Concord is Still Getting the Short End of the Stick as Players Compare it to Marvel Rivals

Concord is entering the spotlight once again as many compare the success of Marvel Rivals to the failed hero shooter.

[TheNamelessOne]

Well, I mean, Concord peaked around 2000 players on Steam, while Rivals is averaging 250k; even doubling that at peak hours. Concord still needs to be looked at and referenced going forward. The thing was a giant waste of time and resources and lost Sony hundreds of millions.

[vTuro24]

"Concord peaked around 2000 players on Steam"

You're giving Concord too much credit there m8.

[jznrpg]

For me both games are the same. I don’t want to play either.

[CrimsonWing69]

Is it not in the same genre!? If a game does it better, why in the hell wouldn’t you compare it to say, “this is how it’s done!”

Look, it’s simple, really. Cut with the ugly character designs, quit treating people like kids with censorship, tone it down on the preaching, and see how well your game sells.

It’s so weird, with all this talk about inclusiveness and tolerance, it ironically feels like they’re really saying they want sh*t to be exclusive to them, anything that “they” don’t want isn’t tolerated in the game. Where really true inclusivity should “include” what audiences want from both camps.

I swear, if they did that instead of trying to scrub everything away, we wouldn’t be in nearly half the bullsh*t we’re wading through now. It’s as simple as that.

[jambola]

you need to learn from others mistakes as well as successes

[boing1]

Wait, so people prefer to play a game with known Marvel superheros instead of unknown gender fluid charcters? I wouldn't guess.

[TwoPicklesGood]

Game was generic and had god awful characters. It did nothing new and should not have been made. Let it die already and pray sony learns from this.