190°

Ex-Days Gone Director Stands by Bend Studio After Live Service Project Cancellation

Ex-Days Gone director supports Bend Studio after the cancellation of its live-service project, stating that devs sometimes have no choice.

P_Bomb121d ago

I don’t blame Bend or Bluepoint. This reeks of management trying to fit a circle where a square should be.

jznrpg120d ago

Hopefully they revisit Days Gone 2 (without the muiltplayer pitch they originally went with)

Knushwood Butt120d ago

Or go oldschool and do online like they used to.
Imagine Days Gone 2 with online like Resistance 2, with the PvE: humans Vs hordes! That could be a blast.

Cacabunga119d ago

It is fine with an online coop horde mode.. but the first one was amazing they are capable of taking over tnto new heights

anast120d ago

Management is the issue and of course the bootlickers.

gold_drake119d ago

i swear, we are not even a month into the new year, and that guy is still talking about this.

neomahi119d ago

When this guy does the job he's supposed to, he does it well. He's the writer for Days Gone. So, again, when he plays to his strengths, he does well. Give him downtime to reflect, and then you get this nonsense. This a writer by profession sounding distraught a live service game didn't make it when he's in the business and makes his living off penning treatments for single-player games, he should be peeing his pants in excitement! It shows, as I mentioned below you, there's a puppet master pulling the strings someone where that doesn't know a thing about gaming trying to change the industry and is willing to fight the most painful upstream battle to get there thinking, in his own (or her own) mind, crawling across burning hot coals has an even brighter light at the end of the LSG tunnel

neomahi119d ago

Why is everyone so shocked by this? John Garvin is a writer, he wrote Uncharted: Golden Abyss and Days Gone, it's WHAT HE DOES! The fact he says: I guess we'll go back to making single-player games like he's pouting shows there's something seriously wrong in the industry and there's a puppet master pulling the strings. What writer pens a solid LSG? Said nobody EVER! He should be happy he's back to work penning a solid treatment for an amazing story-driven game, that's what PlayStation DOES! Xbox does LSGs because that's what they're trying to sell you, Xbox Live. Remember when Sony dragged their feet to make PSN competitive and eventually charged for it when it was free all along? Because they were focused on solid single-player story driven games.

Gamers have been telling devs FOREVER they don't want LSGs on PlayStation but it's like that same puppet master is willing to fight against the current to try and tell gamers they actually want LSGs, like he wants to save an immense amount of money to put in the effort to try and brainwash his customers into taking the red pill they don't want to swallow. Someone is making a lot of effort behind the curtain to move the needle and change the trajectory of the gaming industry, and it's toward the sun to burn up. Microtransactions are like setting a gambling addict loose in a casino. They don't care how he winds up, they just want his pocket change. They have the disclaimer to silence the anti-gamblers, but they don't want to help him, they just want his money. That's what this is. "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain" they say, but that could be deceiving as well, there could be a woman behind the curtain. A Sarah Bond type that doesn't know anything about gaming, all business and wants to run the industry from a business perspective with a business mind put into place as a publicity stunt, not an actual resume that qualifies her for the job. Come on, a woke company hiring a BLACK, FEMALE, EXECUTIVE! She's got a business degree from Harvard and Yale. Privileged up the uterus and no history, whatsoever, in gaming and she's head of Xbox? At least when Tom Kalinske entered the business at SEGA, he was making Barbie and Heman toys, he knew how kids thought was well aware of what his company with doing with Intellivision so he knew and say and talked with the gaming guys, he just hasn't seen 16 but tech until SEGA, but, Sarah Bond that knows nothing about games is dictating how your future gaming life goes based on trends plagued by casual gamers? No wonder Xbox is going the direction it's going. Nadella also needed a YES MAN (woman) in the driver seat that wouldn't fight his plan and Bond was the perfect transplant. Someone naive enough to just do whatever he was told. A tool. Just like Herman Hulst. Difference is, Hulst has a history in gaming, and a good one with Guerilla Games which is where they should have left him, the. guerilla would've only gone the LSG route and failed and learned from those poor choices instead of all of PlayStation suffering from it.

There's a major problem in gaming. Someone moving around in there is a cancer infecting and causing major damage that needs to be stopped

Show all comments (9)
280°

It’s Just Over For ‘Marathon’

Marathon has always been teetered on the edge of future failure, but now that seems set in stone after recent events.

Games_People_Play8h ago

Honestly, even if it was F2P, I wouldn’t play it.

_SilverHawk_8h ago

I can't wait to play marathon. It looks amazing to me

Kornholic5h ago

Couldn't agree more. Every single aspect of Marathon seems very unappealing.

raWfodog15m ago

Arc Raiders interests me a lot more than Marathon ever did.

RaidenBlack5h ago

Bungie stole all their lunch money

CrashMania5h ago

Paul Tassi is a known xbox/MS stooge.

Saying that, Marathon looks so meh to me, absolutely no interest at all.

JEECE4h ago

Once he wrote an article characterizing Horizon Forbidden West, which came out over a year after the PS5 released, as a PS5 "launch game." Assuming this was just a mistake, I pointed out to him that "launch games" for a console are widely understood to be the games that come out on the day of a console's launch or in the immediate window thereafter. He responded and told me that he understood "launch game" to mean a game that launches, which would mean that every game that releases on a console is a "launch game" for that console.

I've basically ignored everything he has said since then. But I don't care about Marathon either way; playing Hunt: Showdown turned me off this genre pretty much.

neutralgamer19926h ago

If I was running Sony why would I not try to have bungie reboot Killzone and have it as their Halo. Honestly I don't know how Sony could justify that 3.6 billion purchase price. Insomniac games at 256 million has been their greatest acquisition in Playstation history for what they have already delivered and what's the pipeline

Profchaos5h ago

The smart money would have given them killzone but they brought them to be a pillar of their live services investment and seeming have no interest in allowing them near a single player story driven game again.

Lightning7725m ago

The bigger mistake imo is not having them do any SP projects. Just all LS stuff.

Also want to clear up some misinformation on my part about Marathon. It wasn't due to creative differences as to why Jade left it was due to early internal Play tests were reportedly not received very well. Which probably prompted her to leave. My fault on that.

Ghostwood6h ago

It does look like ass shit.

Would pulling the plug now make any difference or is Bungie thoroughly cooked regardless?

peppeaccardo6h ago

Since when Forbes is relevant for the gaming community?

Show all comments (20)
80°

Epic Games Asks Judge to Force Apple to Unblock Fortnite on iOS

The saga of the legal battle that sees Epic Games fight Apple in the attempt to bring Fortnite back to iOS has just gained another chapter.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
PapaBop5h ago

Damn, I'm going to need to restock my popcorn if this keeps up.

50°

How One Company Killed Sports Games

A once bustling space offering plenty of choices, now a desolate land of greed, did EA really kill the sports game genre?

anast14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

They made them better than everyone else at first. Once no one was playing any of the inferior options, they turned the investors loose on the customers.