with a screen) where a Switch 2 is more expensive to produce than a Series S. Based on that alone the price/performance will obviously be far lower than the Series S. But we know for a fact that Nintendo doesn't make hardware to lose money.

Profchaos103d ago

Once we learn the capabilities of the system it will be easier to figure out that price point but we have to consider it's a different architecture for its CPU and GPU than a series s most developers don't seem concerned about power differentials between series s and s2 so it's possible that it could be suited for portable versions of current gen games if the Devs work at it.

103d ago
anast102d ago

I agree with Eonjay here.

andy85103d ago (Edited 103d ago )

A PS5 Pro has power, a $400 system with less than the power of an Xbox Series S does not. (Don't get me wrong I don't think Nintendo for their games need power, and i also think for a brand new system it isnt overpriced) but the optional console PS5 Pro comparison is silly.

CrimsonWing69103d ago

The point I was trying to emphasize with the increased prices of consoles (because it’d be very weird if the PS6 is cheaper than the PS5 Pro), it’s not ridiculous for Nintendo to bump the price of the Switch 2 by $100.

Consoles are typically sold at a loss and bank on software sales to recoup that loss. $400 makes sense in the market. Especially with the Switch, uh, 1 being $300 at launch.

andy85103d ago

It won't in my opinion, in fact I think PS6 will be a couple of hundred cheaper than the Pro, simply because it's a required console that's needed to play games. Pricing it at 700+ is suicide and stops every casual gamer getting one. The Pro is priced as it is because it is optional and isn't required to play one game.

CrimsonWing69103d ago

I don’t think that’s why the PRO was priced like that at all. The PS4 Pro wasn’t nearly priced in the same vein, in fact the PS4 Pro took the price point of the base model when it launched.

The industry has been pushing it with what consumers are willing to pay. It’s why we saw a $70 price hike to games and now rumblings of the industry wanting games to cost $100. All of this makes a $100 hike on a Switch 2 make absolute sense to me, whether it’s sold at a loss or total profit.

I mean, this is the same company that charged $70 for Zelda… when that was really the price point for current-gen games due to whatever increase in development costs were… which I still question the validity to this day, but I digress.

andy85103d ago (Edited 103d ago )

You're forgetting the fact that in the PS4 Pros case, the regular PS4 had already had over a 30% official price cut (and that was for a brand new slim model). The PS5 is still nearly 10% more expensive than it was on release day. That 40% price difference is why the PS4 Pro was able to take the same price point

And I mean it's inflation isn't it. That $70 will be become $80 next gen. It can't stay the same forever especially as game cost so much more to developm we should be thankfully it didn't follow inflation from the 90s like cinema tickets have or we would be paying well over 100 for a game. I remember paying 59.99 for a snes game in the early 90s. Some were even 69.99 and look how primitive they were. Paying 70 in 2025 when people were paying it in 1992 doesn't seem that bad

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 103d ago
thesoftware730103d ago

Crimson,

Exactly this, and to be more exact, how can anyone know what the system is worth until we see it's feature set, and most importantly, the games!

One thing we know is that the OLED Switch cost $350, why in blue hell would make people think it would cost that or less? Yes I can understand OLED screens increase cost, but this is all updated internals, with possible Ray Tracing, DLSS and a lot of modern bells and whistles...I'll take that over the OLED any day.

DivineHand125103d ago

If you are fine with paying $400 for Nintendo's next gen handheld dispite the performance not being better than current gen consoles, then you will be fine with paying $750 to $1000 for the PS6.

A next gen console or handheld doesn't necessarily mean it should launch at a higher price. If Nintendo were putting out a handheld that is using the same architecture as the 50 series GPUs then I would agree that the $400 price point is justified. What we heard so far is that the architecture that is going to be used is 2 generations old just like when the original switch came out.

Normally I would say they should target $300 but with the cost of things right now, I believe $350 would have been a fair ask.

CrimsonWing69102d ago

I ain’t fine with paying $1000 for a console.

I don’t think $400 is crazy for a console price regardless of the specs. That’s about what I’d expect a console to be in the $400-$500 range. You start going $700-$1000 and I’ll just wait for some Black Friday sale.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 102d ago
Smellsforfree103d ago

Yeah, I think so too. Probably about $400.

Show all comments (44)
50°

DF Direct Weekly #210: Next-Gen Sony Handheld , Cyberpunk DLSS on Switch 2, Docked VRR In Question

Join Rich, Oliver and Alex for discussion on the latest leaks surrounding the mooted PlayStation handheld and the myste…

Read Full Story >>
digitalfoundry.net
Profchaos28d ago

I really want to know what's going on with docked vrr cause cyberpunk at 40 fps docked seems to be a choice driven by vrr

450°

PS5 price increases prove that console generations are truly screwed, if they’re not already dead

The recent PS5 price increases have proven that the old format of console generations are no longer viable for game companies.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Lightning7736d ago (Edited 36d ago )

It's greed. Next gen prices aren't gonna be much better. I won't be surprised if next gen games are at 80. Then Sony, MS and other devs will do the usually PR of the most powerful console ever or fastest SSD or whatever to "justify" the price hike.

