450°

Concord Is Estimated to Have Sold Only 25,000 Units. Here’s Why Analysts Think It’s Failing

What happened to Concord? Why did a big Sony first-party game get sent out to die immediately? Is it actually selling badly, or are we just reading the numbers wrong? As usual when questions of this nature crop up, I asked a bunch of professional industry analysts to explain it to me.

Games_People_Play243d ago

Nobody wants unpopular activism in their games.
Keep your pronouns to yourself.

jambola243d ago

yes
i'm sure this game is flopping because of a tiny text in the corner that says "he/him"

Games_People_Play243d ago

Believe what you want…

It’s counter culture, regardless of how much social media tries to push it.

Scissorman243d ago

It may not seem like much, but that, coupled with some of the most unimpressive, uninteresting, and downright ugly character designs, are what sealed this game's fate.

DOMination-243d ago

Come on, it has nothing to do with having pronouns for characters.

99% of gamers aren't on N4G like us following every little detail. And even if they did, the general masses don't get wound up about things like that.

The main reasons for failure at launch is much more simple:

- PlayStation gamers just aren't that interested. They have grown up with Sony producing predominantly single player cinematic bangers and this game is just too far outside of that demographic.
- On PC, the genre is very competitive. Why would anyone pay for this when all the other games are F2P

That's it.

Cacabunga243d ago

Gaas is reason enough for me not to buy a game, no matter how good it is..

242d ago
Markusb33242d ago

it really is, as people now cant tolerate the smallest element of activism, as some entertianment companies try to ram it down your throat for the last 8 years and when they say its only a little text it doesnt matter you mod it out and then they ban your mod, so if it doesnt matter why ban a mod removing it ? Real world politics do not need to be in every single title, also no one asked for another gaas game and hero shooters that never end are awful

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 242d ago
-Foxtrot243d ago (Edited 243d ago )

Lets be honest though, people keep going on about the "woke" stuff as the main issue but the real problem is that it's just generic, boring over done slop that we didn't need from Sony.

It's not about being woke or pronouns...it's just a generic, bad game first and foremost.

Elda243d ago

Exactly. Great gameplay is the key to a game's success, pronouns are the least of a game's success or a lack of.

H9243d ago

There's no end to generic bad games, they don't flop that hard, it's a bad and woke game, the things people hate the most in one package

VenomUK243d ago (Edited 243d ago )

@-Foxtrot I agree with everything you say about the generic stuff. But what I played of the beta the controls felt fine, reminded me of Halo - that's a good thing but it's not enough. I'm not the key audience for this type of game as I don't play multiplayer online regularly, but the characters and world do matter and I found them lacking. In the first cinematic reveal the one standout was the woman, and I remember the green guy just because he was green.

Even if the developer creates brilliant controls there needs to be something about the world or the characters for everyone to latch onto and I suspect the developers made the vignettes because they knew the world wasn't interesting enough. Then if you magnify that with unattractive characters in an alien universe who use pronouns (no hate to anyone that does) then that immediately spoils the illusion of a different place as it has 'present day/real world' language that is off-putting to many that they are being lectured to by the developers which there is huge resistance to now.

Star Wars Outlaws might have a woke lead but it has the Star Wars universe to sell it.
The Fable reboot has that god-ugly character - but the game has the wonderful fantasy world to sell it.
Concord has THOSE characters - and no world the public know or care about so it naturally had more of an uphill struggle.

victorMaje243d ago

I originally was really not interested due to live service, non-interesting (imo) characters & no story but I’ve seen a few on here talk about its fun gameplay, which has me intrigued.
I might try it when it goes on sale.

thejigisup242d ago (Edited 242d ago )

Agreed followed by uninteresting character design and poor marketing that seems to push an agenda over gameplay and or narrative. The fact that most people know about this game because of strange character design choices and an inclusion of pronouns over exciting gameplay, graphics, art direction, and strong new narratives is the real problem. People would play if it was fun and engaging, people would stick around if it was good.

FinalFantasyFanatic242d ago (Edited 242d ago )

I just think the "woke" is the final nail in the coffin, people can't love or get attached to these character designs (unlike Overwatch which had some "woke", but the character designs were better). I watched reviews about the game after the beta came out, and most people didn't seem impressed when it didn't fully adhere to the archetype of "hero Arena Shooters" game play. Too slow and floaty, characters are health sponges, etc...

@VenomUK,
The Green Guy stands out to me too, he seems to be the only one I really remember, or the fat brown girl in the trench coat.

