450°

Concord Is Estimated to Have Sold Only 25,000 Units. Here’s Why Analysts Think It’s Failing

What happened to Concord? Why did a big Sony first-party game get sent out to die immediately? Is it actually selling badly, or are we just reading the numbers wrong? As usual when questions of this nature crop up, I asked a bunch of professional industry analysts to explain it to me.

Games_People_Play272d ago

Nobody wants unpopular activism in their games.
Keep your pronouns to yourself.

jambola272d ago

yes
i'm sure this game is flopping because of a tiny text in the corner that says "he/him"

Games_People_Play272d ago

Believe what you want…

It’s counter culture, regardless of how much social media tries to push it.

Scissorman272d ago

It may not seem like much, but that, coupled with some of the most unimpressive, uninteresting, and downright ugly character designs, are what sealed this game's fate.

DOMination-272d ago

Come on, it has nothing to do with having pronouns for characters.

99% of gamers aren't on N4G like us following every little detail. And even if they did, the general masses don't get wound up about things like that.

The main reasons for failure at launch is much more simple:

- PlayStation gamers just aren't that interested. They have grown up with Sony producing predominantly single player cinematic bangers and this game is just too far outside of that demographic.
- On PC, the genre is very competitive. Why would anyone pay for this when all the other games are F2P

That's it.

Cacabunga272d ago

Gaas is reason enough for me not to buy a game, no matter how good it is..

271d ago
Markusb33271d ago

it really is, as people now cant tolerate the smallest element of activism, as some entertianment companies try to ram it down your throat for the last 8 years and when they say its only a little text it doesnt matter you mod it out and then they ban your mod, so if it doesnt matter why ban a mod removing it ? Real world politics do not need to be in every single title, also no one asked for another gaas game and hero shooters that never end are awful

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 271d ago
-Foxtrot272d ago (Edited 272d ago )

Lets be honest though, people keep going on about the "woke" stuff as the main issue but the real problem is that it's just generic, boring over done slop that we didn't need from Sony.

It's not about being woke or pronouns...it's just a generic, bad game first and foremost.

Elda272d ago

Exactly. Great gameplay is the key to a game's success, pronouns are the least of a game's success or a lack of.

H9272d ago

There's no end to generic bad games, they don't flop that hard, it's a bad and woke game, the things people hate the most in one package

VenomUK272d ago (Edited 272d ago )

@-Foxtrot I agree with everything you say about the generic stuff. But what I played of the beta the controls felt fine, reminded me of Halo - that's a good thing but it's not enough. I'm not the key audience for this type of game as I don't play multiplayer online regularly, but the characters and world do matter and I found them lacking. In the first cinematic reveal the one standout was the woman, and I remember the green guy just because he was green.

Even if the developer creates brilliant controls there needs to be something about the world or the characters for everyone to latch onto and I suspect the developers made the vignettes because they knew the world wasn't interesting enough. Then if you magnify that with unattractive characters in an alien universe who use pronouns (no hate to anyone that does) then that immediately spoils the illusion of a different place as it has 'present day/real world' language that is off-putting to many that they are being lectured to by the developers which there is huge resistance to now.

Star Wars Outlaws might have a woke lead but it has the Star Wars universe to sell it.
The Fable reboot has that god-ugly character - but the game has the wonderful fantasy world to sell it.
Concord has THOSE characters - and no world the public know or care about so it naturally had more of an uphill struggle.

victorMaje272d ago

I originally was really not interested due to live service, non-interesting (imo) characters & no story but I’ve seen a few on here talk about its fun gameplay, which has me intrigued.
I might try it when it goes on sale.

thejigisup271d ago (Edited 271d ago )

Agreed followed by uninteresting character design and poor marketing that seems to push an agenda over gameplay and or narrative. The fact that most people know about this game because of strange character design choices and an inclusion of pronouns over exciting gameplay, graphics, art direction, and strong new narratives is the real problem. People would play if it was fun and engaging, people would stick around if it was good.