They'll further push ppl to PC.

Tacoboto36d ago

"It's greed"

Oh. Please do tell us how. What components are getting cheaper?

"They'll further push ppl to PC."

Oh. Ok so Nvidia and their pricing is not greedy, then?

shaenoide36d ago

Companies making billions of dollars in profits every year is more than enough.

rokos36d ago

Another comment on the topic pointed out how how when the PS5 launched the NVMEs of this size were around £200 and now they are around £60 moreover they are using the old 7nm nodes for the CPU and GPU are getting cheaper with time and not more expensive. Both AMD and Nvidia are manufacturing their GPUs on the 4/5nm for a second generation. That is about the components
The push to PC might happen by pushing people to spend the money they would have for a console to make their PC better since most people have a PC or a Laptop. Then those people could take advantage of the more competitive nature of the PC ecosystem (Stem, GOG, Epic) and free online multiplayer. I don't think that would be a large number though.

Lightning7736d ago

Why aren't the components going down? Why are the components rising in cost?

Why are Nintendo prices going up, PSN prices going up and the inevitable GP price gonna go up?

Cacabunga36d ago

Console gen will die when console games die. We are in a slow curve but not close to claim death of console gen

senorfartcushion36d ago

Yeah - it's still greed.

Don't be naive.

Profchaos36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Exactly this gpus have trippled in price since the 20 series

CPUs have gone up

PC games still cost just as much as console games on sale

PC gaming is not some magic realm where you buy a GPU and get every game for a fiver.

I would still be a pc first player if it was

TheEroica35d ago

The complicit folk like this comment above are what ruin the hobby.... Apologists claiming it's not the corporations fault, it's your fault.... Gross. These people are the ones buying junk at premium prices and slowly bringing the hobby to its knees.

Reaper22_35d ago

I guess some people are saying if you're paying PC prices for consoles you might as well just buy a PC.

Tacoboto35d ago

"The complicit folk like this comment above are what ruin the hobby.... Apologists claiming it's not the corporations fault, it's your fault..."

If you want to bury your head then that's your choice but I think gamers also need to be held accountable for the environment they've curated.

Like, I certainly didn't teach Sony any pro-consumer lessons by buying the $200-$250+ collector's editions of TLOU Part 2, Ghost of Tsushima, and the discless GOW Ragnarok Jotnar Edition. What are PS5 Pro buyers teaching them buying a $700 console without a disc drive?

What lesson has Nintendo learned, with MK8 DX selling some 60+ million units, no price drops on Switch hardware, while selling defective joycons for 8 years on their most profitable hardware platform?

What about Microsoft and Xbox, what lessons should they take away from practically giving their games away, to declining/flatlining hardware sales?

Once you think about that, I encourage you to then factor in the reality of the ever-increasing-costs of hardware production, shipping, tariffs and taxes, and the salaries of those they employ...

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 35d ago
generic-user-name36d ago

Yeah I hear the new 50 series nvidia gpus are very affordable.

Games_People_Play36d ago

Nvidia isn’t the only GPU manufacturer out there. In fact, IMO AMD is killing it now with CPUs and GPUs. There is also Intel now, for more budget minded gamers.

Eonjay36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

I don't buy that. Consoles don't exist inside of a vacuum. Everything is going up. Does that mean that everything is screwed? PC gaming isn't a solution is the issue is rising costs. Neither are dead. The real issue is that consumer income has not keep pace with inflation.

There are more adults gaming than kids but the media that caters to us still treats us like children who can't hold complex ideas and critical thinking.

kayoss36d ago

it is also common knowledge that most consoles are sold at a lost. Its not until later that they release a slim version of the console where they make a bit of profit.

Lightning7736d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Believing? No it's called facts. You know me I always have facts on hand.

https://www.thestationwagon...

Sony hasn't sold at a loss for 4 years now.

https://www.theverge.com/20...

As I said Sony makes money off console MS loses it.

kayoss34d ago

@lightning77
So for the last 4 years Sony hasnt sold at a loss. What happens before those 4 years?

kayoss36d ago

For console, its not greed. Companies like Sony are most likely selling the consoles at a lost. Most of their profits and revenue comes from software.

Lightning7736d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Sony aren't selling the console at a loss they make money from it. However Xbox is however they lose about 200$ or so with each console sold. Probably why they're so reliant on multiplat Software sales GP stuff rather than selling consoles.

Profchaos36d ago

Even the switch 2 is being sold at a loss this is a first for Nintendo

Eonjay36d ago

Lol @Lightning77.