Markusb33242d ago

yes the progressive stuff is just another negative element, the game is nothing special, it doesnt inspire and no one asked for a new gaas game, in my view sony would have had a bigger hit if they did an online resistance, socom, or killzone, the IP are established and the assets just need updating but imagine how good one of these could have been,just with regular map updates. I would love to see a return to classic games, single player with a MP included that they either update or not all in one price

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 242d ago
gold_drake243d ago

yeeh i agree.

but i think it's also cause its ... just not fun.

243d ago
Elda243d ago (Edited 243d ago )

I highly doubt the lack of sales is due to pronouns, that is the very least of the games downfall. The core of a game's success is gameplay.

jambola243d ago

In my experience seeing people react to the trailer, nobody was excited, long before pronounce were shown

sushimama243d ago

Yep. I'm playstation all the way. But this game can get lost

purple101243d ago

yeh ,ate totally agree, people will argue it is/ it isn't, but every-single-time a company goes down this path the sales are low, the evidence shows people dont want it shoved in their face, again, you can argue it either way but the sales reflect the public opinion on a whole.

I also played it, and its smooth, quality title, but as someone else suggested, they could have down this same game with PS themed characters, like kratos, ratchet, etc, may have done better.

I also dont think its the price, at £34.99 its way less than a AAA release which would be £49.99 or £59.99, and the same as Helldivers 2, which sold 10 mill.

I RECKON it has something to do with Sonys mahoosive blunder with the Helldivers fiasco, offering it in all regions, only to pull the rug out with PSN account requirement, this may (did) leave a a bad taste =, this alone probably put a few million off just because of the way the handled it, those couple million would be all it needed, to gain traction and be called a success, so Sony literally did this to themselves, and , yer,. pronouns, and making every single female semi-attractive or non-feminine, or however you want to describe it.

Duke19243d ago

lol. nothing like seeing a “he/him” text on screen to seriously rile up the snowflakes.

I bet you get upset when manuals have languages other than just English in them too.

Elda243d ago

Agreed. I don't get some folks here being triggered by pronouns when people use them everyday. WTF is supposedly "woke" about Concord or any game being "woke" It seems some folks are using the term to be down low bigoted/biased, when it means to be aware or being woke from sleep.

TheProfessional242d ago (Edited 242d ago )

That's absurd and shows how ignorant you are. No one ever cared about other languages. It's forcing an agenda and virtue signaling/pandering that is the problem. The irony is the companies only do it because they think it's popular but as soon as they realize it isn't they won't care about "dei" anymore.

attilayavuzer242d ago

It's pretty crazy seeing how many posters here are edgelord conservatives. Like I knew this site had become more and more immature, but this is just embarrassing.

243d ago Replies(1)
neutralgamer1992243d ago

Games

Agreed man so much agenda pushing in all media. It’s like being a man is a bad thing now. All these movie studios and game studios pushing it and paying the price. Days gone is a game which got so much negative attention because it had a white male character. Come on that’s just absurd. And this is coming from a person of color. Stop this nonsense it’s completely getting out of control

Jambola

When people are fed up with this nonsense they will look at things and not support it. But these companies aren’t learning. Just look at how much Disney has failed recently and still pushing the same agenda

thorstein243d ago (Edited 243d ago )

The agenda.

Lulz, no.

The boomer gatekeepers retired and could no longer prevent, black, Latino, lgtbq writers from being published.

Instead, Gen X became the gatekeepers. And the one thing that unifies Gen X is they dgaf... especially when it came to gatekeeping.

You think there is some big conspiracy? That's as nutty as the left thinking their protests work.

It's just simply Gen X makes the decisions and they do not gaf.

neutralgamer1992243d ago

Thostein

Days gone: some critics noted that the game’s story and characters, including the protagonist Deacon St. John, felt generic or uninspired compared to other post-apocalyptic games

As far as concord is concerned good that it failed. Sony needs to focus on what they do best and that’s not GAAS games

Again what the heck are you talking about? No one is stopping anyone from getting published and seen but the issue is now only they want to be heard and their voices are be only ones that matter. They want to silence everyone else with their idiotic statements and cancel culture. We are literally going back decades to see what people said on social media to cancel them

thorstein242d ago (Edited 242d ago )

If you don't know what things are, let me help.

A gatekeeper is someone who decides what gets published, what gets made, what movies get greenlit.

Boomers prevented all of those people I mentioned from getting their stories made. There were always black, Latino, lgbtq, etc writers, they just couldn't get published.

Gen X comes along and changes the paradigm. Not because the left protests and certainly not as part of a goofy conspiracy.

It's simply they dgaf.

That's what I'm talking about.