FinalFantasyFanatic271d ago (Edited 271d ago )

I just think the "woke" is the final nail in the coffin, people can't love or get attached to these character designs (unlike Overwatch which had some "woke", but the character designs were better). I watched reviews about the game after the beta came out, and most people didn't seem impressed when it didn't fully adhere to the archetype of "hero Arena Shooters" game play. Too slow and floaty, characters are health sponges, etc...

@VenomUK,
The Green Guy stands out to me too, he seems to be the only one I really remember, or the fat brown girl in the trench coat.

Markusb33271d ago

yes the progressive stuff is just another negative element, the game is nothing special, it doesnt inspire and no one asked for a new gaas game, in my view sony would have had a bigger hit if they did an online resistance, socom, or killzone, the IP are established and the assets just need updating but imagine how good one of these could have been,just with regular map updates. I would love to see a return to classic games, single player with a MP included that they either update or not all in one price

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 271d ago
gold_drake272d ago

yeeh i agree.

but i think it's also cause its ... just not fun.

272d ago
Elda272d ago (Edited 272d ago )

I highly doubt the lack of sales is due to pronouns, that is the very least of the games downfall. The core of a game's success is gameplay.

jambola271d ago

In my experience seeing people react to the trailer, nobody was excited, long before pronounce were shown

sushimama272d ago

Yep. I'm playstation all the way. But this game can get lost

purple101272d ago

yeh ,ate totally agree, people will argue it is/ it isn't, but every-single-time a company goes down this path the sales are low, the evidence shows people dont want it shoved in their face, again, you can argue it either way but the sales reflect the public opinion on a whole.

I also played it, and its smooth, quality title, but as someone else suggested, they could have down this same game with PS themed characters, like kratos, ratchet, etc, may have done better.

I also dont think its the price, at £34.99 its way less than a AAA release which would be £49.99 or £59.99, and the same as Helldivers 2, which sold 10 mill.

I RECKON it has something to do with Sonys mahoosive blunder with the Helldivers fiasco, offering it in all regions, only to pull the rug out with PSN account requirement, this may (did) leave a a bad taste =, this alone probably put a few million off just because of the way the handled it, those couple million would be all it needed, to gain traction and be called a success, so Sony literally did this to themselves, and , yer,. pronouns, and making every single female semi-attractive or non-feminine, or however you want to describe it.

Duke19272d ago

lol. nothing like seeing a “he/him” text on screen to seriously rile up the snowflakes.

I bet you get upset when manuals have languages other than just English in them too.

Elda272d ago

Agreed. I don't get some folks here being triggered by pronouns when people use them everyday. WTF is supposedly "woke" about Concord or any game being "woke" It seems some folks are using the term to be down low bigoted/biased, when it means to be aware or being woke from sleep.

TheProfessional271d ago (Edited 271d ago )

That's absurd and shows how ignorant you are. No one ever cared about other languages. It's forcing an agenda and virtue signaling/pandering that is the problem. The irony is the companies only do it because they think it's popular but as soon as they realize it isn't they won't care about "dei" anymore.

attilayavuzer271d ago

It's pretty crazy seeing how many posters here are edgelord conservatives. Like I knew this site had become more and more immature, but this is just embarrassing.

272d ago Replies(1)
neutralgamer1992272d ago

Games

Agreed man so much agenda pushing in all media. It’s like being a man is a bad thing now. All these movie studios and game studios pushing it and paying the price. Days gone is a game which got so much negative attention because it had a white male character. Come on that’s just absurd. And this is coming from a person of color. Stop this nonsense it’s completely getting out of control

Jambola

When people are fed up with this nonsense they will look at things and not support it. But these companies aren’t learning. Just look at how much Disney has failed recently and still pushing the same agenda

thorstein272d ago (Edited 272d ago )

The agenda.

Lulz, no.

The boomer gatekeepers retired and could no longer prevent, black, Latino, lgtbq writers from being published.

Instead, Gen X became the gatekeepers. And the one thing that unifies Gen X is they dgaf... especially when it came to gatekeeping.

You think there is some big conspiracy? That's as nutty as the left thinking their protests work.