Imagine believing that it cost Microsoft $200 more to make the series X than it cost Sony to build a PS5. Imagine getting played so hard when the competition is routinely beating you in non Pro match ups. If that were real (it's not) then of course MS would stop making console because they spending way more to get zero or worse results than a cheaper PS5!

Bateekh36d ago

Extremely L take.

No it will NOT push anyone to PC. You must be quite disconnected from reality. Go ahead and search up prices of just the GPU to be able to play modern games. an RTX 5070 will cost you around $700 alone if not a little more, and if you want a 4K capable machine that can run games at decent settings then you're going to need a stronger card which will run you closer to $1000. We haven't even gotten to the CPU or PSU or RAM or SSD, or Motherboard. A 4k gaming pc capable of running at 30+fps will run you $1500+ minimum, and if you want 60+ FPS then you guaranteed will be over $2000. If you want 2K capable machine then maybe around $1400-$1600 or so.

you bafoons are complaining about what, a $450 console (switch 2) an an $80 game? LOL get real. Console gaming is much cheaper, even PS5 Pro at $700 is a crazy deal compared to any modern gaming PC. So no, nobody is going to PC.

And anybody who thinks it's greed is disconnected from reality and just a brokie looking for a handout. Cry more.

Lightning7736d ago

Then why are all these YT gamers (even PS centric ones) building a PC? gaming publications and even ppl I know moving to PC or building a PC? Allot more than they have last gen?

Yep must me all in my head I guess.

So you can afford These prices and price hikes. Sounds like a child with mom's money or someone who has absolutely no life of his own.

NotoriousWhiz36d ago

^ Ironically, having a life is one of the main reasons to go console over PC. No tinkering, no googling or searching protondb to figure out if a game will work on your PC. Just turn it on and press play.

Jawsh66632d ago

It is greed, but this isn’t standard greed and by that I mean these price increases aren’t just wealthy businessmen increasing costs just because they can. This is partially an effect of tarrifs and the prices are just gonna keep going up regardless of if we’re talking PC or Console.

Ps5conehead36d ago

You want to know what greed is it’s insulin pump manufacturers. I have to pay 600 a month . For pump supplies. I have no choice but to spend it. But you can decide if you want a console are not. Mine is life and death. This here is gaming

Extermin8or3_36d ago

First episode of new series of black mirror is for you i think....

Jingsing35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

The sad thing is if Microsoft would just bugger off then none of this acceleration-ism to cloud gaming (the end goal) would be happening. They will ultimately use this expensive pricing to have us paying $100 a month for game streaming in the future.

badz14935d ago

maybe going mainstream was a mistake for gaming. sure revenues have increased several folds from the PS2 times due to that but in a capitalistic market, shareholders always want more year after year. 200mil profit this year, and if they only make another 200mil in the next year, it's not considered as a "success" thus people getting fired, studio got closed down just so that they can say that they made "more" than last year for the investors! if only these people are as passionate about gaming like they do about their margin, gaming would still be an enjoyable and affordable hobby.

I'll be looking at how Sony handles the PS6. if things get crazier in pricing than this gen already is, I think I will just stop at the PS5 and not invest in next gen.

thorstein35d ago

This article is fake. Consoles are dead despite them selling more than ever?

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 32d ago
Games_People_Play36d ago

I find myself playing games on my pc more and more this generation. I have my PC which I built myself, hooked up to my 65 inch oled tv.
I got Indiana Jones for free with my gfx card, my steam library is 500+ deep. I’m only buying consoles at this point because of physical games. Once the consoles go all digital, I will just be a pc gamer, because I can build whatever I want, without any limitations.

ziggyzinfirion36d ago

Without limitations?? Are you sure about that? 😏

gold_drake36d ago

so u have 500 games u probably even havent played.

arent u part of the problem tho? ha

Games_People_Play36d ago

Most of my games were $5-$10 summer and winter sales. Some of them are F2P.
And about 40 of them were full price release day purchases. My account is almost 20 years old.

Michiel198936d ago

unlike consoles, steam doesn't get a 5-6 year reset on their games, i know this is a shocking revelation. if part of the problem is only having to buy your games once, we sure are guilty

Extermin8or3_36d ago

@michiel1989: alll my ps4 gsmes work on my ps5. So that's approaching 14 years worth of content. Also you say that but it's not strictly true. I own pc gsmes from way way back in like 2007/2008 that literally can't run on modern drivers and stuff. You have to go online and find ancient software and install it and often it conflicts with the modern versions of the same software so you have to deal with that to get those titles running.