In the past, those books, games, and movies weren't made and were prevented from being made by Baby Boomers who held that power. Full stop.

As for "they." The ubiquitous "they" and "their agenda."

We didn't go backward because blacks, Latinos, lgbtq, etc etc now have a voice that's equal.

Again, there's no agenda, there's just Gen X not gaf about your weird culture war.

AndrewM243d ago

Your a fucking idiot if you think thats why the game failed. And you have problems.

242d ago
thorstein243d ago (Edited 243d ago )

That's not how the English language works.

I bet you don't think they should teach pronouns in elementary school.

jambola243d ago

I swear lol, some people think pronouns are a trans thing only
I played god of war 1 recently, Imagine the meltdown where the narrator says "he" when referring to Kratos

Gamingsince1981242d ago

@jambola

No one would care, because kratos IS a he .......

242d ago
jambola243d ago

do you really think this game is flopping because pronouns? like serious question

242d ago
Hotpot243d ago

All these people who said “wokeism” isn’t the problem forgot about one thing, it’s not just contained in the game itself.

If you hire staffs based on diversity quota and how woke they are instead of meritocracy, the game quality itself will suffer. and that’s not including obligatory SBI “consultation” and decision makers with agenda interfering with game designs.

TheEroica242d ago

I thought Sony fans didn't want it because it's GaaS trash... Turns out the refection came from their fear of all things different than them. Yikes!

242d ago
seanpitt23242d ago (Edited 242d ago )

This failed because these types of games were popular 6 years ago when fortnight came out..
Not so much now the honeymoon period soon set sail and now we have more F2P games than ever and with this charging $40 that was the nail in the coffin.

How could Sony be so out of touch it's baffling

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 242d ago
thorstein243d ago (Edited 243d ago )

25,000 sales for PSN and Steam. But it was on GoG and Epic too.

At least this article has accurate numbers. We all know it failed, but it's better to have accurate numbers. Articles last week acted like 700 people bought it.

This article is incredibly thorough about the explanation so many people have said about why it didn't do well: saturation, price point, launch window...

TheNamelessOne243d ago (Edited 243d ago )

Those articles are about player numbers. Even if a WHOLE 25k people bought it, what does it matter if only a small fraction of that even cares to play it? Add another 100 for GoG and Epic, by the way. People pretty much use GoG for classic titles, and almost nobody goes to Epic when a Steam version is accessible.

243d ago
DOMination-243d ago

Come on dude, the game is so far a huge commercial failure and no spin can change that.

It's a shame for the developers though. I haven't played it myself so can't comment definitely but most who have seem to say the game is pretty solid and has lots of promise.

As ever, live service games live and die by the support it receives post-launch. Sadly for the developers of Concord, I think they are going to pay the price for being the first in Sony''s experimentation. Future Gaas titles will almost certainly be F2P.

Sony have two choices to make here:
- They can either make the game F2P which will immediately piss off the people who paid full price for it
- This will never happen but they should make it free to Ps+ AND Game Pass subscribers. At least that way they'll get people playing it - and from above, it seems like its pretty solid - its player numbers they need right now.

thorstein243d ago (Edited 243d ago )

"Come on dude, the game is so far a huge commercial failure and no spin can change that."

So what part of me saying "We all know it failed" did you not understand?

I know that people on N4G have difficulty with the English language, especially pronouns, reading comprehension etc.

But I was blatant about the failing numbers.

Saying it sold 30,000 proves it failed, but when you prove something, you can't use lies.

I mean, here on N4G users do and run with them, but seriously, I never spun anything.

Sciurus_vulgaris243d ago

A game with character designs like this ( https://x.com/KhaosKontroll... )wasn’t going to be attractive FPS fans. FPS GAAS has a saturation point, which it probably has already reached.

CantThinkOfAUsername243d ago

Yeah, we need the circus show like CoD. That's what people buy.

RhinoGamer88243d ago

Leadership values on both teams. Layoffs will probably result...not with the leadership though. #sadgame

Elda243d ago (Edited 243d ago )

I'm surprised it sold that much. After the little bit of sales cease it'll be F2P in a few months.

Show all comments (93)
330°

PS5 Mega-Flop Concord Is Reaching Absurdly High Prices on eBay

World's most expensive coaster

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
BISHOP-BRASIL41d ago

Pretty standard for pulled off products, collectors love useless but very limited things.

TheEroica40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

This reminds me of when people spend big on "poo-art"...