It's just simply Gen X makes the decisions and they do not gaf.

neutralgamer1992271d ago

Thostein

Days gone: some critics noted that the game’s story and characters, including the protagonist Deacon St. John, felt generic or uninspired compared to other post-apocalyptic games

As far as concord is concerned good that it failed. Sony needs to focus on what they do best and that’s not GAAS games

Again what the heck are you talking about? No one is stopping anyone from getting published and seen but the issue is now only they want to be heard and their voices are be only ones that matter. They want to silence everyone else with their idiotic statements and cancel culture. We are literally going back decades to see what people said on social media to cancel them

thorstein271d ago (Edited 271d ago )

If you don't know what things are, let me help.

A gatekeeper is someone who decides what gets published, what gets made, what movies get greenlit.

Boomers prevented all of those people I mentioned from getting their stories made. There were always black, Latino, lgbtq, etc writers, they just couldn't get published.

Gen X comes along and changes the paradigm. Not because the left protests and certainly not as part of a goofy conspiracy.

It's simply they dgaf.

That's what I'm talking about.

In the past, those books, games, and movies weren't made and were prevented from being made by Baby Boomers who held that power. Full stop.

As for "they." The ubiquitous "they" and "their agenda."

We didn't go backward because blacks, Latinos, lgbtq, etc etc now have a voice that's equal.

Again, there's no agenda, there's just Gen X not gaf about your weird culture war.

AndrewM272d ago

Your a fucking idiot if you think thats why the game failed. And you have problems.

271d ago
thorstein272d ago (Edited 272d ago )

That's not how the English language works.

I bet you don't think they should teach pronouns in elementary school.

jambola271d ago

I swear lol, some people think pronouns are a trans thing only
I played god of war 1 recently, Imagine the meltdown where the narrator says "he" when referring to Kratos

Gamingsince1981271d ago

@jambola

No one would care, because kratos IS a he .......

271d ago
jambola271d ago

do you really think this game is flopping because pronouns? like serious question

271d ago
Hotpot271d ago

All these people who said “wokeism” isn’t the problem forgot about one thing, it’s not just contained in the game itself.

If you hire staffs based on diversity quota and how woke they are instead of meritocracy, the game quality itself will suffer. and that’s not including obligatory SBI “consultation” and decision makers with agenda interfering with game designs.

TheEroica271d ago

I thought Sony fans didn't want it because it's GaaS trash... Turns out the refection came from their fear of all things different than them. Yikes!

271d ago
seanpitt23271d ago (Edited 271d ago )

This failed because these types of games were popular 6 years ago when fortnight came out..
Not so much now the honeymoon period soon set sail and now we have more F2P games than ever and with this charging $40 that was the nail in the coffin.

How could Sony be so out of touch it's baffling

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 271d ago
thorstein272d ago (Edited 272d ago )

25,000 sales for PSN and Steam. But it was on GoG and Epic too.

At least this article has accurate numbers. We all know it failed, but it's better to have accurate numbers. Articles last week acted like 700 people bought it.

This article is incredibly thorough about the explanation so many people have said about why it didn't do well: saturation, price point, launch window...

TheNamelessOne272d ago (Edited 272d ago )

Those articles are about player numbers. Even if a WHOLE 25k people bought it, what does it matter if only a small fraction of that even cares to play it? Add another 100 for GoG and Epic, by the way. People pretty much use GoG for classic titles, and almost nobody goes to Epic when a Steam version is accessible.

272d ago
DOMination-272d ago

Come on dude, the game is so far a huge commercial failure and no spin can change that.

It's a shame for the developers though. I haven't played it myself so can't comment definitely but most who have seem to say the game is pretty solid and has lots of promise.

As ever, live service games live and die by the support it receives post-launch. Sadly for the developers of Concord, I think they are going to pay the price for being the first in Sony''s experimentation. Future Gaas titles will almost certainly be F2P.

Sony have two choices to make here:
- They can either make the game F2P which will immediately piss off the people who paid full price for it
- This will never happen but they should make it free to Ps+ AND Game Pass subscribers. At least that way they'll get people playing it - and from above, it seems like its pretty solid - its player numbers they need right now.

thorstein272d ago (Edited 272d ago )

"Come on dude, the game is so far a huge commercial failure and no spin can change that."