Michiel198936d ago

most games since windows xp work fine and if its a title from 1990 i don't mind having the option of not having to buy it again and just run a virtual version of 1998 or something alike to play it, but most often there are way easier fixes. Also i can play multiplayer for games that have been shutdown by the publisher, because the pc community is awesome.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 36d ago
bRuud8336d ago (Edited 36d ago )

It looks like we are going to a new video game crash like in te 80s. Games are going to cost too much, the PS6 and next Xbox will be a huge and costly dissapointment.

Christopher36d ago

We honestly do not need a new generation of consoles at all. Even PC gaming is seeing more and more reduced gains on technology advances.

carrotcakeag36d ago

The crash was about very poor quality games on Atari in the days before NES even released. Games are much better now and people will never stop playing. Pricing won’t force people to change hobbies because games like Fortnite start as low as free. Most AAA games end up with massive discounts after a while. Nintendo don’t discount but everyone keeps buying them full price anyway. Those are my thoughts when people predict a total industry crash. The industry will rather change and adapt. Companies that fail to adapt will go bust but there will still be big winners like GTA VI.

Extermin8or3_36d ago

Erm not really. The coat of hardware and such is all increasing if anything given inflation games have gone down in value since 2007 and even further down in value since the 1990s. What's changed is everyone feels entitled to buy everything new day one and not have to save for anything. Sadly that's just not how the world works.

Abnor_Mal36d ago

I’ve already decided that I won’t get a PS6 until the PS7 is released. That way the console will cheaper as will the games and most will be complete editions with all dlc.

I’m too old to be worrying about playing games as soon as they’re released, just so I can say I bought it day one. I will continue to play my last gen and vr games in the meantime as I wait for price drops. This will not push me towards PC gaming though.

DefenderOfDoom236d ago

I still have not bought a PS5 yet . I want to wait till next fall to buy one, hoping they have a price drop on all PS5s . I do not have a PC to game on . Unfortunately I do not think I can wait to next fall because DOOM The Dark Ages is being released on May 15 of next month. .

Abnor_Mal36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

I waited three years before I got my PS5, and to tell the truth it really wasn’t worth it, besides PSVR2.

There aren’t many games for it that is strictly PS5, that I was interested in, many were still available on PS4. The ones that are PS5 only pricing is still a bit high, but I understand you wanting to get a PS5 for DOOM. Hopefully you get one during some kind of sale between now and then.

generic-user-name36d ago

"no longer viable" as the PS5 out paces the PS4 and that's before GTA6 releases. The Switch 2 will almost certainly be a smash hit also.

Show all comments (81)
180°

What Does Switch 2 Mean for PS6, Xbox?

Welcome back to Next-Gen Console Watch! Ryan and Max are back as they discuss what the Nintendo Switch 2 Pricing means for the eventual PlayStation 6 and next Xbox. Can any console going forward reach the same success as the original Switch? And for handheld gaming PC's and the Xbox handheld, can we expect those to cost $450+, just like the Switch 2? .

gold_drake39d ago

probably not much.

the new gen will have its big appeal for alot of people.

the big question will be if the dwitch 2 will be left behind by devs again due to the games being too demanding, again.

but, and ive said this before, nintendo will be fine without it.
their big selling point is nostalgia and people eat it up.
and thw handheld option, but we are yet to see how the battery life actually holds up.

Abear2137d ago

Portal already allows third party games like Cyberpunk on a handheld so I think people are hyping this up too much. Games will look better on Portal and have better battery life. My only interest in S2 is exclusives.

Lightning7739d ago

Means PS6 and SX2 are gonna be expensive af

OtterX39d ago

doesn't even matter for me, because my Switch 1 was 80% a handheld system for me throughout its lifetime. PS5, then PS6 will continue to be my proper console, bc Nintendo will always stay gimped in that regard. With that said, I'm excited for the Switch 2's extra power solely as a handheld. I don't find the system price unreasonable, but I do find the game prices crazy.

Profchaos37d ago

Yeah tend to agree ps is my main but i travel for work and having a switch has always helped with flights and hotel stays

jznrpg37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

I use to bring my PS5 with me everywhere with a huge case hehe. Now I bring my Portal with me everywhere unless I am going to a cabin with no Wifi and then I bring my Pro with me.

porkChop37d ago

The Switch 2 is, what, $629 CAD? I'm not paying that, I'll wait for a price drop. But I'm just wondering how expensive the next PS and Xbox are going to be. I'm definitely not buying them at launch.

This is where shit is just getting too expensive to be worth it for me. Smaller jumps in visuals each gen, poor quality games in general, many games broken or borderline unplayable on launch, mtx out the ass, higher game prices, etc. For me it's not worth paying so much more for so much less. I'll stick with PC where I have a higher cost but so much more utility and usability for the money.

NotoriousWhiz37d ago

PC upgrade costs are astronomical as well. Furthermore, AAA games on PC will be priced comparably to AAA games on console. If you want cheap quality games, there are hundreds of good indies out there which will run just fine on a console or low powered PC.

Show all comments (20)