This is a relatively new game debate that has sparked a lot of controversy and fierce arguments among a lot of industry analysts and experts. On one side, games aim to deliver a more lifelike experience so that players would be able to identify themselves with the characters they are controlling. Things like realistic clothes or environments all become one single experience that needs to be as similar to real life as possible, think a lot of game developers and publishers.
Soulmask is another indie survival-crafter looking to wear the genre's increasingly contested crown, but its player numbers are no joke.
Like the competition, I just hope there's enough to go around. Seems to be alot of survival games already this year.
This one does look cool. Reminds me of Zeno Clash
Austin Suther of TechRaptor writes, "We get another look at Free Lives and Devolver's Anger Foot, and it's looking crazier than ever."
The long-awaited FPS Selaco, running on the GZDoom engine, is finally out in Early Access, and it's even better than we thought.
.
as long as there aren't any idiots that think it's real life.. who cares if they are realistic?
i'd rather have a realistic game over a unrealistic game..
i honestly prefer unrealistic games realism is so boring if you ask me if i want realism id just step outside the door
the right way is to make graphics better or more realistic,while IMPROVING GAMEPLAY INSTEAD OF MAKING IT REALISTIC
good examples:mgs 4,gears 2,cod 4,etc....
bad example:GTA IV,they made gameplay realistic,which is wrong
I want amazing graphics and awesome gameplay
I like my games very realistic, especially online. Yet I enjoy a much more creative and sci-fi-ish experience. I hate when people complain that games aren't realistic (shooters in particular). If people care so much about shooters being realistic, then go join the army or something. Pretty much guaranteed it's nothing like a game. All this realistic game talk makes me wanna get Kizzy 2 even more! Agree if it's a day one purchase for you!!!