So what part of me saying "We all know it failed" did you not understand?

I know that people on N4G have difficulty with the English language, especially pronouns, reading comprehension etc.

But I was blatant about the failing numbers.

Saying it sold 30,000 proves it failed, but when you prove something, you can't use lies.

I mean, here on N4G users do and run with them, but seriously, I never spun anything.

Sciurus_vulgaris272d ago

A game with character designs like this ( https://x.com/KhaosKontroll... )wasn’t going to be attractive FPS fans. FPS GAAS has a saturation point, which it probably has already reached.

CantThinkOfAUsername272d ago

Yeah, we need the circus show like CoD. That's what people buy.

RhinoGamer88272d ago

Leadership values on both teams. Layoffs will probably result...not with the leadership though. #sadgame

Elda272d ago (Edited 272d ago )

I'm surprised it sold that much. After the little bit of sales cease it'll be F2P in a few months.

Show all comments (93)
50°

There’s a Demand for Original Games (Just Not Live Service Slop)

The success of numerous original titles and the failure of several live service games demonstrate a strong demand for story-driven experiences.

Read Full Story >>
8bitdigi.com
330°

PS5 Mega-Flop Concord Is Reaching Absurdly High Prices on eBay

World's most expensive coaster

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
BISHOP-BRASIL70d ago

Pretty standard for pulled off products, collectors love useless but very limited things.

TheEroica69d ago (Edited 69d ago )

This reminds me of when people spend big on "poo-art"...

70d ago Replies(1)
goken70d ago

Worlds most expensive coaster 🤣

badz14969d ago

what's so different between this and those useless NES cartridges or even supposedly "rare" pokemon cards? they are like NFT, just physical. Concord is an actual flop that has been pulled from stores, while Nintendo artificially limited their supply for artificial scarcity.

darthv7270d ago

ehh... I'll stick with the controller. I got enough coasters, they are called xbox games (snickers)

70d ago Replies(2)
Kurt Russell70d ago

Not the biggest coaster collection from xbox this gen :P

TheEroica69d ago (Edited 69d ago )

Concord is the biggest flop of all time... Sony could've saved 5 years by standing over the toilet and flushing 400 million. Remember, Concord is so bad that you cannot even play it anymore. It's vapor. You can't even have a retro review on it or pretend like "maybe there are a few people at home enjoying it". Lol, it was so so bad that it's been obliterated along with piles and piles of money.

The good news is all that failure leads to more pc ports of sonys better games. Sony is a good 3rd party publisher. I'll give them that!

70d ago Replies(1)
Richhard170d ago

Good, I have two sealed copies,

GotGame81869d ago

You can buy a sealed copy for $59 on eBay.

Show all comments (37)
280°

Sony's Recent Live Service Game Cancellations Is Reportedly Tied To Failure Of Concord

Sony Interactive Entertainment's recent cancellation of live service game projects is tied to the failure of Concord, based on a new report.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
-Foxtrot133d ago

Good. Let it be a lesson.

I’m super curious about how they are going to go about Fairgame$. It’s a live service title which didn’t get a good reception with the announcement and it’s being made by a brand new studio they decided to buy straight away because of the live service title they were making. It’s super similar to Concord and Firewalk Studios.

Will they cancel it this far into development or release it with the high chance of it being another disappointment and making Sony the laughing stock.

JEECE133d ago

It feels like that one is far enough along that they are going to go ahead and just push it out.

RaidenBlack133d ago (Edited 133d ago )

The Horizon live-service game is on the ... err horizon as well it seems, don't think that's getting cancelled.
Honestly if one modern Sony live-service game that I wish wasn't cancelled, that'd be the "Spider-Man: The Great Web". The leaked trailer looked cool and imho, it had potential. The timing was just not on its side.
With Avengers and Gotham Knights fumbling and Suicide Squad also not garnering much positivity at the time, Sony pulled the plug.
And 2 other I can also consider as well would be Factions 2.0 and Twisted Metal. Any form of a new Twisted Metal game is still fine for me than nothing.
Hope after all this, Marathin delivers. Oh, it better, especially after they changed such an amazing IP's genre.
I am really curious to see what they can pull-off.

