170°

What we learned about The Witcher 4 from speaking to CD Projekt Red

Eurogamer: "In more than a year of conversations with CD Projekt, Eurogamer has picked up a few hints at what we can expect for The Witcher 4 and its reveal."

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Dandalandan117170d ago

I expect it to be a buggy mess at launch
I also expect them to under deliver what they'll promise to do

Inverno170d ago

That's the thing I will never understand. They may have fixed all the issues Cyberpunk had at launch, and thru a major update they tweaked a few things but it is now only a much stabler version of what they originally released and nothing else. They over promised a bunch of features that did not make it into the game, non of which ever will be patched into it either. And yet people ate up the patches as if they were given the game they were sold on by all the promises of what it was going to be and never was. All they did was fix what shouldn't have been that broken in the first place. Blows my mind how easily people just let things slide.

Christopher170d ago

***They over promised a bunch of features that did not make it into the game***

I mean, they literally sold stuff and then told us before release that they changed things so it wouldn't be included at launch.

thorstein169d ago

Like when they added the metro as if it was new content even though it was in the trailer.

Gamingsince1981170d ago

I just hope the combat is better

savedsynner168d ago

Starting from witcher 1 thru 3, each game has improved on it's combat. Witcher 3 doesn't have all time great combat like an Elden Ring, but it is definitely a fun combat system.
I expect the next game to continue this improvement trend.

That said, none of CDPR's games are known for their combat first. Their most recent, CP2077, while it has pretty good FPS combat, it's by no means amazing.

Also, given the disaster that was CDPR on launch, I'll bet they will let W4 bake as long as is necessary for it to be awesome on launch.

Gamingsince1981168d ago

I have my fingers crossed it all goes well.

170d ago
Demetrius170d ago

Witcher 4, cyberpunk 2, why even talk about these titles since they're years from release 🤣 I keep seeing articles about red dead 3 too. Smh atleast bring up games that come.out late 2025, that's more bearable

savedsynner168d ago

I tend to agree. They're just click-baity articles or for people who have to have all info on a p[articular game...wake me up when we get gameplay footage!

jznrpg170d ago

If I was them I’d take the humble approach and say we are trying to learn from our past mistakes and make the best game we can and that is it.

Show all comments (15)
310°

It’s Just Over For ‘Marathon’

Marathon has always been teetered on the edge of future failure, but now that seems set in stone after recent events.

Games_People_Play11h ago

Honestly, even if it was F2P, I wouldn’t play it.

_SilverHawk_10h ago

I can't wait to play marathon. It looks amazing to me

Kornholic7h ago

Couldn't agree more. Every single aspect of Marathon seems very unappealing.

raWfodog2h ago

Arc Raiders interests me a lot more than Marathon ever did.

RaidenBlack8h ago

Bungie stole all their lunch money

CrashMania8h ago

Paul Tassi is a known xbox/MS stooge.

Saying that, Marathon looks so meh to me, absolutely no interest at all.

JEECE7h ago

Once he wrote an article characterizing Horizon Forbidden West, which came out over a year after the PS5 released, as a PS5 "launch game." Assuming this was just a mistake, I pointed out to him that "launch games" for a console are widely understood to be the games that come out on the day of a console's launch or in the immediate window thereafter. He responded and told me that he understood "launch game" to mean a game that launches, which would mean that every game that releases on a console is a "launch game" for that console.

I've basically ignored everything he has said since then. But I don't care about Marathon either way; playing Hunt: Showdown turned me off this genre pretty much.

neutralgamer19928h ago

If I was running Sony why would I not try to have bungie reboot Killzone and have it as their Halo. Honestly I don't know how Sony could justify that 3.6 billion purchase price. Insomniac games at 256 million has been their greatest acquisition in Playstation history for what they have already delivered and what's the pipeline

Profchaos7h ago

The smart money would have given them killzone but they brought them to be a pillar of their live services investment and seeming have no interest in allowing them near a single player story driven game again.

Lightning772h ago

The bigger mistake imo is not having them do any SP projects. Just all LS stuff.

Also want to clear up some misinformation on my part about Marathon. It wasn't due to creative differences as to why Jade left it was due to early internal Play tests were reportedly not received very well. Which probably prompted her to leave. My fault on that.

Ghostwood8h ago

It does look like ass shit.

Would pulling the plug now make any difference or is Bungie thoroughly cooked regardless?

peppeaccardo8h ago

Since when Forbes is relevant for the gaming community?

Show all comments (22)
80°

Epic Games Asks Judge to Force Apple to Unblock Fortnite on iOS

The saga of the legal battle that sees Epic Games fight Apple in the attempt to bring Fortnite back to iOS has just gained another chapter.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
PapaBop7h ago

Damn, I'm going to need to restock my popcorn if this keeps up.

50°

How One Company Killed Sports Games

A once bustling space offering plenty of choices, now a desolate land of greed, did EA really kill the sports game genre?

anast17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

They made them better than everyone else at first. Once no one was playing any of the inferior options, they turned the investors loose on the customers.