41d ago Replies(1)
goken41d ago

Worlds most expensive coaster 🤣

badz14941d ago

what's so different between this and those useless NES cartridges or even supposedly "rare" pokemon cards? they are like NFT, just physical. Concord is an actual flop that has been pulled from stores, while Nintendo artificially limited their supply for artificial scarcity.

darthv7241d ago

ehh... I'll stick with the controller. I got enough coasters, they are called xbox games (snickers)

41d ago Replies(2)
Kurt Russell41d ago

Not the biggest coaster collection from xbox this gen :P

TheEroica40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

Concord is the biggest flop of all time... Sony could've saved 5 years by standing over the toilet and flushing 400 million. Remember, Concord is so bad that you cannot even play it anymore. It's vapor. You can't even have a retro review on it or pretend like "maybe there are a few people at home enjoying it". Lol, it was so so bad that it's been obliterated along with piles and piles of money.

The good news is all that failure leads to more pc ports of sonys better games. Sony is a good 3rd party publisher. I'll give them that!

41d ago Replies(1)
Richhard141d ago

Good, I have two sealed copies,

GotGame81840d ago

You can buy a sealed copy for $59 on eBay.

Show all comments (37)
280°

Sony's Recent Live Service Game Cancellations Is Reportedly Tied To Failure Of Concord

Sony Interactive Entertainment's recent cancellation of live service game projects is tied to the failure of Concord, based on a new report.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
-Foxtrot104d ago

Good. Let it be a lesson.

I’m super curious about how they are going to go about Fairgame$. It’s a live service title which didn’t get a good reception with the announcement and it’s being made by a brand new studio they decided to buy straight away because of the live service title they were making. It’s super similar to Concord and Firewalk Studios.

Will they cancel it this far into development or release it with the high chance of it being another disappointment and making Sony the laughing stock.

JEECE104d ago

It feels like that one is far enough along that they are going to go ahead and just push it out.

RaidenBlack104d ago (Edited 104d ago )

The Horizon live-service game is on the ... err horizon as well it seems, don't think that's getting cancelled.
Honestly if one modern Sony live-service game that I wish wasn't cancelled, that'd be the "Spider-Man: The Great Web". The leaked trailer looked cool and imho, it had potential. The timing was just not on its side.
With Avengers and Gotham Knights fumbling and Suicide Squad also not garnering much positivity at the time, Sony pulled the plug.
And 2 other I can also consider as well would be Factions 2.0 and Twisted Metal. Any form of a new Twisted Metal game is still fine for me than nothing.
Hope after all this, Marathin delivers. Oh, it better, especially after they changed such an amazing IP's genre.
I am really curious to see what they can pull-off.

PapaBop104d ago (Edited 104d ago )

Marathon is Sony's only real hope I think on the live service front, any live service game released before then will be going out to Freddie Mercury singing "another one bites the dust". They have to hope Bungie have some magic left in them and deliver a product worthy of the name. Live service games and Sony fans are like square pegs in a round hole. They need to really knock it out of the park to justify them and remove the negative stigma surrounding live service games.

CrimsonWing69104d ago

Didn’t they literally announce recently that they’re committed to GaaS?

isarai104d ago

I really don't know how seriously I would take that Herman has always just come off as a yes man. But I say I don't know because I really don't know it could be one way or the other

neutralgamer1992104d ago

Sony's decision to cancel two more live-service games, one from Bluepoint Games and another from Bend Studio—neither of which have significant experience in live-service development—has raised serious concerns among fans. Many of us had been eagerly awaiting announcements about these studios' projects, believing they were nearing completion after years of development.

Now, it appears several first-party studios are being forced to start over, highlighting what feels like a pattern of mismanagement this generation. Sony's strategy seems to be floundering, leaving its first-party portfolio with a string of missteps.

This situation is eerily reminiscent of the "arrogant Sony" era leading up to the PS3's troubled launch. Unfortunately, unlike that time, there’s no strong competition from Xbox to compel Sony to course-correct and refocus on what made them successful in the first place.

103d ago
FinalFantasyFanatic103d ago

Idk, I don't feel like they've learnt their lesson, in the case of Fairgame$, I suspect they'd release it if it's too far along to back out, at least try and make some money on it, if that's possible.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 103d ago
gold_drake104d ago

i still find it ridiculous that they had soo many, 12, in the pipeline. if they had like 3, sure, but 12 is a huge number for potential failure.

Alos88104d ago

They were throwing stuff against the wall and praying something stuck... considering how poorly thought out the whole thing was they should be grateful they even got one win with Helldivers.