PapaBop132d ago (Edited 132d ago )

Marathon is Sony's only real hope I think on the live service front, any live service game released before then will be going out to Freddie Mercury singing "another one bites the dust". They have to hope Bungie have some magic left in them and deliver a product worthy of the name. Live service games and Sony fans are like square pegs in a round hole. They need to really knock it out of the park to justify them and remove the negative stigma surrounding live service games.

CrimsonWing69133d ago

Didn’t they literally announce recently that they’re committed to GaaS?

isarai133d ago

I really don't know how seriously I would take that Herman has always just come off as a yes man. But I say I don't know because I really don't know it could be one way or the other

neutralgamer1992133d ago

Sony's decision to cancel two more live-service games, one from Bluepoint Games and another from Bend Studio—neither of which have significant experience in live-service development—has raised serious concerns among fans. Many of us had been eagerly awaiting announcements about these studios' projects, believing they were nearing completion after years of development.

Now, it appears several first-party studios are being forced to start over, highlighting what feels like a pattern of mismanagement this generation. Sony's strategy seems to be floundering, leaving its first-party portfolio with a string of missteps.

This situation is eerily reminiscent of the "arrogant Sony" era leading up to the PS3's troubled launch. Unfortunately, unlike that time, there’s no strong competition from Xbox to compel Sony to course-correct and refocus on what made them successful in the first place.

132d ago
FinalFantasyFanatic132d ago

Idk, I don't feel like they've learnt their lesson, in the case of Fairgame$, I suspect they'd release it if it's too far along to back out, at least try and make some money on it, if that's possible.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 132d ago
gold_drake133d ago

i still find it ridiculous that they had soo many, 12, in the pipeline. if they had like 3, sure, but 12 is a huge number for potential failure.

Alos88133d ago

They were throwing stuff against the wall and praying something stuck... considering how poorly thought out the whole thing was they should be grateful they even got one win with Helldivers.

PapaBop132d ago

How the hell would that even work? Were they going to create 12 completely different games to try and cater to different audiences? Or would they expect some gamers to be juggling multiple ones and on top of whatever third party ones get created? I really hope someone high up at Sony has pressed the big red panic button because they're starting to look MS levels of incompetent.

attilayavuzer132d ago

Honestly I think the strategy was to have one of them be a huge success (billions in revenue) and have that pay for all the other games and devs they'd shut down from the failures. One Fortnite-level success would double the brand's profit, so it makes sense why they'd take a flier on it, even if the odds were terrible and in practice has so far been about worst case scenario.

FinalFantasyFanatic132d ago

I think they expected multiple failures, they only needed a few to succeed to rake in the big bucks. But there are already a lot of these games out there to the point of saturation, and trying to pull people away from other, popular GaaS games was going to be a big challenge.

MetroidFREAK21133d ago (Edited 133d ago )

They need to wake up. A God of War live service game... what a joke

Relientk77133d ago

A God of War live service game doesn't even make sense no matter how you spin it. What a dumb idea.

bartfart133d ago

Yeah anyone remember gow: ascension multiplayer? Me neither

raWfodog133d ago

I’m a huge God of War fan and this had me scratching my head like ‘huh?’ Stop trying to add GaaS to every IP. It just doesn’t work that way.

Goodguy01133d ago

Focus on quality singleplayer like you had with the ps4 and 3 that made you so well loved. 3rd party will do all the live servicing.

RaidenBlack133d ago (Edited 133d ago )

You need some multiplayer titles as well ... not unlike olden days ... but just not so many of 'em that you lose the quality over quantity.
And plus, experimental smaller projects to keep things interesting.

132d ago
SonyStyled132d ago

They closed all of their ‘small’ game studios though for the GAAS focus. They shot themselves in the foot. PixelOpus, Japan, London (Psygnosis) closed

Show all comments (46)