PapaBop104d ago

How the hell would that even work? Were they going to create 12 completely different games to try and cater to different audiences? Or would they expect some gamers to be juggling multiple ones and on top of whatever third party ones get created? I really hope someone high up at Sony has pressed the big red panic button because they're starting to look MS levels of incompetent.

attilayavuzer103d ago

Honestly I think the strategy was to have one of them be a huge success (billions in revenue) and have that pay for all the other games and devs they'd shut down from the failures. One Fortnite-level success would double the brand's profit, so it makes sense why they'd take a flier on it, even if the odds were terrible and in practice has so far been about worst case scenario.

FinalFantasyFanatic103d ago

I think they expected multiple failures, they only needed a few to succeed to rake in the big bucks. But there are already a lot of these games out there to the point of saturation, and trying to pull people away from other, popular GaaS games was going to be a big challenge.

MetroidFREAK21104d ago (Edited 104d ago )

They need to wake up. A God of War live service game... what a joke

Relientk77104d ago

A God of War live service game doesn't even make sense no matter how you spin it. What a dumb idea.

bartfart104d ago

Yeah anyone remember gow: ascension multiplayer? Me neither

raWfodog104d ago

I’m a huge God of War fan and this had me scratching my head like ‘huh?’ Stop trying to add GaaS to every IP. It just doesn’t work that way.

Goodguy01104d ago

Focus on quality singleplayer like you had with the ps4 and 3 that made you so well loved. 3rd party will do all the live servicing.

RaidenBlack104d ago (Edited 104d ago )

You need some multiplayer titles as well ... not unlike olden days ... but just not so many of 'em that you lose the quality over quantity.
And plus, experimental smaller projects to keep things interesting.

103d ago
SonyStyled103d ago

They closed all of their ‘small’ game studios though for the GAAS focus. They shot themselves in the foot. PixelOpus, Japan, London (Psygnosis) closed

Show all comments (46)
320°

Most Disappointing Game of 2024

VGChartz's Mark Nielsen: "In a year that was to a large extent carried by the game developers of Japan (and to some extent China), western games can rejoice that there was at least one category they managed to dominate: that of Most Disappointing. Sometimes disappointment comes from high expectations met with something middling, other times it comes from middling expectations met with something terrible. This year managed to deliver a bit of both, so either way there was enough disappointment to go around."

Read Full Story >>
vgchartz.com
thorstein104d ago (Edited 104d ago )

Why not mention the 19,000 Steam games of which 80% weren't good enough to merit "success" on the platform?

104d ago
104d ago Replies(2)
RaidenBlack104d ago

You gotta be effing kidding me with that logic.

coolbeans104d ago

Because the very *definition* of disappointment requires one has some kind of expectation for it. Concord was hoping to find its own niche in the crowded 'hero shooter' market, with ~8 years of development, $100 million+ funding, and marketable talent behind it, and went belly up in 2 lousy weeks. That's historical for a live-service game.

thorstein104d ago

It's become a drinking game at this point. Disappointing games? It's the same games in every article with a similar title. Does no one have an original thought anymore?

RaidenBlack104d ago

@thorstein
**It's the same games in every article with a similar title.**
Because it's the same year? The games that got launched is a constant fact for everyone. And if the game was universally disappointing, then obviously everyone would echo the same thing.
Do you want for originality some writer would write up that instead of Concord and Outlaws, Silent Hills 2 was the most disappointing game, right? Coz, that'd be considered a click-bait article then.
And emphasis on the word "disappointing" games, not general bad games.

LordoftheCritics104d ago

Veilguard was easily the most disappointing game of the year.
Highest expectation with Highest disappointment

Concord was just the biggest failure.
In fact it was not very disappointing.
Almost as expected.

DivineHand125104d ago

@LordoftheCritics I disagree about Vailguard being the most disappointing game of the year. Going into the launch of that game, 90% of the comments I was seeing from this community were negative. Many also wanted the game to fail.

In my opinion, for a game to be disappointing, it would mean the game was highly anticipated for success going into the launch of the game only to bomb in the reviews and fail commercially.

I would say Hellblade 2 claims this title. I haven't played any of the games in the series as yet, however, the hate that game received was on another level. I am not sure if it was fanboys that felt threatened by it being the best-looking console game on the market or if the criticisms about it being a boring game were valid. I haven't played these walking games before so put it off since it doesn't seem to be my cup of tea.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 104d ago
anast104d ago

Those 19,000 games have 80%. Dragon age is sitting at 70%, Star wars is at 75% and falling, Lego Horizon adventures is at 56%, Skull and Bones 65% and Concord was DOA. This would mean these games didn't even crack the top 19,000.

103d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 103d ago
104d ago
104d ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (38)